Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
07/17/2013 | Case action form closing case with an effective date of 7/17/2013. | 1 |
08/22/2012 | Service Notice | 3 |
08/22/2012 | Entry ordered that the motion to dismiss is granted with prejudice in accordance with Finding (8). | 2 |
07/03/2012 | Joint motion to dismiss the complaint with prejudice electronically filed by Mr. Lawrence D. Walker on behalf of Ohio Bell Telephone Company. | 2 |
04/10/2012 | Correspondence electronically filed by Mr. Lawrence D. Walker on behalf of Infotelecom, LLC. | 15 |
01/17/2012 | Correspondence electronically filed by Mr. Lawrence D. Walker on behalf of Infotelecom, LLC. | 15 |
11/21/2011 | Correspondence to Attorney Examiner reporting on case status, electronically filed by Mr. Lawrence D. Walker on behalf of Infotelecom, LLC and Ohio Bell Telephone Company. | 3 |
11/14/2011 | Submission of supplemental authority regarding the bankruptcy stay filed by L. Walker counsel for Infotelecom, LLC. | 8 |
11/07/2011 | Notice of submission of supplemental authority regarding the bankruptcy stay filed by L. Walker on behalf of Infotelecom, LLC. | 5 |
10/28/2011 | Correspondence concerning the settlement conference electronically filed by Mrs. Verneda J. Engram on behalf of AT&T Ohio. | 3 |
10/28/2011 | Appearance of counsel for complainant filed by L. Walker. | 2 |
10/28/2011 | Infotelecom LLC's response regarding the bankruptcy automatic stay filed by L. Walker. | 74 |
10/28/2011 | Notice of withdrawal of counsel filed by S.M.Howard. | 2 |
10/21/2011 | Memorandum AT&T Ohio's Opposition to Infolelecom's Assertion That the Bankruptcy Stay Applies to This Proceeding electronically filed by Ms. Mary K. Fenlon on behalf of AT&T Ohio | 6 |
10/18/2011 | Notice of bankruptcy filing and suggestion of stay filed on behalf of Infotelecom, LLC by S. Howard. | 3 |
10/11/2011 | Service Notice | 3 |
10/11/2011 | Entry ordering that At&T Ohio's motion for security be denied in accordance with Finding (7); that Infotelecom's motion for stay be denied in accordance with Finding (11); that a settlement conference be scheduled in accordance with Finding (13). (JSA) | 8 |
10/05/2011 | Reply to Infotelecom's Memo Contra AT&T's Motion for Security electronically filed by Ms. Mary K. Fenlon on behalf of AT&T Ohio. | 44 |
09/28/2011 | Infotelecom's Memorandum Contra AT&T's Motion for Security Pending Final Decision electronically filed by Mr. Stephen M Howard on behalf of Infotelecom, LLC | 6 |
09/26/2011 | Reply in Support of Motion to Suspend Schedule electronically filed by Mr. Stephen M Howard on behalf of Infotelecom, LLC | 30 |
09/21/2011 | Memorandum in Opposition to Infotelecom's Motion for Stay electronically filed by Ms. Mary K. Fenlon on behalf of AT&T Ohio. | 36 |
09/14/2011 | Motion and memorandum in support for stay pending decision by the second circuit in a related case between the parties filed by S. Howard on behalf of Infotelecom LLC. | 8 |
09/13/2011 | Motion for Security Pending Final Decision electronically filed by Ms. Mary K. Fenlon on behalf of AT&T Ohio. | 28 |
09/13/2011 | Answer AT&T Ohio's answer to Infotelecom's complaint. electronically filed by Ms. Mary K. Fenlon on behalf of AT&T Ohio. | 10 |
08/30/2011 | Entry ordering that service to Infotelecom not be disconnected during pendency of this dispute, Infotelecom is instructed to pay during this complaint, all amounts to AT&T Ohio that are not in dispute. (JRJ) | 2 |
08/30/2011 | Service Notice | 2 |
08/29/2011 | Complaint response letter and copy of complaint mailed to J. Kelly, AT&T Ohio. | 1 |
08/29/2011 | Complaint response letter to AT&T with copy of complaint. | 1 |
08/24/2011 | Infotelecom LLC requests assistance from the Commission to prevent the termination of service during the pendency of this complaint case filed by S. Howard. | 4 |
08/24/2011 | In the matter of the complaint of Infotelecom, LLC vs Ohio Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T for alleged and unfair and unjust billing practices. | 109 |