| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 09/23/2014 | Case Action Form closing case with an effective date of 9/23/2014. electronically filed by Mrs. Donielle Genesky on behalf of PUCO | 2 |
| 09/16/2013 | Notice of withdrawal of Counsel submitted by Assistant Attorney General Stephen A. Reilly on behalf of the Staff of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. electronically filed by Kimberly L Keeton on behalf of Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. | 8 |
| 12/22/2011 | Supreme Court Document The following decision, announcement or notice of action by the Supreme Court of Ohio with respect to this case is provided solely for the information and convenience of the reader, and should not be construed as a part of the record of this case before the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, and may be subject to formal revision before it is published in the Ohio Official Reports. The Court’s opinions from 1992 to the present are available online from the Reporter of Decisions at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/ROD/ - Slip Opinion (Mar. 6, 2003) [Cite as Ohio Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm.,117 Ohio St.3d 301, 2008-Ohio-861.] electronically filed by Kimberly L Keeton on behalf of Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. | 17 |
| 05/19/2011 | Entry that AT&T Ohio's motion to dismiss be granted in accordance with
Finding (11). | 4 |
| 05/19/2011 | Service notice. | 6 |
| 03/01/2011 | Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio | 6 |
| 01/07/2011 | Entry ordered that the protective orders shall be extended in accordance with Finding (5). (JSA) | 2 |
| 01/07/2011 | Service Notice | 6 |
| 12/16/2010 | Correspondence in Support of Motion for Extension of Protective Orders sought by AT&T electronically filed by Carolyn S Flahive on behalf of Verizon Business Services. | 2 |
| 12/16/2010 | Correspondence in Support of AT&T Ohio's Request for an Extension of the Protective Order electronically filed by Teresa Orahood on behalf of Sage Telecom, Inc. | 2 |
| 12/16/2010 | Correspondence in Support of Motion for Extension of Protective Orders sought by AT&T Ohio electronically filed by Carolyn S Flahive on behalf of Verizon Wireless. | 2 |
| 12/14/2010 | Motion for extension of protective orders and memorandum in support electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio. | 11 |
| 07/22/2009 | Service Notice. | 6 |
| 07/22/2009 | Entry ordering that the protective orders shall be extended for an additional 18 months in accordance with Finding (5). (JA) | 3 |
| 07/01/2009 | Letter in support of AT&T's motion for extension of a protective Ooder electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Verizon Business | 2 |
| 07/01/2009 | Letter in support of AT&T's motion for extension of a protective order electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Verizon Wireless | 2 |
| 06/30/2009 | Correspondence in support of AT&T Ohio's motion for an extension of the protective orders electronically filed by Teresa Orahood on behalf of Sage Telecom, Inc. | 2 |
| 06/25/2009 | Motion for extension of protective orders and memorandum in support electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio | 11 |
| 10/20/2008 | Reply to OCC's memorandum contra electronically filed by Mrs. Verneda J. Engram on behalf of AT&T Ohio. | 6 |
| 10/08/2008 | Memorandum Contra AT&T Ohio's Motion for a Protective Order by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Patti Mallarnee on behalf of Etter, Terry L Mr. | 11 |
| 09/25/2008 | Motion for a protective order and memorandum in support, electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio. | 25 |
| 09/12/2008 | Reply to AT&T Ohio's show cause pleading of August 29, 2008 by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Etter, Terry L. and Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel. | 21 |
| 08/29/2008 | AT&T Ohio's response Showing Why Basic Local Exchange Service Alternative Regulation Should Not Be Revoked electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio | 113 |
| 08/18/2008 | Service Notice | 5 |
| 08/15/2008 | Entry ordering that OCC's motions set forth reasonable grounds, consistent with finding (7); that AT&T Ohio should file its show cause pleading and OCC should file its reply in accordance with Finding (7). (JSA) | 4 |
| 07/11/2008 | Reply to AT&T Ohio's Memorandum Contra by The Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Etter, Terry L. and Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel | 21 |
