DIS - Case Record for 98-1082-TP-AMT Skip to main content

Case Record For:

98-1082-TP-AMT

File a Public Comment
Case Title: SBC COMMUNICATIONS/AMERITECH OHIO
Status: CL-CLOSED
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: AMT-Application for telephone company mergers
Date Opened: 7/24/1998
Date Closed: 2/16/2017
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
02/16/2017Case action form closing case effective 2/16/2017 electronically filed by Mr. Jeffrey R Jones on behalf of Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.2
09/28/2007Notice of intent to cease providing local exchange service in Ohio filed by M. Fenlon on behalf of SBC Long Distance, LLC dba AT&T Long Distance.3
06/29/2007Notice to the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio that AT&T Long Distance intends to discontinue providing local exchange service in Ohio filed by M. Fenlon.4
06/28/2007Memo to re-open case with an effective date of 6/28/2007. 1
06/02/2006Service Notice12
05/31/2006Entry ordering that the motion of AT&T Long Distance for an extension of time until July 2, 2006, is granted.2
05/31/2006Service Notice12
04/28/2006Motion for extension of time filed on behalf of AT&T Long Distance by J. Kelly.5
07/09/2004SBC Ohio hereby submits to the Staff it's report covering all three periods covered by the retail service quality provisions of the Stipulation and Recommendation filed by J. Kelly.7
06/09/2004Entry ordering that SBC Ohio comply with the requirements of findings 5, 6 and 7.3
06/09/2004Service Notice13
02/26/2004Entry ordering that CoreComm and SBC's request be granted and that the first page of Exhibit DOH-1 of Mr. Heritage's affidavit remain under seal until May 26, 2004 unless otherwise ordered by the Commission and that this case be closed of record.7
02/26/2004Service Notice14
11/14/2003Fourth and final annual compliance report, filed on behalf of applicant by J. Kelly.24
08/07/2003Comments of MCI in support of the interlocutory appeals filed by J. Sanders.7
08/07/2003AT&T response in support of the interlocutory appeals filed by D. Trabaris.7
08/05/2003Interlocutory appeal and memorandum in support from the July 28, 2003 attorney examiner's entry and motions to recognize the interlocutory appeal and to stay the time for placing the unredacted exhibit to the affidavit of Deborah O. Heritage in the public file, filed on behalf of Corecomm Newco, Inc. by T. O'Brien.14
08/04/2003Interlocutory appeal filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by M. Fenlon.13
07/28/2003Entry ordering that SBC Ohio's September 25, 2002 motion for a protective order is granted in part and denied in part; that for eight months from the date of this entry, the Docketing Division should continue to maintain under seal the last six pages of Exhibit DOH-1, which are currently under seal in this docket; that the first page of Exhibit DOH-1 of Ms. Heritage's affidavit shall be moved into the public record. (GLP)3
07/28/2003Service Notice.14
04/01/2003Letter stating that SBC Ohio has provided to the Commission staff the "Year 2002 Network Annual Report in fulfillment of the language referenced in the stipulation, filed by M. Mackey.4
03/31/2003Additional information filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly.4
03/31/2003Executive summary of the year 2002 competition report filed.18
02/06/2003Third report of the Community Technology Board filed by E. Jacobs.7
11/15/2002Third annual progress report filed on behalf of SBC Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.29
09/25/2002Letter stating that The Ohio Bell Telephone Company has begun to use the registered trade names "SBC Ameritech Ohio" and SBC Ameritech", filed by J. Kelly.1
09/25/2002Confidential Heritage confidential Exhibit DOH-1, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (FILED UNDER SEAL)8
09/25/2002Motion for protective order and memorandum in support and affidavit of Deborah O. Heritage, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy.29
08/28/2002Notice of substitution of counsel, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by D. Trabaris.1
06/14/2002Letter on behalf of Ameritech regarding a placeholder for the year two performance measurements reports required by the stipulation and recommendation, filed by W. Adams. 3
05/30/2002Service Notice.13
04/01/2002Annual Report to the Commission Staff filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly.3
04/01/2002Competition Report year 2001 on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.18
04/01/2002 Network Annual Report year 2001, on behalf of Ameritech Ohio, filed by M. Mackey.3
03/19/2002Second report filed on behalf of The Community Technology Fund Board by K. Hardie.7
02/08/2002Entry ordering that the deadline in Section XIII.A.6 of the stipulation for approval of the Ameritech filing of June 14, 2001, is suspended until ordered otherwise by the Commission. (AE)18
12/20/2001Entry ordering that Ameritech's motion to strike its August 31, 2001 response to the OCC/Edgemont joint comments (dated August 16, 2001) is granted; that Ameritech's September 5, 2001 motion for a protective order is moot; that the recommendations made by OCC, Edgemont, and the staff to require certain specified modifications to Ameritech's USA program are denied.5
12/20/2001Service notice15
12/10/2001Service Notice.15
12/07/2001Entry ordering that the deadline in Section XIII.A.6 of the Stipulation is extended for an additional 62 days to February 11, 2002. (AE)17
11/15/2001Second annual compliance report for 2001 filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.27
10/12/2001Entry ordering that the deadline in Section XIII.A.6 of the stipulation is extended for an additional 60 days until December 11, 2001. (AE)17
10/10/2001Notice of substitution and withdrawal of counsel filed on behalf of AARP by W. Gruber.2
10/01/2001Reply to Ameritech Ohio's amended response, filed on behalf of Consumer Parties: OCC by D. Bergmann; and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by W. Gruber;11
10/01/2001Motion to strike and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy.7
09/13/2001Views concerning Ameritech Ohio's non-telephone household ("NTH") merger commitment, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Nourse.4
09/12/2001Amended response to The Consumer Parties' comments, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy.14
09/05/2001Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy.7
08/31/2001Confidential attachments to Ameritech Ohio's response to The Consumer Parties' comments, filed by M. Mulcahy. (FILED UNDER SEAL)8
08/31/2001Response to The Consumer Parties' comments, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy.14
08/20/2001Attachment 1 that was inadvertently omitted from the comments on Ameritech Ohio's commitment to decrease the number of non-telephone households in Ameritech's service territory docketed August 16, 2001, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann.6
08/16/2001Comments filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by W. Gruber.22
08/10/2001Notice of addition of counsel filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs.1
08/09/2001Notice of filing information concerning Section 271 checklist compliance, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by K. Sullivan.5
08/07/2001Entry ordering that the 60-day deadline in Section XIII.A.6 of the stipulation is extended for an additional 60 days to October 12, 2001. (AE)10
07/05/2001Notice of an ex parte communication with certain Commissioners, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.6
06/18/2001Letter providing notice of an ex parte communication with certain Commissioners in connection with this case, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.5
06/14/2001Service quality report for the period of 5/1/00 through 4/30/01 filed by M. Fenlon on behalf of Ameritech.4
05/18/2001Report of the Community Technology Board to the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, filed by E. Jacobs. (FILED 5/17/01)7
05/07/2001Report filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Fenlon.166
04/02/2001Executive summary Year 2000 Competition Report filed by J. Kelly on behalf of Ameritech,17
04/02/2001Service List for the Retail Residential Services Annual Report filed by J. Kelly on behalf of Ameritech.3
04/02/2001Service list for the Year 2000 Network Annual Report filed by J. Kelly on behalf of Ameritech.3
11/15/2000Annual progress report filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.53
10/03/2000Correspondence regarding a choice for telephone service, filed on behalf of OCC by R. Tongren. (4 pgs.) 4
