| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 05/24/1993 | Letter opposing the EAS filed by G. Damico. | 0 |
| 04/09/1993 | Correspondence letter opposing the application, filed by G. Ebel. | 0 |
| 03/11/1993 | Entry ordering that applications for rehearing filed by AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc.; OCC; OTA; Ohio Bell; Century Telephone of Ohio; MCI Telecommunications; United Telephone; the Greater Cleveland Welfare Rights Organiza- tion; Western Reserve Alliance and the Consumers League of Ohio; Sprint Communications Company, L.P.; Centrx Telemanagement, Inc.; New Par; Sterling Cellular; USA Mobile Communications, Inc. II; RAM/BSE Paging Co., L.P.; and Litel Telecommunications Corp. dba LCI International are granted in part and denied in part, as set forth in this entry and attached rules; that OTA's motion for an extension of time to file its memorandum contra is granted. (AE) (ISSUED 3/10/93) | 0 |
| 03/10/1993 | Finding & Order that these rules for alternative regulation of large local exchange companies shall remain in effect as long as the Commission finds that the rules are in the public interest. | 71 |
| 03/10/1993 | Entry ordering that OTA's motion for an extension of time to file its memorandum contra is granted. | 47 |
| 03/05/1993 | Letter in response to letter dated February 24, 1993 from counsel for the Ohio Telephone Association, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. | 0 |
| 03/03/1993 | Letter filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications requesting that the Commission allow the late filing of MCI's memorandum contra filed by D. Trabaris. | 0 |
| 03/03/1993 | Letter filed on behalf of OCC requesting that the Commission consider OCC's pleading in its deliberations in this docket filed by D. Bergmann. | 0 |
| 02/25/1993 | Entry granting the application for rehearing filed by AT&T for the limited purpose of allowing the Commission additional time in which to consider the issues raised on the rehearing. | 0 |
| 02/25/1993 | Letter regarding OCC's and MCI's pleadings, filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. | 0 |
| 02/22/1993 | Memorandum contra filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunica- tions Corp. by J. Patchen. | 0 |
| 02/22/1993 | Memorandum in response to application for rehearing/ requests for clarification, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. | 0 |
| 02/18/1993 | Memorandum in response to applications for rehearing and clarification, filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. | 0 |
| 02/17/1993 | Motion for an extension of time and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. | 0 |
| 02/08/1993 | Application for rehearing and request for clarification and memorandum in support filed on behalf of MCI Tele- communications Corp. by D. Trabaris. | 0 |
| 02/08/1993 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Spring by M. Hull. | 0 |
| 02/08/1993 | Application for rehearing filed on behalf of the Greater Cleveland Welfare Rights Organization, Inc.; The Western Reserve Alliance; and The Consumers League of Ohio by J. Meissner. | 0 |
| 02/08/1993 | Application of the Ohio Telephone Association for rehearing and clarification filed by R. Prohaska. | 0 |
| 02/08/1993 | Application of the Ohio Bell Telephone Company for rehearing and clarification filed by M. Mulcahy. | 0 |
| 02/08/1993 | Application for rehearing of Litel Telecommunications Corporation dba LCI International filed by H. Liebman. | 0 |
| 02/08/1993 | Request for clarification by Centex Telemanagement, Inc. filed by M. Christensen. | 0 |
| 02/08/1993 | Request for clarification of New Par, Sterling Cellular, Inc., USA Mobile Communications, Inc. II and RAM/BSE Paging Co., L.P. filed by M. Christensen. | 0 |
| 02/08/1993 | Application for rehearing and request for clarification of Century Telephone of Ohio, Inc. by D. Conway. | 0 |
| 02/08/1993 | Application for rehearing and clarification of United Telephone Company of Ohio filed by S. Williams. | 0 |
| 02/08/1993 | OCC's application for rehearing; motion for additional comment cycle; and memorandum in support filed by D. Bergmann. | 0 |
| 02/05/1993 | Motion for reconsideration of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. filed by W. Mosca, Jr. and J. Troup. | 0 |
| 02/04/1993 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by Rhine McLin, State Repre- sentative. | 0 |
