DIS - Case Record for 92-1149-TP-COI Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 92-1149-TP-COI
CASE DESCRIPTION: LARGE LOCAL EXCHANGE TELEPHONE CO.
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 5/3/2024
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
05/24/1993 Letter opposing the EAS filed by G. Damico.
04/09/1993 Correspondence letter opposing the application, filed by G. Ebel.
03/11/1993 Entry ordering that applications for rehearing filed by AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc.; OCC; OTA; Ohio Bell; Century Telephone of Ohio; MCI Telecommunications; United Telephone; the Greater Cleveland Welfare Rights Organiza- tion; Western Reserve Alliance and the Consumers League of Ohio; Sprint Communications Company, L.P.; Centrx Telemanagement, Inc.; New Par; Sterling Cellular; USA Mobile Communications, Inc. II; RAM/BSE Paging Co., L.P.; and Litel Telecommunications Corp. dba LCI International are granted in part and denied in part, as set forth in this entry and attached rules; that OTA's motion for an extension of time to file its memorandum contra is granted. (AE) (ISSUED 3/10/93)
03/10/1993 Finding & Order that these rules for alternative regulation of large local exchange companies shall remain in effect as long as the Commission finds that the rules are in the public interest.
03/10/1993 Entry ordering that OTA's motion for an extension of time to file its memorandum contra is granted.
03/05/1993 Letter in response to letter dated February 24, 1993 from counsel for the Ohio Telephone Association, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann.
03/03/1993 Letter filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications requesting that the Commission allow the late filing of MCI's memorandum contra filed by D. Trabaris.
03/03/1993 Letter filed on behalf of OCC requesting that the Commission consider OCC's pleading in its deliberations in this docket filed by D. Bergmann.
02/25/1993 Entry granting the application for rehearing filed by AT&T for the limited purpose of allowing the Commission additional time in which to consider the issues raised on the rehearing.
02/25/1993 Letter regarding OCC's and MCI's pleadings, filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska.
02/22/1993 Memorandum contra filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunica- tions Corp. by J. Patchen.
02/22/1993 Memorandum in response to application for rehearing/ requests for clarification, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann.
02/18/1993 Memorandum in response to applications for rehearing and clarification, filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska.
02/17/1993 Motion for an extension of time and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska.
02/08/1993 Application for rehearing and request for clarification and memorandum in support filed on behalf of MCI Tele- communications Corp. by D. Trabaris.
02/08/1993 Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Spring by M. Hull.
02/08/1993 Application for rehearing filed on behalf of the Greater Cleveland Welfare Rights Organization, Inc.; The Western Reserve Alliance; and The Consumers League of Ohio by J. Meissner.
02/08/1993 Application of the Ohio Telephone Association for rehearing and clarification filed by R. Prohaska.
02/08/1993 Application of the Ohio Bell Telephone Company for rehearing and clarification filed by M. Mulcahy.
02/08/1993 Application for rehearing of Litel Telecommunications Corporation dba LCI International filed by H. Liebman.
02/08/1993 Request for clarification by Centex Telemanagement, Inc. filed by M. Christensen.
02/08/1993 Request for clarification of New Par, Sterling Cellular, Inc., USA Mobile Communications, Inc. II and RAM/BSE Paging Co., L.P. filed by M. Christensen.
02/08/1993 Application for rehearing and request for clarification of Century Telephone of Ohio, Inc. by D. Conway.
02/08/1993 Application for rehearing and clarification of United Telephone Company of Ohio filed by S. Williams.
02/08/1993 OCC's application for rehearing; motion for additional comment cycle; and memorandum in support filed by D. Bergmann.
02/05/1993 Motion for reconsideration of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. filed by W. Mosca, Jr. and J. Troup.
02/04/1993 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by Rhine McLin, State Repre- sentative.
01/07/1993 Resolution No. 92-7 filed on behalf of the City of Heath by Ms. Randy DeCaro.
01/07/1993 Opinion & Order adopting the alternative regulation of large local exchange companies.
12/31/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by L. Drazdik.
12/09/1992 Comments filed on behalf of Continental Cablevision by L. Luff.
12/07/1992 Resolution No. 92-7 filed on behalf of the City of Heath by R. Bindley.
12/04/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by V. Moravchek.
12/03/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by Mr. Richard Bremont.
11/25/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by Jay and Rose Baumberger.
11/20/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of telephone companies filed by George and Martha Schmitz.
