| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 09/25/2012 | Case Action Form to Close cases effective 09/25/2012 filed by J. Jones. | 1 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of Fort Jennings Telephone Company by S. Berelsman. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of Benton Ridge Telephone Company by K. Horne. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of The Champaign Telephone Company by C. Huffman. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of Continental Telephone Company by M. Proctor. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of The Doylestown Telephone Company by T. Brockman. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of The Conneaut Telephone Company by T. Picard. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of Arcadia Telephone Company by M. Proctor. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of The Arthur Mutual Telephone Company by J. Sholl. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of Ayersville Telephone Company by T. Poritious. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of Bascom Mutual Telephone Company by D. Depinet. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of Frontier Communications by J. Stommen. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of Wabash Mutual Telephone Company by D. Stachler. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of Vaughnsville Telephone Company by M. Kaplan. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of Vanlue Telephone Company by M. Proctor. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of Telephone Service Company by M. Plows. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of Sycamore Telephone Company by R. Ekleberry. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of Sherwood Mutual Telephone Association, Inc. by M. Woodring. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of The Farmers Mutual Telephone Company by E. Damman. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of Buckland Telephone Company by R. Moon. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of Columbus Grove Telephone Company by P. Nixon. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of Ridgeville Telephone Company by L. Wendt. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Report filed on behalf of Patterson Telephone Company. | 4 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of The Ottoville Mutual Telephone Company by D. Hoersten. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of The Nova Telephone Company by R. Ringler. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of Orwell Telephone Company by P. Nixon. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of Oakwood Telephone Company by M. Proctor. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of New Knoxville Telephone Company by J. Hoge. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of Minford Telephone Company by P. McGraw. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of The Middle Point Home Telephone Company by R. Long. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of The McClure Telephone Company by L. Armstrong. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of Little Miami Communications Corporation by M. Proctor. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of Kalida Telephone Company, Inc. by C. Phillips. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of Glandorf Telephone Company, Inc. by L. Heckman. | 5 |
| 07/27/2009 | Confidential Release: Response to finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry filed on behalf of Germantown Independent Telephone Company by R. Kern. | 5 |
| 03/30/2007 | Notice of withdrawal and substitution of counsel filed by W. Adams on behalf of Windstream Ohio and Windstream Western Reserve. | 6 |
| 05/26/2005 | Reply of MCI to the memoranda contra of The Office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel, Alltel Ohio, Inc., The Western Reserve Telephone Company, Inc., Chillicothe Telephone Company and CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc., filed by J. Sanders. | 18 |
| 05/26/2005 | Reply memorandum of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. to Memoranda Contra of The Office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel, Alltel Ohio, CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc., The Chillicothe Telephone Company and The Western Reserve Telephone Company, filed by S. Howard. | 35 |
| 05/20/2005 | Letter to Commission that OCC has no objection to MCI filing a combined reply to all of the memoranda contra filed in this proceeding on May 26, 2005, rather than filing separate replies on May 23 and May 26, filed by J. Sanders. | 1 |
| 05/16/2005 | Memorandum contra of MCI's April 26, 2005 motion, filed on behalf of the Chillicothe Telephone Company by A. Emerson. | 9 |
| 05/16/2005 | Memorandum contra MCI's April 26, 2005 motion, filed on behalf of CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc. by D. Conway. | 9 |
| 05/16/2005 | Memorandum contra to MCI's motion for the Commission to Investigate and Restructure the Intrastate Access Charges, to be filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio, Inc. and the Western Reserve Telephone Company, filed by C. Flahive. | 37 |
| 05/13/2005 | Memorandum contra of The Office of the Ohio Consumers Counsel to MCI motion to investigate and restructure access changes, filed by D. Bergmann. | 11 |
| 04/26/2005 | Motion of MCI for the Commission to investigate and restructure the intrastate access charges of ALLTEL Ohio, Inc., CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc., The Chillicothe Telephone Company, Inc., and The Western Reserve Telephone Company, Inc., memorandum in support filed by J. Sanders on behalf of MCI. | 10 |
| 07/15/2004 | Notice of withdrawal and substitution of counsel is given that Jason J. Kilroy, Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease, LLP is withdrawing from representing Suretel and AT&T Communications of Ohio filed by B. Kahn. | 5 |
| 11/12/2003 | Revised Tariff PUCO No.6 filed on behalf of applicant by T.Colquitt. | 2 |
| 11/12/2003 | Notice that Verizon North Inc. has completed implementation of it's optional Local Calling Plans ahead of schedule filed by T. Colquitt. | 1 |
| 10/01/2003 | Revised transmitted tariff sheets, reflect the final wave of Verizon Local Calling Plan LATA Wide, filed on behalf of applicant by T. Colquitt. | 140 |
| 08/01/2003 | Entry granting Sprint/United's motion to renew its 6/28/01 protective order; that WorldCom's motion to renew its 6/28/01 protective order is denied. (GP) | 3 |
| 04/29/2003 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, filed on behalf of Verizon North by C. Cole. | 111 |
| 04/25/2003 | Transmittal papers filed at Supreme Court No. 03-568. | 31 |
| 03/26/2003 | Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of Verizon North Inc. by C. Flahive. | 7 |
| 02/20/2003 | Entry denying the application for rehearing filed by Verizon North; that the motion for stay and request for expedited ruling is denied. | 16 |
| 02/18/2003 | Memorandum contra Verizon North's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. | 9 |
| 02/13/2003 | Entry denying AT&T's application for rehearing and motion for clarification. | 5 |
| 02/13/2003 | Memorandum contra of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. and TCG Ohio to application for rehearing of Verizon North Inc. filed by D. Trabaris. | 14 |
