DIS - Case Record for 03-2040-TP-COI Skip to main content

Case Record For:

03-2040-TP-COI

File a Public Comment
Case Title: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION TRIENNIAL REVIEW (MASS MARKET LOCAL CIRCUIT SWITCHING)
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: COI-Commission inquiry
Date Opened: 10/1/2003
Date Closed: 4/20/2005
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
04/20/2005Entry closing cases consistent with the time frame set forth in finding (6).4
04/20/2005Service Notice34
03/18/2005Supplement to its motion to dismiss triennial review proceedings filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly.9
03/14/2005Executed exhibits A and B to the protective order filed by T. O'Brien on behalf of Covad Communications Company.3
10/18/2004Exhibits A and B to the protective order issued October 28, 2003 filed by J. Sanders.8
07/28/2004Entry on Rehearing, ordered that Verizon North has standing for the purpose of the filing an application for rehearing, that the Finding and Order of June 15, 2004 is clarified pursuant to Finding (15), that Verizon North file the applicable interconnection agreement amendments consistent with Finding (15), that to the extent not specifically addressed herein, all other arguments raised in the application for rehearing are denied.9
07/28/2004Service Notice10
07/23/2004Submission of supplemental authority in support of the request for clarification or, alternatively, application for rehearing filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by T. Lodge.12
07/21/2004Notice of substitution of counsel of William J. Cobb III to Jason Wakefield, filed on behalf of applicant by T. O'Brien.4
07/19/2004Reply memorandum in support of request for clarification or, alternatively, application for rehearing filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by T. Lodge.10
07/16/2004Reply in support of motion to dismiss Triennial Review Proceedings filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly.24
07/12/2004Memorandum contra of XO Ohio, Inc., CoreComm NewCo, Inc., KMC Telecom III, LLC, Time Warner Telecom of Ohio, LP, LDMI Telecommunications, Inc., Covad Communications Company, Nuvox Communications of Ohio, Inc. MCIMetro Access Transmission Services LLC, AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc, and TCG Ohio by M. Dortch, S. Bloomfield, J. Sanders, J. Denniston, and D. Trabaris.14
07/06/2004Joint response to SBC Ohio's motion to dismiss Triennial Review Proceedings, filed on behalf of COVAD Communications Company by W. Cobb III and NuVox Communications Co. of Ohio, Inc. by T. O' Brien.8
07/06/2004Memorandum Contra filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. and TCG Ohio filed by D. Trabaris.10
07/06/2004Memorandum contra to SBC Ohio's motion to dismiss triennial review proceedings filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. dba Sprint by J. Stewart.5
07/06/2004Response to SBC Ohio's motion to dismiss triennial review proceeding filed on behalf of MCIMetro Access Transmission Services, LLC by J. Sanders.4
06/30/2004Request for clarification or, alternatively, application for rehearing, filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by T. Lodge.16
06/18/2004Motion to dismiss triennial review proceedings filed by J. Kelly on behalf of SBC Ohio.8
06/15/2004Finding and order that SBC, Verizon, and any other ILEC offering UNE-P or UNEs impacted by the D.C. Circuit's decision in USTA II comply with finding 11.5
06/15/2004Additional information filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by T. Lodge.6
06/11/2004Supplements to comments filed June 7, 2004 in the referenced cases on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly.8
06/09/2004Certificate of service filed by L. Hayduk on behalf of Sprint.3
06/08/2004 Certificate of Service for comments filed on June 7, 2004 on behalf of First Communications LLC by J. Donovan.22
06/07/2004Response to Commission's May 27, 2004 Docket Entry filed on behalf of Sprint by J. Stewart.8
06/07/2004Comments filed on behalf of Verizon North, Inc. by T. Lodge.15
06/07/2004Comments filed on behalf of Office of the Ohio Consumers Counsel by J. Serio.10
06/07/2004Comments filed on behalf of ACN Communication Services, Inc., Adelphi Business Solutions Operations, Inc. dba TelCove; Choice One Communications of Ohio, Inc.; CoreComm Newco, Inc. and Focal Communications Corporation (collectively the Commenters) by R. Blau.23
06/07/2004Comments filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly.32
06/07/2004Motion for the entry of orders permitting appearances of Pro Hac Vice and affidavits in support of motion filed by M. Dortch9
