| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 06/07/2011 | Case Action Form Archiving Case electronically filed by Christine MT Pirik on behalf of PUCO. | 2 |
| 01/07/2010 | Service Notice | 2 |
| 01/07/2010 | Entry ordering that the applications for rehearing filed by OPAE and OCC are denied. | 8 |
| 12/18/2009 | Memorandum contra applications for rehearing by Ohio Consumers' Counsel and Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy filed by E. Watts on behalf of Duke Energy. | 12 |
| 12/11/2009 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed by L. Sauer on behalf of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel. | 29 |
| 12/09/2009 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed by D. Rinebolt on behalf of the Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy. | 11 |
| 11/12/2009 | Service notice. | 1 |
| 11/12/2009 | Entry ordering OPAE's motion for admission pro hac vice to admit David C. Rinebolt be granted; the motions to intervene filed by OPAE and OCC be granted; the motion to dismiss filed by OPAE be denied; Duke be authorized to modify its accounting procedures and defer costs related to the environmental investigation and remediation costs. | 5 |
| 11/10/2009 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support by the Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by L. Sauer. | 10 |
| 10/30/2009 | Letter in response to an informal Staff inquiry to confirm that the properties in question were presently used and useful as set forth in R.C. 4909.15 filed by A. Spiller on behalf of Duke Energy Ohio. | 1 |
| 10/29/2009 | Letter in response to an informal Staff inquiry to confirm that the properties in question were presently used and useful as set forth in R.C. 4909.15 filed by A. Spiller on behalf of Duke Energy Ohio. (FAX) | 1 |
| 09/09/2009 | Motion of Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy to intervene and to dismiss, memorandum in support and motion to practice pro hac vice before the Commission filed by D. Rinebolt. | 10 |
| 08/10/2009 | In the matter of the application of Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. for authority to defer environmental investigation and remediation costs. | 6 |