|
08/23/2006
|
Service Notice |
|
08/23/2006
|
Entry granting CCB's motion; that complaint is dismissed without prejudice and case closed of record. |
|
08/02/2006
|
Motion for leave to dismiss its complaint filed by M. Dortch on behalf of complainant. |
|
06/27/2006
|
Service Notice |
|
06/26/2006
|
Entry ordering that a telephonic conference be held on July 11, 2006, at 1:30 p.m. at 614-644-1099. (LDJ) |
|
12/21/2005
|
Entry ordering that a telephone conference be scheduled for February 28, 2006, at 1:30 p.m. (LJ) |
|
12/21/2005
|
Service notice. |
|
12/20/2005
|
Notice of change of address filed by M. Dortch on behalf of CCB Ohio, LLC. |
|
11/30/2005
|
Service Notice |
|
11/29/2005
|
Entry ordered that a conference by telephone be held in this matter on December 8, 2005, at 1:30 P.M. (LDJ) |
|
10/18/2005
|
Entry ordered that a settlement conference be held on November 10, 2005, at 1:30 pm in hearing room 11-G of the offices of the Commission, at 180 East Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43215-3793; that Cincinnati Bell, Inc. is dismissed as a party to this action. (LJ) |
|
10/18/2005
|
Service Notice |
|
10/17/2005
|
Answer to amended complaint and response to motion for leave to amend filed by D. Hart on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, LLC. |
|
09/30/2005
|
Motion for leave to amend complaint to identify the respondent as Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, LLC filed by M. Dortch on behalf of CCB Ohio, LLC dba Current Communications. |
|
09/30/2005
|
Amended complaint of CCB Ohio , LLC dba Current Communications seeking a determination by the Commission that the pole attachment procedures used by Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company are unreasonable and discriminatory in their application filed by M. Dortch. |
|
09/20/2005
|
Answer of CCB Ohio, LLC dba Current Communications filed by D. Hart. |
|
08/31/2005
|
Complaint service letter and copy of complaint mailed to D. Ringo, CBT. |
|
08/04/2005
|
In the matter of the complaint of CCB Ohio LLC dba CURRENT Communications (vs) Cincinnati Bell Telephone for the alleged pole attachment procedures are unreasonable and discriminatory. |