06/07/2004Response to the Commission's May 27, 2004 entry filed by M. Dortch for XO Ohio, Inc.; T. O'Brien for Time Warner Telecom of Ohio, LP, LDMI Telecommunications, Inc., Covad Communications Company, and NuVox Communications of Ohio, Inc.; D. Trabaris for AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. and TCG Ohio; J. Sanders for MCI.44
05/28/2004Service Notice8
05/27/2004Entry ordered that comments addressing the issues identified should be filed in accordance with Finding (6).4
04/07/2004Voluntary withdrawal from proceedings, filed on behalf of Sage Telecom Inc. by J. Donovan.6
03/08/2004Letter of acknowledgements of confidentiality for Boyd B. Ferris and David A. Ferris on behalf of First Communications, LLC; Integrated Communication Solutions, Inc. and KMC Telecom III, LLC filed by D. Ferris.4
03/05/2004Memorandum Contra filed on behalf of SBC Ohio as required by the previously established schedule filed by M. Fenlon.6
03/03/2004Entry ordering that all future hearings previously scheduled in these dockets be postponed and held in abeyance until further notice. (JA)3
03/03/2004Motion to dismiss and motion for immediate stay proceedings; request for expedited ruling filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann.7
03/03/2004Response to OCC's motion to dismiss; motion for immediate stay of proceedings and request for expedited ruling filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by D. Hart.5
03/02/2004Exhibits A and B signed by Patty Lynott as provided in the October 28, 2003 entry, filed on behalf of McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc. by M. Christensen.5
03/02/2004Revised redlined Performance Metrics that should be substituted for the redlined Performance Metrics attached to the Supplemental Direct Testimony of MCI witness Sherry Lichtenberg, filed by J. Sanders.44
02/24/2004Application for rehearing or in the alternative, motion for clarification of the office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by D. Bergmann.9
02/24/2004Executed Exhibits A and B to the protective order issued October 28, 2003 filed by J. Sanders.5
02/23/2004Exhibits A and B signed by Frederick Ross Pulz associated with the protective order adopted on October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Winkler.6
02/19/2004Executed exhibits A and B signed William H. Courter, Esq. and Robin R. McVeigh of McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services.8
02/18/2004Letter requesting to be removed as a party to these proceedings, that they do not currently have any local exchange services in the State of Ohio, filed on behalf of CTC Communications Corp. by W. Ward.1
02/13/2004Executed Exhibits A and B, filed on behalf of KMC Telecom III, LLC by D. Ferris.5
02/13/2004Executed Exhibits A and B, filed on behalf of First Communications, LLC by D. Ferris.5
02/13/2004Executed Exhibits A and B, filed on behalf of Integrated Communications Solutions, Inc. by D. Ferris.5
02/13/2004Comments on ruling of Entry on Rehearing issued on February 4, 2004, on Motions for Clarification, or in the alternative, applications for rehearing filed by the OCC and a group of competitive local exchange carriers, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann.4
02/12/2004Motion for leave to intervene and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of First Communications, LLC by D. Ferris.6
02/12/2004Additional executed Exhibits A and B associated with protective order adopted on October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly.5
02/12/2004Additional executed Exhibits A and B to the protective order issued on October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of MCI by J. Sanders.7
02/12/2004Executed Exhibits A and B of the Protective Order, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by D. Trabaris.9
02/11/2004Additional executed Exhibit A and B associated with the Protective order adopted by the Commission on October 28,2003, filed on behalf Sprint Communications Company by B. Donahue.5
02/10/2004Confidential revised testimony of Michael Starkey filed on behalf of MCI WorldCom by J. Sanders. (FILED UNDER SEAL)59
02/10/2004Letter stating the revised testimony of Sherry Lichtenberg and the revised public version of the testimony of Michael Starkey, has been filed on behalf of MCI WorldCom by J. Sanders.1
02/10/2004Direct testimony of Michael Starkey regarding SBC's proposed batch hot cut process, filed on behalf of MCImetro Access Transmission Services, LLC and MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc.58
02/10/2004Direct testimony of Sherry Lichtenberg, regarding SBC's proposed batch hot cut process, filed on behalf of MCImetro Access Transmission Services, LLC, and MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc.42
