DIS - Case Record for 96-0349-TP-ACE Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 96-0349-TP-ACE
CASE DESCRIPTION: BROOKS FIBER COMMUNICATIONS OF OHIO
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 6/22/2024
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
09/17/1997 Memorandum of AT&T Communications of Ohio, INc. regarding Brooks Fiber Communications of Ohio, Inc.'s motion for clarification filed by B. Kahn. (8 pgs.)
07/25/1997 Revised Fresh Look Notice filed on behalf of applicant by P. Venema. (2 pgs.)
07/22/1997 Motion for extension of time filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group, Inc. by B. Ferris. (6 pgs.)
07/17/1997 Finding & Order that the comments set forth in Finding 4 are accepted as timely filed; that the Commission's fresh look policies are further clarified in accordance with Finding 6; that Nextlink, ICG, Time Warner, Brooks Fiber, and any other operational new entrant providers as defined herein, file notice within five calendar days as set forth in Finding 6. (30 pgs.)
07/16/1997 Change of address filed by M. Schermer. (1 pg.)
07/14/1997 Comments filed on behalf of Voice-Tel by S. Dowd. (2 pgs.)
07/01/1997 Comments concerning Fresh Look implementation filed on behalf of City of Columbus by G. Dunn. (7 pgs.)
06/30/1997 Letter requesting that the Commission adapt Fresh Look Provisions to coincide with Number Portability in Ohio, filed on behalf of Eastland Telecommunications Consulting by S. Longenecker. (1 pg.)
06/02/1997 Additional information filed on behalf of applicant by N. Hawthorne. (3 pgs.)
05/29/1997 Reply filed on behalf of Brooks Fiber Communications of Ohio by T. Stein. (7 pgs.)
05/29/1997 Reply comments filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders. (11 pg.)
05/28/1997 Reply comments of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. regard- ing implementation of Fresh Look filed by B. Kahn. (11 pgs)
05/28/1997 "Fresh Look" reply by Telecommunications Resellers Associa- tion filed by S. Bloomfield. (5 pgs.)
05/28/1997 Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P.'s reply comments filed by R. Rosenberry, M. Schermer. (10 pgs.)
05/28/1997 Reply comments of NextLink Ohio, L.L.C. filed by D. Clayton. (13 pgs.)
05/28/1997 Reply comments of GTE North Incorporated regarding "Fresh Look" filed by J. Kennedy. (7 pgs.)
05/28/1997 Reply comments of OCOM Corporation filed by W. Adams. (9pgs)
05/28/1997 Ameritech Ohio's Reply filed by M. Mulcahy. (13 pgs.)
05/22/1997 Initial comments filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris. (4 pgs.)
05/22/1997 Questions and proposed answers filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (34 pgs.)
05/22/1997 Comments filed on behalf of Brooks Fiber Communications of Ohio by T. Stein. (12 pgs.)
05/22/1997 Comments and additional questions filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by D. Clayton. (12 pgs.)
05/22/1997 Comments filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders and M. Berns. (11 pgs.)
05/22/1997 Comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (10 pgs.)
05/22/1997 Comments filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by R. Rosenberry and M. Schermer. (9 pgs.)
05/22/1997 Comments filed on behlaf of CBG Telecommunications by N. Hawthorne. (8 pgs.)
05/22/1997 Comments filed on behalf of Telecommunications Resellers Assn. by S. Bloomfield. (8 pgs.)
05/22/1997 Initial comments filed on behalf of OCOM Corp. by W. Adams. (6 pgs.)
05/22/1997 Responses filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve Telephone Co. by D. Mennenga. (4 pgs.)
05/12/1997 Notice of Operation filed on behalf of applicant by T. Stein. (3 pgs.)
04/23/1997 Notice of withdrawal filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by C. Wilson. (5 pgs.)
04/10/1997 Certificate No. 90-9001 issued. (1 pg.)
03/06/1997 Entry ordering that the motion for leave to file late-filed comments made by MFS Intelenet of Ohio is granted; that the January 16, 1997 Supplemental Finding & Order is clarified to the limited extent outline in Findings 8 and 9; that, in all other respects, the applications for rehearing filed by OCC, APAC, Edgemont, and CBT are denied in their entirety.
03/06/1997 Entry ordering that the motion for leave to file late-filed comments made by MFS Intelenet of Ohio is granted in accor- dance with Finding 3; that the January 16, 1997 Supplemental Finding & Order is clarified to the limited extent outlined in Findings 8 and 9; that, in all other respects, the appli- cations for rehearing filed by OCC, APAC, Edgemont, and CBT are denied in their entirety. (7 pgs.)
03/06/1997 Entry ordering that the motion for leave to file late-filed comments made by MPS Intelenet of Ohio is granted; that the January 16, 1997 Supplemental Finding & Order is clarified to the limited extent outlined in Findings 8 and 9; that, in all other respects, the applications for rehearing filed by OCC, APAC, Edgemont, and CBT are denied in their entirety.