| 02/10/2003 | Memorandum contra to Verizon North's motion for stay pending rehearing and appeal and request for expedited ruling, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by B. Kahn. | 10 |
| 02/10/2003 | Memorandum contra Verizon North's motion for stay and request for expedited ruling, filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. | 9 |
| 02/10/2003 | Memorandum contra Verizon North Inc's motion for stay and request for expedited ruling filed by J. Serio. | 9 |
| 02/03/2003 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Verizon North Inc. by T. Lodge. | 20 |
| 02/03/2003 | Motion for stay pending rehearing and appeal and request for expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Verizon North Inc. by T. Lodge. | 6 |
| 01/28/2003 | Letter hereby confirms its conformance with Entry of January 23, 2003, filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by T. Colquitt. | 3 |
| 01/28/2003 | Revised tariff sheets to expand Verizon's Local Calling Plan-LATA Wide to 42 additional exchanges. This filing represents the seventh wave of LCP LATA Wide that the company plans to extend statewide and becomes effective on February 27, 2003 by T. Colquitt. | 96 |
| 01/23/2003 | Entry denying Verizon's renewed motion to alter access recovery charge or, in the alternative, motion for stay and hearings; that, consistent with Finding 8, Verizon is instructed to immediately review its tariffs to ensure that as of January 2, 2003, its rates reflected the mandates of the June 27, 2002, entry and to provide by January 28, 2003, confirmation that the Commission's prior order has been carried out. | 5 |
| 01/23/2003 | service notice filed. | 9 |
| 01/23/2003 | Service Notice. | 9 |
| 12/19/2002 | Reply of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. to the memoranda contra of ALLTEL Ohio, Inc. The Western Reserve Telephone Company, The Ohio Consumers Counsel, The Chillicothe Telephone Company and CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc. filed by D. Trabaris. | 11 |
| 12/13/2002 | Memorandum contra of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. to Verizon North, Inc.'s renewed motion to alter access recovery charge, or in the alternative, motion for stay and hearing, filed by B. Kahn. | 12 |
| 12/13/2002 | Ohio Consumers' Counsel memorandum contra Verizon North Inc.'s renewed motion to alter access charge recovery, filed by D. Bergmann. | 16 |
| 12/09/2002 | Memorandum contra of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel to AT&T Motion to reduce access charges filed by D. Bergmann. | 11 |
| 12/09/2002 | Memorandum contra of ALLTEL Ohio, Inc. and The Western Reserve Telephone Company to the motion of AT&T Communications of Ohio for the Commission to consider federal rulings and rule on access charge modifications for ALLTEL, Ohio, Inc., CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc., The Chillicothe Telephone Company and The Western Reserve Telephone Company filed by T. Lodge. | 13 |
| 12/09/2002 | CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc.'s memorandum contra AT&T's November 21, 2002 motion filed by D. Conway. | 9 |
| 12/09/2002 | The Chillicothe Telephone Company's memorandum contra AT&T's November 21, 2002 motion filed by D. Conway. | 8 |
| 12/03/2002 | Verizon North Inc's renewed motion to alter access recovery charge, or in the alternative, motion for stay and hearing filed by T. Lodge. | 41 |
| 11/21/2002 | Motion for the Commission to consider federal rulings and rule on access charge modifications for Alltel Ohio Inc., CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc., The Chillicothe Telephone Company and The Western Reserve Telephone Company and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by B. Kahn. | 15 |
| 11/18/2002 | Motion for renewal of protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Worldcom, Inc. by J. Sanders. | 6 |
| 11/04/2002 | Motion for renewal of protective order filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. | 6 |
| 10/22/2002 | Tariff; this filing expand Verizon's Local Calling Plan-LATA Wide to 19 additional exchanges, filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Colquitt. | 71 |
| 10/09/2002 | Final revised tariff sheets local exchange Tariff P.U.C.O. No. 6 filed by D. Terry. | 9 |
| 10/02/2002 | Final revised tariff sheets Local Exchange Tariff P.U.C.O. No. 6, filed by D. Terry. | 5 |
| 09/11/2002 | Final revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, filed on behalf of Sprint by D. Terry. | 28 |
| 09/04/2002 | Tariffs, PUCO Nos. 1 and 3, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by D. Terry. | 212 |
| 08/22/2002 | Entry granting the application for rehearing for the limited purpose of allowing the Commission additional time to consider the arguments raised on rehearing. | 13 |
| 08/15/2002 | Reply of Verizon North Inc. filed by T. Lodge. | 10 |
| 08/08/2002 | Memorandum of Verizon North Inc. in opposition to AT&T's application for rehearing and request for clarification filed by T. Lodge. | 9 |
| 08/08/2002 | Memorandum contra of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel to the application for rehearing of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. filed by D. Bergmann | 12 |
| 07/30/2002 | Revised tariff sheets to replace the pages, expand local calling plan LATA Wide to 24 additional exchanges,Tariff P.U.C.O. no. 6 filed by T. Colquitt. | 63 |
| 07/29/2002 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Trabaris. | 13 |
| 07/24/2002 | Final revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, filed on behalf of Sprint by D. Terry. | 18 |
| 07/03/2002 | Change of attorney filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. and TCG Ohio by D. Trabaris. | 1 |
| 06/28/2002 | Tariff on behalf of Verizon North Inc. tariffs reflecting the mirroring of interstate access charges filed by T. Lodge. | 2 |
| 06/28/2002 | Tariffs on behalf Verizon North Inc. tariffs reflecting the mirroring of interstate access charges filed by T. Lodge. | 250 |
| 06/27/2002 | Entry ordering that Verizon shall file with the Commission by August 15, 2002 detailed documentation supporting the company's revised earnings calculations, and set its intrastate access charges to interexchange carriers at rates equal to June 30, 2002 levels until January 2, 2003. | 15 |
| 05/30/2002 | Revised tariff; this filing expands Verizon's Local Calling Plan - LATA Wide to 23 additional exchanges, filed on behalf of applicant by T. Colquitt. | 7 |
| 05/29/2002 | Memorandum contra to Verizon North's motion to amend and supplement access recovery charge, or in the alternative, motion for stay and request for expedited ruling, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Trabaris; and WorldCom, Inc. by J. Sanders. | 8 |
| 05/29/2002 | Memorandum contra to request for expedited ruling, memorandum in limited support of motion for stay and memorandum contra motion to amend and supplement access recovery charge, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. | 13 |
| 05/22/2002 | Motion to amend and supplement access recovery charge, or in the alternative, motion for stay and request for expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Lodge. | 38 |
| 05/07/2002 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6; this filing expand Verizon's Local Calling Plan - LATA Wide to 23 additional exchanges, filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Colquitt. | 48 |
