| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 09/28/1992 | Returned from the Supreme Court (1 Vol.-3Vols missing) S.C. # 91-1652 | 0 |
| 04/20/1992 | Letter advising the Commission of the change of address for Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, filed by A. Buchmann. | 0 |
| 09/09/1991 | Transmittal papers filed at the Supreme Court. | 0 |
| 08/08/1991 | Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of the City of Cincinnati by F. Dupuis, J. McCarthy, III, and M. Yurick. (S.C. 91-1652 | 0 |
| 07/30/1991 | Entry denying application for rehearing filed by City of Cincinnati. | 0 |
| 07/15/1991 | Memorandum contra the application for rehearing of the City of Cincinnati, filed on behalf of respondent, Dayton Power & Light Company, by C. Faruki. | 0 |
| 07/15/1991 | Memorandum contra application for rehearing filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, by A. Korkosz. | 0 |
| 07/15/1991 | Memorandum contra application for rehearing filed on behalf of respondent, Columbus Southern Power, by M. Resnik. | 0 |
| 07/05/1991 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of the City of Cincinnati by R. Ganulin. | 0 |
| 06/28/1991 | Entry ordering that the motions to issue subpoenas and stay discovery are moot. (AE) | 0 |
| 06/27/1991 | Finding & Order dismissing complaint. | 0 |
| 06/24/1991 | Motion for stay of discovery, memorandum in support thereof, and memorandum contra motions to issue subpoena and request for expedited ruling filed on behalf of the respondent by A. Buchmann. | 0 |
| 06/24/1991 | Columbus Southern Power Company's motion to stay discovery and memorandum contra motions to issue subpoenas filed by M. Resnik. | 0 |
| 06/18/1991 | Motion to stay discovery pending the ruling on its motion to dismiss the complaint of the City of Cincinnati; and memorandum contra the City's motions for issuance of deposition subpoenas, filed on behalf of respondent, DP&L, by P. Horstman. | 0 |
| 06/17/1991 | Motion to issue subpoena for Thomas Chema and request for expedited ruling and memorandum, filed on behalf of complainant by F. Dupuis and M. Yurick. | 0 |
| 06/17/1991 | Motion to issue subpoena for Janine Migden and request for expedited ruling and memorandum, filed on behalf of complainant by F. Dupuis and M. Yurick. | 0 |
| 06/17/1991 | Motion to issue subpoena for Richard Celeste and request for expedited ruling and memorandum, filed on behalf of complainant by F. Dupuis and M. Yurick. | 0 |
| 06/17/1991 | Motion to issue subpoena for William H. Dickhoner and request for expedited ruling and memorandum, filed on behalf of complainant by F. Dupuis and M. Yurick. | 0 |
| 06/17/1991 | Motion to issue subpoena for Alan Schriber and request for expedited ruling and memorandum, filed on behalf of complainant by F. Dupuis and M. Yurick. | 0 |
| 04/05/1991 | Reply to the City of Cincinnati's memorandum contra the motion to dismiss of the Dayton Power & Light Company, filed on behalf of respondent, DP&L, by P. Horstman. | 0 |
| 04/05/1991 | Reply memorandum filed on behalf of respondent, CG&E, by A. Buchmann. | 0 |
| 04/05/1991 | Reply to complainant's memorandum contra respondents' motions to dismiss, filed on behalf of respondent, Columbus Southern Power, by M. Resnik. | 0 |
| 03/29/1991 | Memorandum contra respondents' motions to dismiss filed on behalf of the City of Cincinnati by F. Dupuis and M. Yurick. | 0 |
| 03/15/1991 | Motion to dismiss the complaint and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Columbus Southern Power Company by M. Resnik. | 0 |
| 03/15/1991 | Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, CG&E, by A. Buchmann. | 0 |
| 03/15/1991 | Motion to dismiss the complaint of the City of Cincinnati filed on behalf of respondent by C. Faruki. | 0 |
| 02/25/1991 | Complaint letter mailed to: Columbus Southern Power Co., office of the president. | 0 |
| 02/25/1991 | Complaint letter mailed to: Dayton Power & Light Company, office of the president. | 0 |
| 02/25/1991 | Complaint letter mailed to: Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, office of the president. | 0 |
| 02/22/1991 | In the matter of the complaint of the City of Cincinnati (vs) The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, The Dayton Power & Light Company, and The Columbus and Southern Ohio Electric Company relative to the alleged unreasonable and unjust rates charged or proposed to be charged to consumers by Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Dayton Power & Light Company, and Columbus Southern Power Company. | 0 |