| 01/07/1993 | Resolution No. 92-7 filed on behalf of the City of Heath by Ms. Randy DeCaro. | 0 |
| 01/07/1993 | Opinion & Order adopting the alternative regulation of large local exchange companies. | 0 |
| 12/31/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by L. Drazdik. | 0 |
| 12/09/1992 | Comments filed on behalf of Continental Cablevision by L. Luff. | 0 |
| 12/07/1992 | Resolution No. 92-7 filed on behalf of the City of Heath by R. Bindley. | 0 |
| 12/04/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by V. Moravchek. | 0 |
| 12/03/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by Mr. Richard Bremont. | 0 |
| 11/25/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by Jay and Rose Baumberger. | 0 |
| 11/20/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of telephone companies filed by George and Martha Schmitz. | 0 |
| 11/20/1992 | Petition of members of the Seven Hills Senior Club filed by E. Taress. | 0 |
| 11/12/1992 | Resolution No. R92-38 filed on behalf of the City of Elyria, Ohio by J. Lesnick. | 0 |
| 11/09/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by Charles and Mary Reckner. | 0 |
| 11/05/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by L. Turocy. | 0 |
| 11/04/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by P. Barrett. | 0 |
| 11/04/1992 | Resolution No. 036-92R filed on behalf of the City of Sandusky by S. White. | 0 |
| 11/02/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by A. Ayer. | 0 |
| 10/28/1992 | Correspondence letter filed by D. Miller opposing the rate increase. | 0 |
| 10/28/1992 | Resolution No. 31-92 by the City of Whitehall filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. | 0 |
| 10/27/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by R. Dunnigan, representative of the Golden Age Pensioners Inc. and the Lorain Community Seniors Inc. | 0 |
| 10/26/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by L. Goryance. | 0 |
| 10/26/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by J. Davis. | 0 |
| 10/22/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by Mrs. J. Plunkett. | 0 |
| 10/21/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by E. August, F. Rozgaetis, G. Derus, and W. Angelartes. | 0 |
| 10/21/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by Wayne & Betty Walterhouse. | 0 |
| 10/21/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by D. Box. | 0 |
| 10/21/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by Marge Berens and Don Meneghini. | 0 |
| 10/20/1992 | Resolution No. 92-32 filed on behalf of the Village of Mayfield by B. Rinker. (FILED 10/19/92) | 0 |
| 10/16/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by H. Maxfield, The Mansfield Board of Realtors. | 0 |
| 10/15/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by R. Brooker. | 0 |
| 10/15/1992 | Resolution No. 1992-156 filed on behalf of the City of Strongsville by L. Seefried. | 0 |
| 10/13/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by R. Shears. | 0 |
| 10/13/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies and to the holding of the hearings in Columbus, filed by G. Pierce. | 0 |
| 10/09/1992 | Previously forwarded comments and request for leave to file the comments on September 30, 1992, filed on behalf of the Ohio Council of Retail Merchants. | 0 |
| 10/07/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies by the Commission, filed by H. Carey. | 0 |
| 10/05/1992 | Certified copy of Resolution No. 92-138 filed on behalf of the City of Greenville by M. Fletcher. | 0 |
| 10/02/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- companies, filed by E. Heminger, The Findlay Publishing Company. | 0 |
| 09/30/1992 | Resolution No. 1992-70 filed on behalf of the City of Kent L. Mauck. | 0 |
| 09/30/1992 | Comments filed on behalf of the Ohio Council of Retail Merchants by J. Mahaney, Jr. | 0 |
| 09/29/1992 | Response letter to the Honorable Frank Mahnic, with attached letter from him, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by C. Glazer. | 0 |
| 09/28/1992 | Proof of Publication filed on behalf of Ohio Telephone Association by W. Clark. (Summit County) | 0 |
| 09/28/1992 | Correspondence letters opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by J. Kramer and various consumers. | 0 |
| 09/28/1992 | Resolution No. 27-92 filed on behalf of the City of Lorain by A. Kokinda. | 0 |
| 09/28/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by H. Bundy. | 0 |
