| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 11/10/1992 | Letter concurring with the terms of the proposed application, filed by M. Christensen. | 0 |
| 06/29/1992 | Returned from the Supreme Court. | 0 |
| 04/06/1992 | Tariffs, PUCO No. 1, Section 2 - 2nd sheet 15, 3rd sheet 16, 1st sheet 16.1, original sheet 16.2, and original sheet 16.3, filed on behalf of Ohio Bell by A. Krekel. | 0 |
| 04/02/1992 | Entry approving the tariff for resale and sharing of Centrex service. | 0 |
| 03/30/1992 | Revised tariffs, PUCO No. 1, Section 2 - 1st sheet 15, 2nd sheet 16, original sheet 16.1 (Exhibit A); Section 2 - 2nd sheet 15, 3rd sheet 16, 1st sheet 16.1, original sheet 16.2, original sheet 16.3 (Exhibit B); Exhibit C-2, filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by W. Hunt. | 0 |
| 03/26/1992 | Entry approving the proposed guidelines for the resale and sharing of Centrex service. | 0 |
| 03/17/1992 | Letter stating that CENTEX Telemanagement will withdraw its appeals of the cases pending before the Ohio Supreme Court, Case Nos. 91-1899 and 91-2396, upon the journali- zation of the Commission orders approving both the guide- lines and tariff, as ultimately agreed to by the parties; and requesting that the Commission retain jurisdiction over this proceeding at least until CENTEX Telemanagement's first service order to Ohio Bell has been filled, filed by M. Christensen. | 0 |
| 03/17/1992 | Letter in response to the March 11, 1992 letter from William H. Hunt, filed by N. Ende and M. Christensen. | 0 |
| 03/13/1992 | Letter regarding the joint report of the parties filed February 11, 1992, filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by W. Hunt. | 0 |
| 02/11/1992 | Joint report filed on behalf of complainant by V. Toth and respondent by W. Hunt and C. Rawlings. | 0 |
| 12/31/1991 | Transmittal papers filed at Supreme Court. | 0 |
| 12/02/1991 | Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of Centrex Telemanagement, Inc. by M. Christensen. (S.C. #91-2396) | 0 |
| 10/03/1991 | Entry denying the application for rehearing filed by CENTEX and granting Ohio Bell's application for rehearing for the purpose of clarification, to the extent described in this Order. | 0 |
| 09/17/1991 | Memorandum contra to Ohio Bell Telephone Company's application for rehearing. filed on behalf of Centex Telemanagement, Inc. by S. Bloomfield. | 0 |
| 09/13/1991 | Memorandum contra application for rehearing of Centex Telemanagement, Inc., filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by W. Hunt and C. Rawlings. | 0 |