Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
04/20/2005 | Entry closing cases consistent with the time frame set forth in finding (6). | 4 |
04/20/2005 | Service Notice | 3 |
04/04/2005 | Additional information filed by A. Hansel on behalf of Covad Communications Company . | 6 |
07/28/2004 | Entry on Rehearing, ordered that Verizon North has standing for the purpose of the filing an application for rehearing, that the Finding and Order of June 15, 2004 is clarified pursuant to Finding (15), that Verizon North file the applicable interconnection agreement amendments consistent with Finding (15), that to the extent not specifically addressed herein, all other arguments raised in the application for rehearing are denied. | 9 |
07/28/2004 | Service Notice | 4 |
07/23/2004 | Submission of supplemental authority in support of the request for clarification or, alternatively, application for rehearing filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by T. Lodge. | 12 |
07/19/2004 | Reply memorandum in support of request for clarification or, alternatively, application for rehearing filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by T. Lodge. | 10 |
07/12/2004 | Memorandum contra of XO Ohio, Inc., CoreComm NewCo, Inc., KMC Telecom III, LLC, Time Warner Telecom of Ohio, LP, LDMI Telecommunications, Inc., Covad Communications Company, Nuvox Communications of Ohio, Inc. MCIMetro Access Transmission Services LLC, AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc, and TCG Ohio by M. Dortch, S. Bloomfield, J. Sanders, J. Denniston, and D. Trabaris. | 14 |
06/30/2004 | Request for clarification or, alternatively, application for rehearing, filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by T. Lodge. | 16 |
06/16/2004 | Service Notice | 52 |
06/15/2004 | Finding and order that SBC, Verizon, and any other ILEC offering UNE-P or UNEs impacted by the D.C. Circuit's decision in USTA II comply with finding 11. | 5 |
06/15/2004 | Additional information filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by T. Lodge. | 6 |
06/09/2004 | Certificate of service filed by L. Hayduk on behalf of Sprint. | 3 |
06/08/2004 | Certificate of Service for comments filed on June 7, 2004 on behalf of First Communications LLC by J. Donovan. | 22 |
06/07/2004 | Response to Commission's May 27, 2004 Docket Entry filed on behalf of Sprint by J. Stewart. | 8 |
06/07/2004 | Comments filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by T. Lodge. | 15 |
06/07/2004 | Comments filed on behalf of Office of the Ohio Consumers Counsel by J. Serio. | 10 |
06/07/2004 | Comments filed on behalf of ACN Communication Services, Inc., Adelphi Business Solutions Operations, Inc. dba TelCove; Choice One Communications of Ohio, Inc.; CoreComm Newco, Inc. and Focal Communications Corporation (collectively the Commenters) by R. Blau. | 23 |
06/07/2004 | Motion for the entry of orders permitting appearances of Pro Hac Vice and affidavits in support of motion filed by M. Dortch | 9 |
06/07/2004 | Response to the Commission's May 27, 2004 entry filed by M. Dortch for XO Ohio, Inc.; T. O'Brien for Time Warner Telecom of Ohio, LP, LDMI Telecommunications, Inc., Covad Communications Company, and NuVox Communications of Ohio, Inc.; D. Trabaris for AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. and TCG Ohio; J. Sanders for MCI. | 44 |
05/28/2004 | Service Notice | 3 |
05/27/2004 | Entry ordered that comments addressing the issues identified should be filed in accordance with Finding (6). | 4 |
03/03/2004 | Entry ordering that all future hearings previously scheduled in these dockets be postponed and held in abeyance until further notice. (JA) | 3 |
03/03/2004 | Motion to dismiss and motion for immediate stay proceedings; request for expedited ruling filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. | 7 |
03/03/2004 | Response to OCC's motion to dismiss; motion for immediate stay of proceedings and request for expedited ruling filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by D. Hart. | 5 |
02/26/2004 | CONTINUED-Confidential discovery responses from competitive local exchange carriers resulting from the staff managed discovery process filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (PART 22 OF 22) | 210 |
02/26/2004 | CONTINUED-Confidential discovery responses from competitive local exchange carriers resulting from the staff managed discovery process filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (PART 12 OF 22) | 200 |
02/26/2004 | Letter informing that a hard copy and diskette of the confidential discovery responses from competitive local exchange carriers resulting the staff manage discovery process has been filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. | 1 |