02/09/2004Supplemental direct testimony of Sherry Lichtenberg, filed on behalf of MCI46
02/06/2004Executed Exhibits A and B filed on behalf of McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc. signed by M. Christensen.5
02/04/2004Entry on rehearing granted in part and denied in part, nonparties are required to answer clarifying discovery requests and bring them to the Commission for resolution.6
02/04/2004Service Notice10
02/03/2004Letter stating that Utilicom of Ohio, LLC formally TOTALink of Ohio, LLC has no access lines or customers in the state of Ohio.1
02/03/2004Memorandum Contra filed by J. Kelly on behalf of SBC Ohio.6
02/02/2004SBC Ohio's Memorandum Contra filed by J. Kelly.6
02/02/2004Exhibits A and B filed by J. Sanders on behalf of Monrosen, Inc.5
02/02/2004Memorandum contra the Joint Motion for Clarification, or in the alternative, Application for Rehearing, filed by J. Kelly on behalf of SBC Ohio.6
01/30/2004Motion for clarification, or in the alternative, application for rehearing of the Commission's January 14, 2004 opinion and order filed by D. Bergmann.11
01/29/2004Entry ordering that the markets for Cincinnati Bell's and SBC Ohio's impairment analysis proceeding scheduled to begin on March 15,2004 will be limited to Markets 1, 2, 3, and 4 as identified in Appendix B of the Commission opinion and order of 1/14,2004 and that a pre-hearing telephonic conference be set for Tuesday, February 3,2004 at 2:00PM and that ACN shall be granted intervention. (JA)3
01/27/2004Letter notifying that McLeodUSA does not intend to participate in case # 04-35-TP-COI as well as testimony of Patty Lynott on behalf of McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services and SBC Ohio's mass market proceeding case # 04-34-TP-COI filed by M. Christensen.19
01/27/2004Direct Testimony of Lyndall Nipps filed on behalf of Sage Telecom Inc. and Talk America.115
01/27/2004Confidential version of direct testimony of Michael Starkey and Sherry Lichtenberg on behalf of MCImetro Access Transmission Services, LLC and MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc. regarding SBC's proposed batch hot cut process. (FILED UNDER SEAL)193
01/27/2004Letter stating that Confidential version of testimonies and motions filed under seal filed by B. Royer1
01/27/2004Motion for protective order of MCImetro Access Transmission Services, LLC and MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc.6
01/27/2004Direct Testimony of Michael Starkey and Sherry Lichtenberg on behalf of MCImetro Access Transmission Services LLC and MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc., regarding SBC's proposed batch hot cut process.142
01/26/2004Memo stating that Bulleye Telecom Inc. does not intend to participate in the proceedings for 03-2040-TP-COI.1
01/26/2004Additional executed exhibits A and B to the protective order issued on 10/28/2003 filed on behalf of Covad Communications Company by T. OBrien.5
01/26/2004Letter herby notifying the Commission that Covad Communications Company does not intend to participate in the 03-2040-TP-COI proceedings.1
01/26/2004Letter hereby notifying the Commission that LDMI Telecommunications, Inc. does not intend to participate in the 03-2040-TP-COI proceedings.1
01/23/2004Joint motion for clarification, or in the alternative, application of rehearing of the Commission's January 14, 2004 Opinion and Order, filed on behalf of LDMI Telecommunications, Inc., Dieca Communications, Inc. dba Covad Communications Company by S. Bloomfield, for Sprint Communications Company, L.P by J. Stewart, for AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. and TCG Ohio by D. Trabaris, for Sage Telecom, Inc and Talk American Inc. by H. Kelly and S. Howard, for MCImetro Access Transmission Services, LLC and MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc. by J. Sanders.11
01/23/2004Exhibits A and B signed by A.Streetman and S. Hopkins associated with the protective order adopted of October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Winkler.8
01/22/2004Additional executed Exhibits A and B to the protective order issued on October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of MCI by J. Sanders.9
01/21/2004Revised Wire Center list, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by D. Hart.3
01/20/2004Executed exhibits A and B of the Protective Order, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by D. Trabaris.3
01/16/2004Memo requesting to remove D. Anthony Mastando from service list filed by E. Carden.1
01/15/2004Service Notice.52
