| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 08/31/2000 | PUCO Form KDW 2.01 and 2.02 for the reporting period of July 1, 1999 thru December 31, 1999, due September 1, 2000, filed on behalf of Conneaut Telephone Co. by K. Picard. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 09/01/1998 | PUCO Form KDW 2.01 and 2.02 for the reporting period of July 1, 1996 thru June 30, 1997, filed on behalf of Con- ceaut Telephone Co. by K. Picard. (4 pgs.) | 4 |
| 08/29/1997 | PUCO Form KDW 2.01 and 2.02 for the reporting period July 1, 1996 thru June 30, 1997, due September 1, 1997, filed on behalf of Conneaut Telephone by K. Picard. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 09/26/1996 | Additional information filed. (3 pgs.) | 0 |
| 09/26/1996 | Annual TSA report for the period of July 1, 1995 thru June 30, 1996, filed on behalf of Conneaut Telephone by K. Picard (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 11/15/1995 | Annual TSA report for the period of July 1, 1994 thru June 30, 1995, filed on behalf of Conneaut Telephone Co. by K. Picard. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 10/07/1993 | Entry ordering that all small telephone companies which file amendments to pending cases requesting a modification of tariff charges which is not for an increase in rates must serve upon any entity which has already filed an objection to the objection to the application and served on the company, all pleadings or papers filed with the Commission subsequent to the filing of the objectino in accordance with the Ohio Administrative Code; that, sub- sequent to an amendment being filed, the Commission staff will consider on a case-by-case basis whether the amend- ment is substantial enough in nature to require an ex- tension of the automatic approval date. | 0 |
| 02/17/1993 | Supplemental Finding & Order that small telephone companies shall file their required reporting information pursuant to Findings 5 and 6; that the new filing requirements as discussed in Finding 5 shall become effective upon the date of this Order and this case is closed as a matter of record. | 8 |
| 01/20/1993 | Tariff update, PUCO No. 1, filed on behalf of the Champaign Telephone Co. by A. Moore. | 0 |
| 01/07/1993 | Reply memorandum filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. | 0 |
| 12/28/1992 | Memorandum relative to the request for clarification of OCC, filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. | 0 |
| 12/14/1992 | Request for clarification and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. | 0 |
| 09/03/1992 | Notice of withdrawal of counsel and designation of new trial attorney filed on behalf of OCC by B. Weston. | 0 |
| 10/03/1991 | Entry denying OCC's application for rehearing. | 0 |
| 09/30/1991 | Letter showing erratum in OCC's September 16, 1991 application for rehearing, filed by B. Weston. | 0 |
| 09/26/1991 | Memorandum in opposition to application for rehearing, filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. | 0 |
| 09/16/1991 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by B. Weston. | 0 |
| 08/15/1991 | Supplemental Finding & Order adopting the alternative regulatory requirements for small telephone companies, to take effect 9/1/91. To the extent OCC's and OTA's objections to the proposed alternative regulatory requirements are inconsistent with the Commission findings, they are denied.
| 57 |
| 08/15/1991 | Supplemental Finding & Order denying OCC's and OTA's objections to the proposed alternative regulatory requirements; that it is in the public interest to adopt the alternative regulatory requirements for small telephone companies with less than 15,000 access lines, to take effect 9/1/91; that these requirements shall remain in effect as long as the Commission finds that the alternative regulatory requirements are in the public interest. | 52 |
| 08/15/1991 | Supplemental Finding & Order adopting the alternative regulatory requirements for small telephone companies, to take effect 9/1/91. To the extent OCC's and OTA's objections to the proposed alternative regulatory requirements are inconsistent with the Commission findings, they are denied. | 0 |
| 05/31/1991 | Correspondence filed on behalf of OCC by B. Weston. | 0 |