10/03/2000Correspondence letter regarding the choice for telephone service, filed on behalf of OCC by R. Tongren. (4 pgs.)4
07/14/2000Additional information filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by S. Fioretta. (25 pgs.)25
05/08/2000Ameritech merger stipulations structure access process review filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (5 pgs.)5
01/20/2000Entry ordering that the Commission accepts Ameritech's offer to extend the period of time in which the USA Plan 1 will be available in Ameritech's service territory in Ohio and that Ameritech continue USA Plan 1 until 1/6/2003, unless otherwise ordered by the Commission. (4 pgs.)4
01/14/2000Additional information filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (1 pg.)1
01/06/2000Notice that Ameritech Ohio has provided the Commission Staff with an initial assessment of competition and market power, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy.18
01/06/2000Public version of the Executive Summary of Ameritech Ohio's initial assessment, filed by M. Mulcahy. (18 pgs.)18
01/06/2000Executive summary of the competition report using the Diagnostic Method for Assessing Competition, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy.17
12/02/1999Correspondence urging the PUCO to extend Ameritech Ohio USA Lifeline plan filed by Ohio Consumers' Counsel by R. Tongren.2
12/02/1999Letter urging the Commission to accept Ameritech Ohio's request to extend the Ameritech Ohio USA lifeline plan (known as "USA Plan 1) until January 6, 2003, filed on behalf of OCC by R. Tongren. (2 pgs.)2
11/05/1999Letter regarding Ameritech Ohio Transferor, and SBC Communications Inc Transferee. Filed by J. Kelly (8 pgs)8
11/05/1999Letter regarding Ameritech Ohio and SBC/Ameritech Transferor and SBC Communications Inc. Transferee. Filed by J. Kelly8
11/04/1999Entry ordering that AT&T's motion to reconcile the Ohio and FCC merger conditions is denied; that notice is hereby given to potentially interested parties that the SBC/Ameritech performance measurement and OSS collaboratives are being formed within the 60-day requirements of the stipulation; the first meeding of the performance measurement collabora- tive will begin at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, December 1, 1999, at the Commission offices; the first meeting of the OSS collaborative will begin at 9:00 a.m. on Thursday, December 2, 1999, at the Commission offices; the second meeting for the OSS collaborative will begin at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, December 14, 1999, at the Commission offices. (5 pgs.)5
10/12/1999Notice of filing of certificate of merger filed on behalf of SBC Communications, Inc. and SBC Delaware, Inc. by K. Sullivan; and Ameritech Corporation and Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (3 pgs.)3
09/10/1999Joint applicants' memorandum contra AT&T's motion to supple- ment its reply to joint applicants' memorandum contra AT&T's motion to reconcile federal and state merger conditions, filed on behalf of SBC Communications Inc. and SBC Delaware by J. Lang; and Ameritech Corp. and Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (6 pgs.)6
08/24/1999Motion to supplement its reply to joint applicants' memoran- dum contra AT&T's motion to reconcile federal and state merger conditions and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (8 pgs.)8
08/23/1999Reply to joint applicants' memorandum contra AT&T's motion to reconcile federal and state merger conditions, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (6 pgs.)6
08/16/1999Joint Applicants' Memorandum Contra AT&T Motion to Reconcile Federal and State Merger Conditions filed by Atty. K. Sullivan (6 pgs)6
07/29/1999Response in support of OCC's motion to require applicants to reconcile federal and state merger conditions or, in the alternative, motion for same, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (10 pgs.)10
07/27/1999Notice of withdrawal of motion to require joint applicants to reconcile federal and state merger conditions, filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter. (5 pgs.)5
07/14/1999Motion to require joint applicants to reconcile federal and state merger conditions and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter. (7 pgs.)7
06/02/1999Confidential settlement agreement filed on behalf of Time Warner by P. Jones; and Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (7 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)7
06/02/1999Entry denying the applications for rehearing filed by AT&T, the Sprint Companies, State Alarm, and Iwaynet, except for the limited extent noted in Finding 10, and closing this case of record. Dissenting Opinion on Rehearing of Commissioner Judith A. Jones. (9 pgs.)9
05/17/1999Memorandum contra the applications for rehearing of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Sprint Communications Company LP, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, MCI WorldCom, State Alarm, and Iwaynet Communications, filed on behalf of SBC Communications and SBC Delaware by P. Mancini; and Ameritech Corporation and Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (40 pgs.)40
05/17/1999Memorandum contra filed on behalf of OCC by T. O'Brien. (12 pgs.)12
05/10/1999Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of MCI WorldCom by J. Sanders and J. Van Duzer. (19 pgs.)19
05/10/1999Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of State Alarm by J. Small. (19 pgs.)19
05/10/1999Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Iwaynet Communications by J. Small. (7 pgs.)7
05/07/1999Application for reharing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa; Sprint Communications Company LP by L. Lauridsen; and United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. (36 pgs.)36
04/13/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Jay Westbrook, City of Cleveland, Office of the Council. (3 pgs.)3
04/13/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Paul Hood, Columbiana County Educational Service Center. (1 pg.)1
04/13/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by William Chesson, Jefferson County Chamber of Commerce. (1 pg.)1
04/13/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by C. Bibb, Sr., East Cleveland Citizens for Sound Government. (1 pg.)1
04/13/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Anda Cook. (1 pg.)1
04/13/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Matthew Habash, Columbus City Council. (1 pg.)1
04/09/1999Response letter to Mr. and Mrs. Lon Leapley filed on behalf of the PUCO staff. (1 pg.)1
04/09/1999Response letter to Mr. Jack D. Rike filed on behalf of the PUCO staff. (1 pg.)1
04/09/1999Response letter to Mr. John Beres filed on behalf of the PUCO staff. (1 pg.)1
04/08/1999Opinion & Order that the proposed merger and accompanying stipulation and recommendation are approved to the extent described and clarified in this order; that AT&T's December 10, 1998 and January 4, 1999 motions for protective order and the Sprint companies' January 8, 1999 motion for protective order are granted; that AT&T s December 22, 1998 motion for reconsideration and/or clarification is moot; that the Docketing Division of the Commission should maintain under seal, the documents mentioned in this order. Dissenting Opinion of Commissioner Judith A. Jones. Concurring Opinion of Chairman Craig A. Glazer. Concurring Opinion of Donald L. Mason, Esq.67
04/08/1999Opinion & Order approving the merger and accompanying stipulation and recommendation filed on February 23, 1999, to the extent described and clarified in this order; that AT&T's December 10, 1998 and January 4, 1999 motions for protective order and the Sprint companies' January 8, 1999 motion for protective order are granted; that CBT's March 10, 1999 motion for leave to intervene in this proceeding is denied; that AT&T's December 22, 1998 motion for recon- sideration and/or clarification is moot; that the Docketing Division of the Commission should maintain, under seal, the documents listed in this order for 18 months from the date of this order; that further hearings are not required in this matter and the hearing record in this case shall be closed, effective with the issuance of the final order on rehearing, unless a stipulating party withdraws its consent for the stipulation. Dissenting Opinion of Commissioner Judith A. Jones. Concurring Opinion of Chairman Craig A. Glazer. Concurring Opinion of Donald L. Mason, Esq. (68 pgs.)77
04/07/1999Correspondence letters regarding the application, filed by various consumers. (4 pgs.)4
04/07/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Jay Westbrook, City of Cleveland, Office of the Council. (3 pgs.)3
