DIS - Case Record for 07-1100-TP-CSS Skip to main content

Case Record For:

07-1100-TP-CSS

File a Public Comment
Case Title: VERIZON NORTH INC ET AL
Status: CL-CLOSED
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 10/5/2007
Date Closed: 5/9/2013
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
05/09/2013Memo closing case with an effective date of 5/3/2013. 1
05/01/2013Service Notice4
05/01/2013Entry ordered, that the complaint be dismissed consistent with Finding (8).3
04/18/2013Notice of Withdrawal of Complaint filed by Barth E. Royer on behalf of the Complainant. 3
02/24/2011Service Notice4
02/23/2011Entry ordering that the complaint proceeding be held in abeyance in accordance with Finding (6).3
01/08/2008Motion to strike, memorandum in support and memorandum contra Verizon motion for leave to file surreply on behalf of Windstream Ohio, Inc. and Windstream Western Reserve, Inc. fled by W. Adams.6
12/31/2007Memorandum contra Verizon's motion for leave to file surreply instanter by the office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by D. Bergmann.7
12/21/2007Motion for leave to file surreply instanter to reply memoranda of CenturyTel, Windstream, and OCC, memorandum in support filed by B. Royer on behalf of Verizon.6
12/21/2007Surreply to reply memorandum of CenturyTel, Windstream, and OCC filed by B. Royer on behalf of Verizon.8
12/07/2007Reply memorandum of Windstream Ohio, Inc. and Windstream Western Reserve, Inc. to Verizon's memorandum contra to the motions to dismiss of CenturyTel and Windstream filed by W. Adams.9
12/07/2007Reply memorandum filed on behalf of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel by D. Bergmann.8
12/07/2007Reply memorandum in support of motion to dismiss filed by C. Simshaw on behalf of CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc.11
11/29/2007Service notice.4
11/29/2007Entry granting OCC's intervention and respondents motion for an extension in accordance with Finding (6). (JSA)3
11/28/2007Motion for extension of time and request for expedited ruling of Windstream Ohio, Inc., Windstream Western Reserve, Inc., and CentruyTel of Ohio, Inc. and memorandum in support filed by W. Adams.6
11/19/2007Memorandum of Verizon North, Inc. contra motions to dismiss of CenturyTel and Windstream filed by B. Royer.11
11/19/2007Letter stating that the Commission should act expeditiously to resolve this matter filed by B. Aron on behalf of Sprint Nextel Corporation.3
11/07/2007Motion to intervene, initial comments and memorandum in support by the office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by D. Bergmann.10
11/01/2007Answer and motion to dismiss of Windstream Ohio, Inc. and Windstream Western Reserve, Inc. filed by W. Adams.15
10/31/2007CenturyTel of Ohio's answer and affirmative defenses and their motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed by C. Simshaw.21
10/30/2007Motion and memorandum in support for admission pro hac vice of Calvin K Simshaw, filed by D. Conway.3
10/12/2007Complaint response letter and copy of brochure mailed to : Cassandra Cole, complainant. 1
10/12/2007Complaint service letter and copy of complaint mailed to : Kathy Hobbs, Windstream Ohio, Inc.1
10/12/2007Complaint service letter and copy of complaint mailed to : Ted Hankins, CerturyTel of Ohio.1
10/05/2007In the matter of the complaint of Verizon North Inc., MCImetro Access Transmission Services LLC dba Verizon, Access Transmission Services, MCI Communications Services, Inc. dba Verizon Business Services, Teleconnect Long Distance Services & Systems Co. dba Telecom USA, TTI National, Inc., Bell Atlantic Communications, Inc. dba Verizon Long Distance, NYNEX Long Distance Company dba Verizon Enterprise Solutions, and Verizon Select Services, Inc. dba GTE Long Distance vs.CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc., Windstream Ohio, Inc., and Windstream Western Reserve, Inc., for alleged unjust and unreasonable intrastate switched access charges.14