DIS - Case Record for 85-0702-RR-CSS Skip to main content

Case Record For:

85-0702-RR-CSS

Case Title: RICHLAND COUNTY BD COMM V CONRAIL
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: RR-RAILROAD
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 6/4/1985
Date Closed: 1/24/1991
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
01/24/1991Entry closing case.0
01/04/1991Final inspection report filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by R. Patterson.0
11/09/1990Revised location plan and detailed force account cost estimate submitted by Consolidated Rail Corp., filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by R. Patterson.0
07/12/1990Entry ordering that Conrail proceed with the installation of flashing lights signals at its crossing at Richland County Road 96, Crossing No. 502 645V. Installation is to be completed no later than ll/l5/90 in Case No. 85-702-RR-CSS; also, that Conrail submit site plans in Case No. 88-1288-RR-CSS no later than 12/31/90.0
07/03/1990Letter filed by R. Patterson of the PUCO Staff recommending that the location plans be approved.0
06/26/1990Recommendation filed on behalf of the staff of the PUCO by F. Agler.0
05/24/1990Entry approving the stipulation and directing the parties to proceed with implementation of terms of the agreement.0
05/10/1990Letter requesting state funding assistance by D. Cook, Richland County Commissioners, filed by R. Patterson on behalf of the PUCO Staff.0
05/02/1990Stipulation and Recommendation filed on behalf of complainant by D. Cook, Washington Township by R. Horowitz, PUCO Staff by R. Tongren, and respondent.0
03/13/1990Entry reopening case and scheduling rehearing on 5/24/90 at 10:00 a.m. at the office of the Commission.0
02/01/1990Returned from supreme court.0
01/10/1990Letter stating the Richland County Board of Commissioners intends to appropriate in the l990 General Fund Budget sixty percent of the cost to install active warning devices on the Lucas-Perrysville Road railroad crossing in Monroe Township filed on behalf of complainant by E. Olson.0
01/13/1989Supreme Court Transmittal Papers. (SC No. 87-1664)0
09/29/1987Notice of Appeal of Respondent-Appellant, Consolidated Rail Corporation filed by T. Skulina. (87-1664)0
09/08/1987Copy of certificate of availability of funds to pay the 60% share of signal cost apportioned to Richland County, filed by E. Olson and R. Sowash.0
08/04/1987Entry on Rehearing denying Conrail's application for rehearing; Ordering respondent railroad, Consolidated Rail Corporation, install, operate and maintain flashing lights signals and crossing gates at its crossing on Richland County Road No. 96, with 60% of the cost of in- stalltion to be paid by the governmental authority, Richland County, Ohio and 40% of the installation cost; Ordering Consolidated submit plans for approval by Commission within 30 days from the date of this Entry.0
07/14/1987Memorandum in support of application for rehearing filed on behalf of Conail by M. Brandt.0
07/14/1987Application for rehearing filed on behalf of the Consolidated Rail Corporation by M. Brandt.0
06/16/1987Opinion & Order issued ordering the respondent railroad, Consolidated Rail Corporation, install, operate and maintain flashing light signals and crossing gates, with Richland County, Ohio, with 60% of the cost of installation to be paid by the governmental authority, and 40% be paid by respondent; Ordering devices to be installed within 60 days.0
03/16/1987Reply of Consolidated Rail Corporation to Exceptions of Richland County Board of Commissioners to Attorney Examiner's Report, filed by D. Donovan.0
03/09/1987Exceptions to Attorney Examiner's Report by Richland County Board of Commissioners filed by J. DeWeese.0
02/20/1987Attorney examiner report filed0
07/08/1986Trans., for hearing held 6-12-86, (EP) Submitted Vol. I, 1-66 pages.0
04/08/1986Entry scheduling hearing on June 12, 1986 at 11;00 A.M. at the offices of the Commission.0
03/20/1986Railroad Section's investigation report of the Richland Couonty Road #96, Coonrail grade crossing, Lucas, Ohio.0
02/19/1986Entry initiating an investigation by the PUCO staff.0
07/29/1985Answer filed.0
06/06/1985Complaint form letter and copy of complaint mailed out to following: 1). Consolidated Rail Corporation/c/o C.T. Corporation 2). Daniel F. Donovan/Commerce Counsel - Conrail0
06/04/1985Case filed.0