| 09/28/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by William & Jane Wagner. | 0 |
| 09/28/1992 | Correspondence opposing the deregulation of telephone companies, filed by Fred and Amy Puehler. | 0 |
| 09/28/1992 | Resolution No. RES-92-71 filed on behalf of the City of Youngstown by S. Warren. | 0 |
| 09/28/1992 | Response letter to the Honorable Vern Riffe, with attached Resolution No. 05 of the City of Portsmouth, filed by C. Glazer, PUCO staff. | 0 |
| 09/28/1992 | Response letter to Ms. Rita Eitel, with attached correspon- dence from her, filed by C. Glazer, PUCO staff. | 0 |
| 09/25/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of telephone companies, filed by Mr. & Mrs. Arles Peak. | 0 |
| 09/24/1992 | Resolution No. 92-K filed on behalf of the City of Xenia by D. Spahr. | 0 |
| 09/22/1992 | Correspondence letter filed by M. Temple and K. Geyer opposing the flat rate in phone service. | 0 |
| 09/22/1992 | Letter filed by Bill Welsh opposing the flat rate phone service. | 0 |
| 09/22/1992 | Resolution 92-226 filed on behalf of the City of North Royalton, Ohio by L. Haller. | 0 |
| 09/22/1992 | Correspondence letter filed by Harry and Joan Thieman opp- opposing the request to end PUCO's requlation of their profit. | 0 |
| 09/22/1992 | Correspondence letter filed by A. Sharp supporting the flat- rate service. | 0 |
| 09/22/1992 | Correspondence letter filed by K. Withrow supporting the flat rate phone service. | 0 |
| 09/21/1992 | Correspondence letter filed by Lowell Doyle opposing the rate increase. | 0 |
| 09/21/1992 | Resolution No. 142-92 filed on behalf of the City of Avon Lake, Ohio by K. Lynch. | 0 |
| 09/21/1992 | Correspondence letter filed by D. Miller opposing the flat rate service. | 0 |
| 09/18/1992 | Correspondence opposing the petition for deregulation of telephone companies, filed by J. Edwartowski. | 0 |
| 09/18/1992 | Resolution No. 05 filed on behalf of the City of Ports- mouth. | 0 |
| 09/18/1992 | Certificate of service to be filed with the reply comments which were filed September 8, 1992, filed on behalf of Prodigy Services Co. by M. Galdieri. | 0 |
| 09/17/1992 | Resolution No. 132-1992 filed on behalf of the City of Twinsburg by J. Karabec. | 0 |
| 09/17/1992 | Resolution No. 58-1992 filed on behalf of the City of Forest Park by K. Lives. | 0 |
| 09/17/1992 | Resolution No. 1992-109 filed on behalf of the City of Steubenville by P. Orlando. | 0 |
| 09/16/1992 | Correspondence with various consumer signatures opposing the deregulation of telephone companies, filed. | 0 |
| 09/15/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the application for deregu- lation of telephone companies, filed by S. Bagstad. | 0 |
| 09/15/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the application for deregu- lation of telephone companies, filed by C. Brown. | 0 |
| 09/15/1992 | Comments filed on behalf of New Par; Sterling Cellular, Inc.; USA Mobile Communications, Inc. II; and RAM/BSE Paging Co. L.P. by M. Christensen. | 0 |
| 09/15/1992 | Reply comments filed on behalf of Cellwave, Inc. by M. Dortch. | 0 |
| 09/15/1992 | Correspondence opposing the application to deregulate telephone companies, filed by Verna and Robert Cleveland. | 0 |
| 09/15/1992 | Correspondence opposing application for deregulation of telephone companies, filed by W. Penkal. | 0 |
| 09/14/1992 | Resolution No. 1992-61 filed on behalf of the City of Mayfield Heights by L. Benedetti. | 0 |
| 09/14/1992 | Resolution 92-13 and petitions of the Village of Ada, filed by M. McCord, OCC. | 0 |
| 09/10/1992 | Correspondence objecting to application, filed by K. Shoaf. | 0 |
| 09/09/1992 | Special Resolution filed on behalf of City of Willowick by R. Kaluba. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Notice of withdrawal of counsel and designation of new trial attorney, filed on behalf of OCC by B. Weston. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Entry granting motion of Great Seal Cellular Limited Partnership, and that reply comments of the cellular and radio common carrier industries are to be filed by 9/15/92 and served on the initial commenters. (AE) | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Joint reply filed on behalf of Metrocomm, Inc. and Ohio Linx by J. Canis. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Reply comments filed on behalf of Ohio State Legislative Committee, American Association of Retired Persons, by M. Rouleau. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Reply comments filed on behalf of the Greater Cleveland Welfare Rights Organization, Western Reserve Alliance, and Consumers League of Ohio by J. Meissner. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Reply comments filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Tele- phone by T. Taylor. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Reply comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Public Com- munications Association by R. Hart. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Reply comments filed on behalf of the City of Cleveland by W. Gruber. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Resolution No. 92-88 filed on behalf of the City of Berea, Ohio by S. Austin, Clerk of Council. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Reply comments of Century Telephone of Ohio, Inc. filed by D. Conway. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Reply comments of MCI Telecommunications Corporation filed by D. Trabaris. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Reply comments of the Ohio Cable Television Association filed by S. Howard. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Reply comments of Prodigy Services Company filed by R. Day. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Reply comments of Metas-Ohio filed by D. Muncy. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Reply comments of Centex Telemanagement, Inc. by M. Christensen. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Reply comments filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio, Inc. by F. Frantz. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Reply comments of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by W. Mosca, Jr. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Reply comments of the Ohio Newspaper Association filed by F. Deaner. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Certificate of service filed on behalf of the Ohio Newspaper Assiciation filed by F. Deaner. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Reply comments of LCI International filed by J. Heflinger. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Reply comments of Allnet Commumications Services, Inc. by J. Sanders. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Reply comments of GTE Mobile Communications filed by J. Sanders. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Reply comments filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Reply comments of the Ohio Telephone Association filed by J. Raymond Prohaska. | 0 |
| 09/08/1992 | Reply comments filed on behalf of Ohio Bell Telephone Company by M. Mulcahy. | 0 |
| 09/04/1992 | Reply comments filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio by T. Jacobs. | 0 |
| 09/04/1992 | Motion for extension of time and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Great Seal Cellular Limited Partner- ship by S. Bloomfield. | 0 |
| 09/03/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing application, filed by M. Martin. | 0 |
| 09/02/1992 | Petitions signed by various consumers requesting that basic telephone service continue at a flat rate for unlimited calls. | 0 |
| 09/02/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the elimination of flat rate telephone service, filed by R. Evans. | 0 |
| 08/31/1992 | Resolution No. 1824 filed on behalf of the City of Willard. | 0 |
| 08/31/1992 | Resolution No. 92-R-61 filed on behalf of the City of Kirt- land by S. Harber. | 0 |
| 08/31/1992 | Petitions opposing the application to deregulate telephone companies, filed by J. Wood and various consumers. | 0 |
| 08/31/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the application to deregu- late telephone companies, filed by B. Russo. | 0 |
| 08/28/1992 | Correspondence letter filed opposing the new rules by the telephone companies by B. Franks. | 0 |
| 08/27/1992 | Correspondence letter objecting to application, filed by M. Vining. | 0 |
| 08/27/1992 | Correspondence letter objecting to application, filed by B. Manos. | 0 |
| 08/27/1992 | Petitions with various consumer signatures opposing the the new service requested by the Phone Companies. | 0 |
| 08/26/1992 | Resolution No. 92-44 filed on behalf of the City of Fostoria by P. Allison, Mayor. | 0 |
| 08/25/1992 | Resolution No. 92-16 filed on behalf of the City of Read- ing by T. Houst. | 0 |
| 08/25/1992 | Resolution No. 92-13 filed on behalf of the Village of Ada by D. Traxler. | 0 |