01/14/2004Opinion and Order, ordering that the tentative market definition established in the Opinion and Order be utilized by all parties in both of the trigger and potential deployment tests for SBC Ohio and Cincinnati Bell respectively, that SBC Ohio and Cincinnati Bell shall be granted until January 21, 2004, to file revised wire center lists relative to the respective subsequent impairment analysis, that SBC Ohio and Cincinnati Bell, and intervenors file their testimony consistent this Opinion and Order, ordered that SBC Ohio and Cincinnati Bell's impairment and batch hot cut analysis be addressed in 04-34 and 04-35, respectively, ordered that the interventions granted in this case carry over into Case No. 04-34 and 04-35.85
01/13/2004Motion for leave to intervene, filed on behalf of ACN Communications Services, Inc. by R. Sugarman.6
01/13/2004Additional executed Exhibits A and B associated with the protective order adopted by the Commission on October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by D. Hart.7
01/12/2004Proposed prices for the batch hot cut processes, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly.4
01/12/2004Confidential Cost study in support of its proposed batch hot cut prices, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly. (FILED UNDER SEAL)26
01/09/2004Petition for Joint CLECS for resolution of disputed issues regarding SBC's proposed batch hot cut process and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. and TCG Ohio by D. Chorzempa, COVAD Communications Company, Sage Telecom, Inc., Talk America, Inc. Corecomm Newco., Inc. by T. O'Brien, MCImetro Access Transmission Services, LLC, MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc. by J. Sanders, McLeod USA by W. Courter.45
01/08/2004Executed Acknowledgment of Confidentiality and Exhibits A and B to the Protective Order issued on October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco, Inc. by T. O'Brien.14
01/06/2004Joint status report on multi-state batch hot cut collaborative results filed on behalf of interveners by J. Kelly.131
12/30/2003Objections to the PUCO Entry dated 12/17/2003 filed on behalf of ChoiceOne Communications by A. Mastando.2
12/30/2003Entry ordering that Choice One's objection regarding time to respond to discovery is granted, in part, and denied in part, instead of fourteen calendar days, it will be ten calendar days. Choice One's objection regarding consolidation of the discovery process is denied, and that all parties are encouraged to coordinate discovery requests pursuant to the Commissions entry dated 12/17/2003, the Commission is not currently engaged in managed discovery.This entry should be served upon all competitive local exchange companies, interexchange companies, incumbent local exchange companies relative to any granted edge out authority or out-of-territory authority.51
12/29/2003Reply brief regarding geographic markets, filed on behalf of MCI by J. Sanders.33
12/29/2003Reply brief filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by D. Hart.23
12/29/2003Reply brief filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company, L.P. by J. Stewart.13
12/29/2003Reply brief, filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter.32
12/29/2003Confidential amended prefiled direct testimony of Susan J. Maggard and deposition exhibit 2 (attachment A) (FILED UNDER SEAL) Originally filed 12/23/03.3
12/29/2003Confidential amended prefiled direct testimony of Susan J. Maggard and deposition exhibit 2 (attachment A) (originally filed 12/23/03). FILED UNDER SEAL.5
12/29/2003Allegiance Telecom of Ohio Inc.'s reply brief filed by J. Gockley.12
12/29/2003Reply brief on market definition phase, filed on behalf of AT&T by D. Trabaris and Corecomm by S. Bloomfield.19
12/29/2003Reply brief on market definition, filed on behalf of Sage Telecom, Inc. and Talk America Inc. by R. Sugarman.24
12/29/2003Reply brief concerning geographic market definition, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by M. Fenlon.42
12/29/2003Transcript w/exhibits of hearing held December 11, 2003 before Commission staff. (JA) Vol. III.225
12/26/2003Objections to the PUCO entry dated December 17,2003 filed on behalf of US Xchange of Ohio Inc. dba Choice One Communications filed by A. Mastando.(FAX)2
12/26/2003Response to Choice One Communications objections, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly.3
12/24/2003Transcript cont'd. (part 2 of 2)166
12/24/2003Transcript of hearing held before Commission staff, December 10, 2003, at the Commission. (JA) (Vol. II) part 1 of 2).175
12/23/2003Transcript of hearing held December 9, 2003, at the Commission. (JA) (Vol. 1)300
12/22/2003Executed Exhibits A and B associated with the Protective Order adopted October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by R. Sugarman.25
12/22/2003Executed Exhibits A and B associated with the protective order adopted on October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of The Northridge Group by R. Sugarman.15