04/06/1999Correspondence letters regarding the application, filed by various consumers. (6 pgs.)6
04/02/1999Correspondence letters regarding the application, filed by various consumers. (18 pgs.)18
03/30/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Sally A. Jackson. (1 pg.)1
03/30/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Mayor John P. Stozich, City of Findlay, Ohio. (1 pg.)1
03/30/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by John Sobolewski, West Shore Chamber of Commerce. (1 pg.)1
03/29/1999Confidential Joint Applicants' Exhibit No. 41 filed with transcript of hearing held 3/15/99, Volume XVII. (2 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)2
03/29/1999Confidential AT&T Exhibit No. 18 filed with transcript of hearing held 3/15/99, Volume XVII. (52 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)52
03/29/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 3/15/99, (GP) (PD), 239 pgs., Con't. (Volume XVII) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)239
03/29/1999Correspondence letters regarding the application, filed by various consumers. (13 pgs.)13
03/26/1999Confidential joint applicants' exhibit No. 29 filed with transcript of hearing held 3/12/99, Volume XVI. (1 pg.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)1
03/26/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 3/12/99, (GP) (PD), 237 pgs., Con't. (Volume XVI) (PUCO-Columbus,OH)237
03/26/1999Reply brief filed on behalf of joint applicants, SBC Com- munications and SBC Delaware by P. Mancini; and Ameritech Corporation and Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (67 pgs.)67
03/26/1999Reply brief filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (33 pgs.)33
03/26/1999Reply brief filed on behalf of OCC by T. O'Brien. (28 pgs.)28
03/26/1999Post hearing brief filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Nourse. (25 pgs.)25
03/26/1999Reply brief filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Com- pany, L.P. by L. Lauridsen; and United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. (24 pgs.)24
03/26/1999Reply brief filed on behalf of MCI WorldCom, Inc. by J. Sanders and J. Van Duzer. (20 pgs.)20
03/26/1999Reply brief filed on behalf of NextLink Ohio by C. Hale. (18 pgs.)18
03/26/1999Reply brief filed on behalf of AARP by B. Weston. (12 pgs.)12
03/26/1999Post-hearing reply filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by R. Sugarman. (10 pgs.)10
03/25/1999Transcript filed on hearing held on March 11, 1999, continued for March 12, 1999. (261 pgs.)261
03/25/1999Letter stating the undersigned carriers, and the Competitive Telecommunications Assoc/American Carrier's Telecommunicatio Assoc, are committed to achieving local competition that spans the full spectrum of customers. Submitted by: G. Rowling, R. Rothstein, J. Smith, T. Monroe, G. Morelli, C. Schonhaut. (4 pgs.)4
03/25/1999Letter of the Competition Telecommunications Association/ American Carrier's Telecommunication Association (CompTel/ ACTA), Westel, Inc., Cable & Wireless USA, Inc., Excel Communications, Inc., Qwest Communications Corp., and ICG Telcom Co. Submitted by: L. Oliver. (10 pgs.)10
03/24/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 3/10/99, (GP) (PD), 236 pgs., Con't. (Volume XIV) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)236
03/24/1999Correspondence letters regarding the application, filed by various consumers. (6 pgs.)6
03/23/1999Correspondence letters regarding the application, filed by various consumers. (10 pgs.)10
03/23/1999Table of Contents to the initial brief filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. and United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by L. Lauridsen. (7 pgs.)7
03/22/1999correspondence letter filed by T. Humphries1
03/22/1999Post hearing brief filed on behalf of joint applicants, SBC Communications, Inc. and SBC Delaware, Inc. by P. Mancini; and Ameritech Corporation and Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (76 pgs.)76
03/22/1999Initial brief filed on behalf of MCI WorldCom by J. Sanders. (58 pgs.)58
03/22/1999Initial brief filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company L.P. by J. Stewart. (58 pgs.)58
03/22/1999Post hearing brief filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (49 pgs.)49
03/22/1999Brief filed on behalf of AARP by B. Weston. (47 pgs.)47
03/22/1999Initial brief filed on behalf of OCC by T. O'Brien. (34 pgs.)34
03/22/1999Initial brief filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by D. Clayton. (29 pgs.)29
03/22/1999Post hearing brief filed on behalf of State Alarm by J. Small. (28 pgs.)28
03/22/1999Post hearing brief filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Nourse. (28 pgs.)28
03/22/1999Initial brief filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (7 pgs.)7
03/22/1999Post hearing brief filed on behalf of Iwaynet Communications by J. Small. (6 pgs.)6
03/22/1999Brief filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco by S. Bloomfield. (4 pgs.)4
03/22/1999Correspondence letter filed by Eric Smith. (1 pg.)1
03/22/1999Correspondence letter filed by Thomas Humphries. (1 pg.)1
03/22/1999Correspondence letter filed by John Ramicone. (1 pg.)1
03/22/1999Correspondence letter filed by Jeff Rechenbach. (1 pg.)1
03/22/1999Correspondence letter filed by Ray Mulhern. (1 pg.)1
03/22/1999Correspondence letter filed by Thomas Poorman. (1 pg.)1
03/22/1999Correspondence letter filed by Dan Hartman. (1 pg.)1
03/19/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Richard Erickson. (2 pgs.)2
03/19/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Cazzell Smith, Sr. (1 pg.)1
03/19/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Phillip Parker. (1 pg.)1
03/19/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Thomas Baker. (1 pg.)1
03/19/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Willie Walker. (1 pg.)1
03/17/1999Memorandum contra Cincinnati Bell's motion for leave to intervene out of time filed on behalf of joint applicants, SBC Communications, Inc. and SBC Delaware, Inc. by K. Sul- livan; and Ameritech Corporation and Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (7 pgs.)7
03/17/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Mayor John P. Stozich. (1 pg.)1
03/17/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Donald E. Walrath. (1 pg.)1
03/17/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Robert L. Maxwell. (1 pg.)1
03/16/1999Late filed exhibit of a stipulation between Sprint and the joint applicants, filed on behalf of United Telephone Com- pany of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company by B. Donahue. (6 pgs.)6
03/11/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Bette Mitchell. (1 pg.)1
03/11/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Tim Jochim. (1 pg.)1
03/10/1999Motion for leave to intervene out of time and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by C. Wilson. (7 pgs.)7
03/10/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by J. Ramicone, Ohio Schools Council. (1 pg.)1
03/08/1999Direct testimonyof Joseph Gillan filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (27 pgs.)27
03/08/1999Testimony of Joan Campion filed on behalf of MCI WorldCom by J. Sanders. (11 pgs.)11
03/08/1999Testimony of David E. Stahly filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communi- cations Company L.P. by B. Donahue. (22 pgs.)22
03/08/1999Transcript filed for hearing hled 2/22/99, (GP) (PD), 12 pgs. (Status Conference) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)12
03/05/1999Proof of service of subpoena on Marsha Rockey Schermer, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (8 pgs.)8
03/04/1999Prefiled testimony of Thomas J. Reiman filed on behalf of Ameritech Corp. and Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (17 pgs.)17
03/04/1999Prefiled supplemental direct testimony of James S. Kahan filed on behalf of the SBC Delaware and SBC Communications by K. Sullivan. (17 pgs.)17
03/04/1999Prepared testimony of Amy L. Weinrich filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Nourse. (15 pgs.)15
03/04/1999Direct testimony of Hisham M. Choueiki, Ph.D., P.E., filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Nourse. (12 pgs.)12
03/04/1999Prepared testimony of Doris E. McCarter filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by S. Nourse. (12 pgs.)12
03/04/1999Letter stating that the Payphone Association of Ohio opposes the proposed settlement and stipulation, but will file no testimony on March 8, 1999, filed by H. Kelly. (3 pgs.)2
