DIS - Case Record for 96-1027-TP-CSS Skip to main content

Case Record For:

96-1027-TP-CSS

File a Public Comment
Case Title: OCTA ET AL/AMERITECH OHIO
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 9/27/1996
Date Closed: 4/17/1997
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
09/19/1997Memorandum contra complainants' response and objections to compliance memorandum, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by K. Sullivan. (13 pgs.)13
09/05/1997Response and objections to respondent Ameritech Ohio's compliance memorandum, filed on behalf of complainants by P. Downey. (10 pgs.)10
07/31/1997Entry ordering that the complainants' and Ameritech's applications for rehearing be denied and clarified as set forth in this entry, and that the June 5, 1997 entry on rehearing be clarified as set forth in this entry; that complainants' request for oral hearing be denied. (11 pgs.)11
07/21/1997Compliance memorandum filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by K. Sullivan. (23 pgs.)23
07/15/1997Memorandum contra of complainants to the July 7, 1997 pleading of Ameritech Ohio filed by S. Howard. (4 pgs.)4
07/14/1997Memorandum contra OCTA"S second application for rehearing filed by K. Sullivan. (29 pgs.)29
07/14/1997Memorandum of Amici Curiae in opposition to complainants' application for rehearing filed by J. Gainer, M. Kempic. (11 pgs.)11
07/07/1997Application for rehearing or in the alternative request for clarification filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by K. Sullivan. (4 pgs.)4
07/03/1997Application for rehearing filed on behalf of complaintants by S. Howard. (10 pgs.)10
06/23/1997Proof of Publication filed. (2 pgs.) (Franklin County)2
06/23/1997Request for oral hearing and written statement showing good cause and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complain- ant by S. Howard. (7 pgs.)7
06/20/1997Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.) (Franklin County)1
06/12/1997Verified statement filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy. (7 pgs.)7
06/05/1997Entry ordering that the April 17, 1997 Opinion & Order be clarified as set forth in this entry and that the complainants' and Ameritech's applications for rehearing be granted and denied; that Ameritech comply with the directives and clarifications; that the restrictions against brackets and attaching cable below the telephone facilities are without force and effect in accordance with Finding 11.21
06/05/1997Legal Notice (faxed) to Columbus Dispatch, (Franklin Co.).3
06/05/1997Entry ordering that the Commission's April 17, 1997 Opinion and Order be clarified as set forth in this entry and that the complainants' and Ameritech's applications for rehearing be granted and denied as set forth in this entry; that Ameritech comply with the directives and clarifications as set forth herein; that the restrictions against brackets and attaching cable below the telephone facilities are without force and effect in accordance with Finding 11. (21 pgs.)21
05/27/1997Memorandum contra respondent's application for rehearing filed on behalf of complainants by S. Howard. (18 pgs.)18
05/27/1997Memorandum contra OCTA's application for rehearing filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by K. Sullivan. (23 pgs.)23
05/19/1997Application for rehearing filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by K. Sullivan. (40 pgs.)40
05/19/1997Motion for leave to file brief amicus curiae in support of Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Gas & Electric by J. Gainer; Columbus Southern Power Co. by F. Dutton; The Ohio Telecommunications Industry Assn. by J. Prohaska; CEI and Toledo Edison by M. Kempic; DP&L by K. Guy; and Ohio Edison Co. by J. Burk. (29 pgs.)29
05/16/1997Application for rehearing filed on behalf of complainants by S. Howard. (36 pgs.)36