| 07/01/2008 | Memorandum contra OCC's June 13, 2008 motion electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio. | 38 |
| 06/13/2008 | Motion and memorandum in support by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel for an order requiring AT&T Ohio to show cause as to why its alternative regulation Of Basic Local Exchange Service In The Burton, Cheshire, Dresden, Ironton, Lowellville, New Lexington, Rogers and Toronto Exchanges Should Not Be Revoked Pursuant to R.C. 4927.03(C) And Ohio Adm. Code 4901:1-4-12(B) electronically filed by Ms. Deb J. Bingham on behalf of Etter, Terry L. | 22 |
| 04/10/2008 | Reply to AT&T Ohio's memorandum contra filed by T. Etter on behalf of Ohio Consumers' Counsel. | 16 |
| 03/31/2008 | Memorandum contra OCC's March 13, 2008 motion filed by J. Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio. | 33 |
| 03/13/2008 | Motion and memorandum in support for an order requiring AT&T Ohio to show cause as to why its alternative regulation of basic local exchange service in eleven exchanges should not be revoked by the office of the Ohio Consumers' Council filed by T. Etter. | 25 |
| 02/26/2008 | Service Notice | 4 |
| 02/25/2008 | Entry ordered that the protective orders shall be extended for a period of 18 months. (JA) | 2 |
| 02/19/2008 | Motion for extension for protective order and memorandum in support filed by J. Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio. | 12 |
| 05/14/2007 | Supreme Court Transmittal papers filed (S.C. No. 07-0659). | 9 |
| 04/13/2007 | Notice of appeal of appellant the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by D. Bergmann. (Supreme Court No. 07-0659) | 99 |
| 04/12/2007 | Case Action Form electronically filed by Erin E. Scribner on behalf of Public Utilities Commission of Ohio | 2 |
| 04/11/2007 | Case Action Form electronically filed by Erin E. Scribner on behalf of Public Utilities Commission of Ohio | 2 |
| 02/14/2007 | Entry ordered; that the Consumer Groups' application for rehearing is denied, as set forth in this entry; that consistent with our December 20, 2006 Opinion and Order, the record from Case No. 05-1305-TP-ORD should be considered as part of the record in this case, including but not limited to all of the Commission's orders as well as the evidence submitted by the parties in that case. | 24 |
| 02/14/2007 | Service Notice | 11 |
| 01/30/2007 | Letter opposing AT&T Ohio's pending rate increase filed by Doris Skene. | 1 |
| 01/29/2007 | Memorandum contra the Consumers Groups' application for rehearing filed by J. Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio. | 39 |
| 01/24/2007 | Correspondence letter opposing AT&T proposed rate increase filed by Harold D. Friedman. | 2 |
| 01/19/2007 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter, the Appalachian People's Action Coalition by M. Smalz, the Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs, the City of Cleveland by R. Triozzi, the City of Toledo by K. Bruce, the Village of Holland by P. Skaff, the City of Maumee by S. McAdams, the City of Northwood by B. Ballenger, the City of Oregon by P. Goldberg, the City of Perrysburg by P. Gwyn, the City of Sylvania by J. Moan and Lucas County filed by L. Keiffer. | 76 |
| 01/02/2007 | Revised final tariff amendments to PUCO Tariff No. 20, filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by R. Wentz. | 100 |
| 12/20/2006 | Opinion and Order, ordering that AT&T Ohio's application for alternative regulation of BLES and other Tier 1 services is granted in part and denied in part; that Consumer Groups' request for a hearing is denied; that to the extent not addressed in this opinion and order, all other arguments are denied; that the docketing division maintain for 18 months from the date of this entry, all documents filed under seal in conjunction with applicants memorandum contra of October 26, 2006. | 66 |
| 12/20/2006 | Service Notice | 4 |
| 12/04/2006 | Entry ordering that the application be suspended in accordance with Finding (4). (JA) | 2 |
| 12/04/2006 | Service Notice | 3 |
| 10/31/2006 | Reply to AT&T Ohio's memorandum contra filed by T. Etter, OCC; E. Jacobs, Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition; M. Smalz, Appalachian People's Action Coalition; H. Madorsky, City of Cleveland; K. Bruce, City of Toledo; S. McAdams, City of Maumee; B. Ballenger, City of Northwood; P. Goldberg, City of Oregon; P. Gwyn, City of Perrysburg; P. Skaff, Village of Holland; J. Moan, City of Sylvania; L. Keiffer, Lucas County. (public version)