| 04/17/2002 | Final revised tariff sheets local exchange Tariff PUCO No. 6, filed by D. Terry. | 16 |
| 04/12/2002 | Letter filed pursuant to Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (Commission) rule 4901-1-09, filed by D. Traboris. | 1 |
| 04/10/2002 | Final revised tariff sheets for local exchange Tariff PUCO No. 6 by D. Terry | 23 |
| 03/29/2002 | Revised tariff; this filing includes revisions to accurately reflect the Commission approved Extended Area Service (EAS) arrangements between Rockford and Mendon and from Johnstown to Granville, Newark, Pataskala, St. Louisville, and Sunbury, that were implemented on December 18, 2001, filed on behalf of Sprint by D. Terry. | 5 |
| 02/20/2002 | Revised Local Exchange Tariff, PUCO No. 6, Section C, revised sheets 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 11, 17, 20; Section F revised sheets 1, 2, 3.1 and 3.2 filed by D. Terry on behalf of Sprint | 14 |
| 02/13/2002 | Final revised tariff sheets local exchange tariff PUCO No. 6,filed on behalf of Sprint-Ohio by D. Terry. | 19 |
| 02/06/2002 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Check List, 2nd sheet 1A; Section 2.5, 2nd sheet 30, 1st sheet 35, 2nd sheets 36-46, 1st sheets 47-57, original sheets 58-67, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy. | 36 |
| 01/30/2002 | Final revised tariff sheets for Local Exchange Tariff, PUCO No. 6, Sections C and F filed by D. Terry on behalf of Sprint. | 15 |
| 01/16/2002 | Final revised tariffs, PUCO No. 6, Sections C, F, and I; PUCO No. 5, Section 32, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by D. Terry. | 18 |
| 01/11/2002 | Transmittal No. 183; this filing establishes a monthly recurring regeneration charge for switched and special OptiPoint Services and for Sprint SONET Ring Service, filed on behalf of Sprint by D. Terry. | 7 |
| 01/11/2002 | Tariff revisions pages on behalf of the Sprint local telephone companies F.C.C.No.3, filed by C. Graham. (part 2 of 2) | 167 |
| 01/11/2002 | Tariff revisions pages on behalf of the Sprint local telephone companies F.C.C. no. 3, filed by C. Graham.(part 1 of 2) | 200 |
| 01/09/2002 | Final revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by D. Terry. | 15 |
| 12/17/2001 | Transmittal No. 180, revised tariff PUCO No. 3 filed on behalf of Sprint by D. Terry. | 26 |
| 12/17/2001 | Transmittal No. 180; this filing introduced DSL technology in South Carolina and is not applicable in Ohio's intrastate jurisdiction, filed on behalf of Sprint by D. Terry. | 26 |
| 12/13/2001 | Final revised tariff sheets local exchange tariff PUCO No. 6 filed on behalf of Sprint Ohio by M. Prendergast. | 18 |
| 12/11/2001 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, filed on behalf of applicant by M. Prendergast. | 15 |
| 12/10/2001 | Transmittal No. 181; this filing affects only the Sprint Local Telephone Companies tariff FCC No. 2 and is not applicable in Ohio's intrastate jurisdiction, filed on behalf of Sprint by D. Terry. | 33 |
| 12/03/2001 | Tariff sheets modifications are made to the Sprint Local Telecompany Co.'s tariff FCC no. 3, that are mirrored in the United Telephone Co. access P.U.C.O. no. 1, filed by D. Terry. | 138 |
| 11/27/2001 | Transmittal No. 178; Revised tariff sheets filed on behalf of the Sprint (Sprint LTC) local telephone companies and bearing tariff F.C.C. No. 3 in compliance with the requirements, filed by D. Terry. | 11 |
| 11/26/2001 | Correspondence letter regarding application, filed by M. Fawcett. | 4 |
| 11/26/2001 | Transmittal No. 177; 46th Revised page 1; 17th revised page 1.10, filed on behalf of United Telephone Co. of Ohio dba Sprint by D. Terry. | 7 |
| 11/13/2001 | Revised tariff, 44th Revised Page 1; 16th Revised Page 1.10, Transmittal No. 175 filed on behalf of United Telephone Co. of Ohio dba Sprint by D. Terry. | 9 |
| 11/09/2001 | Proof of Publication. | 2 |
| 11/07/2001 | Revised tariff sheets, 43rd revised page 1, 15th revised page 1.10. Filed by, D. Tarry. | 6 |
| 11/06/2001 | Transmittal No. 176; this filing became effective on November 1, 2001 and adjusted rates in the State of North Carolina where Sprint LTC has been granted Phase II pricing flexibility, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by D. Terry. | 26 |
| 11/05/2001 | Revision tariff sheets, 42nd Revised page 1, 14th Revised page 1.10, 7th Revised page 1.11, 9th Revised page 1.13, 7th Revised page 1.14. Filed by D. Terry. | 19 |
| 10/26/2001 | Final revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Section C, 23rd page 23, 1st page 23.1; Section J, 2nd sheet 2, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by B. Nelson. | 4 |
| 10/24/2001 | Final tariff, PUCO No. 6; this filing reflects the Commission's approval to remove the measured-rate call plan between the exchanges of Ft. Recovery and Union City, OH from the Union City Local Calling Plan, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by M. Prendergast. | 7 |
| 10/22/2001 | Transmittal No. 170; this filing introduced Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) technology in certain Missouri and North Carolina exchanges, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by D. Terry. | 7 |
| 10/16/2001 | Transmittal No. 169; this filing expands DSL technology and is not applicable in Ohio's intrastate jurisdiction, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by D. Terry. | 14 |
| 10/16/2001 | Transmittal No. 171; this is in response to the FCC's order of October 5, 2001, suspending the effective date of Transmittal No. 167 by one day, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by D. Terry. | 25 |
| 10/16/2001 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Check List, 1st sheet 1A; Section 2.5, 1st sheets 30, 32, 33, 36-46, original sheets 47-57, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy. | 28 |
| 10/11/2001 | Service Notice. | 13 |
| 10/11/2001 | Entry ordering that, consistent with Finding 4, the United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint is authorized to establish extended area service consistent with the requirements of the stipulation adopted in Case No. 00-127-TP-COI on June 28, 2001. | 6 |
| 10/09/2001 | Transmittal No. 167; this filing added optical cross-connect rates in conjunction with expanded interconnection and included additional minor revisions, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by D. Terry. | 141 |
| 10/02/2001 | Transmittal No. 168; this filing reduced the Interstate federal universal service fund (USF) change consistent with the requirements of the FCC's CALLS Order, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by D. Terry. | 6 |
| 10/01/2001 | Transmittal No. 166; this filing expanded Sprint's Digital Subscriber Loop (DSL) technology and is not applicable in Ohio's intrastate jurisdiction, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by D. Terry. | 6 |
| 09/10/2001 | Transmittal No. 164; this filing expanded Sprint's Digital Subscriber Loop (DSL) technology and is not applicable in Ohio's intrastate jurisdiction, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by D. Terry. | 6 |
| 09/06/2001 | Transmittal No. 163; this filing introduced rates for a new Frame Relay Service PVC, added optical corss-connect rates in conjunction with expanded interconnection and included additional minor revisions.
