DIS - Case Record for 98-0595-GA-COI Skip to main content

Case Record For:

98-0595-GA-COI

Case Title: CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: GA-GAS
Purpose Code: COI-Commission inquiry
Date Opened: 4/9/1998
Date Closed: 7/18/2002
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
07/19/2002Service Notice.3
07/18/2002Entry closing this case of record.5
12/20/2001Service notice5
07/03/2001Quarterly report filed on behalf of applicant by B. Tucker.6
03/02/2001Service Notice.5
03/02/2001Correspondence letter dated February 7, 2001, to Mr. L.C. Randolph, CG&E, filed by E. Alsmeyer.1
01/02/2001January, 2001 quarterly report filed on behalf of applicant by B. Tucker.5
10/03/2000October, 2000 quarterly report for the three months of June, July and August, 2000, filed on behalf of applicant by B. Tucker. (5 pgs.)5
08/03/2000Finding & Order that the proposed amended tariffs filed by Columbia and CG&E are approved. (3 pgs.)3
06/29/2000Quarterly report filed on behalf of applicant by B. Tucker. (5 pgs.)5
06/29/2000Quarterly report of the Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company for the months of March, April and May, 2000, filed by B. Tucker.5
06/14/2000Revised tariffs schedules which are intended to satisfy the directives delineated at paraagraph (11) of the Commission's Finding and Order issued 6/8/2000. Filed by W. Ginn (28 pgs)28
06/08/2000Finding & Order granting UGM's request to intervene in Case No. 00-98-GA-ATA; that UGM's request for disapproval of the door-to-door solicitation tariff provisions proposed by CG&E in Case No. 00-98-GA-ATA is granted in part and denied in part; that Columbia, East Ohio, and CG&E make the necessary changes to their gas choice marketer code of conduct pro- visions in order for the tariffs to comply with the deter- minations made in this decision. (11 pgs.)11
06/08/2000Finding and Order granting UGM's request to intervene in this Case No. 00-98-GA-ATA; that UGM's request for disapproval of the door to door solicitation tariff provisions proposed by CG&E in Case No. 98-GA-ATA is granted in part and denied in part; that Columbia, East Ohio, and CG&E make the necessary changes to their gas choice marketer code of conduct provisions in order for the tariffs to comply with determinations made in this decision.17
04/24/2000Motion for disapproval of tariffs and memorandum in support filed on behalf of United Gas Management by G. Hummel. (7 pgs.)7
04/19/2000Supreme Court papers. (6 pgs.)6
04/04/2000Quarterly report for three months of December, 1999, January and February, 2000, filed on behalf of applicant by B. Tucker. (5 pgs.)5
03/31/2000Status Report filed on behalf of applicant by W. Tucker. (30 pgs.)30
03/20/2000Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of applicant by J. Gainer. (5 pgs.) (S.C. #00-519)5
03/09/2000Reply of the Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co to the improper memorandum contra of United Gas Management Inc. Respectfully submitted by, P. Colbert (7 pgs)1
03/09/2000Reply of the Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co to the improper memorandum contra of United Gas Management Inc. Respectfully submitted by, P. Colbert (7 pgs)7
03/09/2000Reply of the Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co to the improper memorandum contra of United Gas Management Inc. Respectfully submitted by, P. Colbert (7 pgs)7
03/02/2000Memorandum contra of United Gas Management, Inc. to the February 22, 2000, CG&E application for rehearing and motion for stay of the PUCO's January 20, 2000 entry on rehearing, filed by G. Hummel. (2 pgs.)2
02/22/2000Application for rehearing and motion for a stay of the PUCO's Entry on Rehearing and prior Finding & Order, filed on behalf of CG&E by P. Colbert. (17 pgs.)17
02/04/2000Comments filed on behalf of CG&E by P. Colbert. (7 pgs.)7
02/04/2000Comments filed on behalf of United Gas Management by B. Dingwall. (1 pg.)1
02/04/2000Comments filed on behalf of Columbia Gas by S. Seiple. (8 pgs.)8
01/20/2000Entry ordered that the applications for rehearing and motions for clarification and to lift stay are granted and denied to the extent set forth in this entry on rehearing, ordered that CG&E comply with all applicable directives outlined in the Entry on Rehearing, that interested persons wishing to file comments regarding the staff's proposal on minimum requirements for door to door solicitation by gas marketers shall file those comments in accordance with Finding (8).6
01/18/2000Response letter of United Gas Management, Inc. to Cincinnati Gas and Electric Co. memorandum contra the application for rehearing and/or motion for clarification and motion to lift stay of United Gas Management Co. Inc. filed 1/13/2000. Filed by G. Hummel (2 pgs)2
