Case Record For: 13-0336-EL-CSS File a Public Comment Case Title: KAWS INC DBA RB TOOL & MFG CO VS DUKE ENERGY Status: CL-CLOSED Industry Code: EL-ELECTRIC Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety Date Opened: 1/30/2013 Date Closed: 12/27/2018 Case Documents Public Comments Parties of Record Related Cases Printable Docket Card Service List View All 1 - 13 of 13 documents 1 / 1 Date FiledSummaryPages 12/27/2018Case Action Form closing cases with an effective date of 12/27/18 electronically filed by Ms. Mary E. Fischer on behalf of Megan J. Addison, Attorney Examiner, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.2 07/02/2013Service Notice2 07/02/2013Entry ordering that the parties' joint motion to dismiss be granted and that this case be dismissed without prejudice.2 06/18/2013Joint Motion to Dismiss and memorandum in support electronically filed by Mr. Robert A. McMahon on behalf of Duke Energy Ohio, Inc.3 04/15/2013Service Notice2 04/15/2013Attorney Examiner Entry continuing the settlement conference to June 25, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., electronically filed by Vesta R Miller on behalf of Kerry K. Sheets, Attorney Examiner, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio3 04/11/2013Motion to Continue Settlement Conference and memorandum in support electronically filed by Mr. Robert A. McMahon on behalf of Duke Energy Ohio, Inc.4 03/08/2013Service Notice2 03/08/2013Attorney Examiner Entry scheduling a settlement conference on April 16, 2013, at 2:00 p.m., electronically filed by Vesta R. Miller on behalf of Kerry K. Sheets, Attorney Examiner, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.3 02/19/2013Answer of Respondent Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. electronically filed by Mr. Robert A. McMahon on behalf of Duke Energy Ohio, Inc.5 01/30/2013Complaint service letter and copy of complaint sent to Duke Energy Ohio.1 01/30/2013Complaint response letter and brochure sent to KAWS, INC dba RB Tool & Mfg. Co. 1 01/30/2013In the matter of the complaint of KAWS, Inc dba RB Tool & Mfg. Co vs Duke Energy for continued inefficient service and the damages that have been endured by Customer due to said inefficient service.4 1 / 1 Attorney General: Attorney Examiner: