Skip to main content

Case Record For:


File a Public Comment
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: PEX-Petition for extended area service
Date Opened: 7/12/2002
Date Closed: 9/2/2003
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 28 documents 1 /  2 
Date FiledSummaryPages
09/02/2003Opinion & Order that the request for any form of EAS between the Mogadore Exchange and the Hartville, Greensburg, Ravenna, Rootstown, North Canton, Atwater, Manchester, and Montrose exchanges is denied; that SBC comply with the directives of this order concerning subscriber notification of its optional calling plans and work with the Communications Section to coordinate press releases pertaining to the optional calling plans available to Mogadore exchange subscribers.12
08/06/2003Notice of removal of counsel on behalf of Ameritech Ohio or SBC Ohio, filed by M. Fenlon.2
01/21/2003Company Exhibit 2 filed.20
12/26/2002Complainant Exhibit 4, correspondence letter from Portage County Board of Commissioners, filed by C. Keiper.1
12/18/2002Transcript filed for hearing held December 11, 2002, (KS) 254 pgs Submitted.254
12/04/2002Testimony of Cassandra F. Cole witness for Verizon North Inc. filed by W. Keating.11
12/04/2002Testimony of Kathleen M. Gentle-Klein filed on behalf of respondent Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings.47
12/02/2002Testimony of Cassandra F. Cole witness for Verizon North Inc. filed by W. Keating.11
11/26/2002Proof of publication filed. (Stark County)1
11/15/2002Proof of publication filed.1
10/29/2002Entry ordering that a public hearing in this matter shall be scheduled to begin at 10:00 a.m. on December 11, 2002 at the Summite County public Library, Mogadore Branch, 144 S. Cleveland Ave, Mogadore, Ohio 44260. (KS)7
10/28/2002Letters of legal notices.7
10/18/2002Letter stating that institution of any form of EAS (flat rate or measured rate) for the involved exchanges will not result in exceptionally heavy investments in facilities nor exceptionally high costs, filed on behalf of respondent, SBC Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings.2
09/30/2002Entry ordering that Verizon's motion for protective order, filed on September 20, 2002, is denied and, as a result, the unredacted version of that pleading, filed under seal on September 20, 2002, shall, unless the Commission or attorney examiner orders otherwise, be treated as a public filing beginning seven days after the date of this entry. (KS)8
09/20/2002Confidential information response filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by C. Flahive. (FILED UNDER SEAL) 7
1 /  2 
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Sheets, Kerry