03/04/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 2/18/99, (GP) (PD), 17 pgs. (PUCO-Columbus, OH) (Status Conference)17
03/04/1999Motion for subpoena filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (5 pgs.)5
03/03/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by E. Richard Shoup, Ph.D., Capital University. (1 pg.)1
03/02/1999Response filed on behalf of the Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland by J. Meissner. (1 pg.)1
03/01/1999Statement of opposition to the stipulation and recommenda- tion filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart; and Sprint Communications Com- pany by L. Lauridsen. (6 pgs.)6
03/01/1999Position statement of ICG Telecom Group and stating that they do not intend to file testimony, filed by B. Ferris. (5 pgs.)5
03/01/1999AT&T Communications of Ohio's statement of opposition to the partial stipulation and recommendation, filed by B. Kahn. (5 pgs.)5
03/01/1999Letter stating that the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association opposes the proposed settlement and recom- mendation, and that they do no intend to file testimony, filed by S. Howard. (1 pg.)1
03/01/1999Letter stating that MCI Telecommunications Corp. and MCImetro Access oppose the stipulation and recommenda- tion and intend to file testimony, filed by J. Sanders. (1 pg.)1
03/01/1999Letter stating that both State Alarm and Iwaynet Communi- cations oppose the stipulation, filed by J. Small. (1 pg.)1
03/01/1999Letter stating that Telecommunications Resellers Assn. continues to oppose the merger and, therefore, opposes the stipulation and recommendation and does not intend to file testimony in this case, filed by S. Bloomfield. (1 pg.)1
02/26/1999Statement opposing the proposed settlement agreement, filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by D. Clayton. (1 pg.)1
02/26/1999Letter opposing the stipulation, filed on behalf of AARP by B. Weston. (1 pg.)1
02/26/1999Confidential Joint Applicant's Exhibit 23 filed with trans- cript of hearing held 2/12/99, Volume XIII. (9 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)9
02/26/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 2/12/99, (GP) (PD), 18 pgs., Con't. (Volume XIII) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)18
02/24/1999Entry ordering that the evidentiary hearing shall resume at 10:00 a.m. on March 10, 1999, at the Commission offices; that all parties wo did not sign the proposed stipulation and recommendation shall file a statement indicating their support or opposition to the proposed settlement; that statement shall be filed on or before noon on Monday, March 1, 1999; additionally, those parties who oppose the proposed settlement should indicate at that time whether they will file testimony to address the issue of the reasonableness of the proposed stipulation and recommendation; that all direct, expert testimony in support of the proposed stipu- lation shall be filed by noon on Thursday, March 4, 1999; that any party intending to present direct, expert testimony in opposition to the stipulation and recommendation shall file such testimony by noon on Monday, March 8, 1999; that the requests for an opportunity to conduct additional dis- covery related to the stipulation and for a procedural con- ference are denied. (AE) (3 pgs.)3
02/23/1999Stipulation and recommendation filed on behalf of SCB Com- munications; SCB Delaware; Ameritech Corp. by M. Mulcahy; Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy; PUCO staff by S. Nourse; OCC by T. O'Brien; Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs; Parkview Areawide Seniors by J. Meissner; Time Warner Tele- com by P. Jones; and Corecomm Newco by S. Bloomfield. (175 pgs.)175
02/23/1999Letter requesting that the Commission schedule a brief prehearing conference for the parties to discuss proced- ural matters prior to the issuance of an entry, filed on behalf of MCI WorldCom by J. Sanders. (1 pg.)1
02/17/1999Correspondence letter from H. Myers filed (1 pg)1
02/17/1999Correspondence letter from E.R. Shoup filed (1 pg)1
02/17/1999Transcript for hearing held 2/3/99, continued, 14 pgs (GP) (PD)14
02/12/1999Transcript for hearing held on 1/29/99. Con't (GP) (8 pgs)8
02/09/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by E. Richard Shoup, Ph.D. (1 pg.)1
02/08/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 1/25/99, (GP) (PD), 42 pgs., Con't. (Volume XII) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)42
02/08/1999Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by J. Westbrook, President, Cleveland City Council. (4 pgs.)4
02/05/1999Confidential AT&T Exhibit No. 11.1 filed with transcript of hearing held 1/22/99, Volume XI. (51 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)51
02/05/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 1/22/99, (GP) (PD), 211 pgs., Con't. (Volume XI) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)211
02/04/1999Unredacted AARP Exhibit No. 2 filed with transcript, Volume X, filed. (65 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)65
02/04/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 1/21/99, (GP) (PD), 161 pgs., Con't. (Volume X) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)161
02/04/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 1/20/99, (GP) (PD), 143 pgs., Con't. (Volume IX) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)143
02/04/1999Transcript filed for hearing held January 21, 1999, (GP) (PD), 161 pgs., Continued. (PUCO-Columbus, OH) (Volume X)0
02/02/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 1/19/99, (GP) (PD), 186 pgs., Con't. (Volume VIII) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)186
01/29/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 1/15/99, (GP) (PD), Con't. (Volume VII) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)310
01/28/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 1/14/99, (GP) (PD), 156 pgs., Con't. (Volume VI) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)156
01/27/1999Transcript for hearing held January 13, 1999 at 9:30 a.m. before Gretchen Petrucci and Paul Duffy, Attorney Examiners.114
01/27/1999Confidential direct testimony of Kathleen L. Whiteaker, C.P.A. filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio. (21 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL WITH TRANSCRIPT VOLUME V)21
01/26/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 1/12/99, (GP) (PD), 146 pgs., Con't. (Volume IV) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)146
01/26/1999Direct testimony of Christopher J. Viveros on behalf of SBC Communications Inc. 76
01/26/1999Nextlink's substituted Exhibit 3, Volume 4, filed. (31 pgs.)31
01/26/1999Edgemont substitute Exhibit, Volume 3, filed. (19 pgs.)19
01/25/1999Transcript for hearing held 1/11/99; Volume III, continued, 229 pages. (GP & PD)229
01/25/1999Additional information filed by J. Campion on behalf of MCI Telecommunications. (3 pgs)3
01/22/1999Transcript for hearing held 1/8/99, Volume II, continued 230 pages. (GP & PD)230
01/21/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 1/7/99, (GP) (PD), 226 pgs., Con't. (Volume I) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)226
01/21/1999Letter stating that Ameritech Ohio supports AT&T Communica- tions' motion for protective order, filed by D. Conway. (1 pg.)1
01/19/1999Stipulation between the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association and Ameritech Ohio, filed by S. Howard. (6 pgs.)6
01/16/1999Memorandum Contra to the motion to compel discovery and request for sanctions of SBC Communications, Inc. D. Chorzempa and B. Kahn.12
01/11/1999AT&T Communications of Ohio's memorandum contra to the motion to compel discovery and request for sanctions of SBC Communications, filed by D. Chorzempa. (12 pgs.)12
01/08/1999Unredacted version of direct testimony of David E. Stahly filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. and United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint. (89 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)89
01/08/1999Motion for protective order filed on behalf of United Tele- phone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart and L. Laur- idsen. (4 pgs.)4
01/08/1999Letter stating that they are filing the unredacted testimony of David Stahly, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. (1 pg.)1
01/07/1999Motion to compel both applicants to answer AARP's first set of interrogatories and requests for production of documents filed on behalf of AARP by B. Weston. (15 pgs.)15
01/06/1999Motion to compel AT&T to respond to discovery requests and for sanctions and memorandum in support filed on behalf of SBC Communications by K. Sullivan. (76 pgs.)97