04/17/1997Opinion & Order that Ameritech require that all violations of the National Electric Safety Code for all cable attached to its poles are corrected and file a report in this docket when these violations were corrected; that Ameritech file a report in the 96-702 proceeding detailing how it has cor- rected all instances identified in this case in which the Commission has determined that it has rendered inadequate service to complainants; that Ameritech revise its tariff as set forth in this order. (25 pgs.)25
02/28/1997Reply brief filed on behalf of complainants, The Ohio Cable Telecommunications Assn., Coaxial Communications, V Cable, and Time Warner, by P. Downey. (24 pgs.)24
02/28/1997Reply brief filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by K. Sullivan. (24 pgs.)24
02/28/1997Reply brief of Ameritech Ohio filed by K. Sullivan.24
02/21/1997Initial brief filed on behalf of complainants by P. Downey. (42 pgs.)42
02/21/1997Post-hearing brief filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by K. Sullivan. (22 pgs.)22
02/20/1997Composite Index, Volumes I through VI, January 21, 1997 through January 28, 1997, filed. (11 pgs.)11
02/11/1997Transcript filed for hearing held 1/28/97, (SF), 43 pgs., Submitted. (Volume VI) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)43
02/10/1997Transcript filed for hearing held 1/27/97, (SF), 219 pgs., Con't. (Volume V) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)219
02/07/1997Joint Agreement between AEP and Ameritech dated July 1,1994.Filed by R. Bell.31
02/07/1997Transcript for hearing held on 1/24/97, (SF) 141 pgs., cont. Vol. IV.141
02/06/1997Confidential portion of transcript filed for hearing held 1/23/97, (SF), 1 pg., Con't. (Volume III) (PUCO-Columbus, OH) (FILED UNDER SEAL)1
02/06/1997Transcript filed for hearing held 1/23/97, (SF), 204 pgs., Con't. (Volume III) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)204
02/05/1997Transcript filed for hearing held 1/22/97, (SF), 215 pgs., Con't. (Volume II) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)215
02/04/1997Transcript filed for hearing held 1/21/97, (SF), 158 pgs., Con't. (Volume I) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)158
01/14/1997Certificate of service filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by K. Sullivan. (1 pg.)1
01/14/1997Direct testimony of Kent A. Currie, Ph.D. filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by K. Sullivan. (5 pgs.)5
01/14/1997Direct testimony of Ramont Bell filed on behalf of respon- dent, Ameritech Ohio, by K. Sullivan. (39 pgs.)39
01/10/1997Motion seeking clarification of attorney examiner entry of December 30, 1996 and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainants by S. Howard. (6 pgs.)6
01/07/1997Certificate of service filed on behalf of complainants by S. Howard. (1 pg.)1
01/07/1997Direct testimony of Mark Capwell filedl on behalf of com- plainants by S. Howard. (131 pgs.)131
01/07/1997Direct testimony of Randall Wells filed on behalf of com- plainants by S. Howard. (114 pgs.)114
01/07/1997Direct testimony of Daniel J. McKay filed on behalf of com- plainants by S. Howard. (97 pgs.)97
01/07/1997Direct testimony of Joel S. Rudich filed on behalf of com- plainants by S. Howard. (18 pgs.)18
12/30/1996Entry scheduling the evidentiary hearing at 10:00 a.m. on January 21, 1997, at the Commission offices; that the record in Case No. 96-702-TP-COI, as it relates to the pole attach- ments, be adopted and incorporated into this record. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
11/15/1996Transcript filed for hearing held 11/1/96, (GC) (MKF), 24 pgs., Submitted. (Columbus, OH-PUCO)24
10/29/1996Entry ordering that reasonable grounds have been stated by the complainants; scheduling a conference at 2:00 p.m. on 11/1/96 at the Commission offices. (AE) (3 pgs.)3
10/21/1996Answer filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio filed by K. Sullivan, J. Kelly. (4 pgs.)4
09/27/1996In the matter of the complaint of the Ohio Cable Telecommun- ications Association, Coaxial Communications, Inc., V Cable, Inc. and Time Warner Cable (vs.) Ameritech Ohio relative to alleged violations of section 4905.71 revised code and 47 U.S.C. 224(F)(1) regarding discriminatory treatment of pole attachments by cable televison operators. (6 pgs.)6