DIS - Case Record for 99-1441-TP-PEX Skip to main content

Case Record For:

99-1441-TP-PEX

File a Public Comment
Case Title: WAID SPIDELL/GTE NORTH
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: PEX-Petition for extended area service
Date Opened: 11/5/1999
Date Closed: 3/29/2001
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
09/18/2001Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Section C, 19th sheet 25; Section F, 36th sheet 1, filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by M. Prendergast.3
08/28/2001Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Contents, 54th sheet 2; Check List, 400th sheet 1, 27th sheet 12; Section 2.1, 5th sheet 33; Section 2.3, 1st sheet 9; Section 3-Wilmot, 17th sheet 1, filed on behalf of Verizon North by J. Kennedy.7
04/17/2001Letter stating that the in-service date for the institution of two-way flat-rate EAS between Verizon's Wilmot exchange and Sprint's Wooster exchange will be September 25, 2001 a.m., filed on behalf of respondent Verizon North, by J. Kennedy.1
04/12/2001Letter stating that 9/25/01 has been established as the in-service date for 2-way measured rate EAS between Apple Creek and Wilmot exchanges; it's also the date for 2-way flat rate EAS between Wooster and Wilmot filed by B. Donahue on behalf of Sprint.2
03/30/2001Service Notice.4
03/29/2001Supplemental Opinion & Order that two-way, flat-rate EAS be instituted between the Wilmot Exchange and the Wooster Exchange within six months of this order; that the respondents establish an in-service date within two months of this order.4
03/23/2001Response to Attorney Examiner's request, filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by P. Cook. (Original copy)1
03/22/2001Letter in response to the Attorney Examiner's request regarding the Companies' timing needed for the implementation of flat-rate service, filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by P. Cook. (Fax copy)1
03/15/2001Balloting results filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by P. Cook.1
03/02/2001Ballotts continued filed on behalf of complainants. (Part 9 of 9)46
03/02/2001Ballotts continued filed on behalf of complainants. (Part 8 of 9)201
03/02/2001Ballotts continued filed on behalf of complainants. (Part 7 of 9)201
03/02/2001Ballotts continued filed on behalf of complainants. (Part 6 of 9)201
03/02/2001Ballotts continued filed on behalf of complainants. (Part 5 of 9)201
03/02/2001Ballotts continued filed on behalf of complainants. (Part 4 of 9)201
03/02/2001Ballotts continued filed on behalf of complainants. (Part 3 of 9)202
03/02/2001Ballotts continued filed on behalf of complainants. (Part 2 of 9)201
01/18/2001Opinion & Order that the complainants' request for two-way, nonoptional, flat-rate EAS between the Wilmot Exchange and the Wooster Exchange is granted provided that a substantial majority of the Wilmot Exchange subscribers is willing to pay appropriate rates for the service; that the complainants canvass the Wilmot Exchange subscribers and report the results to the Commission by March 19, 2001; that this case remain open until otherwise ordered by the Commission; that the complainants' request for one-way, measured-rate EAS be instituted from the Wilmot Exchange to the Kidron Exchange and two-way,measured-rate EAS between the Wilmot and Apple Creek exchanges is granted; that all other requests for EAS are denied.20
06/24/2000Affidavit of LCI dba Qwest Communications Services, filed by W. Sharnahan.2
06/21/2000Affidavit filed on behalf of LCI International Telecom Corp. dba Qwest Communications Services by W. Shanahan.3
06/08/2000Proof of publication filed (daily record)1
06/08/2000Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.)1
06/05/2000Transcript of hearing held May 17, 2000, Mt. Eaton, Ohio before Hearing Officer G. See. (part 1 of 2)200
06/05/2000Transcript continued (part 2 of 2)178
05/26/2000Response filed on complainant by C. Spidell.3
05/26/2000Response filed on behalf of complainants by C. Spidell. (3 pgs.)3
05/18/2000Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Section A, 1st sheet 1; Section C, 1st sheet 1; Section C, 12th sheet 2, filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by B. Donahue. (4 pgs.)4
05/18/2000Revised PUCO No.6, Section A, First Revised Sheet 1 and Section C, Twelfth Revised Sheet 2, filed on behalf of applicant by B. Donahue.4
05/08/2000Testimony and attachments of Patricia J. Cook filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by W. Keating. (12 pgs.)12
05/08/2000Testimony and attachments of Patricia J. Cook, filed on behalf of GTE North, Inc. by W. Keating.12
05/08/2000Testimony and attachments of Patricia J. Cook, witness for GTE North, Inc.12
05/05/2000Proof of publication filed (Daily Record)1
05/05/2000Letter in support of EAS service between Mt. Eaton and Wooster, Ohio by F. Cannon, Pres. Wayne Co. Commissioners.2
05/05/2000Certified copy of the letter sent to Mr. Wade Spidell in support of toll free service between Mt. Eaton and Wooster, Ohio, filed by F. Cannon, Wayne County Commissioners. (2 pgs.)2
05/05/2000Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.) (Wayne County)1
05/03/2000Testimony, filed on behalf of United Telephone Co.of Ohio dba Sprint by B. Donahue.10
05/03/2000Testimony of Rebecca J. Donahue filed on behalf of respon- dent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by B. Donahue. (10 pgs.)10
04/24/2000Copy of a 26 question discovery request sent to GTE Inc, Sprint, AT&T, MCI & Worldcom, Sprint Communications Co. and LCI/Qwest, filed by C. Spidell.5
04/24/2000Copy of a 26 question discovery request sent to GTE and Sprint; and a 21 question discovery request sent to AT&T, MCI & WorldCom, Sprint Communications and LCI/Qwest, filed on behalf of complainants by W. Spidell. (10 pgs.)10
04/17/2000Supplemental information response filed on behalf of respon- dent, GTE North, by W. Keating. (2 pgs.)2
04/17/2000Supplemental information response, filed on behalf of GTE North, Inc. by W. Keating.2
04/11/2000Legal Notices faxed to: Holmes County Farmer-Hub (Holmes Co.); The Daily Record (Wayne Co.).5
04/11/2000Revised information response filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by B. Donahue. (7 pgs.)7
04/11/2000Information response filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by B. Donahue. (3 pgs.)3
04/11/2000Revised information response, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by B. Donahue.7
04/11/2000Information response filed on behalf of United Telephone Co. of Ohio dba Sprint by B. Donahue.3
04/10/2000Entry scheduling a hearing at 10:00 a.m. on May 17, 2000, at St. Paul United Church, Mt. Eaton, Ohio; that any person or entity requesting intervention in this matter do so by May 1, 2000; that any party intending to present direct ex- pert testimony file such testimony and serve a copy upon all parties by May 8, 2000. (AE) (3 pgs.)3
03/14/2000Information response, filed by GTE North, Inc. 40
03/14/2000Information response filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by P. Cook. (40 pgs.)40
03/09/2000Information response, filed on behalf of United Telephone Co. of Ohio dba Sprint by B. Donahue.7
03/09/2000Information response of United Telephone Co. of Ohio d/b/a/ Sprint. Filed by B. Donahue (6 pgs)6
02/16/2000Affidavit of LaTrischa C. Miles filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by L. Miles. (2 pgs.)2
02/16/2000Affidavit of LaTrischa C. Miles, filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company, L.P., by L. Miles.2
02/15/2000Affidavit of James Abbott filed on behalf of AT&T Communi- cations of Ohio by J. Abbott. (3 pgs.)3
02/15/2000Affidavit filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by J. Abbott.3
02/14/2000Affidavit of Judith B. Sanders stating that she forwarded the requested MCI calling statistics between the exchanges identified in this proceeding to the respondents on Febru- ary 14, 2000, filed on behalf of MCI WorldCom by J. Sanders. (1 pg.)1
02/14/2000Affidavit of Judith B. Sanders stating that she forwarded the requested WorldCom calling statistics between the ex- changes in this proceeding to the respondents on February 14, 2000, filed on behalf of MCI WorldCom by J. Sanders. (1 pg.)1
02/14/2000Affidavit, filed on behalf of MCI Worldcom by J. Sanders.1
02/14/2000Affidavit, filed on behalf of MCI WorldCom by J. Sanders.1
01/25/2000Answer filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by B. Donahue. (4 pgs.)4
01/25/2000Answer filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by W. Keating. (2 pgs.)2
01/25/2000Answer filed on behalf of GTE North, Inc. by W. Keating.2
01/25/2000Answer filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by B. Donahue.4
01/24/2000Affidavit of William E. Shanahan filed on behalf of LCI International Telecom Corp. by W. Shanahan. (3 pgs.)3
01/24/2000Affidavit of William E. Shanahan filed on behalf of LCI International Telecom Corp. by W. Shanahan.3
01/21/2000Affidavit of William E. Shanahan filed on behalf of LCI International Telecom Corp. by W. Shanahan. (3 pgs.)3
01/12/2000Entry scheduling a conference at 11:00 a.m. on March 29, 2000, at the Commission offices. (AE) (3 pgs.)3
01/06/2000Entry ordering that GTE and Sprint/United file their respective written answer with the Commission and serve a copy upon the spokesperson for the complainants by January 26, 2000; that AT&T, LCI or Qwest, MCI, Sprint, and WorldCom provide the information required by Finding 3 to GTE and Sprint/United by February 15, 2000; that AT&T, LCI or Qwest, MCI, Sprint, and WorldCom file an affidavit with the Commission by February 15, 2000; that GTE and Sprint/United coordinate all the calling information in accordance with Finding 5; that GTE and Sprint/United pro- vide the information required by Finding 6 by March 15, 2000; that GTE and Sprint/United provide the information required by Finding 7 by April 17, 2000. (AE) (8 pgs.)8
11/05/1999In the matter of the petition of C. Waid Spidell and sub- scribers of the Wilmot 359 exchange of GTE North Incorpor- ated for extended area service to the following exchanges: Kidron, Apple Creek, Wooster, and Orrville. (13 pgs.)13