01/06/1999Letter withdrawing from this proceeding, filed on behalf of AirTouch by J. Bentine. (1 pg.)1
01/04/1999Confidential portion of deposition of Robert G. Harris filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (5 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)5
01/04/1999Deposition of Robert G. Harris filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (97 pgs.)60
01/04/1999Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (6 pgs.)6
01/04/1999Reply memorandum in support of motion for protective order filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (7 pgs.)7
01/04/1999Joint applicants' memorandum contra AT&T's motion to recon- sider and/or clarify December 18, 1998 entry, filed on be- half of SBC Communications by K. Sullivan; and Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (7 pgs.)7
12/31/1998Witness list filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway; and SBC Communications Inc. by K. Sullivan. (2 pgs.)2
12/31/1998Memorandum of The Ohio Cable Telecommunications Assn. contra Ameritech Ohio's December 30, 1998 motion for protective order, filed by S. Howard. (35 pgs.)35
12/30/1998Deposition of James S. Kahan taken on December 9, 1998, filed. (194 pgs.)194
12/30/1998Deposition of Christopher J. Viveros taken on December 11, 1998, filed. (144 pgs.)144
12/30/1998Deposition of W. Patrick Campbell taken on December 15, 1998, filed. (75 pgs.)75
12/30/1998Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (17 pgs.)17
12/29/1998Request that the Commission continue the starting dates of hearings to Thursday, January 7, 1999, filed on behalf of SBC Communications and SBC Delaware by K. Sullivan; and Ameritech Corp. and Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (1 pg.)1
12/29/1998Entry ordering that the joint applicants' request to con- tinue the evidentiary hearing to January 7, 1999, is granted; that the joint applicants file a statement in this docket in which they identify the order in which they will present their witnesses; that statement should be filed by December 31, 1998; that the joint applicants shall bring the currently designated, copy prohibited documents to the hearing. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
12/23/1998Entry ordering that the joint applicants' request to present their witnesses in a panel is denied; that the joint motion of the Parkview Areawide Seniors, the Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland, and the Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition for a local, public hearing is denied at this time. (AE) (3 pgs.)3
12/22/1998Motion to reconsider and/or clarify December 18, 1998 entry filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chor- zempa. (8 pgs.)8
12/22/1998Notice of deposition filed on behalf of The Ohio Cable Tele- communications Assn. by S. Howard. (5 pgs.)5
12/21/1998Certificate of service filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighbor- hood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (3 pgs.)3
12/18/1998Reply to the joint applicants' response to the motion to schedule a local public hearing, filed on behalf of Em- powerment Center of Greater Cleveland by J. Meissner; and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (7 pgs.)7
12/18/1998Entry ordering that the examiner's November 10, 1998 oral ruling, which required the deletion of a copy prohibited designation in the nondisclosure agreements, is modified in part; that the joint applicants' request for interlocu- tory review of the examiner's November 10, 1998 oral ruling is denied; that the joint applicants maintain the documents listed in Finding 8 as copy prohibited; SBC and Ameritech shall review the other allegedly "copy prohibited" documents and the discovery requests that they have received in order to determine upon whom copies must be served; those copies shall be served by December 22, 1998; that Ms. Albert, Mr. Branfman, and Ms. Finn are permitted to practice before the Commission in this proceeding; that AARP's motion to inter- vene is granted; that the joint requests of AT&T, Time War- ner,Sprint Communications, Nextlink Ohio, and OCC to move the deposition date of Mr. Kahan is moot; the joint request to require Mr. Kahan to be available for deposition a second time is denied; that Nextlink's request that its witness list be considered timely filed is granted. (AE) (9 pgs.)9
12/17/1998Revised pages to direct testimony of John R. Woodbury, filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. and United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. (13 pgs.)13
12/17/1998Correspondence letter opposing the application, filed by C. Mlay. (1 pg.)1
12/17/1998Supplemental direct testimony of Marsha Rockey Schermer filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by R. Sugarman. (4 pgs.)4
12/17/1998Letter stating that Payphone Association of Ohio will present no witnesses in this case, filed by H. Kelly. (3 pgs.)3
12/17/1998Letter confirming that ICG Telecom Group does not intend to present any witnesses in this case, filed by B. Ferris. (1 pg.)1
12/16/1998Deposition of John R. Woodbury, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint.132
12/16/1998Reply filed on behalf of American Association of Retired Persons by B. Weston. (9 pgs.)9
12/16/1998Entry Nunc Pro Tunc ordering that Finding 8 of the December 10, 1998 entry on rehearing is modified, nunc pro tunc; that, nevertheless, Edgemont's application for rehearing is denied. (3 pgs.)3
12/16/1998Entry ordering that SBC's motion to compel full and complete responses by MCI to certain aspects of SBC's second set of interrogatories and requests for production of documents is granted; that MCI serve responses to the required inter- rogatories and required requests for production of documents by December 18, 1998. (AE) (4 pgs.)4
12/15/1998Correspondence letter from Esther Maimone. (1 pg_1
12/15/1998Correction to the correspondence filed on 12/10/98 filed by S. Bloomfield. (1 pg)1
12/14/1998Joint applicant's response to motion to schedule a local public hearing filed by K. Sullivan and D. Conaway. (4 pgs)4
12/11/1998Service Notice12
12/10/1998Entry ordering that Edgemont's November 16, 1998 application for rehearing is denied. (5 pgs.)5
12/10/1998Entry ordering that Edgemont's November 16, 1998 application for rehearing is denied.6
12/10/1998Entry ordering that the Joint applicants request for interlocutory review on one aspect of the examiners November 10, 1998, oral ruling is still held in abeyance, pending an in camera review of the currently designated "copy prohibited" documents, as set forth in Finding (7) (GP)3
12/10/1998Direct testimony of Marsha Rockey Schermer on behalf of Time Warner Telecom, L.P. filed by R. Sugarman.28
12/10/1998Testimony of Scott A. Falconer filed on behalf of AirTouch Cellular by J. Bentine.27
12/10/1998Expert testimony of Dr. Mark N. Cooper filed on behalf of American Association of Retired Persons by B. Weston. (57 pgs.)57
12/10/1998Direct testimony of Trevor R. Roycroft, Ph.D. on behalf of the Ohio Consumers Counsel.83
12/10/1998Testimony of Scott A. Falconer-Vice president, Marketing, filed on behalf of AirTouch Cellular by J. Bentine.27
12/10/1998Entry ordering that the joint applicants' request for inter- locutory review of one aspect of the examiner's November 10, 1998 oral ruling is still held in abeyance, pending an in camera review of the currently designated "copy prohibited" documents, as set forth in Finding 7. (AE) (3 pgs.)3
12/10/1998Unredacted version of direct testimony of Kathleen L. Whiteaker, C.P.A. and Robert V. Falcone filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (82 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)82
12/10/1998Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (10 pgs.)10
12/10/1998Direct testimony of Joseph Gillan filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (66 pgs.)66
12/10/1998Redacted version of direct testimony of Robert V. Falcone filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (48 pgs.)48
12/10/1998Direct testimony of A. Lee Blitch filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (33 pgs.)33
12/10/1998Redacted version of direct testimony of Kathleen L. White- aker, C.P.A. filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (20 pgs.)20
12/10/1998Direct testimony and exhibits of Roger Colton, Stephen Colton, William Ondrey Gruber, and Thomas Bier filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition and Parkview Areawide Seniors Empowerment Center by E. Jacobs. (266 pgs.)266
12/10/1998Direct testimony of Susan M. Baldwin filed on behalf of OCC by T. O'Brien. (125 pgs.)125