11/20/1992 Petition of members of the Seven Hills Senior Club filed by E. Taress.
11/12/1992 Resolution No. R92-38 filed on behalf of the City of Elyria, Ohio by J. Lesnick.
11/09/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by Charles and Mary Reckner.
11/05/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by L. Turocy.
11/04/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by P. Barrett.
11/04/1992 Resolution No. 036-92R filed on behalf of the City of Sandusky by S. White.
11/02/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by A. Ayer.
10/28/1992 Correspondence letter filed by D. Miller opposing the rate increase.
10/28/1992 Resolution No. 31-92 by the City of Whitehall filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann.
10/27/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by R. Dunnigan, representative of the Golden Age Pensioners Inc. and the Lorain Community Seniors Inc.
10/26/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by L. Goryance.
10/26/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by J. Davis.
10/22/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by Mrs. J. Plunkett.
10/21/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by E. August, F. Rozgaetis, G. Derus, and W. Angelartes.
10/21/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by Wayne & Betty Walterhouse.
10/21/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by D. Box.
10/21/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by Marge Berens and Don Meneghini.
10/20/1992 Resolution No. 92-32 filed on behalf of the Village of Mayfield by B. Rinker. (FILED 10/19/92)
10/16/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by H. Maxfield, The Mansfield Board of Realtors.
10/15/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by R. Brooker.
10/15/1992 Resolution No. 1992-156 filed on behalf of the City of Strongsville by L. Seefried.
10/13/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by R. Shears.
10/13/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies and to the holding of the hearings in Columbus, filed by G. Pierce.
10/09/1992 Previously forwarded comments and request for leave to file the comments on September 30, 1992, filed on behalf of the Ohio Council of Retail Merchants.
10/07/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies by the Commission, filed by H. Carey.
10/05/1992 Certified copy of Resolution No. 92-138 filed on behalf of the City of Greenville by M. Fletcher.
10/02/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- companies, filed by E. Heminger, The Findlay Publishing Company.
09/30/1992 Resolution No. 1992-70 filed on behalf of the City of Kent L. Mauck.
09/30/1992 Comments filed on behalf of the Ohio Council of Retail Merchants by J. Mahaney, Jr.
09/29/1992 Response letter to the Honorable Frank Mahnic, with attached letter from him, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by C. Glazer.
09/28/1992 Proof of Publication filed on behalf of Ohio Telephone Association by W. Clark. (Summit County)
09/28/1992 Correspondence letters opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by J. Kramer and various consumers.
09/28/1992 Resolution No. 27-92 filed on behalf of the City of Lorain by A. Kokinda.
09/28/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by William & Jane Wagner.
09/28/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by H. Bundy.
09/28/1992 Correspondence opposing the deregulation of telephone companies, filed by Fred and Amy Puehler.
09/28/1992 Resolution No. RES-92-71 filed on behalf of the City of Youngstown by S. Warren.
09/28/1992 Response letter to the Honorable Vern Riffe, with attached Resolution No. 05 of the City of Portsmouth, filed by C. Glazer, PUCO staff.
09/28/1992 Response letter to Ms. Rita Eitel, with attached correspon- dence from her, filed by C. Glazer, PUCO staff.
09/25/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of telephone companies, filed by Mr. & Mrs. Arles Peak.
09/24/1992 Resolution No. 92-K filed on behalf of the City of Xenia by D. Spahr.
09/22/1992 Correspondence letter filed by M. Temple and K. Geyer opposing the flat rate in phone service.
09/22/1992 Letter filed by Bill Welsh opposing the flat rate phone service.
09/22/1992 Resolution 92-226 filed on behalf of the City of North Royalton, Ohio by L. Haller.
09/22/1992 Correspondence letter filed by A. Sharp supporting the flat- rate service.
09/22/1992 Correspondence letter filed by Harry and Joan Thieman opp- opposing the request to end PUCO's requlation of their profit.
09/22/1992 Correspondence letter filed by K. Withrow supporting the flat rate phone service.
09/21/1992 Correspondence letter filed by Lowell Doyle opposing the rate increase.
09/21/1992 Resolution No. 142-92 filed on behalf of the City of Avon Lake, Ohio by K. Lynch.
09/21/1992 Correspondence letter filed by D. Miller opposing the flat rate service.
09/18/1992 Correspondence opposing the petition for deregulation of telephone companies, filed by J. Edwartowski.
