| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 09/25/2001 | Service Notice. | 2 |
| 09/25/2001 | Entry dismissing the complaint without prejudice and closing this case of record. | 2 |
| 09/10/2001 | Notice of withdrawal filed on behalf of complainant, AT&T Communications of Ohio, by B. Kahn. | 2 |
| 08/03/2000 | Entry denying Sprint's interlocutory appeal of the examiner's January 11, 2000 discovery ruling. Separate Opinion of Commissioner Craig A. Glazer. (7 pgs.) | 7 |
| 03/16/2000 | Entry ordering that AT&T's request for clarification is granted to the extent discussed in this entry. Concurring Opinion of Commissioner Craig Glazer. (8 pgs.) | 8 |
| 03/06/2000 | Memorandum contra Sprint-United's interlocutory appeal of attorney examiner's discovery ruling, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (7 pgs.) | 7 |
| 03/06/2000 | Memorandum contra Sprint-United's interlocutory appeal of an attorney examiners' discovery ruling, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by D. Chorzempa. | 7 |
| 03/03/2000 | Memorandum contra AT&T application for rehearing or, in the alternative, clarification of United Telephone Company of Ohio, dba Sprint filed by J. Stewart. | 10 |
| 03/03/2000 | Memorandum contra AT&T's application for rehearing or, in the alternative, clarification, filed on behalf of respon- dent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by J. Stewart. (10 pgs.) | 10 |
| 02/28/2000 | Application for interlocutory review filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by J. Stewart. (12 pgs.) | 12 |
| 02/28/2000 | Application for interlocutory review of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. | 12 |
| 02/24/2000 |
Entry ordering that Sprint's motion for an indefinite extension of time to file an interlocutory appeal of the examiner's January 11, 2000 discovery ruling is denied; that, if Sprint decides to file an interlocutory appeal of the examiner's January 11, 2000 discovery ruling, that interlocutory appeal shall be filed on or before February 28, 2000. (AE)
| 6 |
| 02/24/2000 | Entry ordering that Sprint's motion for an indefinite extension of time to file an interlocutory appeal of the examiner's January 11, 2000 discovery ruling is denied; that, if Sprint decides to file an interlocutory appeal of the examiner's January 11, 2000 discovery ruling, that interlocutory appeal shall be filed on or before February 28, 2000. (AE) (5 pgs.) | 5 |
| 02/22/2000 | Application for rehearing or, in the alternative, clarifi- cation, and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of com- plainant, AT&T Communications of Ohio, by B. Kahn. (14 pgs.) | 14 |
| 02/22/2000 |
Application for rehearing or, in the alternative, clarification, and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of complainant, AT&T Communications of Ohio, by B. Kahn
| 14 |