12/10/1998Direct testimony of Trevor R. Roycroft, Ph.D. filed on behalf of OCC by T. O'Brien. (83 pgs.)83
12/10/1998Testimony of Elizabeth Krieger filed on behalf of OCC by T. O'Brien. (23 pgs.)23
12/10/1998Direct testimony of Daniel Gonzalez filed on behalf of Next- link Ohio by T. Powell. (35 pgs.)35
12/10/1998Witness list filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by D. Clayton. (4 pgs.)4
12/10/1998Revised witness list filed on behalf of IwayNet Communi- cations by J. Small. (4 pgs.)4
12/10/1998SAS exhibit 1, testimony of Donald Shury, filed on behalf of State Alarm by J. Small. (14 pgs.)14
12/10/1998Joint applicants' first set of interrogatories to American Association of Retired Persons, filed on behalf of SBC Com- munications and SBC Delaware by J. Lang; and Ameritech Corporation and Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (18 pgs.)18
12/10/1998Testimony of Scott A. Falconer-Vice President, Marketing, Exhibit # 1, filed by J. Bentine on behalf of AirTouch Cellular.27
12/10/1998Direct expert testimony of Beth Fisher, Kim Liston, and Roger Newell filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco by S. Bloomfield. (37 pgs.)37
12/10/1998Certificate of service filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company and United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. (3 pgs.)3
12/10/1998Direct testimony of John R. Woodbury filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company and United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint. (94 pgs.)94
12/10/1998Redacted version of direct testimony of David E. Stahly filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company and United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint. (85 pgs.)85
12/09/1998Motion to permit counsel to appear before the Commission and memorandum in support filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco by S. Bloomfield. (3 pgs.)3
12/09/1998Letter confirming that Telecommunications Resellers Associ- ation will present no witnesses in this case, filed by S. Bloomfield. (1 pg.)1
12/08/1998Letter in response to joint applicants' designation of "copy prohibited" documents in this proceeding, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa and B. Kahn; and Time Warner Telecom by R. Sugarman. (7 pgs.)7
12/08/1998Notice of withdrawal of counsel filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by R. Sugarman. (3 pgs.)3
12/08/1998Statement concerning the propriety of the joint applicants' designation of "copy prohibited" documents in this proceed- ing, filed on behalf of OCC by T. O'Brien. (2 pgs.)2
12/08/1998Letter stating that intervenors MCI Telecommunications Corporation and MCImetro Access Transmission Services do not intend to present any witnesses in this proceeding filed by B. Royer. (2 pgs.) (FILED 12/4/98)2
12/08/1998Letter stating that the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association will not sponsor the testimony of Tim Yanda, Director of Technical Operations for Cox Communications, filed by S. Howard. (1 pg.)1
12/07/1998Motion to schedule a local public hearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Parkview Areawide Seniors, Inc., and the Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland by J. Meissner; and Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (FILED 12/4/98) (9 pgs.)9
12/07/1998Summary of copying prohibited documents filed on behalf of SBC Communications by K. Sullivan. (8 pgs.)8
12/04/1998Letter of interveners intending to present witnesses at the hearing in this matter filed by B. Royer on behalf of MCI. 2
12/04/1998Motion to intervene, memorandum in support, and witness list filed by B. Weston on behalf of the American Association of Retired Persons'. (8 pgs)8
12/04/1998Witness list filed by L. Lauridsen, Sprint Communications and J. Stewart, United Telephone d/b/a/ Sprint. (5 pgs)5
12/04/1998Witness list filed by J. Meissner, Parkview Areawide Seniors and Empowerment Center and E. Jacobs, Edgemont Coalition Legal Aid Society of Dayton. (5 pgs)5
12/04/1998Witness list filed by S. Howard on behalf of Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association. (1 pg)1
12/04/1998Witness list filed by S. Bloomfield on behalf of CoreComm Newco, Inc. (1 pg)1
12/04/1998Witness list filed by J. Small on behalf of Iwaynet Communications, Inc. (4 pgs)4
12/04/1998Witness list filed by J. Small on behalf of State Alarm,Inc. (4 pgs)4
12/04/1998Witness list filed by J. Bentine on behalf of Airtouch Cellular, Inc. (4 pgs)4
12/04/1998Witness list filed by T. O'Brien on behalf of OCC. (3 pgs)3
12/04/1998Witness disclosure list filed by R. Sugarman on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio, L.P. (5 pgs)5
12/04/1998Additional information filed by D. Conaway on behalf of Ameritech. (4 pgs)4
12/04/1998Witness list submitted by D. Chorzempa and B. Kahn on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. (1 pg)1
12/04/1998Entry granting motion to compel the production of Nextlink's witness for Columbus; SBC's motion to compel is granted in part and denied in part; Nextlink serve responses to the required interrogatories and requests for production of documents by 12/9/98; OCTA/s motion is granted in part and denied in part; Ameritech serve response to OCTA's interrogatory on or before 12/9/98. (GP) (8 pgs)9
12/03/1998Substitution of counsel filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by J. Bentine and D. Clayton. (4 pgs.)4
12/02/1998Ameritech Ohio's memorandum contra Ohio Cable Telecommunications Assn.'s motion to compel responses to its second set of interrogatories and requests for production of documents from Ameritech Ohio, filed by D. Conway. (9 pgs.)9
12/02/1998Entry ordering that the joint applicants' request for interlocutory review of the aspect of the examiner's November 10, 1998 oral ruling is held in abeyance, for the reasons set forth in Finding 7; that the joint applicants shall file a summary for each currently designated "copy prohibited" document on or before December 4, 1998; that the intervenors may address why any of the currently designated "copy prohibited" documents do not warrant such treatment by filing such statements by December 8, 1998; that SBC's motion to compel full and complete responses by MCI to SBC's first set of interrogatories is denied; that MCI should serve supplemental answers to the join applicants' first set of inter- rogatories as soon as the information is available. (AE) (6 pgs.)6
12/01/1998Response to joint applicants' proposal to present their witnesses in a panel format, filed on behalf of AT&T by D. Chorzempa. (4 pgs.)4
12/01/1998Letter stating that OCC opposes the use of a panel format under which witnesses would be presented and cross-examined filed by R. Cavicchia. (1 pg.)1
11/30/1998Joint applicant's memorandum contra Edgemont's application for rehearing filed on behalf of SBC Communications by K. Sullivan; and Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (6 pgs.) (FILED 11/27/98)6
11/30/1998Objections and responses to the joint applicants' third set of interrogatories and requests for production of documents filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company, L.P, by L. Lauridsen; and United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. (28 pgs.)28
11/30/1998Objections and responses to SBC's interrogatories and re- quest for production of documents to Sprint, filed on be- half of Sprint Communications Company, L.P. by L. Laurid- sen and United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. (20 pgs.)20
11/27/1998Joint applicant's memorandum contra Edgemont's application for rehearing filed by K. Sullivan and D. Conway. 6
11/27/1998Motion to compel responses to its second set of interroga- tories and requests for production of documents from Ameri- tech Ohio and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ohio Cable Telecommunications Assn. by S. Howard. (38 pgs.)38
11/27/1998Letter stating that Edgemont opposes joint applicants' proposal to present its witnesses in a panel format, filed by E. Jacobs. (1 pg.)1
11/25/1998Notice of substitution of counsel filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. and MCImetro Access Transmission Services by J. Van Duzer and B. Royer. (3 pgs.)3
11/25/1998Notice of withdrawal filed on behalf of the City of Toledo by K. Bruce. (4 pgs.)4
11/24/1998Direct testimony of Karen E. Jennings filed on behalf of SBC Communications by K. Sullivan. (169 pgs.)168
11/24/1998Direct testimony of Christopher J. Viveros filed on behalf of SBC Communications by K. Sullivan. (78 pgs.)78
11/24/1998Direct testimony of Charles H. Smith filed on behalf of SBC Communications by K. Sullivan. (101 pgs.)101