09/18/1992 Resolution No. 05 filed on behalf of the City of Ports- mouth.
09/18/1992 Certificate of service to be filed with the reply comments which were filed September 8, 1992, filed on behalf of Prodigy Services Co. by M. Galdieri.
09/17/1992 Resolution No. 132-1992 filed on behalf of the City of Twinsburg by J. Karabec.
09/17/1992 Resolution No. 1992-109 filed on behalf of the City of Steubenville by P. Orlando.
09/17/1992 Resolution No. 58-1992 filed on behalf of the City of Forest Park by K. Lives.
09/16/1992 Correspondence with various consumer signatures opposing the deregulation of telephone companies, filed.
09/15/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the application for deregu- lation of telephone companies, filed by C. Brown.
09/15/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the application for deregu- lation of telephone companies, filed by S. Bagstad.
09/15/1992 Comments filed on behalf of New Par; Sterling Cellular, Inc.; USA Mobile Communications, Inc. II; and RAM/BSE Paging Co. L.P. by M. Christensen.
09/15/1992 Reply comments filed on behalf of Cellwave, Inc. by M. Dortch.
09/15/1992 Correspondence opposing the application to deregulate telephone companies, filed by Verna and Robert Cleveland.
09/15/1992 Correspondence opposing application for deregulation of telephone companies, filed by W. Penkal.
09/14/1992 Resolution No. 1992-61 filed on behalf of the City of Mayfield Heights by L. Benedetti.
09/14/1992 Resolution 92-13 and petitions of the Village of Ada, filed by M. McCord, OCC.
09/10/1992 Correspondence objecting to application, filed by K. Shoaf.
09/09/1992 Special Resolution filed on behalf of City of Willowick by R. Kaluba.
09/08/1992 Notice of withdrawal of counsel and designation of new trial attorney, filed on behalf of OCC by B. Weston.
09/08/1992 Entry granting motion of Great Seal Cellular Limited Partnership, and that reply comments of the cellular and radio common carrier industries are to be filed by 9/15/92 and served on the initial commenters. (AE)
09/08/1992 Joint reply filed on behalf of Metrocomm, Inc. and Ohio Linx by J. Canis.
09/08/1992 Reply comments filed on behalf of Ohio State Legislative Committee, American Association of Retired Persons, by M. Rouleau.
09/08/1992 Reply comments filed on behalf of the Greater Cleveland Welfare Rights Organization, Western Reserve Alliance, and Consumers League of Ohio by J. Meissner.
09/08/1992 Reply comments filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Tele- phone by T. Taylor.
09/08/1992 Reply comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Public Com- munications Association by R. Hart.
09/08/1992 Reply comments filed on behalf of the City of Cleveland by W. Gruber.
09/08/1992 Resolution No. 92-88 filed on behalf of the City of Berea, Ohio by S. Austin, Clerk of Council.
09/08/1992 Reply comments of Century Telephone of Ohio, Inc. filed by D. Conway.
09/08/1992 Reply comments of MCI Telecommunications Corporation filed by D. Trabaris.
09/08/1992 Reply comments of the Ohio Cable Television Association filed by S. Howard.
09/08/1992 Reply comments of Metas-Ohio filed by D. Muncy.
09/08/1992 Reply comments of Prodigy Services Company filed by R. Day.
09/08/1992 Reply comments of Centex Telemanagement, Inc. by M. Christensen.
09/08/1992 Reply comments filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio, Inc. by F. Frantz.
09/08/1992 Reply comments of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by W. Mosca, Jr.
09/08/1992 Reply comments of the Ohio Newspaper Association filed by F. Deaner.
09/08/1992 Certificate of service filed on behalf of the Ohio Newspaper Assiciation filed by F. Deaner.
09/08/1992 Reply comments of LCI International filed by J. Heflinger.
09/08/1992 Reply comments of Allnet Commumications Services, Inc. by J. Sanders.
09/08/1992 Reply comments of GTE Mobile Communications filed by J. Sanders.
09/08/1992 Reply comments filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann.
09/08/1992 Reply comments of the Ohio Telephone Association filed by J. Raymond Prohaska.
09/08/1992 Reply comments filed on behalf of Ohio Bell Telephone Company by M. Mulcahy.
09/04/1992 Reply comments filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio by T. Jacobs.
09/04/1992 Motion for extension of time and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Great Seal Cellular Limited Partner- ship by S. Bloomfield.
