DIS - Case Record for 11-3467-TP-CSS Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 11-3467-TP-CSS
CASE DESCRIPTION: CHAD KISTER VS AT&T OHIO
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 9/20/2024
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
07/03/2013 Memo closing cases with an effective date of 07/03/13.
05/29/2013 Service Notice
05/29/2013 Entry ordered, That, in accordance with the above findings, pursuant to Rule 4901- 1-23(F)(4) and (5), O.A.C, this case is dismissed, with prejudice, for lack of sufficient prosecution by the complainant.
03/19/2013 Motion to dismiss electronically filed by Jon F. Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.
03/12/2013 Response to motions to compel and to reschedule filed by C. Kister, complainant.
02/11/2013 Service Notice
02/11/2013 Attorney Examiner Entry grants respondent's motion to compel discovery. - electronically filed by Sandra Coffey on behalf of Daniel Fullin, Attorney Examiner, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.
12/05/2012 Service Notice
12/05/2012 Attorney Examiner Entry postponing the hearing in this matter indefinitely until discovery has been completed. - electronically filed by Sandra Coffey on behalf of Daniel Fullin, Attorney Examiner, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.
11/20/2012 Motion to compel and memorandum in support electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio
11/20/2012 Motion for a continuance electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio
10/03/2012 Service Notice
10/03/2012 Attorney Examiner Entry ordered that the hearing scheduled in this matter for 10/10/12 is rescheduled to 12/13/12 at 1:30 p.m. at the offices of the Commission, 180 E. Broad St., 11th Flr, Rm. 11-D, Columbus, Ohio; ordered discovery to be conducted in accordance with Finding (4); and ordered that any party intending to present expert testimony to comply with Finding (5). - electronically filed by Sandra Coffey on behalf of Daniel Fullin, Attorney Examiner, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
09/18/2012 Service Notice
09/18/2012 Attorney Examiner Entry scheduling a hearing for 10/10/12 at 10:00 a.m. at the offices of the Commission located at 180 E. Broad St., 11th Flr., Rm. 11-D, Columbus, Ohio and ordering discovery be conducted in accordance with Finding (6) and ordering any party intending to present expert testimony to comply with Finding (7). - electronically filed by Sandra Coffey on behalf of Daniel Fullin, Attorney Examiner, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.
02/29/2012 Service Notice
02/29/2012 Entry ordering that all portions of the complaint that pertain to the complainant's First Amendment rights, to the complainant's right to make a living under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, to his request for a jury trial, to DSL service, to retail wireless service, and to wiretapping, and all portions of the complaint to the extent that they raise issues which are beyond the scope of Section 4927.21(A), Revised Code, are hereby dismissed as beyond the scope of the Commission's jurisdiction.
09/29/2011 Memorandum contra Complainant's motion to compel electronically filed by Jon F. Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.
09/15/2011 Motion to compel filed by complainant, Chad Kister.
09/14/2011 Motion to compel filed on behalf of complainant, Chad Kister. (FAX)
07/20/2011 Reply electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio
07/13/2011 Response to motion to dismiss and discovery response filed by C. Kister, complainant. (FAX)
06/28/2011 Memorandum contra complainant's motion for discovery and memorandum in support electronically filed by Jon F. Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.
06/28/2011 Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support electronically filed by Jon F. Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.
06/28/2011 Answer electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.
06/17/2011 Motion for Discovery filed by C. Kister (FAX)
06/08/2011 Letter to Complainant with brochure to confirm receipt of filed complaint with assigned case number by the PUCO.
06/08/2011 Complaint service letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Jon Kelly, AT&T Ohio.
06/07/2011 In the matter of the Complaint of Chad Kister vs. AT&T for the alleged poor telephone service filed by Chad Kister.