|
02/02/2007
|
Letter notifying the PUCO of results of the balloting conducted in the Haskins-Tontgogany exchange on behalf of Verizon filed by P. Cook. |
|
05/03/2001
|
Revised tariff, PUCO 20, Part 4, Section 1, 5th sheet 23, 5th sheet 29; Section 2, 8th sheet 15.3, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by K. Gentile-Klein. |
|
04/11/2001
|
Revised tariff sheets, PUCO No. 8 reflecting the establishment of two-way Extended Area Service (EAS) between the Verizon North, Inc. exchange of Haskins-Tontagany and the Toledo exchange of Ameritech and the establishment of two-way Extended Local Calling Plan (ELCP) Service between the Verizon North exchange of Haskins-Tontagany and the Perrysburg exchange of Ameritech Ohio filed by J. Kennedy on behalf of Verizon. |
|
11/21/2000
|
Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. |
|
11/17/2000
|
Letter stating that the in-service date for the institution of two-way flat-rate EAS between Verizon's Haskins-Tontogany exchange and Ameritech's Toledo exchange is May 9, 2001 at 12:01 a.m., filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by J. Kennedy. |
|
10/18/2000
|
Supplemental finding and order ordering that Verizon and Ameritech institute two-way, measured-rate EAS between Haskins-Tontogany and Perrysburg exchanges and two-way nonoptional flat-rate EAS between the Haskins-Tontogany and Toledo exchanges within 12 months of this order. |
|
10/18/2000
|
Supplemental Finding & Order that Verizon and Ameritech institute two-way, measured-rate EAS between the Haskins- Tontogany and Perrysburg exchanges and two-way, nonoptional, flat-rate EAS between the Haskins-Tontogany and Toledo ex- changes as soon as practicable and, in any event, within 12 months of this order; that Verizon and Ameritech establish an in-service date within two months of this order. (4 pgs.) |
|
10/04/2000
|
Review of the balloting results, filed on behalf of respon- dent, Verizon North, by P. Cook. (1 pg.) |
|
09/18/2000
|
Additional information filed on behalf of complainants by P. Dombey. |
|
09/18/2000
|
Ballots filed on behalf of complainants by P. Dombey. |
|
07/20/2000
|
Finding & Order approving the stipulation filed on June 28, 2000 in its entirety; that the request for two-way, non- optional, flat-rate EAS between the Haskins-Tontogany and Perrysburg exchanges be denied, but that two-way, measured- rate EAS between the Haskins-Tontogany and Perrysburg ex- changes be granted; that GTE provide an alphabetical list of all Haskins-Tontogany subscribers' names and addresses to the complainants within 15 days of this order; that the complainants canvass the Haskins-Tontogany subscribers and file the canvas ballots and the results with the Commission by September 20, 2000; that, after the complainants have filed the ballots collected, GTE should review the ballots and file the results of its review with the Commission by October 4, 2000. (12 pgs.) |
|
07/20/2000
|
Finding and order that after the complainants have filed the ballots collected, GTE should review the ballots and file the results of its review with the Commission by 10/4/00. |
|
06/28/2000
|
Stipulation, agreement and recommendation filed on behalf of complainant by P. Dombey; GTE North by W. Keating; Ameritech Ohio by C. Rawlings; and Sprint by J. Stewart. |
|
01/27/2000
|
Information response filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by B. Donahue. |
|
01/25/2000
|
Supplemental information response filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by W. Keating. |
|
01/20/2000
|
Letter stating that the institution of either form of extended area service as a possible consequence of this case will not cause Ameritech to incur exceptionally heavy investments in facilities nor exceptionally high costs, filed by S. Rawlings. |
|
12/28/1999
|
Information response filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by C. Rawlings. |
|
12/28/1999
|
Information response filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by P. Cook. |
|
12/28/1999
|
Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (24 pgs.) |
|
12/17/1999
|
Information response filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by B. Donahue. |
|
12/17/1999
|
Information response filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by B. Donahue. (7 pgs.) |
|
12/03/1999
|
Affidavit of Kim Logue filed on behalf of LCI International Telecom Corp. by K. Logue. (2 pgs.) |
|
11/24/1999
|
Affidavit of James Abbott filed on behalf of AT&T Communi- cations of Ohio by J. Abbott. (3 pgs.) |
|
11/24/1999
|
Affidavit of MCI World Com. Submitted by: J. Sanders. (1 pg.) |
|
11/23/1999
|
Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (3 pgs.) |
|
11/22/1999
|
Answer filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by W. Keating. (3 pgs.) |
|
11/22/1999
|
Affidavit of LaTrischa C. Miles filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Co. L.P. by L. Miles. (2 pgs.) |
|
11/15/1999
|
Answer filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Com- pany of Ohio dba Sprint, by J. Stewart. (4 pgs.) |
|
11/02/1999
|
Letter requesting that United Telephone Long Distance, Inc. be removed from the list of public utilities subject to the Commission's jurisdiction, filed by B. Donahue. (5 pgs.) |
|
10/25/1999
|
Entry ordering that United, Ameritech, and GTE shall file their written answers or other pleadings with the Commis- sion and serve a copy of such upon the spokesperson for the complainants by November 24, 1999; that AT&T, MCI, LCI, Quest, Sprint, and Worldcom shall provide information re- quired by Finding 3 to United, Ameritech, and GTE and file an affidavit with the Commission as required by Finding 4; that United, Ameritech and GTE coordinate all the calling information and ensure that all the IXCs are supplying calling data from the same time frame; that United, Ameri- tech, and GTE provide information required by Findings 6 and 7 to the spokesperson and the Commission; scheduling a con- ference at 1:00 p.m. on January 17, 2000, at the Commission offices. (AE) (8 pgs.) |
|
09/27/1999
|
In the matter of the petition of Philip L. Dombey, Esq., and subscribers of the Village of Haskins and the 823 exchange of Ameritech Ohio for extended area service into the following exchanges of Ameritech Ohio: 740, 891, 893, 897, 878, 874, 872, and all the Toledo, Ohio exchanges as follows: 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 251, 253, 254, 255, 259, 269, 291, 292, 321, 322, 324, 325, 327, 381, 382, 383, 385, 386, 389, 442, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 478, 479, 480, 486, 490, 530, 531, 534, 535, 536, 537, 539, 578, 661,666, 691, 693, 697, 698, 726, 727, 729, 865, and 936. |
|