Case Record For: 88-1085-EL-CSS Case Title: OCC V DAYTON POWER & LIGHT COMPANY Status: AR-Archived Industry Code: EL-ELECTRIC Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety Date Opened: 7/20/1988 Date Closed: Case Documents Public Comments Parties of Record Related Cases Printable Docket Card Service List View All 1 - 13 of 13 documents 1 / 1 Date FiledSummaryPages 09/27/1988Entry dismissing case and granting OCC's motion for a one day extension of time to file its memoranda contra to the motion to dismiss and motion for protective orders.8 09/23/1988Memorandum of DP&L in reply to OCC's memorandum contra DPL's motion for protective order to stay discovery filed by C. Faruki.0 09/15/1988Corrected Exhibit 1 to complainant's memorandum contra motion to dismiss filed by B. Cohen on behalf of OCC.0 09/14/1988Memorandum of The Dayton Power and Light Company in reply to OCC's memorandum contra DP&L's motion to dismiss OCC's complaint filed by C. Faruki.0 09/13/1988Complainant's memorandum contra motion to dismiss filed by B. Cohen.0 09/13/1988Complainant's memorandum contra The Dayton Power and Light Company's motion for a protective order to stay discovery filed by E. Robinson-McGriff on behalf of OCC.0 09/08/1988Motion for extension of time and request for expedited ruling filed by E. Robinson-McGriff on behalf of OCC.0 08/25/1988The Dayton Power and Light Company's motion for a protective order to stay discovery pending the disposition of The Dayton Power & Light Company's motion to dismiss office of Consumers' Counsel's complaint, filed by C. Faruki.0 08/25/1988Motion to dismiss OCC complaint, filed by C. Faruki on behalf of Dayton Power & Light Company.0 08/09/1988Entry granting motion to the request of The Dayton Power & Light Company for a thirty-day extension of time until 9/14/88 to file answer. (AE)0 08/01/1988Motion of The Dayton Power and Light Company for extension of time to respond to filing of Office of The Consumers' Counsel filed by C. Faruki.0 07/25/1988Complaint form letter and copy of complaint mailed out to: Paul L. Hortsman/Smith &Schnacke Dayton Power & Light Company/Stephen Koziar,Jr. Charles Faruki/Smith & Schnacke0 07/20/1988Office of the Consumers' Counsel (Vs) The Dayton Power & Light Company, Relative to Formal Complaint or, in the alternative, motion for Commission-Ordered Investigation into the unjust and unreasonable electric rates charged by The Dayton Power & Light Company.0 1 / 1 Attorney General: Attorney Examiner: Mooney,Colleen