09/03/1992 Correspondence letter opposing application, filed by M. Martin.
09/02/1992 Petitions signed by various consumers requesting that basic telephone service continue at a flat rate for unlimited calls.
09/02/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the elimination of flat rate telephone service, filed by R. Evans.
08/31/1992 Resolution No. 1824 filed on behalf of the City of Willard.
08/31/1992 Resolution No. 92-R-61 filed on behalf of the City of Kirt- land by S. Harber.
08/31/1992 Petitions opposing the application to deregulate telephone companies, filed by J. Wood and various consumers.
08/31/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the application to deregu- late telephone companies, filed by B. Russo.
08/28/1992 Correspondence letter filed opposing the new rules by the telephone companies by B. Franks.
08/27/1992 Correspondence letter objecting to application, filed by M. Vining.
08/27/1992 Correspondence letter objecting to application, filed by B. Manos.
08/27/1992 Petitions with various consumer signatures opposing the the new service requested by the Phone Companies.
08/26/1992 Resolution No. 92-44 filed on behalf of the City of Fostoria by P. Allison, Mayor.
08/25/1992 Resolution No. 92-16 filed on behalf of the City of Read- ing by T. Houst.
08/25/1992 Resolution No. 92-13 filed on behalf of the Village of Ada by D. Traxler.
08/25/1992 Comments filed by J. Capes.
08/24/1992 Corrected pages to the transcript filed 8/14/92, filed by M. DiPaolo-Jones, McGinnis & Associates, Inc.
08/24/1992 Resolution No. 92R-11 filed on behalf of the City of Vermilion by E. Bulan.
08/24/1992 Resolution No. 58-1992 filed on behalf of the City of Forest Park by K. Lives.
08/21/1992 Correspondence letter regarding alternative telephone regulation, filed by D. Taylor.
08/21/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies by the Commission, filed by various consumers.
08/21/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by Ronald M. Mottl, State Represen- tative.
08/20/1992 Resolution No. 58-1992 filed on behalf of the City of Forest Park by K. Lives.
08/20/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by B. Rothschild, Mayor of the City of University Heights.
08/20/1992 Various correspondence letter regarding the deregulation of telephone companies filed.
08/20/1992 Correspondence letter supporting the deregulation of telephone companies, filed by S. Bochnovich, Clermont County Office of Education.
08/19/1992 Transcript filed for hearing held 8/13/92, (AB), 123 pgs., Con't. (Dayton, Ohio)
08/19/1992 Petition with various consumer signatures requesting a fixed phone rate with unlimited local phone calls filed.
08/19/1992 Transcript filed for hearing held 8/14/92, (CG) (AB), 165 pgs., Submitted. (Cincinnati, Ohio)
08/18/1992 Certificate of service of comments filed on behalf of Sprint by M. Piper.
08/18/1992 Entry granting the joint motion to extend the comment deadline, and reply comments are now to be filed by 9/8/92. (AE)
08/18/1992 Transcript filed for hearing held 8/13/92, (RF), 115 pgs., Con't. (Mansfield, Ohio)
08/18/1992 Certificate of service filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio by F. Frantz.
08/17/1992 Page 15 which was inadvertently omitted from the commments filed on behalf of Ohio Public Communications Association by M. Grady.
08/17/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the proposed changes in regulations, filed by R. Whitmeyer.
08/17/1992 Correspondence letter protesting the proposal, filed by various consumers.
08/17/1992 Joint motion for extension of reply comments deadline and request for expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Allnet Communications by J. Sanders, City of Cincinnati by R. Ganulin, City of Columbus by J. Klein, MCI Telecommunications by D. Trabaris, OCC by J. Serio, Ohio Public Communications Assoc. by R. Hart, Prodigy Services Company by R. Day, and Sprint by M. Piper.
08/17/1992 Correspondence letter regarding application, filed by K. McQuade.
08/17/1992 Testimony of Andrew T. Filak, Jr., M.D. filed on behalf of University of Cincinnati Medical Center filed.
08/17/1992 Correspondence letter supporting application, filed by M. Wilson, Greater Cincinnati Convention & Visitors Bureau.
08/17/1992 Testimony of Terry Hankner filed on behalf of the Cincinnati Board of Realtors by T. Hankner.
08/14/1992 Supplemental certificate of service filed on behalf of the Ohio Cable Television Association by S. Howard.
