DIS - Case Record for 01-0833-TP-PEX Skip to main content

Case Record For:

01-0833-TP-PEX

Case Title: CINDY TENNANT VS. AMERITECH OHIO AND VERIZON NORTH
Status: CL-CLOSED
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: PEX-Petition for extended area service
Date Opened: 4/10/2001
Date Closed: 10/3/2013
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
10/03/2013Case action form closing case effective 10/3/2013.1
07/24/2002Revised tariff, PUCO No. 20, Part 4, Section 1, 4th sheet 20; Section 2, 3rd sheet 11, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by K. Gentile-Klein.3
06/27/2002Revised tariff sheets reflect the establishment of a two-way Extended Local Calling Plan (ELCP) Service between the Verizon exchange of Cambridge and Ameritech's Newcomerstown exchange, filed by T. Cloquitt.3
01/07/2002Letter stating that the in-service date for the installation of two-way measured-rate EAS between Verizon's Cambridge exchange and Ameritech's Newcomerstown exchange will be July 31, 2002 at 5:00 a.m., filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by J. Kennedy.1
11/29/2001Supplemental Opinion & Order that two-way, measured-rate EAS be established between the Newcomerstown Exchange and the Cambridge Exchange; that Ameritech and Verizon establish an in-service date within two months on this order.3
11/29/2001Service notice4
11/14/2001Supplemental information response on behalf of Verizon North Inc. Filed by W. Keating.2
10/24/2001Service Notice.4
10/24/2001Opinion & Order denying the complainants' request for two-way, flat-rate EAS between the Newcomerstown Exchange and the Cambridge Exchange; that the complainants' request for two-way, measured-rate EAS between the Newcomerstown Exchange and the Cambridge Exchange is granted contingent upon the Commission's review of Verizon's cost data.12
10/01/2001Correspondence letters supporting the petition, filed by various consumers.5
08/31/2001Transcript filed for hearing held August 16, 2001, (GS), 90 pgs. (Guernsey, Ohio)138
08/28/2001Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by Mr. and Mrs. Randy Birchfield. (1 pg.)1
08/17/2001Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by Tammy Miller.2
08/15/2001Proof of publication filed. (Tuscarawas County)1
08/14/2001Proof of publication filed. (Guernsey County)2
08/14/2001Proof of publication filed.1
08/13/2001Proof of publication filed. (Muskingum County)1
08/13/2001Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by L. Varner. (1 pg.)1
08/13/2001Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by Linda V. Varner.1
08/10/2001Revised Attachment 2 to the testimony of Ameritech witness Kathleen Gentile-Klein, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by S. Rawlings.2
08/09/2001Testimony and attachments of Patricia J. Cook filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by W. Keating. (FILED 8/7/01)13
08/08/2001Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by Nancy Smalley. (FILED 8/7/01)1
08/07/2001Testimony of Kathleen M. Gentile-Klein filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings.25
08/01/2001Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by Shirley Heetzel.1
08/01/2001Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by Thomas Lab.1
07/09/2001Service Notice3
07/09/2001Advertising letter faxed to Time-Reporter.4
07/09/2001Advertising letter faxed to the Daily Jeffersonian.4
07/06/2001Service Notice3
07/05/2001Entry scheduling a public hearing at 10:00 a.m. on August 16, 2001, at the Guernsey Community Center, Guernsey, Ohio; that any person or entity requesting intervention in this matter do so by August 1, 2001. (AE)3
07/02/2001Letter stating that pursuant to paragraph (7) of the entry issued in this case, the institution of any form of EAS (Flat rate or measured rate) for the involved exchanges will not result in exceptionally heavy investments in facilities nor exceptionally high costs, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings.1
06/15/2001Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings.66
06/15/2001Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by P. Cook.5
05/22/2001Affidavit of Kim Wright on behalf of Sprint filed.2
05/18/2001Affidavit of Elizabeth Finnerty filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by J. Abbott.5
05/11/2001Affidavit of Stefanie Vishab filed on behalf of LCI International Telecom by S. Vishab.2
05/08/2001Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by W. Keating.3
05/08/2001Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings.3
05/03/2001Service Notice2
05/02/2001Entry scheduling a teleconference at 10:00 a.m. on June 28, 2001. (AE)3
04/18/2001Entry ordering that Ameritech and Verizon file their respective written answer or responsive pleadings with the Commission and serve a copy upon the spokesperson for the complainants by May 8, 2001; that the IXCs provide the information required by Finding 3 to GTE and Sprint/United by May 24, 2001; that each of the IXCs file an affidavit with the Commission by May 24, 2001; that the respondents coordinate all the calling information in accordance with Finding 5; that respondents provide the information required by Finding 6 by June 15, 2001; that respondents provide the information required by Finding 7 by July 2, 2001. (AE)7
04/18/2001Service Notice.1
04/10/2001In the matter of the petition of Cindy and Everett Tennant and subscribers of the 498 Guernsey County exchange of Ameritech Ohio for extended area service to the 432 435 & 439 exchanges of Verizon North:27