| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 11/10/1993 | Notice to Protested transportation case applicants | 0 |
| 11/10/1993 | Entry dismissing application. | 0 |
| 10/29/1993 | Letter requesting that M. Spurlock be substituted as attorney for this application, and that this application be dismissed, filed by M. Spurlock. | 0 |
| 10/27/1993 | Letter filed on behalf of protestants Retail Delivery Service, Inc. dba RDS Delivery Service and Priority Dispatch, Inc. substituting counsel for these two protestants by D. Turano. | 0 |
| 10/20/1993 | Protest filed on behalf of Bonnie Speed Delivery, Inc. by J. Alden. | 0 |
| 10/20/1993 | Protest filed on behalf of Premier Courier, Inc. by J. Alden. | 0 |
| 10/20/1993 | Protest filed on behalf of Retail Delivery Service, Inc. dba RDS Delivery Service by M. Spurlock. | 0 |
| 10/20/1993 | Protest filed on behalf of Priority Dispatch, Inc. by M. Spurlock. | 0 |
| 10/19/1993 | Protest filed on behalf of Special-D-Rapid, Inc. by B. Ferris | 0 |
| 10/19/1993 | Protest filed on behalf of United States Cargo & Courier Service Incorporated by B. Ferris | 0 |
| 10/19/1993 | Protest filed on behalf of Professional Delivery & Courier by E. Merwin | 0 |
| 10/15/1993 | Protest filed on behalf of E-Z Moving & Storage, Inc. by B. Ferris. | 0 |
| 09/27/1993 | Protest filed on behalf of T &T Trucking, Inc. by D. Turano. | 0 |
| 09/27/1993 | Protest filed on behalf of Fastway Service, Inc. by D. Turano. | 0 |
| 09/27/1993 | Protest filed on behalf of Chapin Trucking Line, Inc. by D. Turano. | 0 |
| 09/24/1993 | Publication letter sent to: Bobbitt | 0 |
| 09/22/1993 | Filing accepted | 0 |
| 09/10/1993 | Application of Ranger Express, Inc. to amend Certificate No. 62972-I by changing the authority description. | 0 |
| 09/10/1993 | (PRESENT AUTHORITY) Transportation of property from and to points in the State of Ohio. RESTRICTED: 1. To the transportation of packages, parcels and articles not exceding seventy (70) pounds in weight and each package, parcel or article shall be considered as a separate and distinct shipment. 2. Against the transportation of exposed motion picture films, except trailers, to or from motor picture exhibitors. 3. Against the use of armored vehicles. 4. Agaist the transportation of exposed film from and to processors. 5. To the transportation of ship- ments moving from origin to distination on the same day. 6. Against the transportation of cash letters, audit and acc- ounting media. 7. To the transportation of one shipment from one consignor to one consignee on any one vehicle, on ship- ments originating at Columbus, Ohio and its Commercial Zone as of 1/8/85, and Akron, Ohio and its Commercial Zone as of 1/8/85 or as defined in Case No. 85-86-TR-ACZ. 8. Against service from and to Youngstown, Ohio, Cleveland, Ohio and Columbus, Ohio and their respective Commercial Zones as of 1/8/85, and Ashtabula, Geauga, and Pickaway Counties, Ohio, unless the origin or destination is a point otherwise authorized herein. (PROPOSED AMENDMENT) TO DELETE RESTRICTION NOS. 6,7 AND 8. | 0 |