| 08/25/1992 | Comments filed by J. Capes. | 0 |
| 08/24/1992 | Corrected pages to the transcript filed 8/14/92, filed by M. DiPaolo-Jones, McGinnis & Associates, Inc. | 0 |
| 08/24/1992 | Resolution No. 92R-11 filed on behalf of the City of Vermilion by E. Bulan. | 0 |
| 08/24/1992 | Resolution No. 58-1992 filed on behalf of the City of Forest Park by K. Lives. | 0 |
| 08/21/1992 | Correspondence letter regarding alternative telephone regulation, filed by D. Taylor. | 0 |
| 08/21/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies by the Commission, filed by various consumers. | 0 |
| 08/21/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by Ronald M. Mottl, State Represen- tative. | 0 |
| 08/20/1992 | Resolution No. 58-1992 filed on behalf of the City of Forest Park by K. Lives. | 0 |
| 08/20/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by B. Rothschild, Mayor of the City of University Heights. | 0 |
| 08/20/1992 | Various correspondence letter regarding the deregulation of telephone companies filed. | 0 |
| 08/20/1992 | Correspondence letter supporting the deregulation of telephone companies, filed by S. Bochnovich, Clermont County Office of Education. | 0 |
| 08/19/1992 | Transcript filed for hearing held 8/13/92, (AB), 123 pgs., Con't. (Dayton, Ohio) | 0 |
| 08/19/1992 | Petition with various consumer signatures requesting a fixed phone rate with unlimited local phone calls filed. | 0 |
| 08/19/1992 | Transcript filed for hearing held 8/14/92, (CG) (AB), 165 pgs., Submitted. (Cincinnati, Ohio) | 0 |
| 08/18/1992 | Certificate of service of comments filed on behalf of Sprint by M. Piper. | 0 |
| 08/18/1992 | Entry granting the joint motion to extend the comment deadline, and reply comments are now to be filed by 9/8/92. (AE) | 0 |
| 08/18/1992 | Transcript filed for hearing held 8/13/92, (RF), 115 pgs., Con't. (Mansfield, Ohio) | 0 |
| 08/18/1992 | Certificate of service filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio by F. Frantz. | 0 |
| 08/17/1992 | Page 15 which was inadvertently omitted from the commments filed on behalf of Ohio Public Communications Association by M. Grady. | 0 |
| 08/17/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the proposed changes in regulations, filed by R. Whitmeyer. | 0 |
| 08/17/1992 | Correspondence letter protesting the proposal, filed by various consumers. | 0 |
| 08/17/1992 | Joint motion for extension of reply comments deadline and request for expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Allnet Communications by J. Sanders, City of Cincinnati by R. Ganulin, City of Columbus by J. Klein, MCI Telecommunications by D. Trabaris, OCC by J. Serio, Ohio Public Communications Assoc. by R. Hart, Prodigy Services Company by R. Day, and Sprint by M. Piper. | 0 |
| 08/17/1992 | Correspondence letter regarding application, filed by K. McQuade. | 0 |
| 08/17/1992 | Testimony of Andrew T. Filak, Jr., M.D. filed on behalf of University of Cincinnati Medical Center filed. | 0 |
| 08/17/1992 | Correspondence letter supporting application, filed by M. Wilson, Greater Cincinnati Convention & Visitors Bureau. | 0 |
| 08/17/1992 | Testimony of Terry Hankner filed on behalf of the Cincinnati Board of Realtors by T. Hankner. | 0 |
| 08/14/1992 | Supplemental certificate of service filed on behalf of the Ohio Cable Television Association by S. Howard. | 0 |
| 08/13/1992 | Transcript filed for hearing held 8/11/92, (RF), 107 pgs., Con't. (Tiffin, Ohio) | 0 |
| 08/13/1992 | Transcript filed for hearing held 8/10/92, (JBB), 85 pgs., Con't. (Marietta, Ohio) | 0 |
| 08/13/1992 | Certificate of service filed on behalf of AT&T by J. Troup. | 0 |
| 08/12/1992 | Correction to comments and appendix filed on August 10, 1992, filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications by D. Trabaris. | 0 |
| 08/12/1992 | Correspondence from various Clyde senior citizens opposing OTA's proposal, filed by C. Fitte. | 0 |
| 08/12/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing OTA's proposal, filed by R. Tucker. | 0 |