| 05/28/1991 | Response to supplemental authority of OCC, filed on behalf of the Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. | 0 |
| 05/20/1991 | Response to supplemental authority of the OCC, filed on behalf of The Benton Ridge Telephone Company by T. Lodge. | 0 |
| 05/13/1991 | Statement of additional authority filed on behalf of OCC by B. Weston. | 0 |
| 04/08/1991 | Correspondence letter opposing application, filed by K. Krites. | 0 |
| 04/05/1991 | Correspondence letter filed by T. Alexander. | 0 |
| 03/29/1991 | Correspondence letter opposing application, filed by K. Krites. | 0 |
| 03/28/1991 | Entry denying OCC's application for rehearing. | 0 |
| 03/25/1991 | Correspondence letter requesting that a public hearing be held in this matter, filed by C. Bunn. | 0 |
| 03/19/1991 | Correspondence letter protesting application filed by A. West. | 0 |
| 03/14/1991 | Memorandum in opposition to the application for rehearing of OCC filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. | 0 |
| 03/11/1991 | Letter objecting to the PUCO proposal that notification of applications for rate increases not be published at least three times in the area's local newspapers, filed on behalf of The Germantown Press, Inc. by D. Grunwald. | 0 |
| 03/11/1991 | Letter requesting that the deadline for comments and objections to the new rules be extended at least to June 1; that customers of these small systems be notified of these proposed changes and be given the right to appear at public hearings to comment on the changes, filed on behalf of the City of Germantown by E. Schwaberow. | 0 |
| 03/11/1991 | Correspondence letter protesting the increase in rates for small telephone companies filed by Jim & Sue Hand. | 0 |
| 03/11/1991 | Correspondence letter protesting the application for small telephone companies to increase their rates filed. | 0 |
| 03/06/1991 | Objections filed on behalf of OCC by B. Weston. | 0 |
| 03/04/1991 | Motion for extension of time, motion for expedited ruling, and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by B. Weston. | 0 |
| 03/04/1991 | Objections and comments filed on behalf of the Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. | 0 |
| 03/04/1991 | Amendment to motion for an extension to request a two-day extension, until March 6, filed on behalf of OCC by B. Weston. | 0 |
| 03/04/1991 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by B. Weston. | 0 |
| 02/27/1991 | Correspondence letter opposing the rate proposal filed by Gary Leppla. | 0 |
| 02/27/1991 | Correspondence letter opposing the rate proposal filed by Nancy & Bill Coleman. | 0 |
| 02/27/1991 | Correspondence letter opposing the PUCO rate proposal filed by Paul McCullough. | 0 |
| 02/26/1991 | Correspondence letter filed by Bob Ferrell. | 0 |
| 02/25/1991 | Correspondence letter filed by Mrs. Vincent Evans. | 0 |
| 02/25/1991 | Correspondence letter opposing raising of rates of small telephone companies filed by J. Hatfield. | 0 |
| 02/21/1991 | Entry denying OCC's motion for customer notice and motion for an extension of time. (AE) | 0 |
| 02/14/1991 | Memorandum in opposition to motions of the OCC filed on behalf ofthe Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. | 0 |
| 02/13/1991 | Motion for customer notice and motion for extension of time and motion for expedited rulings and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by B. Weston. | 0 |
| 02/12/1991 | Transcript filed for hearing held 2/5/91, (RF), 71 pgs., Concluded. | 0 |
| 01/31/1991 | Finding & Order that it is in the public interest to adopt alternative regulatory requirements for small telephone companies with less than 15,000 access lines; scheduling a public forum to be held 2/5/91 at 1:30 p.m. in hearing room 11A at the PUCO; that interested persons are given until 3/4/91 to file objections to the requirements set forth in the appendices to this order. | 0 |
| 01/31/1991 | Finding & Order that it is in the public interest to adopt alternative regulatory requirements for small telephone companies with less than 15,000 access lines; scheduling a public forum to be held 2/5/91 at 1:30 p.m. in hearing room 11A at the PUCO; that interested persons are given until 3/4/91 to file objections to the requirements set forth in the appendices to this order.
