DIS - Case Record for 96-0059-GA-UNC Skip to main content

Case Record For:

96-0059-GA-UNC

Case Title: MB OPERATING CO., INC.
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: GA-GAS
Purpose Code: UNC-Unclassified
Date Opened: 1/19/1996
Date Closed: 5/30/1996
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 63 documents 1 /  5 
Date FiledSummaryPages
07/18/1996Entry granting the motions for leave to file an application for rehearing filed by Farm Bureau and OOGA; that the appli- cations for rehearing filed by both Farm Bureau and OOGA be granted to the extent set forth in Finding 12. (7 pgs.)7
06/28/1996Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Ohio Farm Bureau Federation by L. Gear- hardt.15
06/28/1996Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Ohio Farm Bureau Federation by L. Gear- hardt. (10 pgs.)10
06/28/1996Motion for leave to file an application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Ohio Oil & Gas Association, et al. by W. Airey. (6 pgs.)6
06/28/1996Motion for leave to file an application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Ohio Oil & Gas Association, et al. by W. Airey.6
06/28/1996Motion for leave to file an application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Ohio Farm Bureau Federation by L. Gearhardt. (6 pgs.)6
06/28/1996Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Ohio Oil & Gas Association, et al. by W. Airey. (15 pgs.)15
06/14/1996Service Notice5
06/13/1996Entry Nunc Pro Tunc ordering that Finding 21 in the May 30, 1996 Finding & Order in this case be changed nunc pro tunc to read as set forth in Finding 3. (2 pgs.)2
06/07/1996Supplemental statement of applicants filed by S. Taft and G. Weber. (5 pgs.)5
06/07/1996Supplemental statement of applicants filed by S. Taft and G. Weber.5
05/30/1996Service Notice21
05/30/1996Finding & Order granting the application contingent upon Northeast's, Ohio Intrastate's and MB Operating Company's compliance with the requirements set forth in Findings 15 and 16; that the motion of East Ohio Gas Company to intervene be granted to the extent discussed in this order; that the Commission's approval of the application does not con- stitute state action for the purposes of exemption from federal antitrust laws. (18 pgs.)0
05/15/1996Correspondence letters regarding the application, filed by various consumers.7
05/15/1996Stipulation filed on behalf of Northeast Ohio Natural Gas Corp., Ohio Intrastate Gas Transmission Co., Northeast Ohio Operating Companies, Inc., Marbel Energy Corp., and MB Operating Co., Inc. by S. Taft; and East Ohio Gas Co. by H. Liebman.8
 
1 /  5 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Deerwester, Steven