| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 01/26/2012 | Case status form to archive case filed by Doug Jennings. | 1 |
| 06/22/2010 | Memo closing case effective 6/22/10. | 1 |
| 04/21/2010 | Correspondence advising the Commission of the filing of the interconnection agreement amendments filed by Stephen M. Howard on behalf of the Sprint entities and electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio. | 2 |
| 04/15/2010 | Entry granting the parties' jointly filed request for an extension of time to April 21, 2010. | 2 |
| 04/15/2010 | Service Notice | 3 |
| 04/13/2010 | Motion jointly requesting an extension of time filed by Stephen M. Howard on behalf of the Sprint entities and electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio. | 2 |
| 03/31/2010 | Service Notice | 3 |
| 03/31/2010 | Entry denying AT&T's motion to dismiss Sprint'a amended complaint; that Sprint's interconnection agreements with AT&T shall be extended for a three-year period, beginning March 25, 2009; that the parties submit executed interconnection agreements reflecting the three-year extensions within 14 days of this entry. | 17 |
| 09/17/2009 | Reply brief in support of motion to dismiss electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio. | 13 |
| 09/10/2009 | Memorandum contra AT&T of Ohio's motion to dismiss electronically filed by Mr. Stephen M Howard on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P., Sprint Spectrum L.P., Nextel West Corp,. and NPCR, Inc. | 19 |
| 08/26/2009 | Motion to dismiss the amended complaint electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio. | 32 |
| 08/26/2009 | Answer to the amended complaint electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio. | 8 |
| 08/06/2009 | Service Notice. | 3 |
| 08/06/2009 | Entry ordering that Sprint's motion to amend its complaint is granted and that AT&T is granted until August 26, 2009 to file an answer and any other responsive pleading. (DJ) | 5 |
| 07/17/2009 | Correspondence concerning the Complainants' motion to amend their complaint and the amended complaint electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio. | 3 |
| 07/02/2009 | Motion to amend complaint filed by S. Howard on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P., Sprint Spectrum, L.P., Nextel West Corp,, and NPCR, Inc. | 21 |
| 07/02/2009 | Amended complaint of Sprint Communications Company L.P., Sprint Spectrum L.P. and Nextel West Corp., for a three-year extension of current interconnection agreement with the Ohio Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T of Ohio filed by S. Howard. | 25 |
| 12/09/2008 | Entry ordering a conference be held on January 15, 2009, at 10:00 a.m. in hearing room 11-B at the offices of the Commission, 180 East Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215.(LJ) | 3 |
| 12/09/2008 | Service Notice | 3 |
| 07/08/2008 | Memorandum contra AT&T Ohio's motion to summarily dismiss Sprint's motion for declaratory ruling and request for expedited ruling, electronically filed by Stephen M Howard on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. | 10 |
| 07/02/2008 | Correspondence concerning the motion filed on July 1, 2008 electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio | 3 |
| 07/01/2008 | Motion to summarily dismiss Sprint's motion for declaratory ruling and request for expedited ruling electronically filed by Jon F. Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio. | 51 |
| 06/25/2008 | Motion for declaratory ruling and memorandum in support electronically filed by Stephen M Howard on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. | 36 |
| 04/02/2008 | Entry on rehearing stating that AT&T's application for rehearing is denied in its entirety; that Sprint's motion for protective order is granted for an 18 month period. | 9 |
| 04/02/2008 | Service Notice | 3 |
| 03/27/2008 | Ruling of the Administrative Law Judge of California granting motions filed by J. Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio. | 7 |
| 03/14/2008 | Memorandum contra AT&T Ohio's application for rehearing and request for clarification filed by A. Gomaz on behalf of Sprint Nextel Corporation. | 79 |
| 03/14/2008 | Motion for protective order and memorandum to support filed by S. Howard on behalf of Sprint Nextel Corporation. | 9 |
| 03/14/2008 | Confidential document: Confidential version of FCC Pleading filed by S. Howard on behalf of Sprint Communications' Company LP. et al. | 1 |
| 03/04/2008 | Application for rehearing, request for clarification, and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by M. Fenlon. | 70 |
| 02/05/2008 | Service Notice | 3 |
| 02/05/2008 | Finding and order permitting Sprint to port to Ohio the BellSouth ICA, subject to state specific modifications and denying AT&T's motion to dismiss. | 16 |
| 11/29/2007 | Reply brief in support of motion to dismiss the complaint, filed by D. Friedman on behalf of AT&T Ohio. | 20 |
| 11/26/2007 | Service Notice. | 3 |
| 11/26/2007 | Entry ordering that AT&T's motion to extend the time to file a reply to Sprint's memorandum contra is granted. AT&T may file a reply on November 29, 2007. (LDJ) | 2 |
| 11/21/2007 | Motion of AT&T Ohio for an extension of time and request for expedited ruling filed by J. Kelly. | 4 |
| 11/19/2007 | Memorandum contra in response to AT&T of Ohio's motion to dismiss electronically filed by Stephen M Howard on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. | 49 |
| 11/02/2007 | AT&T Ohio's motion to dismiss the complaint filed by M. Fenlon. | 55 |
| 11/02/2007 | AT&T Ohio's answer to complaint filed by M. Fenlon. | 6 |
| 11/01/2007 | Service notice. | 2 |
| 11/01/2007 | Entry ordering AT&T's request to extend the time to file an answer and any other responsive pleading to November 2, 2007 is granted. (L.D.J.) | 2 |
| 10/31/2007 | AT&T Ohio's motion for an extension of time and request for expedited ruling filed by J. Kelly. | 3 |
| 10/26/2007 | Application continued. (Part 7 of 7) | 116 |
| 10/26/2007 | Application continued. (Part 6 of 7) | 186 |
| 10/26/2007 | Application continued. (Part 5 of 7) | 208 |
| 10/26/2007 | Application continued. (Part 4 of 7) | 198 |
| 10/26/2007 | Application continued. (Part 3 of 7) | 198 |
| 10/26/2007 | Application continued. (Part 2 of 7) | 198 |
| 10/26/2007 | In the matter of the Carrier to Carrier complaint and request for expedited ruling of Sprint Communications Company, L.P., Sprint Spectrum L.P., Nextel West Corp., and NPCR, Inc., complainant vs. The Ohio Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T Ohio, respondent relative to the adoption of an interconnection agreement with The Ohio Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T of Ohio. (Part 1 of 7) | 204 |