DIS - Case Record for 95-0789-EL-CSS Skip to main content

Case Record For:

95-0789-EL-CSS

Case Title: DANA HUMFLEET/OHIO EDISON
Status: CL-CLOSED
Industry Code: EL-ELECTRIC
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 8/22/1995
Date Closed: 10/3/2013
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
10/03/2013Case action form closing case effective 10/3/2013.1
06/27/1996Service Notice1
06/27/1996Entry granting the parties request for a dismissal with prejudice and closing this case of record. (3 pgs.)3
06/13/1996Amendment to Exhibit A of the joint stipulation of dis- missal filed on behalf of complainant by D. Humfleet; and respondent, Ohio Edison, by J. Burk. (3 pgs.)3
03/05/1996Transcript filed for hearing held 2/22/96, (GS), 4 pgs., Con't. (Columbus, Ohio-PUCO)4
02/29/1996Joint stipulation of dismissal filed on behalf of complain- ant by D. Humfleet, and respondent, Ohio Edison, by J. Burk. (12 pgs.)12
02/21/1996Motion for continuance filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Edison, by J. Burk. (4 pgs.)4
01/24/1996Transcript filed for hearing held 1/17/96, (GNS), 4 pgs., Con't.4
01/19/1996Entry granting the parties' request for a continuance; continuing the hearing to 10:00 a.m. on 2/22/96 at the Commission offices. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
01/16/1996Motion for continuance filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Edison, by J. Burk. (4 pgs.)4
12/21/1995Proof of Publication filed. (Delaware County)1
12/13/1995Legal Notice sent to: The Delaware Gazette (Delaware Co.) Certified Mail.0
11/08/1995 Entry scheduling a hearing at 10:00 a.m. on 1/17/96 at the Commission offices. (2 pgs.)2
10/06/1995Entry denying Ohio Edison's request for a dismissal and that a prehearing conference on this matter be held in accordance with finding (5). (AE) (3 pgs.)3
09/13/1995Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Edison, by J. Burk. (6 pgs.)6
08/24/1995Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Ohio Edison, Kathy Kolich.1
08/22/1995In the matter of the complaint of Dana Humfleet (vs) Ohio Edison Company relative to the alleged unjust and unfair refusal of company to allow complainant to be exempt from the Optional Controlled Service Rider A, provision B. (8 pgs.)8