DIS - Case Record for 88-0555-RR-CSS Skip to main content

Case Record For:

88-0555-RR-CSS

Case Title: BILL NICKLES V NORFOLK SOUTHERN
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: RR-RAILROAD
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 4/4/1988
Date Closed: 7/18/1989
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
11/06/1990Entry closing case as the requirements of the July l8, l989 order have been fulfilled.0
09/17/1990Findings filed on behalf of the PUCO Staff by R. Patterson.0
07/27/1990Entry denying N&W's motions to dismiss it as a party in this proceeding and to vacate the January 30, l990 order as to it; Wheeling and Lake Erie Railway Company be joined as a party in this proceeding; that the time period for completing installation of the protective devices at the subject crossing be extended to no later than 8/27/90. (AE)0
07/16/1990Combined motion for extension of time, motion to dismiss and to vacate an order, and memorandum in support of motions filed on behalf of respondent, N&W Railway Company, by F. Wimbush.0
01/30/1990Entry ordering N&W to proceed with the installation of crossing protective devices with completion within l80 days.0
01/23/1990Letter stating that Commission will assume the certification of funds and submit that funds are available for l00% of the public share of the cost of the installation of the warning devices at the S.R. 94 crossing filed on behalf of the PUCO Staff by R. Patterson.0
09/11/1989Letter regarding site plans filed on behalf of Staff by T. King.0
09/06/1989Entry ordering that N&W be given until 10/16/89, to file the circuit plans and cost estimates for the installation of automatic protection devices at the crossing identified in complaint. (AE)0
09/01/1989Force account estimate and detailed circuit plans for the installtion of flashing light signals and crossing gates at the State Route 94 grade crossing in Snively, Ohio filed by B. Wimbush on behalf of respondent.0
08/25/1989Request for an extension of time to file circuit plans filed on behalf of Norforlk and Western Railway by F. Wimbush.0
07/18/1989Opinion & Order upholding complaint and order N & W install, operate and maintain crossing protections.0
03/17/1989Trans., for hearing held on 3/9/89, (RM) Submitted Vol. I, 1-133 pages.0
02/15/1989Entry stating that all expert testimony must be filed no later than March 6, 1989. (AE)0
01/18/1989Entry scheduling hearing to be held on 3/9/89, at 10:00 a.m. at Dalton High School, Music Room, 177 North Mill Street, Dalton, Ohio. (AE)0
12/05/1988Letter filed by Wm. Wright on behalf of the PUCO staff, RE: to requesting the hearing be scheduled for 3/9/89.0
11/15/1988Investigation Report issued by T. King on behalf of the PUCO staff.0
06/30/1988Entry dismissing Norfolk Southern Corp as respondent and naming N&W as proper respondent and ordering the railroad section of the Commission to initiate an investigation.0
05/23/1988Answer of Norfolk and Western Railway Company to complaint, filed by F. Blair Wimbush.0
05/02/1988Answer of M. Squillace and R. Szialgyi on behalf of ODOT.0
04/25/1988Motion to Dismiss filed by W. Dissen on behalf of Norfolk and Western Corporation.0
04/04/1988Petition of William Nickles, aka Bill Nickles (Vs) Norfolk Southern Corporation and Ohio Department of Transportation RE: relating to dangerous public railroad highway grade crossing in Wayne County, Sugar Creek Township Way-94-4.71 NS Grade Crossing 473 164 W.0