08/13/1992 Transcript filed for hearing held 8/11/92, (RF), 107 pgs., Con't. (Tiffin, Ohio)
08/13/1992 Transcript filed for hearing held 8/10/92, (JBB), 85 pgs., Con't. (Marietta, Ohio)
08/13/1992 Certificate of service filed on behalf of AT&T by J. Troup.
08/12/1992 Correction to comments and appendix filed on August 10, 1992, filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications by D. Trabaris.
08/12/1992 Correspondence from various Clyde senior citizens opposing OTA's proposal, filed by C. Fitte.
08/12/1992 Correspondence letter opposing OTA's proposal, filed by R. Tucker.
08/12/1992 Entry ordering that all entities who have filed initial comments in this matter are to serve promptly copies of those comments, as well as any reply comments, upon each of the other entities listed in Finding 2. (AE)
08/10/1992 Initial comments filed on behalf of the State of Ohio, Department of Administrative Services by D. Malkoff.
08/10/1992 Comments filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone by T. Taylor.
08/10/1992 Initial comments filed on behalf of LCI International by D. Kinkoph.
08/10/1992 Comments filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve Telephone by F. Frantz.
08/10/1992 Executive summary of changes recommended by United Telephone Company of Ohio and initial comments filed on behalf of United Telephone by T. Jacobs.
08/10/1992 Comments filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications by D. Trabaris.
08/10/1992 Comments filed on behalf of Sprint by M. Piper.
08/10/1992 Comments filed on behalf of the Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska.
08/10/1992 Proposed rules to implement an Ohio Telecommunications Regulatory Framework, filed on behalf of the Ohio Tele- phone Association by J. Prohaska.
08/10/1992 Comments filed on behalf of Ohio Bell by M. Mulcahy.
08/10/1992 Concurrence with comments of the Ohio Telephone Association, filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart.
08/10/1992 Comments filed on behalf of the Chillicothe Telephone Company by A. Korkosz.
08/10/1992 Comments filed on behalf of Ohio State Legislative Committee, American Association of Retired Persons by M. Rouleau.
08/10/1992 Joint comments filed on behalf of MetroComm, Inc. and Ohio Linx by J. Canis.
08/10/1992 Motion to intervene and memorandum in support and comments filed on behalf of Greater Cleveland Welfare Rights Organization, Inc., Western Reserve Alliance, and Consumers League of Ohio by J. Meissner.
08/10/1992 Letter stating that Allnet Communications Services, Inc. will not file initial comments, but reserves the right to file reply comments, filed by J. Sanders.
08/10/1992 Initial comments filed on behalf of Century Telephone of Ohio, Inc. by D. Conway.
08/10/1992 Initial comments filed on behalf of Centex Telemanagement, Inc. by M. Christensen.
08/10/1992 Comments filed on behalf of METAS-Ohio by D. Muncy.
08/10/1992 Comments filed on behalf of the Ohio Cable Television Association by C. Caruso, W. Newcomb, Jr., and S. Howard.
08/10/1992 Comments filed on behalf of the Ohio Public Communications Association by M. Grady.
08/10/1992 Comments filed on behalf of the City of Columbus by J. Klein.
08/10/1992 Comments filed on behalf of the Ohio Newspaper Association by F. Deaner.
08/10/1992 Transcript filed for hearing held 8/5/92, (CG) (RF), 99 pgs., Con't.
08/10/1992 Various correspondence letters filed by consumers.
08/10/1992 Comments filed on behalf of Prodigy Services Company by R. Day.
08/10/1992 Comments filed on behalf of OCC by B. Weston.
08/07/1992 Notice of Public Works Committee Meeting, filed on behalf of the City of New Philadelphia by T. Hurst.
08/07/1992 Initial comments filed on behalf of AT&T by L. Salustro.
08/06/1992 Transcript filed for hearing held 7/31/92, (CG) (KS), (SS), 146 pgs., Con't.
08/06/1992 Response letter to Mr. Joseph P. Meissner, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by Chairman Glazer.
08/06/1992 Correspondence letter opposing the deregulation of tele- phone companies, filed by Mrs. Nancy Hightree.
08/06/1992 Correspondence letter objecting to the elimination of flat-rate service, filed by Mr. & Mrs. Richard Schirr.
08/05/1992 Proofs of publication filed on behalf of Ohio Telephone Association by W. Clark.