12/22/2003Initial brief filed on behalf of Allegiance Telecom of Ohio, Inc. by J. Gockley. (original copy)24
12/19/2003Initial brief filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann.47
12/19/2003Initial brief, filed on behalf of Allegiance Telecom of Ohio, Inc. by J. Gockley. (FAX)24
12/19/2003Initial brief of Sage Telecom, Inc. and Talk America Inc. by J. Donovan.20
12/19/2003Initial brief concerning geographic market definition, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J.Kelly.51
12/19/2003Initial brief filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by D. Hart.20
12/19/2003Market Definition phase brief, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc.D. Trabaris and Corecomm Newco, Inc. by S. Bloomfield.26
12/19/2003Initial brief regarding definition of the market, filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company, LP by J. Stewart.8
12/19/2003Initial brief regarding geographic markets, filed on behalf of MCI by J. Sanders.45
12/19/2003Entry ordering hearing for March 8, 2004, at 10:00 a.m. at the offices of the Commission, that the manner in which disputed batch hot cut issues should be raised is clarified in accordance with Finding (2), that the joint status report filed on or before January 6, 2003, that SBC Ohio file its proposed batch hot cut prices and cost study on or before January 12, 2004, that petitions seeking resolution of disputed batch hot cut issues should be filed on or before January 9, 2003, that SBC Ohio should file its answer to a filed petition within 10 calendar days of being served with a pleading, that SBC Ohio and intervenors shall file direct testimonies regarding the batch hot cost issues on January 27, 2004. (JA)3
12/18/2003Service Notice59
12/17/2003Entry ordering that, if appropriate, all parties and telephone companies should file objections by December 26, 2003; that, in the absence of the filing of objections, electronic and hard copy access of the data responses from the first phase of this proceeding shall occur consistent with Finding 5; that, for the impairment phase of this proceeding, party-initiated discovery shall proceed in accordance with Finding 6.4
12/04/2003Additional discovery questions, filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company, LP by J. Stewart.5
12/04/2003Motion for admission Pro Hac Vice of Dennis G. Friedman, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly.4
12/04/2003 Supplemental filing to the deposition of Timothy J. Tardiff.5
12/04/2003Exhibits A and B of the protective order in order for the signatories to gain access to both confidential and restricted access information by D. Trabaris on behalf of AT&T Communications.5
12/03/2003Executed Exhibits A and B and an acknowledgement of confidentiality associated with the protective order adopted on October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of Allegiance Telecom of Ohio, Inc. by J. Gockley.6
12/03/2003Exhibits A and B associated with the protective order adopted by the Commission on October 28, 2003 filed by J. Kelly on behalf of SBC Ohio.11
12/02/2003Motion to revise protective order and memorandum in support so as to make electronic copies available: and request for expedited ruling, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Winkler.10
12/02/2003Executed Exhibit A and B associated with the Protective Order adopted on October 28, 2003 for Mark A. Stachiw and Lawrence E. Strickling, filed on behalf of Allegiance Telecom of Ohio, Inc. by G. Leegar.7
12/01/2003Testimony, Appendix and Maps of Ben Johnson, PhD. on behalf of OCC by J. Serio.66
12/01/2003Testimony of Kathy L. Hagans on behalf of the OCC by J. Serio..32
12/01/2003Testimony of Emily E. Binder on behalf of Sprint Communications Company, L.P. dba Sprint.10
12/01/2003Supplemental filing of deposition of Susan Maggard held November 24, 2003.5
12/01/2003Testimony of Terry L. Murray, filed on behalf of MCImetro Access Transmission Services, LLC and MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc.145
12/01/2003Confidential Testimony of Ben Johnson w/attached maps. (FILED UNDER SEAL).19
12/01/2003Testimony of Joseph Gilland, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. TCG Ohio and Corecomm Newco, Inc. by S. Howard.31
12/01/2003Testimony of A. Daniel Kelley, Charles P. Wehnes and Robert W. McCausland, filed on behalf of Sage Telecom, Inc. and/or Talk America Inc. by R. Sugarman.111
12/01/2003Direct testimony of Lawrence E. Strickling, filed on behalf of applicant by J. Gockley.20
12/01/2003Attachment LS-1 (FILED UNDER SEAL)2
11/28/2003Amended prefiled direct testimony of Susan J. Maggard, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by D. Hart.17
