| Summary: |
|
Entry ordered, that the procedural schedule set forth in finding (8) be observed. Finding (8) The attorney examiner notes that the application in the present cases was filed by AEP-Ohio less than a week prior to the filing of the ESP 2 Stipulation, and that a procedural schedule had not yet been established in these cases prior to the filing of the
stipulation. In light of the Commission's rejection of the ESP 2 Stipulation, the attorney examiner finds that the present cases should now move forward, and a comment period should be established in order to assist the Commission in its review of AEP-Ohio's application. Accordingly, the following procedural schedule should be established: (a) Initial comments should be filed by April 2, 2012, (b) Reply comments should be filed by April 17, 2012 (SJP) |
|