| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 03/08/1999 | Supreme Court Papers. (64 pgs.) | 64 |
| 02/05/1999 | Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (15 pgs.) (S.C. #99-0290) | 15 |
| 02/05/1999 | Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (15 pgs.) (S.C. #99-0290) | 15 |
| 12/09/1998 | Entry denying the joint application for rehearing filed by AT&T Communications of Ohio and MCI Telecommunications Corp. (7 pgs.) | 7 |
| 11/19/1998 | Memorandum contra the joint application for rehearing of MCI Telecommunications and AT&T Communications, filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (8 pgs.) | 8 |
| 11/09/1998 | Joint application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. San- ders; and AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (28 pgs.) | 28 |
| 10/08/1998 | Finding & Order that the intent of Section X.F. of the Commission's local service guidelines in Case No. 95-845- TP-COI is clarified as indicated herein; that, by this entry, the intraLATA toll presubscription implementation cost recovery MOU rates filed by the LEC's are approved; that in accordance with Finding 18, the Sprint, AT&T and MCI motions for suspension and intervention are denied. (7 pgs.) | 7 |
| 10/08/1998 | Finding & Order that the intent of Section X.F. of the Commission's local service guidelines in Case No. 95-845- TP-COI is clarified as indicated herein; that, by this entry, the intraLATA toll presubscription implementation cost recovery MOU rates filed by the LECs are approved; that in accordance with Finding 18, the Sprint, AT&T and MCI motions for suspension and intervention are denied. (7 pgs.) | 7 |
| 10/08/1998 | Finding and Order that the intent of Section X.F. of the Commission's local service guidelines in this case is clarified as indicated herein; that, by this entry, the intraLATA toll presubscription implementation cost recovery MOU rates filed by the LECs are approved; that, in accordance with Finding 18 the Sprint, AT&T and MCI motion for suspension and intervention are denied | 23 |
| 10/05/1998 | Motion of AT&T for leave to intervene and memorandum in support of MCI's and Sprint's motions to suspend and request for investigation, filed by D. Chorzempa. (12 pgs.) | 12 |
| 10/05/1998 | Motion of AT&T for leave to intervene and memorandum in support of MCI's and Sprint's motions to suspend and request for investigation, filed by D. Chorzempa. | 12 |
| 10/05/1998 | Memorandum contra to the motion of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company L.P. to intervene and suspend the company's presubscription imple- mentation charge, filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (6 pgs.) | 6 |
| 10/05/1998 | Motion of AT&T for leave to intervene and memorandum in support of MCI's and Spring's motions to suspend and re- quest for investigation, filed by D. Chorzempa. (12 pgs.) | 12 |
| 10/02/1998 | Supplemental motion of MCI Telecommunications Corp. for leave to intervene and request for clarification and/or Commission-ordered investigation and memorandum in sup- port filed by J. Sanders and M. Berns. (12 pgs.) | 12 |
| 10/02/1998 | Supplemental motion for leave to intervene, memorandum in support and request for clarification and/or Commission Ordered Investigation, filed by J. Sanders and M. Berns. | 12 |
| 09/24/1998 | Motion and memorandum of MCI for leave to intervene and suspend the implementation of IntraLATA Toll Presubscription Charges filed by J. Sanders/M. Berns. (12 pgs.) | 12 |
| 09/24/1998 | Motion and Memorandum of MCI for leave to intervene and to suspend the implementation of Intralata Toll Presubscription Chares. Submitted by: J. Sanders/M. Berns. (12 pgs.) | 12 |
| 09/24/1998 | Motion and Memorandum of MCI for leave to intervene and to suspend the implementation of IntraLATA Toll Presubscription Charges filed by J. Sanders/M. Berns. | 12 |
| 09/21/1998 | Final tariff sheets, section 6, first revised sheet no. 3 filed by G. Cooper. (2 pgs) | 2 |
| 09/17/1998 | Motion to intervene and suspend the applicant's presubscrip- tion implementation charges and those of all other companies listed in the caption and memorandum in support filed on be- half of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart; and Sprint Communications Company L.P. by L. Lauri- dsen. (9 pgs.) | 9 |
| 08/21/1998 | Revised tariff sheet; section 6, first revised sheet no. 3 filed by G. Cooper. (2 pgs) | 2 |
| 07/03/1997 | Final tariff, PUCO No. 5, Section 6, original sheets 1, 2, 3; Preface, 5th sheet 1, 2nd sheet 4, filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (6 pgs.) | 6 |
| 06/26/1997 | Finding & Order that, with the exception of the implementa- tion cost recovery MOU rate, the proposed tariffs are approved; that applicant file their proposed MOU rate for incremental cost recovery no later than August 24, 1998; that this case be closed of record. (5 pgs.) | 5 |
| 04/30/1997 | Supplement application filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (14 pgs.) | 14 |
| 01/17/1997 | Entry ordering that approval of this application is suspend- ed until the Commission specifically orders otherwise. (AE) (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 01/17/1997 | Entry ordering that approval of this application is suspended until the Commission specifically orders otherwise. (AE) | 3 |
| 12/09/1996 | In the matter of the application of Telephone Service Com- pany to institute intraLATA dialing parity. (1 pg.) | 1 |