03/04/1997 Opposition of MFS Intelenet of Ohio to Cincinnati Bell's application for rehearing, and motion for leave to late file memorandum in opposition, filed by D. Myers. (14 pgs.)
03/03/1997 Entry automatically approving the tariffs as of March 3, 1997, and closing this case of record. (AE) (9 pgs.)
03/03/1997 Entry automatically approving the tariffs as of March 3, 1997, and closing this case of record. (AE) (9 pgs.)
02/28/1997 Opposition to application for rehearing of Cincinnati Bell Telephone, filed on behalf of Midcom Communications by C. Hunter. (14 pgs.)
02/28/1997 Memorandum contra CBT's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of CBG by N. Hawthorne. (8 pgs.)
02/27/1997 Revised tariff, PUCO No. 1, original pages 1.3, 1.5, 2.25, and 13.2, filed on behalf of applicant by M. Kraus. (5 pgs.)
02/21/1997 Tariffs, PUCO No. 1 and PUCO No. 2, filed on behalf of applicant by S. Bloomfield. (175 pgs.)
02/18/1997 Application for rehearing filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by C. Wilson. (9 pgs.)
01/16/1997 Supplemental Finding & Order that this case is partially suspended pending review of the tariffs which will be auto- matically approved and this case closed of record, absent full or partial suspension, on March 3, 1997. (13 pgs.)
09/23/1996 Affidavits of Marguerite A. Forrest and John C. Shapleigh filed on behalf of applicant by S. Bloomfield. (2 pgs.)
09/19/1996 Opinion & Order granting the application to the extent set forth in this Order; that a certificate be issued to Brooks; that Brooks file in this docket, by 9/26/96, an affidavit signed by two appropriate officers of Brooks Fiber attesting that sufficient financial resources will be available at all times to the certified entity to satisfy its public utility obligations as determined by Title 49 of the Re- vised Code and this Commission; that this docket shall re- main open for consideration of additional issues. (9 pgs.)
08/06/1996 Transcript filed for hearing held 7/23/96, (DF), 20 pgs., Con't. (Columbus, OH-PUCO)
07/15/1996 Letter stipulating that it does not take issue with the applicant's ability to meet the managerial, financial, and technical qualifications required for certification, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (2 pgs.)
07/12/1996 Testimony of Martin W. Clift, Jr. filed on behalf of applicant S. Bloomfield. (15 pgs.)
07/12/1996 Revised Exhibit 4 to the application, filed on behalf of applicant by S. Bloomfield. (3 pgs.)
07/02/1996 Notice of withdrawal of counsel and designation of new trial attorney filed on behalf of OCC by A. Kelsey. (2 pgs.)
07/02/1996 Entry scheduling a hearing at 10:00 a.m. on 7/23/96 at the Commission offices; scheduling a prehearing conference at 10:00 a.m. on 7/16/96 at the Commission offices; that the motions to intervene filed by OCC and Ameritech are granted; that the motion to intervene filed by CBT is denied; that all discovery be completed by the parties by 7/10/96; that Brooks shall file its direct, expert testimony to be pre- sented in support of its application and serve a copy upon all parties by 7/12/96; expert testimony to be presented by any other party at the hearing must be filed and served upon all parties by 7/19/96. (AE) (7 pgs.)
06/26/1996 Reply to memorandum contra motions to intervene and requests for hearing, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by C. Wilson. (3 pgs.)
06/26/1996 Reply memorandum filed on behalf of OCC by A. Kelsey. (4 pgs.)
06/26/1996 Reply filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (4 pgs.)
06/11/1996 Memorandum contra motions to intervene and requests for oral hearing filed on behalf of applicant by S. Bloom- field. (9 pgs.)
05/28/1996 Motion to intervene and request for oral hearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (5 pgs.)
05/28/1996 Motion to intervene and request for hearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by C. Wilson. (5 pgs.)
05/28/1996 Motion to intervene and request for oral hearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by R. Pace, Sr. (4 pgs.)
05/10/1996 Proof of Publication filed by S. Bloomfield. (3 pgs.) (Wood County, Lucas County)
04/18/1996 Entry ordering that Brooks cause publication of the legal notice by 4/26/96 and file proof of the publications by 6/26/96; that any interested person, firm, corporation, or entity wishing to intervene shall file a motion for inter- vention and an accompanying memorandum in support by 5/28/96; that Brooks file a response to any motions for intervention by 6/11/96; that any reply to Brooks' response be filed by 6/26/96. (AE) (3 pgs.)
04/05/1996 In the matter of the application of Brooks Fiber Communi- cations of Ohio, Inc. for a certificate of public con- venience and necessity to provide local exchange and dial- tone services and non switched private line services. (114 pgs.)