DIS - Case Record for 96-1327-TP-ATA Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 96-1327-TP-ATA
CASE DESCRIPTION: COLUMBUS GROVE TELEPHONE COMPANY
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 5/22/2024
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
09/01/1999 Memo automatically closing this case of record.
03/08/1999 Supreme Court Papers. (64 pgs.)
02/05/1999 Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (15 pgs.) (S.C. #99-0290)
12/09/1998 Entry denying the joint application for rehearing filed by AT&T Communications of Ohio and MCI Telecommunications Corp. (7 pgs.)
11/19/1998 Memorandum contra the joint application for rehearing of MCI Telecommunications and AT&T Communications, filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (8 pgs.)
11/09/1998 Joint application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders; and AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (28 pgs.)
10/08/1998 Finding & Order that the intent of Section X.F. of the Commission's local service guidelines in Case No. 95-845- TP-COI is clarified as indicated herein; that, by this entry, the intraLATA toll presubscription implementation cost recovery MOU rates filed by the LEC's are approved; that in accordance with Finding 18, the Sprint, AT&T and MCI motions for suspension and intervention are denied. (7 pgs.)
10/08/1998 Finding & Order that the intent of Section X.F. of the Commission's local service guidelines in Case No. 95-845- TP-COI is clarified as indicated herein; that, by this entry, the intraLATA toll presubscription implementation cost recovery MOU rates filed by the LECs are approved; that in accordance with Finding 18, the Sprint, AT&T and MCI motions for suspension and intervention are denied. (7 pgs.)
10/08/1998 Finding and Order that the intent of Section X.F. of the Commission's local service guidelines in this case is clarified as indicated herein; that, by this entry, the intraLATA toll presubscription implementation cost recovery MOU rates filed by the LECs are approved; that, in accordance with Finding 18 the Sprint, AT&T and MCI motion for suspension and intervention are denied
10/05/1998 Motion of AT&T for leave to intervene and memorandum in support of MCI's and Sprint's motions to suspend and request for investigation, filed by D. Chorzempa.
10/05/1998 Memorandum contra to the motion of United Telephone Company dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company to intervene and suspend the company's presubscription charge, filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (5 pgs.)
10/05/1998 Motion of AT&T for leave to intervene and memorandum in support of MCI's and Sprint's motions to suspend and re- quest for investigation, filed by D. Chorzempa. (12 pgs.)
10/02/1998 Supplemental motion of MCI Telecommunications Corp. for leave to intervene and request for clarification and/or Commission-ordered investigation and memorandum in sup- port filed by J. Sanders and M. Berns. (12 pgs.)
10/02/1998 Supplemental motion for leave to intervene, memorandum in support and request for clarification and/or Commission Ordered Investigation, filed by J. Sanders and M. Berns.
09/24/1998 Motion and Memeorandum of MCI for leave to intervene and to suspend the implementation of Intralata Toll Presubscription Charges. Submitted by: J. Sanders/M. Berns. (12 pgs.)
09/24/1998 Motion and Memorandum of MCI for leave to intervene and to suspend the implementation of IntraLATA Toll Presubscription Charges filed by J. Sanders/M. Berns.
09/24/1998 Motion and Memorandum of MCI for leave to intervene and to suspend the implementation of IntraLATA Toll Presubscription Charges filed by J. Sanders/M. Berns.
09/21/1998 Final tariff sheets, section 4, first revised sheet no. 28 filed by G. Cooper. (2 pgs)
09/17/1998 Motion to intervene and suspend the applicant's presubscrip- tion implementation charges and those of all other companies listed in the caption and memorandum in support filed on be- half of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart; and Sprint Communications Company L.P. by L. Lauri- dsen. (9 pgs.)
08/24/1998 Revised tariff sheets to reflect the minutes of use (MOU) rate, filed by G. Cooper. (2 pgs) Filed 8/21/98
08/21/1998 Revised General Exchange Services Tariff, PUCO No. 6; Section 4; First Revised Sheet No. 28 replaces Original Sheet No. 28, filed on behalf of Columbus Grove Telephone Company by G. Moore.
08/21/1998 Revised tariff sheet; section 4, first revised sheet no. 28 filed by G. Cooper. (2 pgs)
02/05/1998 Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (15 pgs.) (S.C. #99-0290)
06/05/1997 Finding & Order that, with the exception of the implementa- tion cost recovery MOU rates, the proposed applicantion is approved; that, after August 8, 1997, the Commission staff will convene a workshop of all interested parties to develop an agreed upon methodology for calculating the applicant's incremental intraLATA toll presubscripbtion implementation cost recovery MOU rate; that the applicant file their pro- posed MOU rate for incremental cost recovery no later than August 24, 1998. (5 pgs.)
05/19/1997 Supplemental application filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (13 pgs.)
01/17/1997 Entry ordering that approval of this application is suspend- ed until the Commission specifically orders otherwise. (AE) (2 pgs.)
12/11/1996 In the matter of the application of Columbus Grove Telephone Company to institute intraLATA dialing parity. (1 pg.)