| 08/12/1992 | Entry ordering that all entities who have filed initial comments in this matter are to serve promptly copies of those comments, as well as any reply comments, upon each of the other entities listed in Finding 2. (AE) | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Initial comments filed on behalf of the State of Ohio, Department of Administrative Services by D. Malkoff. | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Comments filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone by T. Taylor. | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Initial comments filed on behalf of LCI International by D. Kinkoph. | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Comments filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve Telephone by F. Frantz. | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Executive summary of changes recommended by United Telephone Company of Ohio and initial comments filed on behalf of United Telephone by T. Jacobs. | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Comments filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications by D. Trabaris. | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Comments filed on behalf of Sprint by M. Piper. | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Comments filed on behalf of the Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Proposed rules to implement an Ohio Telecommunications Regulatory Framework, filed on behalf of the Ohio Tele- phone Association by J. Prohaska. | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Comments filed on behalf of Ohio Bell by M. Mulcahy. | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Concurrence with comments of the Ohio Telephone Association, filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Comments filed on behalf of the Chillicothe Telephone Company by A. Korkosz. | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Comments filed on behalf of Ohio State Legislative Committee, American Association of Retired Persons by M. Rouleau. | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Joint comments filed on behalf of MetroComm, Inc. and Ohio Linx by J. Canis. | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support and comments filed on behalf of Greater Cleveland Welfare Rights Organization, Inc., Western Reserve Alliance, and Consumers League of Ohio by J. Meissner. | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Letter stating that Allnet Communications Services, Inc. will not file initial comments, but reserves the right to file reply comments, filed by J. Sanders. | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Initial comments filed on behalf of Century Telephone of Ohio, Inc. by D. Conway. | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Initial comments filed on behalf of Centex Telemanagement, Inc. by M. Christensen. | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Comments filed on behalf of METAS-Ohio by D. Muncy. | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Comments filed on behalf of the Ohio Cable Television Association by C. Caruso, W. Newcomb, Jr., and S. Howard. | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Comments filed on behalf of the Ohio Public Communications Association by M. Grady. | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Comments filed on behalf of the City of Columbus by J. Klein. | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Comments filed on behalf of the Ohio Newspaper Association by F. Deaner. | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Transcript filed for hearing held 8/5/92, (CG) (RF), 99 pgs., Con't. | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Various correspondence letters filed by consumers. | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Comments filed on behalf of Prodigy Services Company by R. Day. | 0 |
| 08/10/1992 | Comments filed on behalf of OCC by B. Weston. | 0 |
| 08/07/1992 | Notice of Public Works Committee Meeting, filed on behalf of the City of New Philadelphia by T. Hurst. | 0 |
| 08/07/1992 | Initial comments filed on behalf of AT&T by L. Salustro. | 0 |
| 08/06/1992 | Transcript filed for hearing held 7/31/92, (CG) (KS), (SS), 146 pgs., Con't. | 0 |
| 08/06/1992 | Response letter to Mr. Joseph P. Meissner, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by Chairman Glazer. | 0 |
| 08/06/1992 | Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by Mrs. Nancy Hightree. | 0 |
| 08/06/1992 | Correspondence letter objecting to the elimination of flat-rate service, filed by Mr. & Mrs. Richard Schirr. | 0 |
| 08/05/1992 | Proofs of publication filed on behalf of Ohio Telephone Association by W. Clark. | 0 |
| 08/05/1992 | Exhibits from hearings filed. | 0 |
| 08/05/1992 | Various correspondence letters opposing the deregulation of telephone companies filed. | 0 |
