| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 09/04/1997 | Opinion & Order that, in accordance with these findings, ODOT's April 4, 1997 request is granted on a limited basis, such that, for a two year period commencing the date of the journalization of this entry, Cincinnati Bell shall make the 2-1-2 service code available to ODOT for use in providing, on a noncommercial basis by means of its ARTIMIS project, travel and traffic management information services throughout those portions of the greater Cincinnati Northern Kentucky Metropolitan Area which are located within Ohio; that this case be dismissed and closed of record. | 16 |
| 09/04/1997 | Opinion & Order that, in accordance with these findings, ODOT's April 4, 1997 request is granted on a limited basis,such that, for a two-year period commencing on the date of the journalization of this entry, Cincinnati Bell shall make the 2-1-1 service code available to ODOT for use in providing, on a noncommercial basis by means of its ARTIMIS project, travel and traffic management information services throughout those portions of the greater Cincinnati Northern Kentucky Metropolitan Area which are located within Ohio; that this case be dismissed and closed of record. (16 pgs.) | 16 |
| 11/16/1993 | Proof of Publication filed. (Clark County) | 0 |
| 10/28/1993 | Entry ordering that Case No. 93-1799-TP-COI is hereby initiated in order for the Commission to investigate the allocation of three-digit dialing codes and other abbreviated dialing arrangements; that Case Nos. 93-99- TP-CSS and 93-1171-TP-CSS be held in abeyance pending the outcome of the Commission's investigation in Case No. 93-1799-TP-COI. | 0 |
| 09/14/1993 | Correspondence letter filed on behalf of Asset Protection Inc. by R. Napper. | 0 |
| 08/17/1993 | Additional information filed on behalf of complainant by R. Napper. | 0 |
| 07/07/1993 | Answer filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company, by S. Williams. | 0 |
| 06/17/1993 | Entry denying United's motion to dismiss complaint and ordering that they file their answer to the complaint by 7/7/93; that complaint against Sprint be dismissed and closed of record. | 0 |
| 02/04/1993 | Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Sprint, by M. Hull. | 0 |
| 02/03/1993 | Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company, by S. Williams. | 0 |
| 01/14/1993 | Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: United Telephone Company of Ohio, office of the president. | 0 |
| 01/14/1993 | Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Mary Hull U.S. Sprint. | 0 |
| 01/13/1993 | In the matter of the complaint of Redell V. Napper dba Asset Protection (vs) United Telephone Company of Ohio and Sprint relative to the alleged unjust and unreason- able refusal of the issuance of an N11 service code. | 0 |