DIS - Case Record for 93-0685-TP-CSS Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 93-0685-TP-CSS
CASE DESCRIPTION: ARTHUR CORBIN/CHILLICOTHE TELEPHONE
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 5/1/2024
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
04/06/1995 Supreme Court Case returned. #93-2419 (1) Vol.-Destroyed.
12/28/1993 Supreme Court Transmittal papers.
11/29/1993 Notice of appeal filed on behalf A. Corbin and L. Loucks filed by OCC by D. Bergman.
09/30/1993 Entry denying OCC's application for rehearing, and the Commission's Order issued on August 5, 1993 is reaffirmed.
09/17/1993 Memorandum contra application for rehearing, filed on behalf of respondent, Chillicothe Telephone Company, by A. Korkosz.
09/07/1993 Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann.
08/05/1993 Entry granting CTC's motion to consolidate Case Nos. 93-685-TP-CSS and 93-913-TP-CSS and dismissing complaints. Dissenting Opinion of Commissioner Richard M. Fanelly. Concurring Opinion of Chairman Craig A. Glazer.
06/16/1993 Reply memorandum filed on behalf of respondent, Chillicothe Telephone Company, by A. Korkosz.
06/04/1993 Memorandum contra motion to dismiss, filed on behalf of complainants by Y. Ranft.
05/28/1993 Letter to Joseph W. Thomas from W. Spratley, filed on behalf of OCC by Y. Ranft.
05/19/1993 Notice of appearance of counsel filed on behalf of OCC by Y. Ranft.
05/17/1993 Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state reasonable grounds of complaint and memorandum in support filed on behalf of the Chillicothe Telephone Company by A. Korkosz.
05/14/1993 Petitions supporting application, filed by J. Thomas.
04/27/1993 Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Jack Anthony, Chillicothe Telephone.
04/23/1993 In the matter of the complaint of Arthur J. Corbin and various subscribers (vs) Chillicothe Telephone Company relative to the alleged unjust, unfair, and unreasonable charges associated with the company's application to offer Caller ID and Call Return.