DIS - Case Record for 89-0564-TP-COI Skip to main content

Case Record For:

89-0564-TP-COI

File a Public Comment
Case Title: SMALL LOCAL EXCHANGE TEL COMPANIES
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: COI-Commission inquiry
Date Opened: 4/12/1989
Date Closed: 2/17/1993
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 93 documents 1 /  7 
Date FiledSummaryPages
08/31/2000PUCO Form KDW 2.01 and 2.02 for the reporting period of July 1, 1999 thru December 31, 1999, due September 1, 2000, filed on behalf of Conneaut Telephone Co. by K. Picard. (3 pgs.)3
09/01/1998PUCO Form KDW 2.01 and 2.02 for the reporting period of July 1, 1996 thru June 30, 1997, filed on behalf of Con- ceaut Telephone Co. by K. Picard. (4 pgs.)4
08/29/1997PUCO Form KDW 2.01 and 2.02 for the reporting period July 1, 1996 thru June 30, 1997, due September 1, 1997, filed on behalf of Conneaut Telephone by K. Picard. (3 pgs.)3
09/26/1996Additional information filed. (3 pgs.)0
09/26/1996Annual TSA report for the period of July 1, 1995 thru June 30, 1996, filed on behalf of Conneaut Telephone by K. Picard (3 pgs.)3
11/15/1995Annual TSA report for the period of July 1, 1994 thru June 30, 1995, filed on behalf of Conneaut Telephone Co. by K. Picard. (3 pgs.)3
10/07/1993Entry ordering that all small telephone companies which file amendments to pending cases requesting a modification of tariff charges which is not for an increase in rates must serve upon any entity which has already filed an objection to the objection to the application and served on the company, all pleadings or papers filed with the Commission subsequent to the filing of the objectino in accordance with the Ohio Administrative Code; that, sub- sequent to an amendment being filed, the Commission staff will consider on a case-by-case basis whether the amend- ment is substantial enough in nature to require an ex- tension of the automatic approval date.0
02/17/1993 Supplemental Finding & Order that small telephone companies shall file their required reporting information pursuant to Findings 5 and 6; that the new filing requirements as discussed in Finding 5 shall become effective upon the date of this Order and this case is closed as a matter of record.8
01/20/1993Tariff update, PUCO No. 1, filed on behalf of the Champaign Telephone Co. by A. Moore.0
01/07/1993Reply memorandum filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann.0
12/28/1992Memorandum relative to the request for clarification of OCC, filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska.0
12/14/1992Request for clarification and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann.0
09/03/1992Notice of withdrawal of counsel and designation of new trial attorney filed on behalf of OCC by B. Weston.0
10/03/1991Entry denying OCC's application for rehearing.0
09/30/1991Letter showing erratum in OCC's September 16, 1991 application for rehearing, filed by B. Weston.0
 
1 /  7 
      
      
Attorney General:
Gainer,James
Attorney Examiner: