Skip to main content

Case Record For:

99-1180-TP-CSS

File a Public Comment
Case Title: AT&T/UNITED TELEPHONE DBA SPRINT
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 9/30/1999
Date Closed: 9/25/2001
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 38 documents 1 /  3 
Date FiledSummaryPages
09/25/2001Service Notice.2
09/25/2001Entry dismissing the complaint without prejudice and closing this case of record.2
09/10/2001Notice of withdrawal filed on behalf of complainant, AT&T Communications of Ohio, by B. Kahn.2
08/03/2000Entry denying Sprint's interlocutory appeal of the examiner's January 11, 2000 discovery ruling. Separate Opinion of Commissioner Craig A. Glazer. (7 pgs.)7
03/16/2000Entry ordering that AT&T's request for clarification is granted to the extent discussed in this entry. Concurring Opinion of Commissioner Craig Glazer. (8 pgs.)8
03/06/2000Memorandum contra Sprint-United's interlocutory appeal of attorney examiner's discovery ruling, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (7 pgs.)7
03/06/2000Memorandum contra Sprint-United's interlocutory appeal of an attorney examiners' discovery ruling, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by D. Chorzempa.7
03/03/2000Memorandum contra AT&T application for rehearing or, in the alternative, clarification of United Telephone Company of Ohio, dba Sprint filed by J. Stewart.10
03/03/2000Memorandum contra AT&T's application for rehearing or, in the alternative, clarification, filed on behalf of respon- dent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by J. Stewart. (10 pgs.)10
02/28/2000Application for interlocutory review filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by J. Stewart. (12 pgs.)12
02/28/2000Application for interlocutory review of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart.12
02/24/2000 Entry ordering that Sprint's motion for an indefinite extension of time to file an interlocutory appeal of the examiner's January 11, 2000 discovery ruling is denied; that, if Sprint decides to file an interlocutory appeal of the examiner's January 11, 2000 discovery ruling, that interlocutory appeal shall be filed on or before February 28, 2000. (AE) 6
02/24/2000Entry ordering that Sprint's motion for an indefinite extension of time to file an interlocutory appeal of the examiner's January 11, 2000 discovery ruling is denied; that, if Sprint decides to file an interlocutory appeal of the examiner's January 11, 2000 discovery ruling, that interlocutory appeal shall be filed on or before February 28, 2000. (AE) (5 pgs.)5
02/22/2000Application for rehearing or, in the alternative, clarifi- cation, and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of com- plainant, AT&T Communications of Ohio, by B. Kahn. (14 pgs.)14
02/22/2000 Application for rehearing or, in the alternative, clarification, and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of complainant, AT&T Communications of Ohio, by B. Kahn 14
 
1 /  3 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Petrucci, Gretchen