| Summary: |
|
Finding & Order denying the motions for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of collocation; that it is un- necessary to rule on the motions to intervene; that notice and comments, as utilized on this collocation issue, is an appropriate method of obtaining varying viewpoints from interested entities and rendering a decision on this matter; that Sprint's motion to sub- stitute the comments submitted on 12/16/92, for those filed on 12/4/92 is granted; that the collocation policy adopted herein represents the minimum acceptable standards for interconnection in Ohio; however, the Commission shall continue to monitor closely the terms and conditions of collocation and interconnection in Ohio. Concurring Opinion of Chairman Craig A. Glazer. |
|