01/13/2000Memorandum contra the application for rehearing and/or motion for clarification and motion to lift stay of United Gas Management, filed on behalf of CG&E by P. Colbert. (17 pgs.)17
01/03/2000Application for rehearing and/or motion for clarification and motion to lift stay and memorandum in support filed on behalf of United Gas Management by G. Hummel. (16 pgs.)16
01/03/2000Notice of substitution of counsel filed on behalf of United Gas Management by G. Hummel. (4 pgs.)4
12/30/1999Application for rehearing, filed on behalf of the Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company by P. Colbert.17
12/30/1999Application for rehearing filed on behalf of CG&E by P. Colbert. (17 pgs.)17
12/30/1999Door-to-Door Solicitation Minimum Requirements for gas marketers praticipating in the gas choice programs, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff. (2 pgs.)2
12/27/1999Quarterly report reflecting the three months of September, October and November, 1999, filed on behalf of applicant by B. Tucker. (5 pgs.)5
12/27/1999Quarterly report for the months, September, October and November, 1999, filed on behalf of The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company by B. Tucker.5
12/02/1999Finding & Order that the continuation of the Columbia, East Ohio Gas and CG&E pilot customer choice programs is approved subject to the terms and conditions described herein; that Columbia, East Ohio, and CG&E submit reports by April 1, 1000; that the staff's recommendations are adopted to the extent described herein; that the Commission's staff develop a proposal to address complaints associated with door-to- door solicitations and present its proposal to the Commis- sion within 30 days of this Order; that nothing in this Order constitutes state action for purposes of antitrust laws. Concurring Opinion of Commissioner Craig A. Glazer. (35 pgs.)35
10/04/1999Quarterly report for the three months of June, July and August, 1999, filed on behalf of applicant by B. Tucker. (5 pgs.)5
08/09/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of Stand Energy Corp. by J. Phillips. (6 pgs.)6
08/09/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of applicant by J. Gainer. (7 pgs.)7
08/09/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of Columbia Gas by A. Koncelik. (6 pgs.)6
08/09/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of East Ohio Gas by H. Liebman. (13 pgs.)13
08/09/1999Reply comments to the staff second report filed on behalf of Columbia Energy Services by S. Bloomfield. (7 pgs.)7
08/09/1999Reply comments to the staff second report filed on behalf of Columbia Energy Services by S. Bloomfield. (7 pgs.)7
08/02/1999Comments filed on behalf of Columbia Gas by A. Koncelik. (12 pgs.)12
08/02/1999Comments filed on behalf of Columbia Gas by A. Koncelik. (12 pgs.)12
08/02/1999Comments filed on behalf of Stand Energy Corp. by J. Phillips. (5 pgs.)5
08/02/1999Comments filed on behalf of Stand Energy Corp. by J. Phillips. (5 pgs.)5
08/02/1999Comments filed on behalf of DP&L by R. Reid. (9 pgs.) 9
08/02/1999Comments filed on behalf of East Ohio Gas Co. by H. Liebman. (12 pgs.)12
08/02/1999Comments filed on behalf of OCC by W. Margard III. (102 pgs.)102
08/02/1999Comments filed on behalf of OCC by W. Margard III. (102 pgs.)102
08/02/1999Comments filed on behalf of applicant by P. Colbert. (14 pgs.)14
08/02/1999Comments filed on behalf of Enron Energy Service by M. Petricoff. (5 pgs.)5
08/02/1999Comments filed on behalf of Enron Energy Service by M. Petricoff. (5 pgs.)5
08/02/1999Comments filed on behalf of Honda of America Mfg. by W. Airey. (5 pgs.)5
08/02/1999Comments filed on behalf of Honda of America Mfg. by W. Airey. (5 pgs.)5
08/02/1999Comments filed on behalf of Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. by D. Conway. (4 pgs.)4
08/02/1999Comments filed on behalf of Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. by D. Conway. (4 pgs.)4
07/27/1999Comments filed on behalf of Reliant Energy Retail by C. Broadrick. (2 pgs.)2
07/15/1999Entry ordering that interested persons shall have until August 2, 1999 to file comments to the staff's June 30, 1999 report, and shallhave until August 9, 1999 to file reply comments. (3 pgs.)3
07/12/1999Quarterly report reflecting the months of March, April and May, 1999, filed on behalf of applicant by B. Tucker. (5 pgs.)5
06/30/1999Second report on Ohio's natural gas choice programs, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff.155
06/30/1999Second report on Ohio's natural gas choice programs, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff. (158 pgs.)158
04/01/1999Final Report filed on behalf of appilcant by W. Ginn. (52 pgs.)52
04/01/1999Quarterly report filed on behalf of applicant by B. Tucker. (5 pgs.)5
