Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
10/09/2002 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis petitioner Virgil Cochran. | 28 |
05/16/2002 | Supreme Court Transmittal Papers filed. | 7 |
04/16/2002 | Notice of Appeal of appellant Virgil Cochran. | 13 |
02/21/2002 | Entry denying Mr. Cochran's and Ameritech's applications for rehearing and closing this case of record. | 4 |
02/21/2002 | Service notice. | 2 |
02/11/2002 | Complaint of Virgil Cochran vs. Ameritech Telephone Corporation, filed by T. Linton. | 9 |
02/08/2002 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by T. Linton. | 11 |
02/08/2002 | Memorandum contra complainant's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by T. Linton. | 12 |
02/01/2002 | Respondent complainant application for a rehearing Virgil Cochran vs. Ameritech Telephone Corporation. | 10 |
01/10/2002 | Opinion & Order that this complaint is granted, in part, and denied, in part as set forth in this entry. | 6 |
01/10/2002 | Service Notice. | 1 |
12/24/2001 | Response to memorandum on Ameritech Ohio responding to complainant's post-hearing summation of closing argument and exhibits, filed on behalf of complainant by V. Cochran. | 17 |
12/18/2001 | Memorandum of Ameritech Ohio responding to complainant's post-hearing summation of closing argument and exhibits filed by T. Linton. | 13 |
12/14/2001 | Transcript filed for hearing held November 26, 2001, (SF), 117 pgs., Submitted. (PUCO-Columbus, OH) | 117 |
12/11/2001 | Summation of closing argument and exhibits filed on behalf of complainant by V. Cochran. | 27 |
10/19/2001 | Service Notice | 1 |
10/18/2001 | Entry ordering that a hearing be held 11/26/01, at 10:00 a.m., in Hearing Room 11-F, at the offices of the Commission, 180 East Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215. (AE) | 2 |
08/29/2001 | Service Notice. | 1 |
08/28/2001 | Entry scheduling a prehearing settlement conferenece at 1:30 p.m. on September 12, 2001, Hearing Room 11-B, Commission offices; that, if the parties do not reach a settlement at the conference, they shall meet with the attorney examiner at the conclusion of the conference to discuss procedural matters related to the case. (AE) | 2 |
10/17/2000 | Objections filed on behalf of complainant by V. Cochran. (1 pg.) | 1 |
10/06/2000 | Motion of Ameritech Ohio to dismiss. Filed by T. Linton (11 pgs) | 11 |
09/15/2000 | Motion filed on behalf of complainant by V. Cochran. (6 pgs.) | 6 |
08/30/2000 | Memorandum responding to complainant notice of interlocutory appeal, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by T. Linton. (6 pgs.) | 6 |
08/25/2000 | Notice of interlocutory appeal filed on behalf of complain- ant by V. Cochran. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
08/09/2000 | Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of complainant by V. Cochran. (1 pg.) | 1 |
08/09/2000 | Complainants Notice of appeal and memorandum Filed by V. Cochran (2 pgs) | 2 |
08/07/2000 | Memorandum responding to complainant's notice of appeal and memorandum, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by T. Linton. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
08/01/2000 | Memorandum responding to "complainants motion, memorandum and declaration, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by T. Linton. | 21 |
08/01/2000 | Memorandum responding to complainant's motion, memorandum and declaration, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by T. Linton. (21 pgs.) | 21 |
07/26/2000 | Motion, memorandum and declaration filed on behalf of com- plainant by V. Cochran. (29 pgs.) | 29 |
07/25/2000 | Entry scheduling a prehearing settlement conference at 10:00 a.m. on August 18, 2000, at the Commission offices; that, if the parties do not reach a settlement at this conference, they shall meet with the attorney examiner at the conclusion of the conference to discuss procedural matters related to the case. (AE) (2 pgs.) | 2 |
07/14/2000 | First supplemental motion to strike memorandum of Ameritech Ohio responding to complainant's motion for strike judement, filed on behalf of complainant by V. Cochran. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
07/10/2000 | Memorandum responding to complainant's motion to strike out for judgment, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by T. Linton. (4 pgs.) | 4 |
06/29/2000 | Complainant's first request for production of document, filed by V. Cochran. (1 pg.) | 1 |
06/29/2000 | First request for production of documents filed on behalf of complainant by V. Cochran. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
06/29/2000 | Motion to strike out for judgment and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by V. Cochran. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
06/29/2000 | First request for production of documents filed on behalf of complainant by V. Cochran. | 2 |
06/29/2000 | Motion to strike out for judgment and memorandum filed on behalf of complainant by V. Cochran. | 3 |
06/12/2000 | Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by T. Linton. (9 pgs.) | 9 |
06/05/2000 | Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Jon F. Kelly, Ameritech Ohio. (1 pg.) | 1 |
06/01/2000 | In the matter of the complaint of Virgil Cochran (vs) Ameritech Ohio relative to the alleged unjust and un- lawful charges for telephone service. (17 pgs.) | 17 |