02/26/2004 | CONTINUED-Confidential discovery responses from competitive local exchange carriers resulting from the staff managed discovery process filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (PART 21 OF 22) | 200 |
02/26/2004 | Confidential Testimony of Patricia A. Tanner on behalf of The Office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by J. Serio. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 18 |
02/26/2004 | Confidential testimony of Karen J. Hardie on behalf of The Office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by J. Serio. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 44 |
02/26/2004 | CONTINUED-Confidential discovery responses from competitive local exchange carriers resulting from the staff managed discovery process filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (PART 20 OF 22) | 198 |
02/26/2004 | CONTINUED-Confidential discovery responses from competitive local exchange carriers resulting from the staff managed discovery process filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (PART 14 OF 22) | 200 |
02/26/2004 | CONTINUED-Confidential discovery responses from competitive local exchange carriers resulting from the staff managed discovery process filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (PART 19 OF 22) | 200 |
02/26/2004 | CONTINUED-Confidential discovery responses from competitive local exchange carriers resulting from the staff managed discovery process filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (PART 18 OF 22) | 201 |
02/26/2004 | CONTINUED-Confidential discovery responses from competitive local exchange carriers resulting from the staff managed discovery process filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (PART 13 OF 22) | 199 |
02/26/2004 | CONTINUED-Confidential discovery responses from competitive local exchange carriers resulting from the staff managed discovery process filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (PART 11 OF 22) | 196 |
02/26/2004 | CONTINUED-Confidential discovery responses from competitive local exchange carriers resulting from the staff managed discovery process filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (PART 17 OF 22) | 201 |
02/26/2004 | CONTINUED-Confidential discovery responses from competitive local exchange carriers resulting from the staff managed discovery process filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (PART 10 OF 22) | 200 |
02/26/2004 | CONTINUED-Confidential discovery responses from competitive local exchange carriers resulting from the staff managed discovery process filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (PART 16 OF 22) | 202 |
02/26/2004 | CONTINUED-Confidential discovery responses from competitive local exchange carriers resulting from the staff managed discovery process filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (PART 15 OF 22) | 202 |
02/26/2004 | CONTINUED-Confidential discovery responses from competitive local exchange carriers resulting from the staff managed discovery process filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (PART 9 OF 22) | 200 |
02/26/2004 | CONTINUED-Confidential discovery responses from competitive local exchange carriers resulting from the staff managed discovery process filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (PART 8 OF 22) | 200 |
02/26/2004 | CONTINUED-Confidential discovery responses from competitive local exchange carriers resulting from the staff managed discovery process filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (PART 7 OF 22) | 201 |
02/26/2004 | CONTINUED-Confidential discovery responses from competitive local exchange carriers resulting from the staff managed discovery process filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (PART 6 OF 22) | 203 |
02/26/2004 | CONTINUED-Confidential discovery responses from competitive local exchange carriers resulting from the staff managed discovery process filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (PART 5 OF 22) | 197 |
02/26/2004 | CONTINUED-Confidential discovery responses from competitive local exchange carriers resulting from the staff managed discovery process filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (PART 4 OF 22) | 204 |
02/26/2004 | CONTINUED-Confidential discovery responses from competitive local exchange carriers resulting from the staff managed discovery process filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (PART 3 OF 22) | 202 |
02/26/2004 | CONTINUED-Confidential discovery responses from competitive local exchange carriers resulting from the staff managed discovery process filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (PART 2 OF 22) | 199 |
02/26/2004 | Confidential discovery responses from competitive local exchange carriers resulting from the staff managed discovery process filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (PART 1 OF 22) | 201 |
