Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
03/13/1997 | Entry closing this case of record. (1 pg.) | 1 |
02/19/1997 | Memo from Joe Reinhardt, PUCO staff, recommending that this case be closed of record due to the fact that all grade crossing upgrades have been completed. (1 pg.) | 1 |
01/12/1996 | Returned mail. | 0 |
12/21/1995 | Entry ordering that the construction completion date for the projects involved in this case be extended until July 15, 1996. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
11/22/1995 | Letter requesting extension of order deadline from January 26, 1996 to July 15, 1996 filed on behalf of Conrail by F.X. Giacoma. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
01/26/1995 | Entry ordering Conrail to proceed with installation of the project in Findlay, Ohio; that Conrail complete installation on or before January 26, 1996; that Conrail notify the Commisssion's railroad section and ODOT upon completion of each each installation and railroad crossing closure.(8 pgs) | 0 |
01/20/1995 | Memo from ODOT authorizing Conrail to proceed with the installation of the Findlay/Conrail Corridor Project, Hancock County, filed by M. Ross, PUCO staff. (5 pgs.) | 0 |
10/17/1994 | Memo from ODOT stating that all improvements will be done within existing local right-of-way and no new property will be acquired, and that ODOT is filing the Categorical Exclusion Confirmation, filed by J. Reinhardt, PUCO staff. (2 pgs.) | 0 |
03/31/1994 | Memo, with attached letter from George Stanforth, ODOT, stating that ODOT will begin reviewing the railroad's plans for their field and office check, filedl by J. Reinhardt. | 0 |
03/10/1994 | Entry ordering that the installation project programmed for the East Market Street grade crossing in Findlay (513 704 C) be deleted from case No. 91-2143-RR-FED and added to the Findlay Rail Corridor project authorized in case No. 93-292-RR-FED. | 0 |
01/07/1994 | Memo stating that Conrail has submitted the rquired pre- liminary plans and estimates within their deadline as ordered by the Commission and that these plans have been forwarded to ODOT and Federal Highway Admininstration for funding and construction authorization, filed by J. Rein- hardt, PUCO staff. | 0 |
09/23/1993 | Entry adopting the stipulation and recommendation; that Conrail submit for Commission approval site plans and cost estimates for the installation project within 90 days of the date of this entry. | 0 |
09/01/1993 | Memo from J. Reinhardt, PUCO staff, stating that ODOT has authorized the Commission to secure preliminary engineer- ing for contract plan preparation, and that Conrail should be ordered to submit the required preliminary plans and estimates as agreed in the Findlay Corridor. | 0 |
04/01/1993 | Executed four party agreement and recommendation for the City of Findlay Corridor Project, Conrail, Hancock County, filed on behalf of ODOT by J. Wray; Conrail by G. M. Williams; the PUCO staff by A. Agler; and the City of Findlay by D. Wobster, submitted by J. Reinhardt, PUCO staff. | 0 |
02/17/1993 | In the matter of the request regarding the Corridor Project, with installation and upgrade of active warning devices, rail-highway surfaces, and grade crossing closures to vehicles at various locations in the City of Findlay, Hancock County, Consolidated Rail Corp. | 0 |