DIS - Case Record for 96-0298-TP-ACE Skip to main content

Case Record For:

96-0298-TP-ACE

Case Title: SCHERERS COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC.
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: ACE-Application for a certificate
Date Opened: 3/26/1996
Date Closed: 3/3/1997
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
01/15/1999Letter stating that applicant has decided not to pursue this application, filed by P. Keinath. (1 pg.)1
01/14/1999Entry dismissing this case and closing it of record. (2 pgs.)2
01/11/1999Correspondence regarding the representation of Scherers, filed by S. Bloomfield. (2 pgs.)2
11/24/1998Letter requesting that the company be given until Monday, December 14, 1998 in which to file a tariff, filed on be- half of applicant by S. Bloomfield. (1 pg.)1
11/18/1998Entry ordering that applicant should submit on or before November 27, 1998, a proposed complete tariff in this case or file a letter notifying the Commission of their inten- tion to proceed immediately in this matter, otherwise this case will be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (AE) (1 pg.) (ISSUED 11/13/98)1
04/23/1997Notice of withdrawal filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by C. Wilson. (5 pgs.)5
03/06/1997Entry ordering that the motion for leave to file late-filed comments made by MFS Intelenet of Ohio is granted; that the January 16, 1997 Supplemental Finding & Order is clarified to the limited extent outline in Findings 8 and 9; that, in all other respects, the applications for rehearing filed by OCC, APAC, Edgemont, and CBT are denied in their entirety.7
03/06/1997Entry ordering that the motion for leave to file late-filed comments made by MFS Intelenet of Ohio is granted in accor- dance with Finding 3; that the January 16, 1997 Supplemental Finding & Order is clarified to the limited extent outlined in Findnigs 8 and 9; that, in all other respects, the appli- cations for rehearing filed by OCC, APAC, Edgemont, and CBT are denied in their entirety. (7 pgs.)7
03/06/1997Entry ordering that the motion for leave to file late-filed comments made by MPS Intelenet of Ohio is granted; that the January 16, 1997 Supplemental Finding & Order is clarified to the limited extent outlined in Findings 8 and 9; that, in all other respects, the applications for rehearing filed by OCC, APAC, Edgemont, and CBT are denied in their entirety.8
03/04/1997Opposition of MFS Intelenet of Ohio to Cincinnati Bell's application for rehearing, and motion for leave to late file memorandum in opposition, filed by D. Myers. (14 pgs.)14
03/03/1997Entry ordering that this case shall remain partially sus- pended for an indefinite period, pending tariff approval by the Commission. (AE) (9 pgs.)9
03/03/1997Entry automatically approving the tariffs as of March 3, 1997, and closing this case of record. (AE) (9 pgs.)9
02/28/1997Opposition to application for rehearing of Cincinnati Bell Telephone, filed on behalf of Midcom Communications by C. Hunter. (14 pgs.)14
02/28/1997Memorandum contra CBT's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of CBG by N. Hawthorne. (8 pgs.)8
02/18/1997Application for rehearing filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by C. Wilson. (9 pgs.)9
01/16/1997Supplemental Finding & Order that if applicant files their proposed tariffs by January 31, 1997, such tariffs shall be automatically approved and this case closed of record, ab- sent full or partial suspension, on March 3, 1997. (13 pgs.)13
09/19/1996Opinion & Order granting the application to the extent set forth in this Order; that a certificate be issued to SCG; that this docket shall remain open for consideration of additional issues. (9 pgs.)9
08/14/1996Transcript for hearing held 7/31/96, (DF), 13 pgs., sub.13
07/23/1996Testimony of Gordon F. Sherer filed on behalf of applicant by S. Bloomfield. (13 pgs.)13
07/19/1996Letter stating that Ameritech Ohio does not take issue with the applicant's ability to meet the managerial, financial, and technical qualifications required for certification, filed by J. Kelly. (2 pgs.)2
07/12/1996Entry ordering that the motions to intervene filed by OCC and Ameritech are granted; that the motion to intervene filed by CBT is denied; scheduling a hearing at 10:00 a.m. on 7/31/96 at the Commission offices; scheduling a prehear- ing conference at 10:00 a.m. on 7/23/96 at the Commission offices; that all discovery be completed by the parties by 7/23/96; that expert testimony be filed and served in accordance with Finding 10. (AE) (6 pgs.)6
07/02/1996Reply memorandum filed on behalf of OCC by A. Kelsey. (4 pgs.)4
07/02/1996Notice of withdrawal of counsel and designation of new trial attorney filed on behalf of OCC by A. Kelsey. (2 pgs.)2
07/02/1996Reply to memorandum contra motions to intervene, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by C. Wilson. (4 pgs.)4
07/02/1996Reply filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (4 pgs.)4
06/18/1996Memorandum contra motions to intervene and requests for oral hearing, filed on behalf applicant by S. Bloomfield. (6 pgs.)6
06/04/1996Proofs of publication filed on behalf of applicant by S. Bloomfield. (40 pgs.) (38 counties)40
06/03/1996Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (4 pgs.)4
06/03/1996Motion to intervene and request for hearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by C. Wilson. (5 pgs.)5
06/03/1996Motion to intervene and request for oral hearing and memor- andum in support filed on behalf of OCC by R. Pace, Sr. (4 pgs.)4
04/18/1996Entry ordering that SCG cause publication of the legal notice by 5/2/96 and file proof of the publications with the Commission by 7/2/96; that any interested person, firm, corporation, or entity wishing to intervene shall file a motion for intervention and accompanying memorandum in support by 6/3/96; that SCG file a response to any motions for intervention by 6/17/96; that any reply to SCG's response by filed by 7/2/96. (AE) (3 pgs.)3
03/28/1996Two verifications to the application which were inadver- tently omitted from the application, filed on behalf of applicant by S. Bloomfield. (3 pgs.)3
03/26/1996In the matter of the application of Scherers Communications Group, Inc. for a certificate of public convenience and necessity to provide local exchange services within the state of Ohio.16
03/26/1996In the matter of the application of Scherers Communications Group, Inc. for a certificate of public convenience and necessity to provide local exchange services within the state of Ohio. (16 pgs.)16