Skip to main content

Case Record For:

86-0861-TP-PEX

File a Public Comment
Case Title: R SAAM V UNITED/OHIO BELL & GENERAL
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: PEX-Petition for extended area service
Date Opened: 5/22/1986
Date Closed: 6/16/1987
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 37 documents 1 /  3 
Date FiledSummaryPages
10/03/1989Tariff sheets filed on behalf of respondent by J. Ludenia.0
09/29/1989Revised tariff sheets filed on behalf of applicant by L. Soeder.0
04/24/1989Information Response of The Ohio Bell Telephone Company filed by A. Sedory.0
04/14/1989Letter filed by M. Askins on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio, RE: informing the Commission that the proposed implementation date is October 7, 1989.0
12/20/1988Supplemental Opinion and Order denying two-way, non-optional EAS between Woodville exchange and Toledo exchange and Elmore exchanges; granting two-way, non-optional, measured- rate EAS between Woodville exchange and Toledo exchange and Extended Local Calling service from Woodville exchange and Toledo exchange and Local Calling Plus from the Toledo to Woodville Exchange.0
11/30/1987Survey results from residents inthe 849 exchange filed by R. Saam.0
10/15/1987Comments of Complainants filed by R. Goodman.0
10/02/1987Entry ordering that counsel for the complainats shall have until 10/12/87, to provide a statement to the Commission regarding whether complainants desire a further hearing on the cost of instituting requested flate-rate EAS and/or measured-rate EAS between the remaining involved exchanges, or otherwise to comment on the informational responses of the respondents filed 8/14/87. (AE)0
09/29/1987Letter filed by R. Goodman on behalf of complainant, requesting a second extension of time until 10/12/87 within which to file comments to the Information Response submitted by Ohio Bell, United Telephone, and General Telephone.0
09/03/1987Entry ordering that counsel for the complainants shall have until 9/28/87, to provide a statement to the Commission re- garding whether complainants desire a further hearing on the cost of instituting requested flat-rates EAS and/or measured rate EAS between the remaining involved exchanges, or to otherwise comment on the informational responses of the respondents filed 8/14/87. (AE)0
09/01/1987Letter filed by R. Goodman on behalf of complainant, RE: requesting an extension of time until 9/28/87 to file comments.0
08/18/1987Information response of United Telephone Company of Ohio, filed by J. Rozic.0
08/14/1987Information Response of The Ohio Bell Telephone Company filed by A. Sedory.0
08/14/1987Information response of GTE MTO Inc. filed by B. Kazee.0
06/24/1987Correspondence letter requesting status of case, filed by and on behalf of R. Saam.0
 
1 /  3 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Fullin, Daniel