| 45 |
| 10/31/2006 | Confidential target of reply to AT&T Ohio's memorandum contra, filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter, Appalachian People's Action Coalition by M. Smalz, Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs, City of Cleveland by H. Madorsky, City of Toledo by K. Bruce, City of Holland by P. Skaff, City of Maumee by S. McAdams, City of Northwood by B. Ballenger, City of Oregon by P. Goldsberg, City of Perrysville by P. Gwyn, City of Sylvania by J. Moan and Lucas County by L. Keiffer.(45) (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 1 |
| 10/30/2006 | Motion for protective order and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by J. Kelly. | 9 |
| 10/26/2006 | Memorandum contra to the Consumers' Group opposition, filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by J. Kelly. | 61 |
| 10/26/2006 | Confidential attachment 3, 4, and 5 to memorandum contra The Consumers' Group opposition, filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by J. Kelly. (15 pages) | 1 |
| 10/26/2006 | Letter stating attachment 3, 4, and 5 to AT&T Ohio's Memorandum Contra The Consumers' Group opposition, will be filed under seal, filed by J. Kelly. | 3 |
| 10/16/2006 | Confidential document filed under seal on behalf of OCC opposition to AT&T Ohio application filed by J. Migden-Ostrander. (87 pgs) | 1 |
| 10/16/2006 | Confidential document filed under seal: Affidavit of Douglas S. Williams filed by OCC. (149 pgs) | 1 |
| 10/16/2006 | Confidential document filed under seal: Affidavit of Trevor R. Roycroft Ph.D. filed by OCC. (4 pgs) | 1 |
| 10/16/2006 | Affidavit of Douglas S. Williams filed on behalf of OCC. (Part 2 of 2) | 133 |
| 10/16/2006 | Affidavit of Douglas S. Williams filed on behalf of OCC. (Part 1 of 2) | 125 |
| 10/16/2006 | Affidavit of Trevor R. Roycroft, Ph.D. filed on behalf of OCC. | 182 |
| 10/16/2006 | Opposition to AT&T Ohio's application for basic local service alternative regulation; demonstration of why the application should not be granted on behalf of The OCC, by T. Etter, The Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition, by E. Jacobs, The Appalachian People's Action Coalition, by M. Smalz, The City of Cleveland, by R. Triozzi, The City of Toledo, by K. Bruce, The City of Holland, by P. Skaff, the City of Maumee, by S. McAdams, The City of Northwood, by B. Ballenger, The City of Sylvania, by J. Moan and Lucas County, by L. Keiffer. | 94 |
| 09/27/2006 | Entry granting the interlocutory appeal in accordance with Finding (9). | 4 |
| 09/21/2006 | Entry granting in part and denying in part the request for the interlocutory appeal in accordance with Finding (11); that all other arguments and motions are denied. (JSA) | 6 |
| 09/21/2006 | Entry approving AT&T Ohio's motion to amend and supplement its application in accordance with Finding (3); that OCC's motion for an extension of time is granted in accordance with Finding (7); that objections to AT&T Ohio's application are due October 16, 2006; that discovery should proceed in accordance with finding (7) (JSA) | 3 |
| 09/21/2006 | Service Notice | 4 |
| 09/20/2006 | Memorandum of AT&T Ohio contra OCC' s motion for extension of time file by J. Kelly. | 6 |
| 09/18/2006 | Memorandum contra to OCC's interlocutory appeal, filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by J. Kelly. | 7 |
| 09/18/2006 | Attachment to the memorandum in opposition to application for interim review and interlocutory appeal by the office of the Ohio Consumers Counsel, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Extended Territories, LLC by C. Bracken. | 3 |
| 09/18/2006 | Memorandum in opposition to application for interim review and interlocutory appeal by the office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Extended Territories, LLC by D. Hart. | 6 |
| 09/15/2006 | Motion and memorandum in support to modify timeframe for intervenors to file a statement as to why the application should not be granted, request for expedited ruling filed by T. Etter on behalf of Ohio Consumers' Counsel. | 9 |
| 09/13/2006 | Letter correcting typographical errors and information inadvertently omitted from the original filing, filed on behalf of applicant by J. Kelly. | 3 |
| 09/13/2006 | Motion to amend and supplement to application, filed on behalf of applicant by J. Kelly. | 2 |
