DIS - Case Record for 01-0017-GA-CSS Skip to main content

Case Record For:

01-0017-GA-CSS

Case Title: CIN. GAS & EL. VS LICKING RURAL ELECTRIFICATION
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: GA-GAS
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 1/2/2001
Date Closed:
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
02/15/2002Service Notice4
02/14/2002Entry ordering that the applications for rehearing filed by Respondents be granted; that these cases be dismissed and closed of record; that any motions in these cases that the Commission has not addressed are denied as moot; that OCC's request to certify an interlocutory appeal in Case No. 01-330-GA-CSS is denied as moot.4
02/12/2002Respondents' Memorandum Contra The Ohio Consumers' Counsel's motion to intervene, filed by D. Stinson8
02/01/2002Service notice.3
02/01/2002Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Energy Cooperative, Cinergy Resources n/k/a The Energy Cooperative II, NGO Development Corp., National Gas & Oil Co., and National Gas & Oil Cooperative by G. Krassen. 14
01/30/2002Entry granting CG&E's motion to file second amended complaint; that the prehearing conference be cancelled; that respondents' motion for a continuance of time to answer complaint be denied; that a copy of second amended complaint be served on named respondents; that respondents file an answer or other responsive motion within 20 days of the date of this entry; that respondents' motion for expedited ruling be granted. (AE)3
01/29/2002Letter regarding granting the motion of Licking Rural Electrification, Inc. (LRE) be dismissed as a party to the case, filed by B. Royer.1
01/28/2002Motion to intervene OCC counsel on behalf of the residential consumers of the State of Ohio by R. Tongren.4
01/28/2002Energy Cooperative Inc. and the Energy Cooperative Inc. II's motion for continuance and request for expedited ruling, filed by D. Stinson.7
01/25/2002Motion of the Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company for leave to file second amended complaint filed by J. Gainer.19
01/15/2002Correspondence letter supporting the complaint, filed by Roy C. Butz.1
01/11/2002Service Notice.2
01/10/2002Entry ordering that the motion of LRE to be dismissed as a party to this proceeding is granted; that CG&E's March 8, 2001 motion to amend its complaint is granted; that CG&E's request to establish a discovery and hearing schedule in order to determine which entities are the proper respondent(s) is denied; that LRE's April 4, 2001, motion for a protective order is granted; that LRE's motions to strike are denied; that CG&E's June 18, 2001, motion to compel discovery responses is denied; that the Docketing Division serve a copy of the amended complaint (attached to CG&E's March 8, 2001 motion) upon TEC I, TEC II NGO Development Corp. NGO II, and NGO III; each shall file an answer and any responsive motion within 20 days of the date of this entry and appropriately serve CG&E; that the caption in this case should be modified to reflect the newly named respondents; that a joint prehearing settlement conference be held in Case Nos. 01-17-GA-CSS and 01-330-GA-CSS at 10:00 a.m. on January 31, 2002, Room 110F, Commission offices.4
07/19/2001Reply to Cincinnati Gas & Electric's memorandum contra motion to strike, filed on behalf of respondent, Licking Rural Electrification, by B. Royer.5
07/12/2001Memorandum contra to Licking Rural Electrification Inc.'s motion to strike filed by J. Finnigan on behalf of CG&E,4
07/11/2001Memorandum contra the Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company supplemental authorities to memorandum contra motion to dismiss filed by B. Royer on behalf of Licking Rural Electrification, Inc.13
07/02/2001Motion to strike and memorandum contra motion of Cincinnati Gas & Electric to compel discovery, filed on behalf of respondent, Licking Rural Electrification, by B. Royer.9
07/02/2001Supplemental authorities to CG&E's memorandum contra motion to dismiss named respondent, filed on behalf of respondent, CG&E, by J. Finnigan, Jr.61
06/18/2001Motion to compel discovery and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co., by J. Finnigan, Jr.24
05/21/2001Reply to memorandum contra motion to strike of the Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company filed by B. Royer on behalf of Licking Rural Electrification, Inc.7
05/14/2001Memorandum contra to motion to strike filed on behalf of complainant, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co., by J. Gainer.4
04/26/2001Motion to strike and reply of Licking Rural Electrification, Inc. to memorandum contra motion for protective order filed by B. Royer.12
04/16/2001Memorandum of the Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company contra motion for protective order of Licking Rural Electrification, Inc. filed by J. Gainer5
04/04/2001Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Licking Rural Electrification, by B. Royer.8
03/26/2001Memorandum contra motion of Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company to establish schedule for discovery and evidentiary hearing filed by B. Royer on behalf of Licking Rural Electrification, Inc.10
03/08/2001Motion to amend complaint and to establish schedule for discovery and evidentiary hearing filed by J. Finnigan.26
02/22/2001Reply to memorandum contra motion to dismiss named respondent, filed on behalf of respondent, Licking Rural Electrification, by B. Royer.70
02/12/2001Memorandum contra motion to dismiss named respondent filed by J. Finnigan on behalf of CG&E.5
02/12/2001Affidavit of William Ginn filed by J. Finnigan22
01/24/2001Motion to Dismiss named respondent filed by B. Royer.5
01/24/2001Answer of Licking Rural Electrification Inc. filed by B. Royer.4
01/04/2001Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: The Energy Cooperative, Jim Johnson.1
01/04/2001Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: The Energy Cooperative, Jim Johnson.1
01/04/2001Complaint and complaint letter mailed to: Licking Rural Electrification dba The Energy Co-op.1
01/03/2001In the matter of the complaint of The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company (vs) The Energy Cooperative, Inc. (TEC I), The Energy Cooperative, Inc. II (TEC II), NGO Development Corporation (NGO I), National Gas & Oil Company (NGO II), and National Gas & Oil Cooperative (NGO III) relative to the alleged unjust violation of the terms and conditions of rate FRAS.19