DIS - Case Record for 08-0989-TP-BLS Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 08-0989-TP-BLS
CASE DESCRIPTION: VERIZON NORTH INC
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 4/28/2024
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
10/03/2011 Memo archiving case with an effective date of 10/3/11.
08/06/2009 Memo closing case effective 08/06/09.
06/03/2009 Service Notice
06/03/2009 Entry on rehearing ordered that the application for rehearing is granted in part and denied in part, ordered that the motion to reopen the proceeding is denied.
05/18/2009 Reply to Verizon's Memorandum Contra OCC's Motion to Reopen or, Alternatively, Motion to Abrogate or Modify the Order by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Etter, Terry L. and Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel
05/13/2009 Service Notice.
05/13/2009 Entry ordering that the application for rehearing filed by OCC is granted.
05/11/2009 Memorandum Contra to the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel's motion to reopen or to abrogate or modify electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Verizon North Inc.
04/27/2009 Memorandum of Verizon North, Inc. contra application for rehearing by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E. Lodge.
04/24/2009 Motion and memorandum in support to reopen or, alternatively, motion to abrogate or modify the order by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Mary V. Edwards on behalf of T. Etter.
04/17/2009 Application for Rehearing by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of T. Etter.
03/24/2009 Correspondence letter expressing disapproval over the approval of Verizon's recent increase filed by V. Hoover.
03/18/2009 Finding ordering that Verizon's motion to supplement its application is granted; that for the exchanges identified in Attachment A of this Finding and Order, Verizon's application for an alternative form of BLES and other Tier 1 services is granted; that for the exchanges identified in Attachment B of this Finding and Order, Verizon's application for an alternative form of BLES and other Tier 1 services is denied; that Verizon shall at least 30 days prior to any increase notify affected customers; that the proposed tariff revisions are approved as discussed.
03/18/2009 Service Notice.
12/30/2008 Service Notice.
12/29/2008 Entry ordering that Verizon's BLES application is suspended. (LDJ)
12/17/2008 Supplemental Response to the Staff's Data Request - First Set (Dated October 22, 2008 - Response October 29, 2008; Supplemental December 17, 2008) electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Verizon North Inc.
12/11/2008 Revised tariff pages PUCO Tariff No. 7 filed by C. Cole on behalf of Verizon North Inc.
11/14/2008 Reply in support of its alternative motion for leave to supplement its application electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Verizon North Inc.
11/07/2008 Reply to Verizon's Memorandum In Response By the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Etter, Terry L. and Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel.
11/04/2008 Service Notice
11/04/2008 Entry ordering that OCC is allowed until November 7, 2008, to file a response to Verizon's October 27, 2008, filing. (LDJ)
11/03/2008 Response - Verizon's Response to the Staff's Data Request - First Set (Dated October 22, 2008 - Response October 29, 2008) with Supplement electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Verizon North Inc.
11/03/2008 Correspondence - Language Correction electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Verizon North Inc.
10/29/2008 Motion and memorandum in support for Extension of Time to file a Reply to Verizon's Memorandum in Response and Request for an Expedited Ruling by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Etter, Terry L. and Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel.
10/27/2008 Verizon's Supplement to its Application and, in the Alternative, Motion for Leave to Supplement its Application electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Verizon North Inc.
10/27/2008 Verizon's Memorandum in Response to the Opposition of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel and in Support of its Motion to Supplement its Application electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Verizon North Inc.
10/21/2008 Letter opposing the rate increase of Verizon North filed by M. & L. Powell.
10/17/2008 Opposition to Verizon's application for basic local service alternative regulation and demonstration why the application should not be granted by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel; along with the affidavits of Kathy L. Hagans and Karen J. Hardie electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Bergmann, David C. and Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel.
10/10/2008 Service Notice
10/10/2008 Entry ordering that OCC's motion for intervention is granted in accordance with Finding (5); that in accordance with Finding (2), for the purpose of timelines under the Commission's rules, Verizon's application shall be deemed filed on September 2, 2008 and that discovery proceed in accordance with Rule 4901:1-4-09(1), O.A.C. (LJ)
09/04/2008 Motion to Intervene of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Patti Mallarnee on behalf of Etter, Terry L Mr.
09/03/2008 Correspondence letter objecting to Verizon's proposal to place basic home telephone service on pricing flexibility, filed by G. Murray.
09/02/2008 Correspondence letter correcting clerical inadvertence, electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Verizon North Inc.
08/29/2008 Application continued. (Part 3 of 3)
08/29/2008 Application continued. (Part 2 of 3)
08/29/2008 In the matter of the application of Verizon North Inc. for approval of an alternative form of regulation of basic local exchange service and other Tier 1 services.