11/28/2003Confidential deposition of Susan Maggard Exhibit 2. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (filed 11/25/03)3
11/26/2003Notice of substitute of counsel filed on behalf of Allegiance Telecom by S. Bloomfield.3
11/26/2003Motion for admission pro hac vice of John Gockley and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Allegiance Telecom by S. Bloomfield.4
11/25/2003Deposition of Susan Maggard.113
11/25/2003Notice of deposition and request for production of documents, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly.4
11/24/2003Deposition of Timothy J. Tardiff w/exhibits (November 19, 2003).141
11/24/2003Confidential portion of deposition of William Deere with exhibits C, D, E, F, and G attached. (FILED UNDER SEAL)103
11/24/2003Deposition and exhibits of William C. Deere continued (part 2 of 2)163
11/24/2003Deposition of William C. Deere, w/ exhibits attached. (part 1 of 2)150
11/24/2003Motion for waiver and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company, L.P. by J. Stewart.3
11/21/2003Executed Exhibits A and B associated with the Protective Order, filed on behalf of Sage Telecom, Inc., Talk America, and Z-Tel Communications, Inc. by R. Sugarman.41
11/20/2003Executed Acknowledgment of confidentiality and Exhibits A and B to the Protective Order issued on October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of Allegiance Telecom, Inc. by S. Bloomfield.6
11/20/2003Additional executed Exhibits A and B to the Protective Order issued on October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of Covad Communications Company by T. O'Brien.3
11/20/2003Service Notice10
11/19/2003Entry ordering that Movants motion for extension of time is granted in part and denied in part, that Movants request to limit the length of reply briefs is denied, that parties should submit any additional mass market questions in accordance with Finding (7). (JA)3
11/18/2003Motion and memorandum in support for admission pro hac vice of Mark Stachiw and Jeffery J. Binder, filed on behalf of Allegiance Telecom Inc. by S. Bloomfield.4
11/17/2003Exhibit A and B to the Protective Order issued on October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of MCI by J. Sanders.5
11/14/2003Notice of depositions filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco, Inc., Covad Communications Co., LDMI Telecommunications, and Bullseye Telecom by T. O'Brien.2
11/14/2003Additional Exhibits A and B filed by D. Olson on behalf of Cincinnati Bell. 7
11/14/2003Exhibits A and B associated with the protective order adopted by the Commission on October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by B. Donahue.6
11/14/2003Joint motion for extension to time to file reply briefs and to set a page limitation on initial briefs and memorandum in support, filed of Ohio Consumers Counsel by T. Etter, MCImetro Access Transmission Services, LLC, BrooksFiber Communications, Inc. and MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc. by J. Sanders, AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by D. Trabaris and COVAD Communications Company, Corecomm Newco, Inc. and LDMI Telecommunications, Inc. by T. O'Brien.9
11/13/2003Entry ordering that the public utilities discussed in Findings (2), (3), and (5) comply with the directives and time frames specified in this entry, that SBC Ohio, Cincinnati Bell, and all intervenors comply with the procedural schedule identified in Findings (6) and (8) of this entry, that the motion to intervene is granted pursuant to Finding (10).12
11/13/2003Additional Executed Exhibits A & B to the Protective Order issued 10/28/2003 filed on behalf of MCI filed by J. Sanders.5
11/12/2003Exhibits A & B filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by D. Olson.3
11/12/2003Exhibits A and B and an acknowledgement of confidentiality associated with the protective order adopted by the Commission 10/28/2003 filed by G. Leeger on behalf of Allegiance Telecom of Ohio, Inc.10
11/12/2003Confidential information filed on behalf of SBC. (FILED UNDER SEAL)4
11/12/2003Direct Testimony of William C. Deere on behalf of SBC Ohio concerning Geographical Market Definition.100
11/12/2003Acknowledgement of Confidentiality in this case signed by D. Trabaris on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. filed by S. Howard.2
11/12/2003Letter stating testimonies of William C Deere and Timothy J Tardiff have been filed as well as a confidential version of attachment WCD-4 to Mr. Deere's testimony filed under seal pursuant to protective order filed on behalf of SBC by J. Kelly.3
11/12/2003Direct Testimony of Timothy J Tardiff on behalf of SBC Ohio concerning geographic market definition filed by SBC Ohio.56