Transmittal No. 165; this filing withdrew certain revisions originally filed under Transmittal No. 163, filed on behalf of United Telephone Co. of Ohio dba Sprint by D. Terry. | 68 |
| 08/20/2001 | Transmittal No. 162; this filing expanded Sprint's Digital Subscriber Loop (DSL) technology and is not applicable in Ohio intrastate jurisdiction, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by D. Terry. | 13 |
| 08/09/2001 | Transmittal No. 160; this filing expanded Sprint's Digital Subscriber Loop (DSL) technology and is not applicable in Ohio's intrastate jurisdiction, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by D. Terry. | 6 |
| 08/09/2001 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by M. Prendergast. | 12 |
| 08/07/2001 | Final revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Section C, 12th sheet 5, 19th sheet 13, 1tgh sheet 15, 12th sheet 19, 21st sheet 23,: Section F, 21st sheet 3, 6th sheet 3.1, filed on behalf of Sprint by M. Prendergast. | 10 |
| 08/06/2001 | Transmittal No. 159; this filing expanded Sprint's Digital Subscriber Loop (DSL) technology and is not applicable in Ohio's intrastate jurisdiction, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by D. Terry. | 6 |
| 08/06/2001 | Transmittal No. 158; this filing made changes to the manner in which service rearrangements are charges, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by D. Terry. | 103 |
| 08/02/2001 | Transmittal No. 161; this filing adjusted certain end user common line charges in the state of Nevada and is not applicable in Ohio's intrastate jurisdiction, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by D. Terry. | 7 |
| 08/02/2001 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6; this filing reflects the Commission's approval of the establishment of one-way flat-rated Extended Area Service (EAS) between the exchanges of Mason and Morrow, Mason and Waynesville, Waynesville and Mason, and Waynesville and Morrow, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by M. Prendergast. | 7 |
| 07/31/2001 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, this filing reflects the Commission's approval of the establishment of one-way flat-rates Extended Area Service (EAS) between the exchanges listed in this filing, submitted on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by M. Prendergast. | 13 |
| 07/30/2001 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Index, 2nd sheet 1; Check List, 399th sheet 1, original sheet 1A; Section 2.5, original sheets 28 through 45, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy. | 22 |
| 07/30/2001 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 5, Section 21, 1st sheet 2, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by B. Donahue. | 2 |
| 07/26/2001 | Service Notice. | 12 |
| 07/26/2001 | Entry approving application and authorizing final tariff be filed with an effective date of 7/30/01. | 2 |
| 07/19/2001 | Opinion & Order that the stipulation filed on June 25, 2001, is approved as set forth in this order; that the proposed intrastate access tariffs are approved; Verizon's interstate access rates must mirror the interstate rates consistent with the Commission's January 11, 2001 opinion and order and the entry on rehearing issued March 15, 2001; that Verizon commence the implementation of the local calling plan as set forth in this order. | 10 |
| 07/19/2001 | Service Notice. | 12 |
| 07/19/2001 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 2, Index, 3rd sheet 1; Section 1, 9th sheet 1, 8th sheet 12, 5th sheet 13, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy. | 5 |
| 07/18/2001 | Proofs of publication filed by T. Lodge. | 52 |
| 07/18/2001 | Transmittal 156, Check sheets for FCC N.o 3 tariff. .(Part 2 of 2) | 180 |
| 07/18/2001 | Tariff sheets for FCC No. 3, Check sheets for Transmittal No. 156 filed by D.Terry on behalf of Sprint. (Part 1 of 2) | 201 |
| 07/18/2001 | Transmittal No. 155; under this transmittal, which became effective on July 14, 2001, Sprint expanded its Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) technology to include additional exchanges, filed on behalf of Sprint by D. Terry. | 14 |
| 07/17/2001 | Revised tariff sheet, PUCO No. 5, Section 21, filed by B. Donahue on behalf of Sprint. | 5 |
| 07/13/2001 | Transcript, 20 pages, and exhibits for hearing held 7/11/01 in Marion, Ohio. | 26 |
| 07/12/2001 | Transmittal No. 157, Sprint tariff FCC No. 3 Check Sheets, 26th revised page 1 filed by D. Terry | 6 |
| 07/12/2001 | Transcript for hearing held 7/10/01 in Bryan, Ohio | 10 |
| 07/12/2001 | Revised tariff pages filed; Transmittal No. 154, FCC No. 3 Check sheets; PUCO No. 1 Access Service Tariff, Sections 6,7, and 22 filed by D. Terry on behalf of Sprint. | 32 |
| 07/11/2001 | Reply comments of Verizon North, Inc. filed by T. Lodge | 9 |
| 07/11/2001 | Reply comments of OCC filed by D. Bergmann | 5 |
| 07/11/2001 | Corrected Price List Sheet No. 9.1 of Section 11 filed by S. Briar on behalf of AT&T. | 2 |
| 07/10/2001 | Transcript filed for hearing held July 9, 2001, (JJ), 15 pgs. (Waverly, OH) | 20 |
| 07/10/2001 | Unredacted version of supplemental impact statement filed by B. Donahue. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 11 |
| 07/10/2001 | Redacted version of the 6/1/01 supplemental impact statement filed by B. Donahue on behalf of Sprint. | 12 |
| 07/09/2001 | Request to hold case number 01-166-TP-PEX in abeyance pending the result of case number 00-127-TP-COI filed by L. Brickner. | 1 |
| 07/06/2001 | Comments of Verizon North Inc. concerning the stipulation between Verizon North, OCC, and the Staff filed by T. Lodge. | 10 |
| 07/06/2001 | Comments of AT&T on Verizon's stipulation and recommendation filed by B. Kahn. | 4 |
| 07/03/2001 | Proofs of publication filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by B. Donahue. | 58 |
| 07/03/2001 | Correspondence letter protesting the application, signed by various consumers. | 1 |
| 07/02/2001 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 1, Access Service Tariff, PUCO No. 5, General Exchange Tariff, and FCC No. 3, Check Sheets for Transmittal No. 153, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by D. Terry. (Part 2 of 2) | 75 |
| 07/02/2001 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 1, Access Service tariff, PUCO No. 5, General Exchange Tariff, and FCC No. 3, check Sheets for Transmittal No. 153, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by D. Terry. (Part 1 of 2) | 200 |
| 07/02/2001 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 1, Section 21, 1st sheet 9, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by D. Terry. | 2 |
| 07/02/2001 | Service Notice. | 12 |
| 07/02/2001 | Correspondence letter protesting the applicaiton, signed by various consumers. | 1 |
| 07/02/2001 | Correspondence letter opposing the application, signed by various consumers. | 1 |
| 06/29/2001 | Price List Addendum; the purpose of this filing is to decrease rates to various residential and business services and introduces various promotional rates, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by S. Briar. | 43 |
| 06/29/2001 | Submission of tariff and revised exhibit to stipulation, filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Lodge. | 29 |
| 06/28/2001 | Finding & Order that, consistent with Finding 7, the AT&T , Qwest, Sprint, and WorldCom flow-through plans are approved; that the motions for protective treatment filed by AT&T, Qwest, Sprint, and WorldCom are granted in accordance with Finding 8. | 3 |
| 06/28/2001 | Opinion & Order that the stipulation and recommendation filed on June 1, 2001, is approved; that the proposed intrastate access tariffs are approved effective July 3, 2001; Sprint/United's intrastate access rates must mirror the interstate rates consistent with the Commission's January 11, 2001 opinion and order and the entry on rehearing issued Marcy 15, 2001; that the motion for protective order accompanying the supplemental impact statement filed by Sprint/United is granted in part and denied in part; that the late payment fee application, Case No. 01-1266-TP-UNC is approved. Concurring Opinion of Donald L. Mason. | 15 |
| 06/28/2001 | Entry ordering that Verizon publish legal notice in accordance with Finding 7; Verizon should also docket proofs of publication by July 11, 2001; that written comments, if any, be filed by July 6, 2001; written comments in response are due by July 11, 2001. (AE) | 5 |
| 06/27/2001 | Letter stating that it does not intent to increase any local exchange rates by more than two rate bands during the initial period of two years, filed on behalf of Sprint by D. Helmick. | 5 |