| 09/13/2006 | Confidential document Exhibit 3 filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by J. Kelly. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (434 pages) | 1 |
| 09/13/2006 | Supplement to application filed on behalf of applicant by J. Kelly. | 106 |
| 09/11/2006 | Application for review and interlocutory appeal and in the alternative, motion for clarification filed by T. Etter on behalf of The Office of the Ohio Consumers Counsel. | 29 |
| 09/08/2006 | Replacement Exhibit 4 for AT&T Ohio's application filed on August 11, 2006 filed by J. Kelly. | 103 |
| 09/07/2006 | Service Notice | 4 |
| 09/06/2006 | Entry ordering that OCC's motion for an extension of time and request for an expedited ruling is granted in accordance with Finding (4). (JSA). | 3 |
| 09/05/2006 | Motion for extension of time, memorandum in support filed by T. Etter on behalf lf the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel. | 7 |
| 09/01/2006 | Entry ordering that the motions for a protective order and the motion for an expedited ruling are granted in accordance with Finding (3); that the docketing division should maintain for 18 months from the date of this entry all documents, that are currently under seal in this proceeding; that the motions for intervention are granted in accordance with Finding (9). (JA) | 5 |
| 09/01/2006 | Service Notice | 4 |
| 08/31/2006 | Joint motion for a protective order and request for expedited ruling and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by M. Fenlon and Cincinnati Bell Extended Territories by D. Hart. | 9 |
| 08/29/2006 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of the Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (original) | 7 |
| 08/25/2006 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (FAX) | 7 |
| 08/25/2006 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of the Northwest Ohio Aggregation Coalition by L. Kovacik (City of Toledo), L. Keiffer (Lucas County), S. McAdams (City of Maumee), B. Ballenger (City of Northwood), P. Goldberg (City of Oregon), J. Moan (City Sylvania), P. Gwyn (City of Perrysburg) and P. Skaff (City of Holland). | 5 |
| 08/25/2006 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of the City of Cleveland by W. Zigli. | 7 |
| 08/24/2006 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of the Appalachian People's Action Coalition (APAC) by M. Smalz. | 6 |
| 08/23/2006 | Letter objecting to the AT&T Ohio rate increase, filed by consumer J. Kriskis. | 1 |
| 08/21/2006 | Request of AT&T Ohio for an extension of time filed by M. Fenlon. | 3 |
| 08/15/2006 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support on behalf of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by T. Etter. | 7 |
| 08/11/2006 | Application Continued. (Part 15 of 20) | 200 |
| 08/11/2006 | Application Continued. (Part 16 of 20) | 200 |
| 08/11/2006 | Application Continued. (Part 18 of 20) | 150 |
| 08/11/2006 | Motion for a protective order and memorandum in support filed by J. Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio. | 6 |
| 08/11/2006 | Application Continued. (Part 19 of 20) | 200 |
| 08/11/2006 | Application Continued. (Part 11 of 20) | 201 |
| 08/11/2006 | Application Continued. (Part 20 of 20) | 194 |
| 08/11/2006 | Application Continued. (Part 17 of 20) | 201 |
| 08/11/2006 | Application Continued. (Part 14 of 20) | 202 |
| 08/11/2006 | Application Continued. (Part 13 of 20) | 206 |
| 08/11/2006 | Application Continued. (Part 10 of 20) | 200 |
| 08/11/2006 | Application Continued. (Part 9 of 20) | 201 |
| 08/11/2006 | Confidential document: Exhibit 3 filed by J. Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio. | 2 |
| 08/11/2006 | Application Continued. (Part 12 of 20) | 200 |
| 08/11/2006 | Application Continued. (Part 8 of 20) | 200 |
| 08/11/2006 | Application Continued (Part 7 of 20) | 200 |
| 08/11/2006 | Application Continued. (Part 6 of 20) | 199 |
| 08/11/2006 | Application Continued. (Part 5 of 20) | 200 |
| 08/11/2006 | Application Continued. (Part 4 of 20) | 200 |
| 08/11/2006 | Application Continued. (Part 3 of 20) | 201 |
| 08/11/2006 | Application Continued. (Part 2 of 20) | 201 |
| 08/11/2006 | In the matter of the application and memorandum in support of application of The Ohio Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T Ohio for approval of an alternative form of regulation of basic local exchange and other tier 1 services pursuant to Chapter 4901:1-4, Ohio Administrative Code. (Part 1 of 20) | 200 |