DIS - Case Record for 87-0348-RR-CSS Skip to main content

Case Record For:

87-0348-RR-CSS

File a Public Comment
Case Title: CO-OPERATIVE COMMITTEE V CONRAIL
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: RR-RAILROAD
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 3/3/1987
Date Closed: 8/6/1992
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
08/06/1992Entry closing case since corrective action has eliminated the cause for complaint.0
04/27/1992Additional Findings filed on behalf of the PUCO by L. Charles.0
04/27/1992Findings filed on behalf of the Staff of the PUCO by L. Charles.0
04/27/1992Letter filed on behalf of the PUCO Staff stating that all the requirements have been meet and that the case be dismissed filed by R. Patterson.0
01/30/1992First quarterly progress report by Scott Wasserkrug, Conrail, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by R. Patterson.0
12/30/1991Entry adopting the 90-day progress report and jurisdiction be retained over the subject matter of this complaint until work has been completed at all locations.0
12/06/1991Memo to K. Sheets, PUCO staff, recommending that the 90-day progress report be adopted as a finding by way of Commission Entry beginning not later that January 31, 1992, filed by R. Patterson, PUCO staff.0
11/27/199190-Day progress report filed on behalf of complainant, Co-Operative Legislative Committee, by M. Adams.0
10/22/1991Status report of Co-Operative Legislative Committee of Railroad Brotherhoods and Railroad Unions, State of Ohio, filed by M. Adams.0
10/17/1991Letters to Mr. Steve Gast, Grieser, Schafer, Blumenstiel & Slane and Mr. Scott K. Wasserkrug, associate general attorney for Conrail regarding the filing of their 90-day reports which are due to be filed with the Commission by October 28, 1991, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by R. Patterson.0
09/03/1991On-site inspections report conducted during the week of August 12, 1991, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by R. Patterson.0
08/15/1991Entry ordering complaint be continued pending the outcome of negotiations among the parties.0
08/12/1991Transcript filed for hearing held 7/29/91, (KS) (DB), 5 pgs., Con't.0
07/11/1991Entry amending June 27, 1991 entry.0
06/27/1991Entry scheduling a prehearing conference on July 29 and 30, 1991 at 10:00 a.m. at the offices of the Commission.0
02/05/1991Letter stating that Conrail is systematically evaluating, and if appropriate, correcting lighting levels at its various Cleveland Yards, filed on behalf of Conrail by M. Hutchinson.0
02/01/1989Entry granting staff's request to continued hearing and the date for the continued hearing be set by Entry. (AE)0
01/19/1989Letter filed by Wm. Wright on behalf of the PUCO staff, RE: to the hearing dates scheduled for this matter.0
01/19/1989Letter filed by R. Deal on behalf of complainant.0
12/07/1988Entry continuing hearing to be held on 2/8/89 and 2/9/89, at 10:00 a.m., at the offices of the Commission. (AE)0
12/06/1988Motion for continuance of hearing date filed by R. Stroh on behalf of Consolidated Rail Corporation.0
11/23/1988Entry rescheduling hearing to be held on 12/8/88, and 12/9/88, at 10:00 a.m., at the offices of the Commission. (AE)0
11/09/1988Letter filed by Wm. Wright on behalf of the PUCO staff, requesting the hearing be rescheduled.0
10/03/1988Entry scheduling a hearing to be heldon 11/29/88, at 10:00 a.m., at the offices of the Commission. (AE)0
09/07/1988Motion to reopen complaint and memorandum in support of motion filed by M. Adams on behalf of complainant.0
05/02/1988Response to request on the "current status of the senior management decision regarding the above-captioned matter" filed by R. Stroh on behalf of Conrail.0
04/19/1988Copy of letter filed by M. Adams, to: R. Stroh, Consolidated Rail Corporation.0
03/16/1988Letter filed by R. Stroh on behalf of Conrail.0
03/03/1988Letter filed by M. Adams on behalf of complainant, to: Mr. Robert Smith/Consolidated Rail Corporation, Relative to previous agreement.0
12/28/1987Correspondence from Conrail dated 12/7/87 and 12/16/87, filed by R. Stroh.0
12/14/1987Trans., for hearing held on 12/8/87, (KS) Con't. Vol. I, 1-3 pages.0
11/16/1987Entry rescheduling hearing to be held on December 8, 1987, at 10:00 a.m., at the offices of the Commission. (AE)0
11/16/1987Entyr ordering that the complainant's motion for leave to repeat videotape deposition and costs should be granted in part and denied in part; Ordering that Consolidated Rail Corporation permit the night videotaping of switching operations at the locations indentified in the complaint in this matter; Ordering that the complainant's request for an order assessing the costs of a repeat videotaping session to the respondent, be denied. (AE)0
10/26/1987Reply to motion contra for leave to repeat videotape desposition and costs filed by M. Adams on behalf of applicant.0
10/16/1987Motion contra for leave to repeat vidotape deposition and costs filed by R. Stroh on behalf of respondent.0
09/29/1987Motion for leave to repeat video tape deposition and costs filed on behalf of the Complainant by M. Adams.0
09/04/1987Subpeona to; Andrew Kosiorek, Jr., filed on behalf of complainant.0
08/05/1987Entry granting motion to continue hearing; Ordering hearing be rescheduled for November 10, 1987, at 10:00 a.m., at the offices of the Commission. (AE)\0
08/04/1987Railroad Section's staff report concerning the investiga- tion conducted July 1, 2, 8, and 9, submitted by R. J. Feddern on behalf of PUCO staff.0
07/21/1987Motion to continue hearing and to limit evidence filed by M. Adams on behalf of complainant.0
05/20/1987Entry scheduling hearing on September 1, 1987 at 10:00 a.m. at the office of the Commission and that the railroad department of the Commission investigate further the areas alleged to be unsafe and file with the Commission a written report of its findings.0
05/01/1987Acknowledgment of Answer and Request for Formal Hearing filed by M. Adams on behalf of complainant.0
04/23/1987Answer filed by R. Stroh on behalf of the respondent.0
03/27/1987Entry granting respondent extension of time to file answer until April 23, 1987. (AE)0
03/20/1987Letter filed by R. Stroh on behalf of Consolidated Rail Corporation, requesting a 30 days extension to file answer in this proceeding.0
03/09/1987Complaint form letter and copy of complaint sent out to; Mr. Daniel F. Donovan/Consolidated Rail Corporation.0
03/03/1987Complaint of Co-Operative Legislative Committee (Vs) Consolidated Rail Corporation, Relative to the Alleged, unsafe working conditions at eight identified locations in the Cleveland, Ohio area.0