11/24/1998Direct testimony of James S. Kahan filed on behalf of SBC Communications by K. Sullivan. (337 pgs.) (Volume I)337
11/24/1998Direct testimony of James S. Kahan filed on behalf of SBC Communications by K. Sullivan. (448 pgs.) (Volume II)448
11/24/1998Testimony of the following persons filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway: 1) Dr. Robert G. Harris 2) W. Patrick Campbell 3) Michael R. Schaedler (101 pgs.)101
11/23/1998Joint applicants' notice of depositions filed on behalf of SBC Communications and SBC Delaware by J. Lang; and Ameri- tech Corp. by D. Conway. (11 pgs.)11
11/23/1998Notice of deposition of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition to Ameritech, filed by E. Jacobs. (4 pgs.) (FILED 11/19/98)4
11/20/1998Entry granting OCC's request for a continuance of the evidentiary hearing; hearing shall now begin at 10:00 a.m. on January 5, 1999; that any direct, expert testi- mony to be presented by the joint applicants should be filed by noon on Tuesday, November 24, 1998; that any direct expert testimony to be presented by any inter- venor should be filed by December 10, 1998; that all intervenors who will present witnesses at the hearing shall file a list of those witnesses (and delineate the subject matter(s) that each witness will address) with the Commission by December 4, 1998; that any comments on the pending suggestion for a panel presentation of the joint applicants' witnesses should be submitted by December 1, 1998; that nothing in this entry alters the discovery cut-off date (it closed on November 19, 1998) or the requirement that responses to any future motions be filed and served within five calendar days of the date that the motion is filed with the Commission. (AE) (3 pgs.)3
11/19/1998Entry denying AT&T's application for rehearing. (4 pgs.)4
11/19/1998Notice of deposition of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition to SBC Communications, Inc., and notice of deposition of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition to Ameritech, filed by E. Jacobs. (8 pgs.)13
11/18/1998Joint memorandum contra joint applicants' application for review through interlocutory appeal of ruling prohibiting designation of copying prohibited documents, filed on be- half of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn; OCC by T. O'Brien; United Telephone Company of Ohio by J. Stewart; Sprint Communications Co. LP by L. Lauridsen; and Time Warner by R. Sugarman. (30 pgs.)30
11/17/1998Entry ordering that the joint applicants make the appro- priate revisions to their nondisclosure agreements, in conformance with the examiner's November 10, 1998 ruling; that Parkview's motion for leave to amend its motion to intervene is moot; that Time Warner Cable's motion to com- pel is granted in part and denied; that Ameritech Corpora- tion and Ameritech Ohio should serve answers to interroga- tory 10 and document requests 10 and 18 (as they relate to offering(s) and competition studies for Ohio) upon Time Warner Cable within 10 calendar days of this ruling. (AE) (5 pgs.)5
11/13/1998Application for rehearing filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (6 pgs.)6
11/13/1998Application for rehearing on the Commission's October 15, 1998 entry, filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs.(FAX)5
11/13/1998Joint application for review through interlocutory appeal of ruling prohibiting designation of copying prohibited docu- ments filed by K. Sullivan and D. Conaway (127 pgs)127
11/12/1998Memorandum contra Time Warner Cable's motion to compel discovery filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (8 pgs.)8
11/09/1998Joint applicants' memorandum contra AT&T's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of SBC Communications by K. Sul- livan; and Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (9 pgs.)9
11/06/1998Time Warner Cable's motion to compel proper and complete discovery responses from Ameritech Corporation and Ameritech Ohio filed by T. Hill. (114 pgs)114
11/06/1998Preliminary independent staff proposal relative to the issues identified by the PUCO filed by S. Nourse. (23 pgs)23
10/30/1998Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (20 pgs.)20
10/29/1998Motion for leave to amend its motion to intervene and memor- andum in support filed on behalf of the Parkview Areawide Seniors, Inc. by J. Meissner. (10 pgs.)10
10/29/1998Entry granting Parkview's motion to intervene in this case. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
10/23/1998Testimony continued. (Part 2 of 2)225
10/23/1998Direct testimony of James S. Kahan filed on behalf of SBC Communications. (Part 1 of 2)225
10/23/1998Comments of the City of Dayton in furtherance of the Septem- ber 3, 1998 comments filed by the City of Dayton, submitted by W. Gillispie. (2 pgs.)2
10/21/1998Joint applicants' memorandum in opposition to the motion of Parkview Areawide Seniors to intervene, filed on behalf of SBC Communications by K. Sullivan; and Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (4 pgs.)4
10/19/1998Correspondence letter supporting merger filed by C. Murphy on behalf of the National Association of Commissions for Women. (2 pgs)2
10/16/1998Motion of Parkview Areawide Seniors, Inc. to intervene and memorandum in support filed by J. Meissner. (7 pgs.)7
10/15/1998Entry ordering that, as a result of the rulings made in this entry, the AARP/Edgemont requests in 98-1024 are now moot and 98-1024 shall be dismissed and closed of record; that the Commission's staff analyze and evaluate the appli- cation filed in 98-1082 in light of the issues set forth in Finding 4 and file a proposal by November 6, 1998; that all outstanding motions to intervene are granted; that discovery is now permitted, but limited to the issues identified in this entry; that Time Warner companies' motions to shorten discovery time frames are granted; responses to interroga- tories, requests for production of documents, and requests for admissions should be served within 10 calendar days after receipt of the written discovery requests; that all responses to any future motions shall be filed and served within five calendar days of the date that the motion is filed with the Commission; that the Commission will not entertain ex parte communications requests during the pen- dency of this case; that Mr. Lauridsen is permitted to practice before the Commission; that the prehearing con- ference currently scheduled to be held on October 21, 1998, is rescheduled for November 17, 1998, at 1:30 p.m. at the Commission offices; that the evidentiary hearing shall be limited and shall begin at 10:00 a.m. on December 9, 1998, at the Commission offices; that any direct, expert testi- mony to be presented by the joint applicants should be filed by November 20, 1998; that any direct, expert testimony to be presented by any other party should be filed before seven calendar days before the hearing commences. (13 pgs.)13
10/09/1998Memorandum contra filed on behalf of joint applicants, SCB Communications by K. Sullivan; and Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (6 pgs.)6
10/09/1998Letter stating that AirTouch Communications, Inc. joins in the joint motion for clarification of procedures, filed by J. Bentine. (1 pg.)1
10/08/1998Entry denying OCC's application for rehearing. (2 pgs.)2
09/28/1998Joint motion for clarification of procedures filed by L. Reardon and M. Schermer, Time Warner; S. Howard, Ohio Cable Television Assoc.; D. Chorzempa, B. Kahn, AT&T; L. Lauridsen Sprint Communications; S. Bloomfield, CoreComm Newco, L.L.P. and Telecommunications Resellers Assoc. (9 pgs)9
09/18/1998Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by P. Villegas, Hispanic Chamber of Commerce of Orange County. (1 pg.)1
09/18/1998Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by T. Ament, Anaheim Chamber of Commerce. (2 pgs.)2
09/18/1998Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by M. Blank, St. Anselm's Cross-Cultural Community Center. (2 pgs.)2
09/14/1998Reply comments filed on behalf of OCC by T. O'Brien. (27 pgs.)27
09/14/1998Reply comments filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio by L. Reardon and M. Schermer. (24 pgs.)24
09/14/1998Reply comments filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by D. Kinkoph. (16 pgs.)16
09/14/1998Joint applicants' reply comments filed on behalf of SBC Communications and SBC Delaware by K. Sullivan; and Ameri- tech Corp. and Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (50 pgs.)50
09/14/1998Reply to joint applicants' comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (18 pgs.)18