02/26/2004 | Confidential Testimony of Timothy J. Gates on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. and TCG Ohio, Inc. by S. Howard. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 3 |
02/26/2004 | Redacted version of testimony of Patricia A. Tanner on behalf of the Office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel. | 19 |
02/26/2004 | Testimony of F. Ross Pultz on behalf of the Office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel. | 15 |
02/26/2004 | Redacted version of Testimony of Karen J. Hardie on behalf of The Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel. | 44 |
02/26/2004 | Certificate of service of Confidential version of the direct testimony of Timothy J. Gates filed by S. Howard. | 3 |
02/26/2004 | Motion for a protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. filed by S. Howard. | 7 |
02/26/2004 | Direct Testimony of Dr. Jeffrey I. Rosenblum filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. and TCG Ohio. | 41 |
02/26/2004 | Direct testimony of Timothy J. Gates on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. and TCG Ohio. (public version) | 67 |
02/26/2004 | Deposition of Susan Maggard taken November 24, 2004 filed on behalf of interveners by J. Serio. | 108 |
02/24/2004 | Application for rehearing or in the alternative, motion for clarification of the office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by D. Bergmann. | 9 |
02/24/2004 | Executed Exhibits A and B to the protective order issued October 28, 2003 filed by J. Sanders. | 5 |
02/23/2004 | Deposition of Larry F. Darby on behalf of The Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, AT&T Communications of Ohio, The Staff of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio and The Residential Consumers of the Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company. | 213 |
02/23/2004 | Exhibits A and B signed by Frederick Ross Pulz associated with the protective order adopted on October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Winkler. | 6 |
02/19/2004 | Executed exhibits A and B signed William H. Courter, Esq. and Robin R. McVeigh of McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services. | 8 |
02/18/2004 | Letter requesting to be removed as a party to these proceedings, that they do not currently have any local exchange services in the State of Ohio, filed on behalf of CTC Communications Corp. by W. Ward. | 1 |
02/13/2004 | Executed Exhibits A and B, filed on behalf of KMC Telecom III, LLC by D. Ferris. | 5 |
02/13/2004 | Executed Exhibits A and B, filed on behalf of First Communications, LLC by D. Ferris. | 5 |
02/13/2004 | Executed Exhibits A and B, filed on behalf of Integrated Communications Solutions, Inc. by D. Ferris. | 5 |
02/13/2004 | Comments on ruling of Entry on Rehearing issued on February 4, 2004, on Motions for Clarification, or in the alternative, applications for rehearing filed by the OCC and a group of competitive local exchange carriers, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. | 4 |
02/12/2004 | Additional executed Exhibits A and B associated with protective order adopted on October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly. | 5 |
02/12/2004 | Executed Exhibits A and B of the Protective Order, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by D. Trabaris. | 9 |
02/06/2004 | In response to request for paper copies of the documents on disks with Motion for Protective Order filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by D. Hart. | 53 |
02/06/2004 | CBT Network model report filed confidential. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 15 |
02/04/2004 | Entry on rehearing granted in part and denied in part, nonparties are required to answer clarifying discovery requests and bring them to the Commission for resolution. | 6 |
02/04/2004 | Service Notice | 3 |
02/03/2004 | Prefiled Direct Testimony of Douglas B. Maxwell on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company. | 15 |
02/03/2004 | Motion for a protective order filed by D. Hart on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company. | 5 |
02/03/2004 | Testimony of Larry F. Darby on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, Inc. | 131 |
02/02/2004 | Executed Exhibits A and B of the protective order for the signatories to gain access to Confidential and restricted access information filed by D. Trabaris on behalf of AT&T. | 3 |
01/30/2004 | Motion for clarification, or in the alternative, application for rehearing of the Commission's January 14, 2004 opinion and order filed by D. Bergmann. | 11 |
01/29/2004 | Entry ordering that the markets for Cincinnati Bell's and SBC Ohio's impairment analysis proceeding scheduled to begin on March 15,2004 will be limited to Markets 1, 2, 3, and 4 as identified in Appendix B of the Commission opinion and order of 1/14,2004 and that a pre-hearing telephonic conference be set for Tuesday, February 3,2004 at 2:00PM and that ACN shall be granted intervention. (JA) | 3 |