11/12/2003Direct testimony of Susan J. Maggard on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company filed by D. Hart.16
11/12/2003Motion for an additional extension of time filed by M. Dortch on behalf of ICG Communications, Inc.2
11/10/2003Additional acknowledgement forms and executed Exhibits A and B to the Protective Order issued 10/28/2003 filed on behalf of FCC Triennial Review-Mass Market by J. Sanders.5
11/10/2003Acknowledgement of confidentiality and exhibits A and B associated with the Protective Order adopted by the Commission on 10/28/2003 filed on behalf of Intervenors by R. Sugarman.4
11/10/2003Acknowledgement and executed Exhibits A and B associated with the Protective Order adopted by the Commission on 10/28/2003 filed by D. Olson on behalf of Cincinnati Bell16
11/10/2003Acknowledgement of Confidentiality and executed exhibits A and B associated with the protective order adopted by the Commission on 10/28/2003 filed on behalf of Sage Telecom. Inc. Talk America Inc., and Z-Tel Communications Inc. by R. Sugarman.4
11/07/2003Exhibits A and B to the protective order issued on 10/28/2003 filed on behalf of LDMI Telecommunications by T. O'Brien.3
11/07/2003Exhibits A and B to the protective order issued on October 28, 2003, filed on behalf of MCI/WorldCom by J. Sanders.7
11/07/2003Exhibits A and B of the protective order, filed on behalf of Covad Communications Company by T. O'Brien.3
11/07/2003Exhibits A and B of the Protective Order, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by D. Trabaris.3
11/06/2003Exhibits A and B and acknowledgement form filed by T. O'Brien on behalf of Covad Communications.6
11/06/2003Exhibits A and B to the protective order filed by T. O'Brien on behalf of LDMI Telecommunications.5
11/06/2003Service Notice58
11/05/2003Exhibit A and B associated with the protective order, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly. 5
11/04/2003Exhibits A and B associated with the protective order adopted by the Commission on 10/28/2003 filed on behalf of SBC by J. Kelly.17
11/04/2003Exhibits A and B of the Protective Order filed by D. Bergmann on behalf of Ohio Consumers' Council.8
11/04/2003Exhibits A and B of the Protective Order filed by B. Donahue on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P.19
11/03/2003Exhibits A and B of the Protective Order filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by D. Trabaris.19
11/03/2003Exhibits A and B associated with the protective order adopted by Commission 10/28/03 filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. 41
10/31/2003Motion for an Extension of Time to respond to the Commissions information requests to Non-ILEC, filed on behalf of ICG Communications, Inc. by M. Dortch.2
10/31/2003Exhibits A and B submitted on behalf of SBC filed by J. Kelly.18
10/31/2003Letter to PUCO Staff, Legal Dept. requesting extension of time to respond to Appendix A of the Commission Entry dated October 2, 2003, filed on behalf of Glandorf Telephone Company by C. Flahive.2
10/30/2003Objection to SBC Ohio and Cincinnati Bell Telephone Batch Hot Cut Notice, filed on behalf of MCImetro Access Transmission Services, LLC, Brooks Fiber Communications, Inc. and MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc. by J. Sanders. 8
10/30/2003Objections filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. and TCG Ohio by D. Trabaris and S. Howard.6
10/28/2003Entry ordering a hearing on the issue of defining SBC Ohio's and Cincinnati Bell's markets for the purpose of this proceeding shall be held at the offices of the Commission,Hearing Room 11D on December 9, 10, 11, 2003 at 10:00 am.15
10/28/2003Entry ordering that the submitted applications for rehearing be denied.7
10/28/2003Service Notice66
10/28/2003Motion to intervene and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of Revolution Communications Company, LLC dba 1-800-4-A-Phone by J. Migden. 8
10/27/2003SBC Ohio's memorandum contra, OCC's Motion for clarification or, in the alternative, application for rehearing filed on behalf of SBC by J. Kelly.4
10/24/2003Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc. by J. Sanders.7
10/24/2003Motion for admission pro hac vice of William J. Cobb III and memorandum in support filed on behalf of DIECA Communications, Inc. dba Covad Communications Co. by T. O'Brien. 3
10/24/2003Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of BullsEye Telecom, Inc. by T. O'Brien. 4
10/24/2003Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco by T. O'Brien.4
10/24/2003Motion to intervene filed on behalf of Allegiance Telecom, Inc. by J. Binder.5
10/24/2003Motion to Intervene and memorandum in support of LDMI Telecommunications filed by S. Bloomfield. 4