| 06/27/2001 | Transcript for hearing held 6/19/01 at Western Reserve Middle School, Warren, Ohio. | 18 |
| 06/27/2001 | Letter protesting Sprint's plan to add a monthly fee to have toll free service to Newark and surrounding towns filed by several consumers. | 1 |
| 06/26/2001 | Initial comments on stipulation and recommendation and memorandum contra Verizon North's motion to implement access charge elements and local calling plans, or in the alternative, motion for stay and hearing and request for expedited ruling, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. | 9 |
| 06/26/2001 | Certificate of Service filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Lodge. | 4 |
| 06/26/2001 | Transcript filed for hearing held June 19, 2001, (PD), 19 pgs. (Warren, Ohio) | 19 |
| 06/25/2001 | Stipulation filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Lodge; OCC by T. Etter; and the PUCO staff by S. Nourse. | 17 |
| 06/25/2001 | Correspondence letter opposing the application, filed by Rosanna L. Chegar. | 1 |
| 06/25/2001 | Correspondence letter opposing the application, filed by James Gardiner. | 1 |
| 06/22/2001 | Transcript filed for hearing held June 20, 2001, (JRJ), 31 pgs. (Bellefontaine, Ohio) | 34 |
| 06/22/2001 | Confidential Flow Through Plan and tariff revisions filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 22 |
| 06/22/2001 | Redacted proposed flow through plan and tariff revisions, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. | 7 |
| 06/22/2001 | Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. | 6 |
| 06/22/2001 | Correspondence letter opposing the application, filed by Steven L. Botos. | 1 |
| 06/22/2001 | Correspondence letter opposing the application, filed by Janice Johnston. | 1 |
| 06/21/2001 | Confidential exhibit regarding the agreement made between Qwest Communications, PUCO staff, and OCC, filed on behalf of Qwest Communications Corp. by T. Snyder, PUCO staff by S. Nourse, and OCC by D. Bergmann. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 3 |
| 06/21/2001 | Motion for approval of the agreement between Staff and Qwest Communications (Exhibit filed under seal), filed on behalf of Qwest Communications Corp. by T. Snyder. | 6 |
| 06/21/2001 | Correspondence letter opposing the application, filed by Dave Winkle. | 1 |
| 06/20/2001 | History & pending report for Jean Gargano filed on behalf of the PUCO staff. | 1 |
| 06/20/2001 | Correspondence letter opposing the application, filed by Robert Wilhelm. | 1 |
| 06/20/2001 | Correspondence letter opposing the application, filed by Kay Frysinger. | 1 |
| 06/20/2001 | Reply comments filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. | 13 |
| 06/20/2001 | Reply comments filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio. | 7 |
| 06/20/2001 | Motion for extension of time and memorandum in support filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. | 6 |
| 06/20/2001 | Transcript of hearing held June 19, 2001, (JRJ), 28 pgs. (Pataskala, Ohio) | 31 |
| 06/19/2001 | Case report of Georgia Heltman filed on behalf of the PUCO staff. | 1 |
| 06/19/2001 | Case report to Don Hire, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff. | 1 |
| 06/15/2001 | Comments filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Lodge. | 6 |
| 06/15/2001 | Motion for clarification filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. | 8 |
| 06/15/2001 | Initial comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. | 8 |
| 06/15/2001 | Initial comments filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. | 12 |
| 06/14/2001 | Exhibit 1 filed on behalf of Sprint by J. Stewart. | 6 |
| 06/12/2001 | Correspondence filed by consumer. | 1 |
| 06/12/2001 | Motion to implement access charge elements or in the alternative, motion for stay and hearing and request for expedited ruling filed by T. Lodge on behalf of Verizon North Inc. | 66 |
| 06/08/2001 | Entry ordering that Sprint/United publish legal notice in accordance with Finding 5; Sprint/United should also docket proofs of publication by June 22, 2001; that written comments, if any, be filed by June 15, 2001; written comments in response are due by June 20, 2001. (AE) | 16 |
| 06/08/2001 | Confidential revised description of flow through, filed on behalf of WorldCom, Inc. by J. Sanders. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 4 |
| 06/08/2001 | Letter regarding the update to its February 14, 2001 filing, submitted on behalf of WorldCom, Inc. by J. Sanders. | 1 |
| 06/05/2001 | Confidential supplemental impact statement filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. (FILED UNDER SEAL ON 6/1/01) | 17 |
| 06/01/2001 | Stipulation and recommendation filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by A. Hammerstein; OCC by D. Bergmann; and United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart; | 41 |
| 06/01/2001 | Supplemental impact statement filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. | 15 |
| 06/01/2001 | Motion for protective order filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. | 8 |
| 05/24/2001 | Entry denying the Sprint Companies' May 1, 2001 application for rehearing; that this case remain open until otherwise ordered by the Commission. | 5 |
| 05/24/2001 | Service Notice. | 11 |
| 05/11/2001 | Memorandum contra application for rehearing of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Co. L.P., filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. | 8 |
| 05/10/2001 | Memorandum contra Sprint's third application for rehearing, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. | 5 |
| 05/10/2001 | Service Notice. | 10 |
| 05/10/2001 | Entry denying the applications for rehearing of AT&T, Sprint, and Verizon. (Filed 5/9/01) | 5 |
| 05/09/2001 | Entry ordering that AT&T's April 13, 2001 application for rehearing, the Sprint companies' April 16, 2001 application for rehearing, and Verizon's April 16, 2001 application for rehearing are denied; that this case remain open until otherwise ordered by the Commission. | 5 |
| 05/01/2001 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Co. by J. Stewart. | 10 |
| 04/30/2001 | Revised tariff, PUCO No. 1, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by D. Terry. | 43 |
| 04/26/2001 | Memorandum contra rehearing applications of Verizon and Sprint-United to Commission's March 15, 2001 entry on rehearing, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. | 7 |
| 04/26/2001 | Memorandum contra second applications for rehearing, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. | 7 |
| 04/25/2001 | Entry ordering that United Telephone Co. dba Sprint and Verizon North comply with Finding 5; that the July 1, 2001, intrastate access charge reductions are contingent upon Commission-approved IXC flow-through plans by that same date. | 13 |
| 04/23/2001 | Memorandum in opposition to AT&T's limited application for rehearing, filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Lodge. | 9 |
| 04/20/2001 | Correspondence informing the Commission of certain factual information relating to this case, filed by S. Nourse, PUCO staff. | 6 |
| 04/16/2001 | Application for further rehearing filed by T. Lodge on behalf of Verizon North Inc. | 10 |
| 04/16/2001 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company L.P. by J. Stewart. | 8 |
| 04/13/2001 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AT&t Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. | 7 |
| 04/06/2001 | Letter stating that Cincinnati Bell proposes to resume mirroring the rate elements in its PUCO Access Services Tariff No. 2 after those found in its FCC No. 35 Federal Access Tariff, filed by M. Bishop. | 2 |
| 03/30/2001 | Confidential flow-through plan filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by E. Phelan. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 10 |
| 03/30/2001 | Motion for protective order filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by J. Stewart. | 6 |
| 03/30/2001 | Flow through plan filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by E. Phelan. | 3 |
| 03/28/2001 | Motion for a protective order filed by T. Snyder on behalf of Qwest Communications Corporation | 5 |
| 03/28/2001 | Response of Qwest Communications Corporation to the Commission's 3/15/01 order filed by T. Snyder. | 11 |
| 03/27/2001 | Confidential Exhibits 1-6 filed on behalf of Qwest Communications. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 12 |
| 03/27/2001 | Motion for protective order filed by T.
