DIS - Case Record for 06-0915-TP-ORD Skip to main content

Case Record For:

06-0915-TP-ORD

Case Title: MATTER OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RULES CONCERNING ENHANCED 911 PURSUANT TO HB 361
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: ORD-Administrative order
Date Opened: 7/18/2006
Date Closed: 8/29/2008
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
08/29/2008Case Action Form electronically filed by Erin E. Scribner on behalf of Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.2
04/25/2007Finding and order stating that Rule 4901:1-8-02, O.A.C., is modified in accordance with finding (3) and that the attached revised Rule 4901:1-8-02 (Appendix A) is hereby adopted.3
04/25/2007Service Notice5
01/17/2007Service Notice25
01/17/2007Entry on rehearing granting in part and denying in part its application; that the attached proposed rules (Appendix A) for Chapter 4901:1-8, as modified, are adopted; that the adopted rules be effective on the earliest day permitted by law, unless otherwise ordered by the Commission.22
12/20/2006Service Notice6
12/20/2006Entry on rehearing, ordering that the applications for rehearing by the entities enumerated in Finding (3) are granted.2
12/05/2006Request for rehearing of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC and Cincinnati Bell Wireless LLC filed by J. Brenzel.7
12/01/2006Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ohio Telecom Association by T. Lodge.8
12/01/2006Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Verizon Wireless by C. Flahive.8
12/01/2006Joint application for rehearing of Sprint Nextel Corporation and T-Mobile USA, and memorandum in support filed by S. Howard.12
12/01/2006Application of Verizon for rehearing filed by T. Lodge.7
12/01/2006Application for rehearing of new Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, Cincinnati SMS Limited Partnership and McLang Cellular Telephone Company filed by J. Lang.7
12/01/2006Application for rehearing of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC. and Cincinnati Bell Wireless LLC. filed by J. Brenzel. (FAX)7
12/01/2006Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed by AT&T Ohio filed by J. Kelly.32
11/30/2006Application for rehearing of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Embarq and Embarq Communications, Inc. filed by J. Stewart.6
11/01/2006Service Notice23
11/01/2006Service Notice4
11/01/2006Opinion and Order; ordered that new Chapter 4901:1-8, O.A.C. as set forth in the appendix to this opinion and order, is hereby adopted; that to the extend not addressed in this opinion and order or the attached appendix, all other arguments raised are denied.24
09/15/2006Reply comments filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by J. Kelly.13
09/15/2006Reply comments of the Ohio Telecom Association filed by T. Lodge.4
09/15/2006Reply comments of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership, and McLang Cellular Telephone Company filed by P. Rosato.5
09/15/2006Reply comments of the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association by G. Russell.6
09/13/2006Comments regarding the 9-1-1 data base, filed on behalf of Hamilton County Board of Commissioners by G. Wenz.2
08/30/2006Certificate of Service filed on behalf of Verizon Wireless by T. Lodge.3
08/30/2006Certificate of Service filed on behalf of Ohio Telecom Association by T. Lodge.3
08/30/2006Certificate of Service filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. and MCImetro Access Transmission Services LLC by T. Lodge.3
08/24/2006Certificate of Service, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC and Cincinnati Bell Wireless LLC by J. Brenzel. (original)3
08/23/2006Certificate of Service filed on behalf of Embarq by J. Stewart.1
08/23/2006Certificate of service, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC and Cincinnati Bell Wireless LLC by J. Brenzel. (FAX)3
08/21/2006Comments of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio, LLC filed by T. O'Brien.2
08/21/2006Comments of Verizon Wireless filed by T. Lodge5
08/21/2006Comments of Verizon North, Inc. and MCImetro Access Transmission Services, LLC filed by T. Lodge.9
08/21/2006Initial comments of AT&T Ohio filed by M. Fenlon.5
08/21/2006Comments of Ohio Telecom Association filed by T.Lodge.3
08/21/2006Comments of Sprint Nextel Corporation filed by W. Newcomb, Jr.7
08/21/2006Initial comments of T-Mobile USA filed by S. Howard.3
08/21/2006Initial comments of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Embarq and Embarq Communications, Inc. filed by J. Stewart.14
08/21/2006Comments of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, LLC and Cincinnati Bell Wireless, LLC filed by J. Brenzel.4
08/17/2006Service Notice50
08/17/2006Entry ordered that an extension of time is granted; reply comments now due on September 15, 2006. (JJ)2
08/16/2006Motion for extension of time and request for expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed by T. Lodge on behalf of Verizon Wireless.4
07/27/2006Service Notice62
07/26/2006Entry ordering that interested persons and entities are hereby authorized to file initial comments by August 21, 2006 and reply comments by September 1, 2006.12
07/18/2006In the matter of the Implementation of Rules Concerning Enhanced 9-1-1 Pursuant to H.B. 361.1