10/24/2003Motion to Intervene and memorandum in support filed by Dieca Communications, Inc. DBA Covad Communications Company by T. O'Brien.6
10/24/2003Memorandum contra the Joint CLEC's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly.9
10/24/2003Memorandum of the Ohio Telecom Association Opposing Applications for rehearing and request for limited intervention filed by T. Lodge. 6
10/24/2003Response of Cincinnati Bell in opposition to (1) the competitive carriers joint application for rehearing of the Commissions Oct 2, 2003 Entry and (2) the motion for clarification or, in the alternative, application for rehearing of the Ohio Consumer's Counsel filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by D. Hart. 9
10/24/2003Memorandum Contra and the joint CLEC's application for rehearing filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly.9
10/24/2003Motion to Intervene and memorandum in support filed by OCC on behalf of residential utility consumers of the State of Ohio by D. Winkler. 8
10/24/2003Motion to intervene and Memorandum in support filed on behalf of Sprint filed by J. Stewart.5
10/24/2003Memorandum in response to application for rehearing of the competitive carriers filed on behalf of Sprint by J. Stewart. 5
10/24/2003Motion to intervene and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. and TCG Ohio by D. Trabaris and S. Howard. 13
10/23/2003Batch Hot Cut Notice filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly. 7
10/23/2003Notice contesting necessity of a batch hot cut process in its service territory, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by D. Hart. 5
10/23/2003Motion for admission Pro Hac Vice filed on behalf of Sage Telecom, Inc, Talk America Inc., and Z-Tel Communications, Inc. by R. Sugarman. 3
10/22/2003Entry ordering that the batch hot cut workshop scheduled for November 5 and 6, 2003, should be limited in scope to SBC Ohio; that Cincinnati Bell's batch hot cut process will be addressed at a later date; that, at this time, commercial mobile radio service providers do not have to respond to the list of questions attached to the Entry or October 2, 2003, in accordance with Finding 4.7
10/20/2003Motion for clarification or, in the alternative, application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio.7
10/17/2003Petition filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by M. Fenlon.19
10/17/2003Petition contesting the impairment finding for mass market local switching filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by P Rupich.4
10/17/2003Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of McLeodUSA Telecommunications services, Inc. by M. Christensen.3
10/15/2003Entry ordering that, to the extent applicable, SBC Ohio, Verizon North, Cincinnati Bell, and Sprint-United must each formally notify the Commission alternatively indicating whether or not it contends that the implementation of a batch hot cut process is unnecessary for some or all of its Ohio markets within its service territory, consistent with Finding 3; that all intervening parties objecting to an ILEC's contention that a batch hot cut process is unnecessary must file its objection with the Commission consistent with Finding 3; that a collaborative workshop be scheduled for 10:00 a.m. on November 5 and 6, 2003, Hearing Room 11-D, Commission offices.60
10/14/2003Joint application for rehearing filed on behalf of Dieca Communications, Covad Communications, CoreComm Newco, LDMI Telecommunications, and NuVox Communications of Ohio by T.O'Brien; AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Trabaris; Sage Telecom, Talk America and Z-Tel Communications by H. Kelly; MCImetro Access Transmission and MCI WorldCom Communications by J. Sanders.22
10/10/2003Motion for leave to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Z-Tel Communications by R. Sugarman.4
10/10/2003Motion for leave to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Talk America, Inc. by R. Sugarman. 4
10/10/2003Response filed on behalf of US LEC Communications by G. Lunsford.1
10/10/2003Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Sage Telecom Inc. by R. Sugarman. 4
10/10/2003Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Talk America Inc. by R. Sugarman. 4
10/08/2003Response letter to Commission regarding Local Circuit Switching in the Mass Market, they do not currently provide competitive local exchange service in the State of Ohio, filed on behalf of 360networks by C. Forst.1
10/02/2003Service Notice51
10/02/2003Entry ordered that all motions for intervention shall be filed on or before October 24, 2003.26
10/01/2003In the matter of the implementation of the Federal Communications Commission Triennial Review Regarding Local Circuit Switching in the Mass Market.1