DIS - Case Record for 96-1312-TP-ATA Skip to main content

Case Record For:

96-1312-TP-ATA

Case Title: TELEPHONE SERVICE COMPANY
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: ATA-Application for tariff approval
Date Opened: 12/9/1996
Date Closed:
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
03/08/1999Supreme Court Papers. (64 pgs.)64
02/05/1999Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (15 pgs.) (S.C. #99-0290)15
02/05/1999Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (15 pgs.) (S.C. #99-0290)15
12/09/1998Entry denying the joint application for rehearing filed by AT&T Communications of Ohio and MCI Telecommunications Corp. (7 pgs.)7
11/19/1998Memorandum contra the joint application for rehearing of MCI Telecommunications and AT&T Communications, filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (8 pgs.)8
11/09/1998Joint application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. San- ders; and AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (28 pgs.)28
10/08/1998Finding & Order that the intent of Section X.F. of the Commission's local service guidelines in Case No. 95-845- TP-COI is clarified as indicated herein; that, by this entry, the intraLATA toll presubscription implementation cost recovery MOU rates filed by the LEC's are approved; that in accordance with Finding 18, the Sprint, AT&T and MCI motions for suspension and intervention are denied. (7 pgs.)7
10/08/1998Finding & Order that the intent of Section X.F. of the Commission's local service guidelines in Case No. 95-845- TP-COI is clarified as indicated herein; that, by this entry, the intraLATA toll presubscription implementation cost recovery MOU rates filed by the LECs are approved; that in accordance with Finding 18, the Sprint, AT&T and MCI motions for suspension and intervention are denied. (7 pgs.)7
10/08/1998Finding and Order that the intent of Section X.F. of the Commission's local service guidelines in this case is clarified as indicated herein; that, by this entry, the intraLATA toll presubscription implementation cost recovery MOU rates filed by the LECs are approved; that, in accordance with Finding 18 the Sprint, AT&T and MCI motion for suspension and intervention are denied23
10/05/1998Motion of AT&T for leave to intervene and memorandum in support of MCI's and Sprint's motions to suspend and request for investigation, filed by D. Chorzempa. (12 pgs.)12
10/05/1998Motion of AT&T for leave to intervene and memorandum in support of MCI's and Sprint's motions to suspend and request for investigation, filed by D. Chorzempa. 12
10/05/1998Memorandum contra to the motion of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company L.P. to intervene and suspend the company's presubscription imple- mentation charge, filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (6 pgs.)6
10/05/1998Motion of AT&T for leave to intervene and memorandum in support of MCI's and Spring's motions to suspend and re- quest for investigation, filed by D. Chorzempa. (12 pgs.)12
10/02/1998Supplemental motion of MCI Telecommunications Corp. for leave to intervene and request for clarification and/or Commission-ordered investigation and memorandum in sup- port filed by J. Sanders and M. Berns. (12 pgs.)12
10/02/1998Supplemental motion for leave to intervene, memorandum in support and request for clarification and/or Commission Ordered Investigation, filed by J. Sanders and M. Berns.12
09/24/1998Motion and memorandum of MCI for leave to intervene and suspend the implementation of IntraLATA Toll Presubscription Charges filed by J. Sanders/M. Berns. (12 pgs.)12
09/24/1998Motion and Memorandum of MCI for leave to intervene and to suspend the implementation of Intralata Toll Presubscription Chares. Submitted by: J. Sanders/M. Berns. (12 pgs.)12
09/24/1998Motion and Memorandum of MCI for leave to intervene and to suspend the implementation of IntraLATA Toll Presubscription Charges filed by J. Sanders/M. Berns.12
09/21/1998Final tariff sheets, section 6, first revised sheet no. 3 filed by G. Cooper. (2 pgs)2
09/17/1998Motion to intervene and suspend the applicant's presubscrip- tion implementation charges and those of all other companies listed in the caption and memorandum in support filed on be- half of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart; and Sprint Communications Company L.P. by L. Lauri- dsen. (9 pgs.)9
08/21/1998Revised tariff sheet; section 6, first revised sheet no. 3 filed by G. Cooper. (2 pgs)2
07/03/1997Final tariff, PUCO No. 5, Section 6, original sheets 1, 2, 3; Preface, 5th sheet 1, 2nd sheet 4, filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (6 pgs.)6
06/26/1997Finding & Order that, with the exception of the implementa- tion cost recovery MOU rate, the proposed tariffs are approved; that applicant file their proposed MOU rate for incremental cost recovery no later than August 24, 1998; that this case be closed of record. (5 pgs.)5
04/30/1997Supplement application filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (14 pgs.)14
01/17/1997Entry ordering that approval of this application is suspend- ed until the Commission specifically orders otherwise. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
01/17/1997Entry ordering that approval of this application is suspended until the Commission specifically orders otherwise. (AE)3
12/09/1996In the matter of the application of Telephone Service Com- pany to institute intraLATA dialing parity. (1 pg.)1