Snyder on behalf of Qwest Communications. | 3 |
| 03/27/2001 | Amended certificate of service filed by T. Snyder on behalf of Qwest Communications Corporation | 3 |
| 03/27/2001 | Response of Qwest Communications Corporation to the Commissions 3/15/01 order filed by T. Snyder | 14 |
| 03/26/2001 | Response of Qwest Communications Corporation to the Commission's 3/15/01 order filed by T. Snyder. (FAX) | 7 |
| 03/19/2001 | Service Notice | 13 |
| 03/16/2001 | Revised tariff sheets, PUCO No. 20, Part 21, Section 2 filed by S. Drombetta | 6 |
| 03/15/2001 | Entry ordering that the applications for rehearing of the Sprint companies and Verizon are denied in part and granted in part for the reasons set forth in this entry; that the January 31, 2001 decision is clarified to the extent set forth in this entry; that Verizon's request for a stay of the January 11, 2001 decision is granted in part; implementation of the ordered rate caps and rate reductions by Verizon and Sprint/United need not take place until May 1, 2001; that AT&T's objection to Verizon's January 31, 2001 tariff filing is denied; that Qwest's request for an extension of time is granted and its request for clarification is denied; Qwest shall file its proposed flow-through plan and tariff revisions by March 26, 2001; that the February 16, 2001 requests for revenue-neutral offsets based upon the revenue impact statements filed by Sprint/United and Verizon are denied; that a meeting of Verizon, Sprint/United, staff, OCC and the IXCs take place at 1:30 p.m. on March 19, 2001, in Hearing Room 11-D, PUCO. | 15 |
| 03/13/2001 | Entry ordering that the application for rehearing of OCC, the Sprint companies, and Verizon are granted for the limited purpose of allowing the Commission additional time to consider the arguments and requests raised. | 2 |
| 03/12/2001 | Response to access revenue impact statements of Verizon and Sprint-United, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. | 11 |
| 03/09/2001 | Memorandum in reply to response of OCC to statement of access reduction revenue impact, filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Mazzola. | 7 |
| 03/02/2001 | Response to access reduction revenue impact statements, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. | 15 |
| 02/22/2001 | Memorandum contra rehearing applications of OCC, Verizon and Sprint-United to Commissions January 11, 2001 Opinion and Order, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc., by D. Chorzempa. | 25 |
| 02/22/2001 | Memorandum contra applications for rehearing, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. | 18 |
| 02/22/2001 | Memorandum contra to application for rehearing of OCC, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Co. by J. Stewart. | 8 |
| 02/22/2001 | Memorandum contra to application for rehearing of Verizon North, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Corp. by J. Stewart. | 4 |
| 02/22/2001 | Memorandum in response to application for rehearing of OCC, filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Lodge. | 8 |
| 02/16/2001 | Statement regarding access reduction revenue impact, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. | 7 |
| 02/16/2001 | Statement of access reduction revenue impact filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Lodge. | 22 |
| 02/15/2001 | Letter regarding a confidential description of the flow through calculations, filed on behalf of WorldCom, Inc. by J. Sanders. | 1 |
| 02/15/2001 | Petition for extension and motion for clarification filed on behalf of Qwest Communications Corporation by J. Gubb.(orig.) | 6 |
| 02/15/2001 | Confidential description of flow through filed on behalf of WorldCom by J. Sanders. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 3 |
| 02/14/2001 | AT&T flow-through plan. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 56 |
| 02/14/2001 | WorldCom summary of Ohio Flow through 2/14/2001. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 10 |
| 02/14/2001 | Sprint Flow-through plan (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 4 |
| 02/14/2001 | Proposed flow through plan and tariff revisions filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by D. Chorzempa. | 9 |
| 02/14/2001 | Objections to Verizon's proposed tariff, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by D. Chorzempa. | 6 |
| 02/14/2001 | Petition for extension and motion for clarification filed on behalf of Qwest Communications Corporation by J. Gobb. (Fax copy) | 6 |
| 02/14/2001 | Motion for protective order of WorldCom, Inc. filed by J. Sanders. | 5 |
| 02/14/2001 | Letter regarding the flow-through plan in compliance with the Commission's Opinion and Order 1/11/2001, filed by E. Phelan. | 3 |
| 02/14/2001 | Motion for protective order filed on behalf of Sprint Communications, L.P. by J. Stewart. | 6 |
| 02/12/2001 | Application of Verizon North Inc. for rehearing request for partial stay and request for clarification filed by T. Lodge. | 17 |
| 02/12/2001 | Application for rehearing of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communictions Company LP filed by J. Stewart. | 43 |
| 02/12/2001 | Application for rehearing filed by D. Bergmann on behalf of OCC. | 15 |
| 01/31/2001 | Tariff, PUCO No. 20, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by S. Drombetta. | 13 |
| 01/31/2001 | Tariffs to be withdrawn, PUCO No. 2, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by M. Bishop. | 18 |
| 01/31/2001 | Revision to PUCO No.2 tariff filed by T. Lodge on behalf of Verizon North. | 12 |
| 01/31/2001 | Application for approval to revise its Facilities for Intrastate Access tariff, PUCO No. 2, to comply with the Commission's order dated January 11, 2001 in Case No. 00-127-TP-COI, filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Lodge. (ORIGINALLY FILED AS CASE NO. 01-260-TP-ATA) | 12 |
| 01/31/2001 | Application and exhibits in compliance with PUCO Opinion & Order filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by D. Terry. | 86 |
| 01/30/2001 | Entry granting WorldCom's motion for an extension of time; that all IXC flow-through plans and IXC proposed tariff revisions required by the Commission in its January 11, 2001 decision shall now be filed no later than February 14, 2001. (AE) | 2 |
| 01/25/2001 | Motion for extension of time and memorandum in support filed on behalf of WorldCom, Inc. by J. Sanders and E. Siegel. | 6 |
| 01/11/2001 | Opinion & Order that CBT's June 12, 2000 filing is deemed timely filed; that the Docketing Division shall maintain as confidential the items filed under seal on May 31, 2000, by the small ILECs for a period of 18 months from the date of this decision; that Ameritech, CBT, Sprint/United, and Verizon reduce their intrastate access rates to mirror the CALLS rate caps and rate reductions; that AT&T, Qwest, Sprint, and WorldCom flow through the access reductions ordered in this decision; that this case remain open until otherwise ordered by the Commission. | 18 |
| 11/30/2000 | Entry ordering that, except as detailed in the June 29, 2000 ruling, Ameritech, CBT, Verizon, and Sprint/United are still required to set their respective intrastate access rates equal to June 30, 2000 levels until the Commission orders otherwise. | 2 |
| 11/28/2000 | Letter providing notice that on November 8, 2000, AT&T met with Chairman Schriber, Jim Smith of Ameritech, Dave Celone, and Nadia Soliman and on November 10, 2000 with Chairman Schriber and Commissioner Fergus at the Commission to discuss issues related to intrastate access charge reform, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by E. Finnerty. | 1 |
| 10/23/2000 | Letter stating that Beth Finnerty and David Doty from AT&T met with the Chairman Schriber on October 18, 2000 to discuss some of the generic issues that will confront the Commission in this case, filed by D. Chorzempa. | 1 |
| 09/25/2000 | Supreme Court Transmittal Papers. | 10 |
| 08/25/2000 | Information response filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (6 pgs.) | 6 |
| 08/25/2000 | Amended response filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by D. Marshall. (11 pgs.) | 11 |
| 08/24/2000 | Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (47 pgs.) (S.C. #00-1544) | 47 |
| 08/15/2000 | Entry denying AT&T's application for rehearing, motion for a stay, motion for an escrow, and motion for expedited rulings for the reasons set forth in this entry. (13 pgs.) | 13 |
| 07/26/2000 | Memorandum contra application for rehearing, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. | 8 |