09/14/1998Reply comments filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by L. Lauridsen; and United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. (13 pgs.)13
09/14/1998Reply comments filed on behalf of AirTouch Communications by J. Bentine. (14 pgs.)14
09/14/1998Reply comments filed on behalf of The American Association of Retired Persons by B. Weston. (8 pgs.)8
09/14/1998Reply comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Cable Telecom- munications Assn. by S. Howard. (13 pgs.)13
09/14/1998Reply filed on behalf of State Alarm by J. Small. (5 pgs.)5
09/14/1998Reply comments filed on behalf of Time Warner Cable by T. Hill. (7 pgs.)7
09/14/1998Reply comments filed on behalf of Corecomm Newco dba Cellular One by S. Bloomfield. (8 pgs.)8
09/14/1998Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by T. O'Brien. (8 pgs.)8
09/14/1998Reply comments filed on behalf of Telecommunications Resel- lers Assn. by S. Bloomfield. (7 pgs.)7
09/11/1998Letter reserving the ability to address the merits of the individual requests for intervention which have been recent- ly filed in this case, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway; and SBC Communications by K. Sullivan. (2 pgs.)2
09/10/1998Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by M. Fiehrer. (1 pg.)1
09/08/1998Letter requesting that the Commission hold full evidentiary and public hearings in this case, filed on behalf of the Appalachian Center for Economic Networks by A. Borgstrom. (1 pg.)1
09/08/1998Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by M. Metzler, the Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce. (2 pgs.)2
09/08/1998Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by P. Villegas, Hispanic Chamber of Commerce. (1 pg.)1
09/08/1998Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by T. Ament, the City of Anaheim Chamber of Commerce. (2 pgs.)2
09/03/1998Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by M. Blank. (2 pgs.)2
09/03/1998Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Iwaynet Communications by J. Small. (9 pgs.)9
09/03/1998Initial comments filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (13 pgs.)13
09/03/1998Merger related issues filed on behalf of State Alarm by J. Small. (7 pgs.)7
09/03/1998Comments filed on behalf of Time Warner Telecom of Ohio, L.P. by L. Reardon. (122 pgs.)122
09/03/1998Comments filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by L. Lauridsen; and United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by W. Walston. (25 pgs.)25
09/03/1998Comments filed on behalf of The American Association of Retired Persons by B. Weston. (66 pgs.)66
09/03/1998Comments filed on behalf of OCC by T. O'Brien. (42 pgs.)42
09/03/1998Comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Cable Telecommunica- tions Assn. by W. Newcomb, Jr. (28 pgs.)28
09/03/1998Petition to intervene filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group, Inc. by B. Ferris. (5 pgs.)5
09/03/1998Comments filed on behalf of AirTouch Communications by J. Bentine. (22 pgs.)22
09/03/1998Comments filed on behalf of joint applicants, SBC Communi- cations and SBC Delaware by K. Sullivan; and Ameritech Corp- oration and Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. (21 pgs.)21
09/03/1998Initial comments filed on behalf of Telecommunications Resellers Association by S. Bloomfield. (10 pgs.)10
09/03/1998Motion to intervene and motion for hearing and motion for a prohibition of ex parte communications and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (8 pgs.)8
09/03/1998Comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Domestic Violence Net- work by N. Neylon. (7 pgs.)7
09/03/1998Comments filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco, Inc. dba Cellular One by S. Bloomfield. (18 pgs.)18
09/03/1998Comments filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group, Inc. by B. Ferris. (6 pgs.)6
09/03/1998Comments filed on behalf of the City of Dayton by T. Strach. (6 pgs.)6
09/03/1998Comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (27 pgs.)27
09/03/1998Comments filed on behalf of Time Warner Cable by T. Hill. (12 pgs.)12
09/03/1998Comments filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by D. Kinkoph. (18 pgs.)19
09/02/1998Comments filed on behalf of the City of Toledo by K. Bruce. (7 pgs.)7
08/27/1998Motion for leave to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. and MCI- metro Access Transmission Services by J. Sanders and M. Berns. (7 pgs.)7
08/26/1998Notice of substitution of counsel filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone, by J. Stewart. (4 pgs.)4
08/24/1998Joint applicants' memorandum in Opposition to pending motions filed between August 4 and August 21, 1998, filed by K. Sullivan and D. Conway. (5 pgs)5
08/24/1998Telecommunications Resellers Association's motion to intervene, filed by S. Bloomfield. (6 pgs)6
08/21/1998Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco, Inc. dba Cellular One by S. Bloomfield. (6 pgs.)6
08/20/1998Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland by J. Meissner. (7 pgs.)7
08/18/1998Motion for intervention and memorandum in support filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by B. Donahue. (9 pgs.)9
08/18/1998Motion for practice before the Commission filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by B. Dona- hue. (4 pgs.)4
08/17/1998Response to joint applicants memorandum in opposition filed by T. Etter on behalf of Ohio Consumers' Counsel. (8 pgs)8
08/13/1998Order that this case be designated as 98-1082-TP-AMT; that interested persons file comments regarding the merger- related issues they believe should be considered by the Commission when evaluating this merger; such comments shall be filed by September 3, 1998 and any reply comments shall be filed by September 14, 1998; scheduling a prehearing con- ference at 2:30 p.m. on October 21, 1998, at the Commission offices; that discovery be suspended until otherwise stated. (3 pgs.)3
08/11/1998Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Nextlink Ohio by J. Bentine. (5 pgs.)5
08/11/1998Reply to joint applicants' memorandum in opposition, filed on behalf of The Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association by S. Howard. (7 pgs.)7
08/10/1998Request for evidentiary and public hearings to be held filed by M. Smalz on behalf of the Appalachian People's Action Coalition (APAC). (1 pg)1
08/10/1998Motion for leave to file a reply instanter and memorandum in support filed by L. Reardon and M. Schermer. (10 pgs)10
08/05/1998Joint applicants' memorandum in opposition to the motions of Time Warner Communications of Ohio, Time Warner Cable, OCC, The Payphone Association of Ohio, and The Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association to intervene, to shorten the time for discovery and for a hearing, filed on behalf of SBC Communications by K. Sullivan; and Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (8 pgs.)8
08/05/1998Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of State Alarm by J. Small. (5 pgs.)5
08/05/1998Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Airtouch Cellular by J. Bentine. (5 pgs.)5
08/04/1998Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by D. Chorzempa. (8 pgs.)8
08/04/1998Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of the City of Toledo by K. Bruce. (4 pgs.)4
08/03/1998Petition to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of the Payphone Association of Ohio by H. Kelly. (8 pgs.)8
08/03/1998Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association by S. Howard. (11 pgs.)11
07/31/1998Motion to intervene (expedited ruling requested) and memor- andum in support filed on behalf of Time Warner Cable, a division of Time Warner Entertainment Co., by T. Hill. (8 pgs.)8
07/31/1998Motion to shorten the time period for discovery (expedited ruling requested) and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Time Warner Cable, a division of Time Warner Entertain- ment Company, by T. Hill. (5 pgs.)5
07/29/1998Motion to intervene (expedited ruling requested) and memor- andum in support filed on behalf of Time Warner Communica- tions of Ohio by R. Sugarman and M. Schermer. (10 pgs.)10
07/29/1998Motion to shorten the time period for discovery (expedited ruling requested) and memorandum in support filed on be- half of Time Warner Communications by R. Sugarman and M. Schermer. (6 pgs.)6
07/28/1998Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by T. O'Brien. (7 pgs.)7
07/24/1998In the matter of the joint application of SBC Communications Inc., SBC Delaware, Inc., Ameritech Corporation, and Ameri- tech Ohio for consent and approval of a change of control (317 pgs.)317