| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 09/18/1996 | Complaint for a writ of mandamus filed with the Supreme Court of Ohio by the City of Clyde. (37 pgs.) | 37 |
| 08/20/1996 | Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of The City of Clyde, Ohio by G. Ottinger. (8 pgs.) | 8 |
| 06/12/1996 | Entry ordering that Clyde's request to reopen the hearing to introduce new evidence be denied; that Clyde's applica- tion for rehearing be granted to the limited extent set forth in Finding 10 and denied in all other respects; that Commission staff meet with Clyde and Toledo Edison to review all of Clyde's safety related concerns, investigate such concerns, file a report of investigation in a separate docket, and provide a copy of the staff report to both Clyde and Toledo Edison; that Clyde and Toledo Edison be given 45 days from the issuance of the staff report to file any response to such report; that this case is closed of record. Dissenting Opinion of Commissioner Richard M. Fanelly. (7 pgs.) | 7 |
| 06/03/1996 | Resolution No. 1996-72 filed on behalf of the City of Clyde. (4 pgs.) | 4 |
| 05/23/1996 | Memorandum contra application for rehearing of the City of Clyde, filed on behalf of Continental Cablevision of Ohio, Inc. by B. Royer. (10 pgs.) | 10 |
| 05/23/1996 | Memorandum contra Clyde's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of Toledo Edison by R. McLaren, Jr. (16 pgs.) | 16 |
| 05/15/1996 | Original affidavit of Dennis Benesh to replace to copy attached to the application for rehearing filed on May 13, 1996, filed on behalf of the City of Clyde by G. Ottinger. (5 pgs.) | 5 |
| 05/13/1996 | Memorandum of law in support of the application of The City of Clyde, Ohio for rehearing and for leave to adduce addit- ional evidence filed by G. Ottinger. (67 pgs.) | 67 |
| 05/13/1996 | Application of The City of Clyde, Ohio for rehearing and for leave to adduce additional evidence filed by G. Ottinger. (8 pgs.) | 8 |
| 04/11/1996 | Opinion & Order that Clyde's application for substitution of electric service by its municipal electric utility to those consumers located within Clyde's corporate limits who pres- ently receive electric service from the Toledo Edison Com- pany and authorization to require the removal of certain of Toledo Edison's electric distribution facilities from within Clyde's corporate limits is denied. Separate Concurring Opinion of Commissioner Richard M. Fanelly. (32 pgs.) | 32 |
| 08/18/1995 | Letter addressing the misstatements made by the attorneys for Clyde filed by T. Keegan. (10 pgs.) | 10 |
| 06/16/1995 | Correspondence letter opposing the application, filed by Arlyn and Patricia Newhouse. | 2 |
| 06/16/1995 | Reply brief filed on behalf of Continental Cablevision of Ohio by B. Royer. (12 pgs.) | 0 |
| 06/16/1995 | Reply brief filed on behalf of applicant by G. Ottinger. (90 pgs.) | 0 |
| 06/16/1995 | Post-hearing reply brief filed on behalf of Toledo Edison by R. McLaren, Jr. (33 pgs.) | 0 |