| 07/26/2000 | Memorandum contra application for rehearing, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (8 pgs.) | 8 |
| 07/24/2000 | Memorandum contra of OCC to the application for rehearing and motion for stay of AT&T Communications of Ohio, filed by D. Bergmann. (20 pgs.) | 20 |
| 07/24/2000 | Memorandum contra of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications to application of AT&T Communications of Ohio for rehearing, filed by J. Stewart. (11 pgs.) | 11 |
| 07/24/2000 | Memorandum contra of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications to motion of AT&T Communi- cations of Ohio for an order staying the June 29, 2000 entry or in the alternative an order establishing escrow, filed by J. Stewart. (9 pgs.) | 9 |
| 07/24/2000 | Cincinnati Bell Telephone's opposition to application for rehearing of AT&T Communications of Ohio, filed by D. Hart. (9 pgs.) | 9 |
| 07/24/2000 | Ameritech Ohio's memorandum contra motion for stay or in the alternative an order establishing an escrow account, filed by M. Mulcahy. (8 pgs.) | 8 |
| 07/24/2000 | Memorandum contra of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company to motion of AT&T Communications of Ohio for expedited rulings, filed by J. Stewart. (6 pgs.) | 6 |
| 07/24/2000 | Opposition to motion of AT&T Communications of Ohio for an order staying the June 29, 2000 entry or, in the alterna- tive, an order establishing an escrow, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by D. Hart. (6 pgs.) | 6 |
| 07/24/2000 | Opposition to motion of AT&T Communications of Ohio for expedited rulings on its application for rehearing and motion for an order staying the Commission's entry of June 29, 2000, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by D. Hart. (4 pgs.) | 4 |
| 07/24/2000 | Memorandum of GTE North Incorporated in response to July 17th filings of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. filed by T. Lodge. | 10 |
| 07/19/2000 | Tariff, PUCO No.2, 1st page 9, original pages 9.1, 9.2, and 9.3, 1st page 10, original pages 10.1, 01.2, 10.3, 10.4, 10.5, 10.6, 10.7, 10.8, 10.9, 10.10, 10.11, 10.12 and 10.13, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by M. Bishop. | 28 |
| 07/17/2000 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. | 23 |
| 07/17/2000 | Motion for an order staying the June 29, 2000 entry or in the alternative, an order establishing an escrow, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc., by D. Chorzempa. | 10 |
| 07/17/2000 | Motion for expedited rulings on its application for rehearing and motion for an order staying the Commission's entry of June 29, 2000, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by D. Chorzempa. | 7 |
| 07/12/2000 | Reply comments filed on behalf of Teligent Services by S. Bloomfield. | 5 |
| 07/12/2000 | Reply comments filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Co. L.P. by J. Stewart. | 22 |
| 07/12/2000 | Reply comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. | 20 |
| 07/12/2000 | Reply comments filed on behalf of The Small Telephone Companies by T. Lodge. | 26 |
| 07/12/2000 | Reply comments filed on behalf of GTE North by T. Lodge. | 12 |
| 07/12/2000 | Reply comments filed on behalf of Western Telephone Co. and Alltel Ohio by T. Lodge. | 9 |
| 07/12/2000 | Reply comments filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by D. Marshall. | 11 |
| 07/12/2000 | Reply Comments of Ohio Consumers' Counsel. Filed by: D. Bergmann, | 0 |
| 07/12/2000 | Reply comments to parties' initial comments to the Commissions April 27, 2000 entry, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by D. Chorzempa. | 49 |
| 07/12/2000 | Reply comments of WorldCom, Inc. filed by J. Sanders and J. Campion | 12 |
| 07/10/2000 | Memorandum contra to AT&T's motion to strike, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (5 pgs.) | 5 |
| 07/06/2000 | Statement of compliance filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Kennedy. | 7 |
| 07/06/2000 | Statement of compliance filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Kennedy. | 1 |
| 07/03/2000 | Tariff, PUCO No. 1, filed on behalf of Sprint by D. Terry. | 106 |
| 07/03/2000 | Letter stating that United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint is freezing intrastate access charges at the June 30, 2000 levels until the Commission issues a decision in the 00-127 proceeding or until December 1, 2000, whichever comes first, filed by B. Donahue. | 2 |
| 06/30/2000 | Memorandum in opposition to AT&T's motion to strike CBT's information response, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by D. Hart. | 5 |
| 06/30/2000 | Memorandum in opposition to AT&T's motion to strike infor- mation response, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by R. Wentz. (5 pgs.) | 5 |
| 06/29/2000 | Entry ordering that CBT and Sprint/United Telephone Company, consistent with Finding 4, shall set intrastate access charges to interexchange carriers at rates set equal to June 30, 2000 levels; that Ameritech shall set its intra- state access charges to interexchange carriers at rates set equal to June 30, 2000 levels, except to the extent neces- sary to implement the intrastate presubscribed interexchange carrier charge reductions consistent with the company's alternative regulation plan; that GTE shall set its intra- state access charges to interexchange carriers at rates set equal to June 30, 2000 levels, except to the extent neces- sary to comply with the Commission's prior requirement to reduce intrastate access charges by $5 million; that AT&T, MCI, Sprint, and Qwest are instructed to work with the staff to develop proposed rate flow through rate reductions con- sistent with Finding 7. (4 pgs.) | 4 |
| 06/28/2000 | Certificate of service filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company L.P. by J. Stewart. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 06/28/2000 | Certificate of service filed on behalf of CTSI, Inc. by B. Ferris. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 06/27/2000 | Certificate of service filed on behalf of CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc. by V. Norris. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 06/27/2000 | Certificate of service filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 06/26/2000 | Certificate of service filed on behalf of OCC by D. Berg- mann. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 06/23/2000 | Revised Execitive Summary for initial comments, filed on behalf of Western Reserve Telephone Co. and Alltel Ohio by T. Lodge. (5 pgs.) | 5 |
| 06/23/2000 | Certificate of service filed on behalf of the Small Tele- phone Companies by T. Lodge. (5 pgs.) | 5 |
| 06/23/2000 | Certificate of service filed on behalf of Western Reserve Telephone Co. and Alltel Ohio by T. Lodge. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 06/23/2000 | Certificate of service filed on behalf of Doylestown Tele- phone Co., Nova Telephone Co., Ridgeville Telephone Co., and Sycamore Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 06/23/2000 | Certificate of service filed on behalf of GTE North by T. Lodge. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 06/23/2000 | Certificate of service filed on behalf by M. Christensen. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 06/22/2000 | Entry ordering that each entity that filed initial comments in response to the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry in this docket shall serve a copy of those comments upon the other entities listed in Finding 3. (AE) (4 pgs.) | 4 |
| 06/20/2000 | Comments filed on behalf of Association of Communications Enterprises by S. Bloomfield. (6 pgs.) | 6 |
| 06/20/2000 | Initial comments filed on behalf of Doylestown Telephone Co., Nova Telephone Co., Ridgeville Telephone Co., and Sycamore Telephone Co. by T. Lodge. (11 pgs.) | 11 |
| 06/20/2000 | Comments filed on behalf of Buckeye TeleSystem by S. Bloom- field. (5 pgs.) | 5 |
| 06/20/2000 | Initial comments filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Tele- phone Co. by R. Wentz. (15 pgs.) | 15 |
| 06/20/2000 | Comments filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (80 pgs.) | 80 |
| 06/20/2000 | Initial comments filed on behalf of McLeodUSA Telecommuni- cations Services by M. Christensen. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 06/20/2000 | Comments filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by S. Bloomfield. (10 pgs.) | 10 |