01/27/2004 | Letter notifying that McLeodUSA does not intend to participate in case # 04-35-TP-COI as well as testimony of Patty Lynott on behalf of McLeodUSA
Telecommunications Services and SBC Ohio's mass market proceeding case # 04-34-TP-COI filed by M. Christensen. | 19 |
01/26/2004 | Memo stating that Bulleye Telecom Inc. does not intend to participate in the proceedings for 03-2040-TP-COI. | 1 |
01/26/2004 | Letter herby notifying the Commission that Covad Communications Company does not intend to participate in the 03-2040-TP-COI proceedings. | 1 |
01/26/2004 | Letter hereby notifying the Commission that LDMI Telecommunications, Inc. does not intend to participate in the 03-2040-TP-COI proceedings. | 1 |
01/23/2004 | Joint motion for clarification, or in the alternative, application of rehearing of the Commission's January 14, 2004 Opinion and Order, filed on behalf of LDMI Telecommunications, Inc., Dieca Communications, Inc. dba Covad Communications Company by S. Bloomfield, for Sprint Communications Company, L.P by J. Stewart, for AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. and TCG Ohio by D. Trabaris, for Sage Telecom, Inc and Talk American Inc. by H. Kelly and S. Howard, for MCImetro Access Transmission Services, LLC and MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc. by J. Sanders. | 11 |
01/23/2004 | Exhibits A and B signed by A.Streetman and S. Hopkins associated with the protective order adopted of October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Winkler. | 8 |
01/22/2004 | Additional executed Exhibits A and B to the protective order issued on October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of MCI by J. Sanders. | 9 |
01/14/2004 | Opinion and Order, ordering that the tentative market definition established in the Opinion and Order be utilized by all parties in both of the trigger and potential deployment tests for SBC Ohio and Cincinnati Bell respectively, that SBC Ohio and Cincinnati Bell shall be granted until January 21, 2004, to file revised wire center lists relative to the respective subsequent impairment analysis, that SBC Ohio and Cincinnati Bell, and intervenors file their testimony consistent this Opinion and Order, ordered that SBC Ohio and Cincinnati Bell's impairment and batch hot cut analysis be addressed in 04-34 and 04-35, respectively, ordered that the interventions granted in this case carry over into Case No. 04-34 and 04-35. | 85 |
01/13/2004 | Motion for leave to intervene, filed on behalf of ACN Communications Services, Inc. by R. Sugarman. | 6 |
01/13/2004 | Additional executed Exhibits A and B associated with the protective order adopted by the Commission on October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by D. Hart. | 7 |
01/12/2004 | Proposed prices for the batch hot cut processes, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly. | 4 |
01/12/2004 | In the matter of the implementation of the Federal Communications Commission's Triennial Review regarding local circuit switching in Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company's mass market. | 1 |
01/12/2004 | Confidential Cost study in support of its proposed batch hot cut prices, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 26 |
01/09/2004 | Petition for Joint CLECS for resolution of disputed issues regarding SBC's proposed batch hot cut process and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. and TCG Ohio by D. Chorzempa, COVAD Communications Company, Sage Telecom, Inc., Talk America, Inc. Corecomm Newco., Inc. by T. O'Brien, MCImetro Access Transmission Services, LLC, MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc. by J. Sanders, McLeod USA by W. Courter. | 45 |
01/08/2004 | Executed Acknowledgment of Confidentiality and Exhibits A and B to the Protective Order issued on October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco, Inc. by T. O'Brien. | 14 |
01/06/2004 | Joint status report on multi-state batch hot cut collaborative results filed on behalf of interveners by J. Kelly. | 131 |
12/30/2003 | Objections to the PUCO Entry dated 12/17/2003 filed on behalf of ChoiceOne Communications by A. Mastando. | 2 |
12/30/2003 | Entry ordering that Choice One's objection regarding time to respond to discovery is granted, in part, and denied in part, instead of fourteen calendar days, it will be ten calendar days. Choice One's objection regarding consolidation of the discovery process is denied, and that all parties are encouraged to coordinate discovery requests pursuant to the Commissions entry dated 12/17/2003, the Commission is not currently engaged in managed discovery.This entry should be served upon all competitive local exchange companies, interexchange companies, incumbent local exchange companies relative to any granted edge out authority or out-of-territory authority. | 51 |