08/05/1992 Exhibits from hearings filed.
08/05/1992 Various correspondence letters opposing the deregulation of telephone companies filed.
08/04/1992 Various correspondence letters opposing the deregulation proposals filed.
08/03/1992 Comments filed on behalf of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense and all other Federal Excutive Agencies by C. Simpson, Jr.
08/03/1992 Various petitions to prevent automatic phone hikes and veto power by phone companies filed.
08/03/1992 Specific comments filed on behalf of Coin Phones, Inc. by S. Bittner.
08/03/1992 Notice of filing filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by A. Henkener.
07/31/1992 Correspondence letter filed by James and Frances Asley opposing the changes in service.
07/29/1992 Correspondence requesting to be recorded as official testimony at the July 31, 1992 hearing, filed on behalf of the Council of the City of Brook Park by R. Johnson, A. Lischner, B. Spina, G. Caldwell, S. Adams, M. Gammella, and J. Cavanaugh.
07/28/1992 Various correspondence letters opposing alternative regulations.
07/16/1992 Transcript filed for hearing held 7/9/92, (JB), 111 pgs., Con't.
07/15/1992 Entry denying the motion to schedule additional evening meetings; that the motion to extend the time in which to file initial and reply comments is granged in part, as set forth in Finding 5; that OTA's notice of the public meetings is approved and should be published; that OCC's motion to require Commission staff approval of the pub- lication notice is moot. (AE)
07/15/1992 Proposed notice of public hearings filed on behalf of Ohio Telephone Association by K. Collins.
07/10/1992 Concurrence in OCC's motions filed July 9, 1992, filed on behalf of American Association of Retired Persons by M. Rouleau.
07/09/1992 Motion to continue the daytime local public hearings to include evening hearings, motion to require review of notice for local public hearings, motion to extend comment period deadlines, request for expedited rulings, and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of OCC by B. Weston.
07/08/1992 Letter stating that The Ohio Farmers Union supports the June 29, 1992 motions for local public hearings and customer notices filed in this case, filed by C. Nash.
07/07/1992 Entry ordering that Mary Rouleau be permitted to represent the American Association of Retired Persons in this pro- ceeding; that the local exchange companies make the appropriate corrections to their notices, as set forth in Finding 5. (AE)
07/02/1992 Letter supporting the motion filed on June 29, 1992 by OCC requesting local public hearings in this case, filed on behalf of the Ohio State Legislative Committee by M. Kennedy.
07/02/1992 HEARING SCHEDULED 8/14/92, CINCINNATI, OHIO
07/02/1992 HEARING SCHEDULED 8/13/92, MANSFIELD, OHIO
07/02/1992 HEARING SCHEDULED 8/13/92, DAYTON, OHIO
07/02/1992 HEARING SCHEDULED 8/11/92, TIFFIN, OHIO
07/02/1992 HEARING SCHEDULED 8/10/92, MARIETTA, OHIO
07/02/1992 HEARING SCHEDULED 8/5/92, COLUMBUS, OHIO
07/02/1992 CLEVELAND HEARING 7/31/92, CLEVELAND, OHIO
07/02/1992 Entry inviting all interested entities to file comments by 8/3/92 and reply comments by 8/18/92. A conference is scheduled on 7/9/92 at 1:00 p.m. at the Commission and public hearings are scheduled as follows: 1. Cleveland - 7/31/92 at 10:30 a.m. at Lausche State Office Building. 2. Columbus - 8/5/92 at 6:30 p.m. at the Commission offices. 3. Marietta - 8/10/92 at 6:30 p.m. at Marietta College. 4. Tiffin - 8/11/92 at 2:00 p.m. at Sentinel Vocational Center. 5. Dayton - 8/13/92 at 6:30 p.m. at Dayton Municipal Building. 6. Mansfield - 8/13/92 at 6:30 p.m. at City Hall. 7. Cincinnati - 8/14/92 at 9:00 a.m. at City Hall. Concurring Opinion of Chairman Glazer. Separate Concurring Opinion of Commissioner Brown.
06/29/1992 Motion to admit out-of-state counsel for practice before the Commission and request for an expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by B. Weston.
06/29/1992 Motion for local public hearings, motion for customer notice, request for expedited rulings, and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by B. Weston, K. Bruce, and W. Gruber.
06/23/1992 In the matter of the Commission's promulgation of Rules for the establishment of alternative regulation plans for large local exchange telephone companies.