| 06/20/2000 | Comments filed on behalf of Teligent Services Inc. by S. Bloomfield. (12 pgs.) | 12 |
| 06/20/2000 | Comments filed on behalf of CTSI, Inc. by B. Ferris. (17 pgs.) | 17 |
| 06/20/2000 | Initial comments filed on behalf of United Telephone Com- pany of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company L.P. by J. Stewart. (26 pgs.) | 26 |
| 06/20/2000 | Initial comments filed on behalf of Western Reserve and Alltel Ohio by T. Lodge. (31 pgs.) | 31 |
| 06/20/2000 | Initial comments filed on behalf of GTE North by T. Lodge. (31 pgs.) | 31 |
| 06/20/2000 | Initial comments filed on behalf of the Small Telephone Companies by T. Lodge. (37 pgs.) | 37 |
| 06/20/2000 | Initial comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (42 pgs.) | 42 |
| 06/20/2000 | Motion to strike CBT's and Ameritech Ohio's information response, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (5 pgs.) | 5 |
| 06/20/2000 | Comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (27 pgs.) | 27 |
| 06/20/2000 | Initial comments filed on behalf of WorldCom, Inc. by J. Sanders and J. Campion. (60 pgs.) | 60 |
| 06/20/2000 | Comments filed on behalf of CenturyTel of Ohio by V. Norris. (5 pgs.) | 5 |
| 06/12/2000 | Response filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by D. Marshall. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of the Fort Jennings Telephone Company, by S. Berelsman. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of Farmers Mutual Telephone Company, by E. Damman. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of the Benton Ridge Telephone Company, by K. Horne. (FILED UNDER SEALED) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of Buckland Telephone Company, by R. Moon. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of the Champaign Telephone Company, by C. Huffman. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of Columbus Grove Telephone Company, by P. Nixon. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of Continental Telephone Company, by M. Proctor. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of Doylestown Telephone Company, by T. Brockman. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of Conneaut Telephone Company, by T. Picard. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of Arcadia Telephone Company, by M. Proctor. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of Arthur Mutual Telephone Company, by J. Sholl. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of Ayersville Telephone Company, T. Pontious. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of Bascom Mutual Telephone Company, by D. Depinet. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of Frontier Communications of Michigan, Inc., by J. Stommen. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of Wabash Mutual Telephone Company. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of Vaughnsville Telephone Company, by M. Kaplan. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of Vanlue Telephone Company, byM. Proctor. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of Telephone Service Company. by M. Plows. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of the Sycamore Telephone Company, by R. Ekleberry. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of Sherwood Mutual Telephone Company, by M. Woodring. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of the Ridgeville Telephone Company, by L. Wendt. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of Pattersonville Telephone Company. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 4 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of the Ottoville Mutual Telephone Company, by D. Hoersten. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of The Germantown Independent Telephone Co. by R. Kern. (4 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 4 |
| 05/31/2000 | Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Small Local Exchange Carriers by T. Lodge. (41 pgs.) | 41 |
| 05/31/2000 | Information response filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Smith. (6 pgs.) | 6 |
| 05/31/2000 | Information response filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve Telephone by T. Lodge. (6 pgs.) | 6 |
| 05/31/2000 | Response filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by W. Walston. (4 pgs.) | 4 |
| 05/31/2000 | Response filed on behalf of GTE North by N. Heuring. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 05/31/2000 | Response information filed on behalf of Horizon Chillicothe Telephone by K. Rickey. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 05/31/2000 | Response information filed on behalf of CenturyTel by V. Norris. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of Nova Telephone Company, by R. Ringler. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of the Orwell Telephone Company, by P. Nixon. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of Oakwood Mutual Telephone Company, by M. Proctor. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of the New Knoxville Telephone Company, filed by J. Ploge.. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of Minford Telephone Company, filed by P. McGraw. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of the Middle Pont Home Telephone Company, by R. Long. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of McClure Telephone Company by L.. Armstrong. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of Little Miami Communications Corporation. by M. Proctor. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential information response filed on behalf of Kalida Telephone Company, Inc. by C. Phillips. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential response filed on behalf of Glandorf Telephone Company by L. Heckman. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/31/2000 | Confidential response on behalf of Germantown Independent Telephone Company by R. Kern. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 5 |
| 05/18/2000 | Entry ordering that the extension requests of OCC and the small ILECs in Ohio are granted in part; that all interested stakeholders may now file initial and reply comments to the list of questions contained in Finding 4 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry on or before June 20 and July 12, 2000, respectively; that large and small ILECs shall still file with the Commission, on or before May 31, 2000, the revenue information listed in Finding 5 of the Commission's April 27, 2000 entry. (AE) (4 pgs.) | 4 |
| 05/11/2000 | Request for an extension of time for the filing of comments in response to paragraph 4 of the Commission's entry of April 27, 2000, filed on behalf of the Small Local Exchange Telephone Company of the State of Ohio by T. Lodge. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 05/11/2000 | Memorandum contra OCC's motion for extension of time; request for expedited ruling, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (4 pgs.) | 4 |
| 05/04/2000 | Motion for extension of time and request for expedited ruling and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of OCC by J. Bergmann. (7 pgs.) | 7 |
| 04/27/2000 | Entry ordering that all interested stakeholders are invited to file initial comments and reply comments to the list of questions contained in Finding 4 of this entry; the initial and reply comments must be filed with the Commission on or before May 31 and June 20, 2000, respectively; that large and small ILECs file with the Commission the revenue infor- mation by May 31, 2000; that CTSI's motion to intervene and motion for other counsel to appear in this proceeding are denied. (9 pgs.) | 9 |
| 04/24/2000 | Motion to appear and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of CTSI, Inc. by B. Ferris. (6 pgs.) | 6 |
| 03/30/2000 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of CTSI, Inc. by B. Ferris. (7 pgs.)a | 7 |
| 03/24/2000 | Letter notifying the Commission that The Ohio Small Local Exchange Carriers Association (OSLECA) trustees voted on March 17, 2000, to give the Commission ten (10) days notice that $75,000 or less of the Hardship funds will be utilized in accordance with the guidelines issued on September 2, 1999, in an entry in PUCO Case 97-414-TP-UNC, filed by P. Collins. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 01/20/2000 | Entry ordering that a generic investigation be opened in accordance with finding. (2 pgs) | 2 |
| 01/19/2000 | In the matter of the Commission's Investigation into the modification of Intrastate Access Charges. (1 pg) | 1 |