12/29/2003 | Reply brief regarding geographic markets, filed on behalf of MCI by J. Sanders. | 33 |
12/29/2003 | Reply brief filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by D. Hart. | 23 |
12/29/2003 | Reply brief filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company, L.P. by J. Stewart. | 13 |
12/29/2003 | Reply brief, filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter. | 32 |
12/29/2003 | Confidential amended prefiled direct testimony of Susan J. Maggard and deposition exhibit 2 (attachment A) (FILED UNDER SEAL) Originally filed 12/23/03. | 3 |
12/29/2003 | Confidential amended prefiled direct testimony of Susan J. Maggard and deposition exhibit 2 (attachment A) (originally filed 12/23/03). FILED UNDER SEAL. | 5 |
12/29/2003 | Allegiance Telecom of Ohio Inc.'s reply brief filed by J. Gockley. | 12 |
12/29/2003 | Reply brief on market definition phase, filed on behalf of AT&T by D. Trabaris and Corecomm by S. Bloomfield. | 19 |
12/29/2003 | Reply brief on market definition, filed on behalf of Sage Telecom, Inc. and Talk America Inc. by R. Sugarman. | 24 |
12/29/2003 | Reply brief concerning geographic market definition, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by M. Fenlon. | 42 |
12/29/2003 | Transcript w/exhibits of hearing held December 11, 2003 before Commission staff. (JA) Vol. III. | 225 |
12/26/2003 | Objections to the PUCO entry dated December 17,2003 filed on behalf of US Xchange of Ohio Inc. dba Choice One Communications filed by A. Mastando.(FAX) | 2 |
12/26/2003 | Response to Choice One Communications objections, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly. | 3 |
12/24/2003 | Transcript cont'd. (part 2 of 2) | 166 |
12/24/2003 | Transcript of hearing held before Commission staff, December 10, 2003, at the Commission. (JA) (Vol. II) part 1 of 2). | 175 |
12/23/2003 | Transcript of hearing held December 9, 2003, at the Commission. (JA) (Vol. 1) | 300 |
12/22/2003 | Executed Exhibits A and B associated with the Protective Order adopted October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by R. Sugarman. | 25 |
12/22/2003 | Executed Exhibits A and B associated with the protective order adopted on October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of The Northridge Group by R. Sugarman. | 15 |
12/22/2003 | Initial brief filed on behalf of Allegiance Telecom of Ohio, Inc. by J. Gockley. (original copy) | 24 |
12/19/2003 | Initial brief filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. | 47 |
12/19/2003 | Initial brief, filed on behalf of Allegiance Telecom of Ohio, Inc. by J. Gockley. (FAX) | 24 |
12/19/2003 | Initial brief of Sage Telecom, Inc. and Talk America Inc. by J. Donovan. | 20 |
12/19/2003 | Initial brief concerning geographic market definition, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J.Kelly. | 51 |
12/19/2003 | Initial brief filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by D. Hart. | 20 |
12/19/2003 | Market Definition phase brief, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc.D. Trabaris and Corecomm Newco, Inc. by S. Bloomfield. | 26 |
12/19/2003 | Initial brief regarding definition of the market, filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company, LP by J. Stewart. | 8 |
12/19/2003 | Initial brief regarding geographic markets, filed on behalf of MCI by J. Sanders. | 45 |
12/19/2003 | Entry ordering hearing for March 8, 2004, at 10:00 a.m. at the offices of the Commission, that the manner in which disputed batch hot cut issues should be raised is clarified in accordance with Finding (2), that the joint status report filed on or before January 6, 2003, that SBC Ohio file its proposed batch hot cut prices and cost study on or before January 12, 2004, that petitions seeking resolution of disputed batch hot cut issues should be filed on or before January 9, 2003, that SBC Ohio should file its answer to a filed petition within 10 calendar days of being served with a pleading, that SBC Ohio and intervenors shall file direct testimonies regarding the batch hot cost issues on January 27, 2004. (JA) | 3 |
12/18/2003 | Service Notice | 59 |
12/17/2003 | Entry ordering that, if appropriate, all parties and telephone companies should file objections by December 26, 2003; that, in the absence of the filing of objections, electronic and hard copy access of the data responses from the first phase of this proceeding shall occur consistent with Finding 5; that, for the impairment phase of this proceeding, party-initiated discovery shall proceed in accordance with Finding 6. | 4 |
12/04/2003 | Additional discovery questions, filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company, LP by J. Stewart. | 5 |
12/04/2003 | Motion for admission Pro Hac Vice of Dennis G. Friedman, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly. | 4 |