| 08/04/1992 | Various correspondence letters opposing the deregulation proposals filed. | 0 |
| 08/03/1992 | Comments filed on behalf of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense and all other Federal Excutive Agencies by C. Simpson, Jr. | 0 |
| 08/03/1992 | Various petitions to prevent automatic phone hikes and veto power by phone companies filed. | 0 |
| 08/03/1992 | Specific comments filed on behalf of Coin Phones, Inc. by S. Bittner. | 0 |
| 08/03/1992 | Notice of filing filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by A. Henkener. | 0 |
| 07/31/1992 | Correspondence letter filed by James and Frances Asley opposing the changes in service. | 0 |
| 07/29/1992 | Correspondence requesting to be recorded as official testimony at the July 31, 1992 hearing, filed on behalf of the Council of the City of Brook Park by R. Johnson, A. Lischner, B. Spina, G. Caldwell, S. Adams, M. Gammella, and J. Cavanaugh. | 0 |
| 07/28/1992 | Various correspondence letters opposing alternative regulations. | 0 |
| 07/16/1992 | Transcript filed for hearing held 7/9/92, (JB), 111 pgs., Con't. | 0 |
| 07/15/1992 | Entry denying the motion to schedule additional evening meetings; that the motion to extend the time in which to file initial and reply comments is granged in part, as set forth in Finding 5; that OTA's notice of the public meetings is approved and should be published; that OCC's motion to require Commission staff approval of the pub- lication notice is moot. (AE) | 0 |
| 07/15/1992 | Proposed notice of public hearings filed on behalf of Ohio Telephone Association by K. Collins. | 0 |
| 07/10/1992 | Concurrence in OCC's motions filed July 9, 1992, filed on behalf of American Association of Retired Persons by M. Rouleau. | 0 |
| 07/09/1992 | Motion to continue the daytime local public hearings to include evening hearings, motion to require review of notice for local public hearings, motion to extend comment period deadlines, request for expedited rulings, and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of OCC by B. Weston. | 0 |
| 07/08/1992 | Letter stating that The Ohio Farmers Union supports the June 29, 1992 motions for local public hearings and customer notices filed in this case, filed by C. Nash. | 0 |
| 07/07/1992 | Entry ordering that Mary Rouleau be permitted to represent the American Association of Retired Persons in this pro- ceeding; that the local exchange companies make the appropriate corrections to their notices, as set forth in Finding 5. (AE) | 0 |
| 07/02/1992 | Letter supporting the motion filed on June 29, 1992 by OCC requesting local public hearings in this case, filed on behalf of the Ohio State Legislative Committee by M. Kennedy. | 0 |
| 07/02/1992 | HEARING SCHEDULED 8/14/92, CINCINNATI, OHIO | 0 |
| 07/02/1992 | HEARING SCHEDULED 8/13/92, MANSFIELD, OHIO | 0 |
| 07/02/1992 | HEARING SCHEDULED 8/13/92, DAYTON, OHIO | 0 |
| 07/02/1992 | HEARING SCHEDULED 8/11/92, TIFFIN, OHIO | 0 |
| 07/02/1992 | HEARING SCHEDULED 8/10/92, MARIETTA, OHIO | 0 |
| 07/02/1992 | HEARING SCHEDULED 8/5/92, COLUMBUS, OHIO | 0 |
| 07/02/1992 | CLEVELAND HEARING 7/31/92, CLEVELAND, OHIO | 0 |
| 07/02/1992 | Entry inviting all interested entities to file comments by 8/3/92 and reply comments by 8/18/92. A conference is scheduled on 7/9/92 at 1:00 p.m. at the Commission and public hearings are scheduled as follows: 1. Cleveland - 7/31/92 at 10:30 a.m. at Lausche State Office Building. 2. Columbus - 8/5/92 at 6:30 p.m. at the Commission offices. 3. Marietta - 8/10/92 at 6:30 p.m. at Marietta College. 4. Tiffin - 8/11/92 at 2:00 p.m. at Sentinel Vocational Center. 5. Dayton - 8/13/92 at 6:30 p.m. at Dayton Municipal Building. 6. Mansfield - 8/13/92 at 6:30 p.m. at City Hall. 7. Cincinnati - 8/14/92 at 9:00 a.m. at City Hall. Concurring Opinion of Chairman Glazer. Separate Concurring Opinion of Commissioner Brown. | 0 |
| 06/29/1992 | Motion to admit out-of-state counsel for practice before the Commission and request for an expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by B. Weston. | 0 |
| 06/29/1992 | Motion for local public hearings, motion for customer notice, request for expedited rulings, and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by B. Weston, K. Bruce, and W. Gruber. | 0 |
| 06/23/1992 | In the matter of the Commission's promulgation of Rules for the establishment of alternative regulation plans for large local exchange telephone companies. | 0 |