DIS - Case Record for 00-0581-TP-PEX Skip to main content

Case Record For:

00-0581-TP-PEX

Case Title: DOUGLAS DIX/AMERITECH OHIO
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: PEX-Petition for extended area service
Date Opened: 3/29/2000
Date Closed: 6/21/2001
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
08/20/2002Revised tariff, PUCO No. 20, Part 4, Section 1, 1st sheet 21.1, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by R. Wentz.2
07/08/2002Revised tariff, PUCO No. 20, Part 4, Section 1, 1st sheet 21.1, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by R. Wentz.2
05/07/2002Tariff, PUCO No. 20; this filing is to institute Two-Way, Nonoptional, Measured-Rate Extended Area Service between the Magnolia-Waynesburg Exchange and the North Canton Exchange of Ameritech Ohio, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by K. Gentile-Klein.3
04/02/2002Revised tariff sheets reflect the establishment of a two-way extended Local Calling Plan (ELCP) Service between the Verizon exchanges of Malvern and Dellroy and Ameritech's Magnolia-Waynesburg exchange, by J. Kennedy.4
08/27/2001Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings.2
08/10/2001Letter stating that the in-service date for the institution of two-way measured-rate EAS between Ameritech's Magnolia Waynesburg exchange on the one hand, and Verizon's Dellroy and Malvern exchanges, on the other hand, is May 1, 2002 at 12:01 am, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy.1
07/31/2001Affidavit informing the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio that, LCI has submitted the reguired calling information to the designated local exchange companies. Filed by S. Vishab (2 pgs)2
06/21/2001Finding & Order approving the stipulation in its entirety; that Ameritech is authorized to provide two-way, nonoptional, measured-rate EAS between the Magnolia-Waynesburg exchange and the North Canton exchange; that Verizon is authorized to provide two-way, nonoptional, measured-rate EAS between the Dellroy exchange and the Magnolia-Waynesburg exchange, and between the Malvern exchange and the Magnolia-Waynesburg exchanges.6
06/21/2001Service Notice.3
05/09/2001Stipulation, agreement and recommendation filed on behalf of complainants by D. Dix; respondents, Ameritech Ohio by C. Rawlings, and Verizon North by W. Keating.8
02/07/2001Amendment to petition, filed on behalf of complainant by D. Dix.1
02/01/2001Entry scheduling a teleconference at 10:00 a.m. on February 9, 2001. (AE)2
10/10/2000Suplemental information response of Verizon North filed by W. Keating (2 pgs) (filed 10/6/00)2
10/06/2000Letter concerning Ameritech Ohio will not be providing cost/revenue studies, because the applicable calling rates do not exceed 3.0 in either direction. Filed by S. Rawlings (1 pg)1
10/06/2000Supplemental information response of Verizon North Inc. Filed by W. Keating (2 pgs)2
09/11/2000Correspondence letter regarding the petition, filed by J. James, Wendell Ford Sales Co. (1 pg.)1
09/11/2000Entry scheduling a telephonic conference at 10:00 a.m. on September 13, 2000. (AE) (3 pgs.)3
09/08/2000Supplemental information response filed by C. Rawlings on behalf of Ameritech. (48 pgs)48
09/01/2000Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (93 pgs.)93
09/01/2000Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by P. Cook. (45 pgs.)45
09/01/2000Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by P. Cook.45
08/22/2000Affidavit of Judith B. Sanders filed on behalf of MCI WorldCom by J. Sanders. (1 pg.)1
08/07/2000Answer filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by C. Rawlings.3
08/07/2000Affidavit of Verizon Select Services Inc. filed by P. Heise de Barros. (3 pgs.)3
08/07/2000Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (3 pgs.)3
08/07/2000Affidavit filed on behalf of Verizon Select Services Inc. by P. Heise de Barros. (3 pgs.)3
08/04/2000Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by W. Keating. (3 pgs.)3
08/04/2000Affidavit of James Abbott filed on behalf of AT&T Communi- cations of Ohio by J. Abbott. (4 pgs.)4
08/04/2000Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North Incor- porated, by W. Keating. (3 pgs.)3
07/25/2000Affidavit of Kim Wright filed on behalf of Sprint Communi- cations Company by K. Wright. (2 pgs.)2
06/29/2000Entry ordering that Ameritech and GTE file their respective answers or other pleadings with the Commission and serve a copy upon the spokesperson for the complainants as required by Finding 2; that AT&T, WorldCom, Qwest, GTE Corp., and Sprint provide the information as required by Finding 4; that AT&T, WorldCom, Qwest, GTE Corp., and Sprint file an affidavit, as required by Finding 5, with the Commission; that Ameritech and GTE corrdinate all calling information and ensure that all the IXCs are supplying calling data from the same time frame; that Ameritech and GTE provide information required by Finding 7 and Finding 8 to the spokesperson and the Commission; that a conference be scheduled at a later date. (AE) (8 pgs.)8
03/29/2000In the matter of the petition of Douglas A. Dix and sub- scribers of the Magnolia/Waynesburg exchange of Ameritech Ohio for extended area service into the Alliance, Bolivar, Carrollton, Dellroy, Hartville, Louisville, Malvern, Marl- boro, Massillon, Minerva, Navarre, N. Canton, and Paris ex- changes of Ameritech Ohio. (75 pgs.)75