12/04/2003 | Supplemental filing to the deposition of Timothy J. Tardiff. | 5 |
12/04/2003 | Exhibits A and B of the protective order in order for the signatories to gain access to both confidential and restricted access information by D. Trabaris on behalf of AT&T Communications. | 5 |
12/03/2003 | Executed Exhibits A and B and an acknowledgement of confidentiality associated with the protective order adopted on October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of Allegiance Telecom of Ohio, Inc. by J. Gockley. | 6 |
12/03/2003 | Exhibits A and B associated with the protective order adopted by the Commission on October 28, 2003 filed by J. Kelly on behalf of SBC Ohio. | 11 |
12/02/2003 | Motion to revise protective order and memorandum in support so as to make electronic copies available: and request for expedited ruling, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Winkler. | 10 |
12/02/2003 | Executed Exhibit A and B associated with the Protective Order adopted on October 28, 2003 for Mark A. Stachiw and Lawrence E. Strickling, filed on behalf of Allegiance Telecom of Ohio, Inc. by G. Leegar. | 7 |
12/01/2003 | Testimony, Appendix and Maps of Ben Johnson, PhD. on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. | 66 |
12/01/2003 | Testimony of Kathy L. Hagans on behalf of the OCC by J. Serio.. | 32 |
12/01/2003 | Testimony of Emily E. Binder on behalf of Sprint Communications Company, L.P. dba Sprint. | 10 |
12/01/2003 | Testimony of Terry L. Murray, filed on behalf of MCImetro Access Transmission Services, LLC and MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc. | 145 |
12/01/2003 | Confidential Testimony of Ben Johnson w/attached maps. (FILED UNDER SEAL). | 19 |
12/01/2003 | Testimony of Joseph Gilland, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. TCG Ohio and Corecomm Newco, Inc. by S. Howard. | 31 |
12/01/2003 | Testimony of A. Daniel Kelley, Charles P. Wehnes and Robert W. McCausland, filed on behalf of Sage Telecom, Inc. and/or Talk America Inc. by R. Sugarman. | 111 |
12/01/2003 | Direct testimony of Lawrence E. Strickling, filed on behalf of applicant by J. Gockley. | 20 |
11/28/2003 | Amended prefiled direct testimony of Susan J. Maggard, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by D. Hart. | 17 |
11/28/2003 | Confidential deposition of Susan Maggard Exhibit 2. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (filed 11/25/03) | 3 |
11/26/2003 | Notice of substitute of counsel filed on behalf of Allegiance Telecom by S. Bloomfield. | 3 |
11/26/2003 | Motion for admission pro hac vice of John Gockley and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Allegiance Telecom by S. Bloomfield. | 4 |
11/25/2003 | Deposition of Susan Maggard. | 113 |
11/25/2003 | Notice of deposition and request for production of documents, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly. | 4 |
11/24/2003 | Deposition of Timothy J. Tardiff w/exhibits (November 19, 2003). | 141 |
11/24/2003 | Confidential portion of deposition of William Deere with exhibits C, D, E, F, and G attached. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 103 |
11/24/2003 | Deposition and exhibits of William C. Deere continued (part 2 of 2) | 163 |
11/24/2003 | Deposition of William C. Deere, w/ exhibits attached. (part 1 of 2) | 150 |
11/24/2003 | Motion for waiver and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company, L.P. by J. Stewart. | 3 |
11/21/2003 | Executed Exhibits A and B associated with the Protective Order, filed on behalf of Sage Telecom, Inc., Talk America, and Z-Tel Communications, Inc. by R. Sugarman. | 41 |
11/20/2003 | Executed Acknowledgment of confidentiality and Exhibits A and B to the Protective Order issued on October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of Allegiance Telecom, Inc. by S. Bloomfield. | 6 |
11/20/2003 | Additional executed Exhibits A and B to the Protective Order issued on October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of Covad Communications Company by T. O'Brien. | 3 |
11/19/2003 | Entry ordering that Movants motion for extension of time is granted in part and denied in part, that Movants request to limit the length of reply briefs is denied, that parties should submit any additional mass market questions in accordance with Finding (7). (JA) | 3 |
11/18/2003 | Motion and memorandum in support for admission pro hac vice of Mark Stachiw and Jeffery J. Binder, filed on behalf of Allegiance Telecom Inc. by S. Bloomfield. | 4 |
11/17/2003 | Exhibit A and B to the Protective Order issued on October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of MCI by J. Sanders. | 5 |
11/14/2003 | Notice of depositions filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco, Inc., Covad Communications Co., LDMI Telecommunications, and Bullseye Telecom by T. O'Brien. | 2 |