| 26 |
| 10/03/1990 | Correspondence letter opposing the l0% rate increase filed by C. Peter. | 0 |
| 10/02/1990 | Correspondence letter opposing the l0% rate increase filed by Mrs. E. Lee. | 0 |
| 10/02/1990 | Correspondence letter opposing the l0% rate increase filed by D. Morris. | 0 |
| 10/02/1990 | Correspondence letter opposing the l0% rate increase filed by F. Heischman. | 0 |
| 10/02/1990 | Correspondence letter opposing the l0% rate increase filed by B. Kruszynski. | 0 |
| 10/02/1990 | Correspondence letter opposing the l0% rate increase filed by L. Leedy. | 0 |
| 10/01/1990 | Correspondence letter opposing the l0% rate increase filed by John and Rebecca McClincy. | 0 |
| 10/01/1990 | Correspondence letter supporting the l0% rate increase filed by Robert and Geneva Blaser. | 0 |
| 09/26/1990 | Correspondence letter opposing the l0% rate increase filed by M. Thomas. | 0 |
| 09/17/1990 | Correspondence letter opposing the l0% rate increase filed by W. M. Jeffery. | 0 |
| 09/14/1990 | Correspondence letter opposing the l0% rate increase, filed by L. Garrett. | 0 |
| 09/06/1990 | Correspondence letter filed by Mrs. Vincent Evans. | 0 |
| 09/06/1990 | Correspondence letter filed by Mrs. Ray (Carol) Brumbaugh. | 0 |
| 09/06/1990 | Correspondence letter filed by William E. Barker. | 0 |
| 08/31/1990 | Transcript filed for hearing held 8/22/90, (RF), 97 pgs., Submitted. (FINDLAY, OHIO) | 0 |
| 08/23/1990 | Correspondence letter filed by Mrs. V. Evans. | 0 |
| 08/09/1990 | Entry denying OCC's motion for publication of legal notice; ordering that the Commission's media office shall send the attached press release to newspapers of general circulation in each of the counties in which the affected small telephone companies are operating. (AE) | 0 |
| 08/03/1990 | Memorandum in opposition to motion of OCC's motion for public notice filed on behalf of Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. | 0 |
| 07/31/1990 | Motion for public notice, motion for expedited ruling, and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by B. Weston. | 0 |
| 07/16/1990 | Entry denying OCC's motion for a public hearing; that a workshop is scheduled for 8/22/90 at l:30 p.m. at the County Engineer's office, in the assembly room, lst Floor, l900 Lima Avenue, Findaly, Ohio. (AE) | 0 |
| 07/02/1990 | Correspondence letter stating concerns about independently owned telephone companies under the PUCO jurisdiction filed by Mrs. V.C. Evans. | 0 |
| 06/15/1990 | Reply comments filed on behalf of the OCC by B. Weston. | 0 |
| 06/15/1990 | Reply to OCC's comments filed on behalf of The Ridgeville Telephone Company by K. Miller. | 0 |
| 06/14/1990 | Reply comments filed on behalf of the Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. | 0 |
| 05/11/1990 | Reply memorandum filed on behalf of the OCC by B. Cohen. | 0 |
| 05/01/1990 | Memorandum in opposition to motion for local public hearing filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. | 0 |
| 04/26/1990 | Correspondence letter discussing the parameters for regulating small telephone companies filed by T. Roberts, Ohio State Respresentative. | 0 |
| 04/20/1990 | Motion for local public hearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of the OCC by B. Weston. | 0 |
| 04/17/1990 | Entry granting OCC's 12/19/89 motion and that interested persons be given until 5/15/90 to file comments with respect to the small telelphone company proposal; small companies be given until 5/15/90 to file replies to OCC's 12/19/89 comments. (AE) | 0 |
| 03/30/1990 | Correspondence letter filed by Mrs. V. Evans. | 0 |
| 01/18/1990 | Entry scheduling public forum for 2/15/90 at l0:00 a.m. at the Offices of the Commission. Attorney Examiner will withhold ruling upon OCC's motion until after the public forum is held. (AE) | 0 |
| 12/22/1989 | Letter regarding deregulating small telephone companies filed by Mrs. V. Evans. | 0 |
| 12/19/1989 | Motion for reply comment opportunity filed on behalf of OCC by B. Weston. | 0 |
| 12/19/1989 | Motion to intervene filed on behalf of OCC by B. Weston. | 0 |
| 12/19/1989 | Comments filed on behalf of OCC by B. Weston. | 0 |
| 12/19/1989 | Comments of MCI Telecommunications Corp. filed by D. Trabaris. | 0 |
| 12/19/1989 | Recommendations, proposals and comments of the Ohio Telephone Association filed by R. Prohaska. | 0 |
| 09/13/1989 | Entry granting OTA's request for an extension of time and giving small telephone companies and interested persons until 12/19/89 to file their recommendations and proposals. | 0 |
| 08/23/1989 | Motion of Ohio Telephone Association for extension of time and memorandum in support of motion filed by R. Prohaska. | 0 |
| 06/20/1989 | Entry requesting small local telephone companies & interested persons to submit recommendation and proposals by 9/20/89. | 0 |
| 04/12/1989 | In the Matter of the Commission Investigation into the Implementation of Sections 4927.01 to 4927.05, Revised Code, as they relate to regulation of Small Local Exchange Telephone Companies. | 0 |