| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 05/15/2013 | Memo closing case with an effective date of 05/15/13. | 1 |
| 05/01/2013 | Service Notice | 2 |
| 05/01/2013 | Entry ordered, that, in accordance with the above findings, the complainant's April 9, 2013, rehearing application be denied in its entirety. | 5 |
| 04/19/2013 | Memorandum Contra Application for Rehearing electronically filed by Lydia M. Floyd on behalf of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company. | 10 |
| 04/09/2013 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed by E. Holmes, complainant. (FAX) | 3 |
| 03/20/2013 | Service Notice | 2 |
| 03/20/2013 | Entry that in accordance with the above findings, CEl's motion to dismiss this case is granted, and this case is hereby dismissed, based on the complainant's lack of standing to bring the complaint he has filed in this case. It is, further, ordered, that, in accordance with the above findings, the complainant's request to have the Commission, in the event that it finds the complainant lacks standing to bring this complaint himself, proceed further with this case, on its own initiative, is denied. | 5 |
| 01/17/2013 | Service Notice | 2 |
| 01/17/2013 | Attorney Examiner Entry scheduling a prehearing settlement teleconference for 10:00 a.m. on 02/06/2013 through the use of the Commission's bridge line in accordance with Finding (4). - electronically filed by Sandra Coffey on behalf of Daniel Fullin, Attorney Examiner, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio | 3 |
| 01/14/2013 | Reply in Support of the Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company's Motion to Dismiss electronically filed by Lydia M. Floyd on behalf of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company. | 7 |
| 01/07/2013 | Response to Respondent's motion to dismiss and notice of objection and memorandum in support filed by E. Holmes, Complainant. (FAX) | 6 |
| 01/03/2013 | Motion and memorandum in support for extension of time to answer motion to dismiss and respondent answer to complaint filed by complainant, E. Holmes. | 1 |
| 01/03/2013 | Service Notice | 2 |
| 01/02/2013 | Attorney Examiner Entry grants an extension until 01/09/2013 for the Complainant to file a Memorandum Contra the Respondent's Motion to Dismiss and until 01/16/2013 for the Respondent to file a Reply Memorandum. The Complainant's request for time and opportunity to file a formal pleading in response to the Respondent's Answer to the Complaint is denied. - electronically filed by Sandra Coffey on behalf of Daniel Fullin, Attorney Examiner, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. | 4 |
| 12/31/2012 | Motion and memorandum in support for an extension of time filed by complainant, Eugene Holmes. (FAX) | 2 |
| 12/17/2012 | Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support electronically filed by Lydia M. Floyd on behalf of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company. | 9 |
| 12/17/2012 | Answer of Respondent The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company to Complaint electronically filed by Lydia M. Floyd on behalf of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company. | 6 |
| 12/03/2012 | Notice of Objection and Reply in Opposition to Respondent's, Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading Filed by Eugene P. Holmes. (original) | 3 |
| 12/03/2012 | Service Notice | 2 |
| 12/03/2012 | Attorney Examiner Entry granting an extension of time to answer. - electronically filed by Sandra Coffey on behalf of Daniel Fullin, Attorney Examiner, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio | 3 |
| 11/30/2012 | Notice of objection and reply in opposition to respondent's motion for extension of time to file responsive pleading filed by E. Holmes, complainant. (FAX) | 3 |
| 11/28/2012 | Motion and memorandum in support for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading electronically filed by Lydia M. Floyd on behalf of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company. | 6 |
| 11/15/2012 | Complaint Response Letter and copy of brochure sent to Mr. Eugene Holmes. | 1 |
| 11/15/2012 | Complaint Service Letter and copy of complaint sent to Ms. Leila Vespoli, Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company. | 1 |
| 11/14/2012 | In the matter of the complaint of Eugene Holmes vs The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company for the alleged abuse of discreation as well as public safety. | 2 |