03/25/1999Comments of the approved CG&E Gas Suppliers Group. Submitted by: J. Phillips. (15 pgs.)15
01/04/1999Quarterly report filed on behalf of applicant by B. Tucker. (7 pgs.)7
11/19/1998Entry ordering that CG&E's request for a stay is granted to the extent set forth in Finding 8; that, having granted the request for stay and finding that a hearing is not necessary, United's motion to intervene is moot; CG&E's motion to strike the responses of United and Enron is with- out merit and should be denied; that CG&E's request to file its reply memorandum out of time is granted for good cause shown. (4 pgs.)4
11/06/1998Withdrawal of motion to strike filed by J. Gainer on behalf of CG&E. (1 pg)1
11/05/1998Memorandum contra motion to strike and file out of time a reply memorandum, filed on behalf of Enron Energy Services by M. Petricoff. (4 pgs.)4
11/05/1998Letter withdrawing its motion to strike United Gas Manage- ment's memorandum contra, filed on behalf of applicant by J. Gainer. (1 pg.)1
11/04/1998Supreme Court Transmittal Papers. (6 pgs.)6
11/03/1998Motion to strike and file out of time a reply memorandum to the memorandum contra of United Gas Management, Inc., and Enron Energy Services Inc. to Cincinnati Gas & Elec- tric Co.'s motion for stay or waiver and Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co.'s reply memorandum and memorandum in support filed on behalf of applicant by J. Gainer. (9 pgs.)9
10/30/1998Comments on CG&E's letter filed on behalf of United Gas Management, Inc. by A. Lewis. (1 pg.)1
10/23/1998Memorandum contra of Enron Energy Services, Inc. to the October 5, 1998 motion for stay or waiver by CG&E, filed by M. Petricoff. (5 pgs.)5
10/21/1998Information regarding the progress made by the CG&E colla- borative with respect to the process to handle a customer's desire to switch suppliers, filed on behalf of applicant by W. Ginn. (1 pg.)1
10/20/1998Memorandum contra of United Gas Management, Inc. to motion for stay or waiver of CG&E, filed by H. Liebman. (8 pgs.)8
10/20/1998Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on be- half of United Gas Management, Inc. by H. Liebman. (4 pgs.)4
10/05/1998Motion for stay or waiver of the Public Utilities Commis- sion of Ohio's opinion and order requiring the applicant to assume the receivable of gas marketers and memorandum in support filed on behalf of applicant by J. Gainer. (10 pgs.)10
10/05/1998Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of applicant by J. Gainer. (6 pgs.) (S.C. #98-2059)6
08/06/1998Entry ordering that the applications for rehearing filed by Columbia Gas, East Ohio, CG&E, and Enron are denied, subject to the clarifications set forth herein; that Columbia's revised tariffs submitted on July 7 and 31, 1998, and the tariff addendum filed on July 24 and 28, 1998 are approved; the effective date of the proposed Columbia tariff shall be August 1, 1998; that East Ohio and CG&E file revised tariffs consistent with the Commission's finding and order and this entry on rehearing within 14 days from the date of this entry. (14 pgs.)14
07/27/1998Memorandum in opposition to the application for rehearing of CG&E and Columbia Gas of Ohio request for clarification or, in the alternative, application for rehearing, filed on behalf of OCC by E. Stephens. (11 pgs.)11
07/17/1998Comments and petition for rehearing filed on behalf of Enron Energy Services by M. Petricoff. (14 pgs.)14
07/17/1998Application for rehearing filed on behalf of applicant by J. Gainer. (19 pgs.)19
07/17/1998Request for clarification, or, in the alternative, appli- cation for rehearing filed on behalf of Columbia Gas by S. Seiple. (7 pgs.)7
07/17/1998Application for rehearing filed on behalf of East Ohio Gas Co. by H. Liebman. (6 pgs.)6
06/18/1998Finding & Order approving Columbia's application to expand its program statewide, subject to the terms and conditions and to the extent described herein; that continuation of the East Ohio and CG&E pilot programs is approved, subject to the terms and conditions and to the extent described herein; that the LDSs submit reports by April 1, 1999 in accordance with this order; that the staff's recommendations be adopted to the extent described herein. Concurring Opinion of Chairman Craig A. Glazer. Concurring Opinion of Commissioner Judith A. Jones. Concurring Opinion of Commissioner Donald L. Mason. (57 pgs.)57
06/09/1998Reply comments filed on behalf of The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company by J. Gainer.7
06/09/1998Certificate of service filed by E. Stephens. (5 pgs)5
06/09/1998Certificate of service filed by E. Stephens. (5 pgs.)5
06/09/1998Reply comments of Cincinnati Gas & Electric filed by J. Gainer. (7 pgs)7
05/29/1998Letter stating Comments with regards to the Staff Evaluation of the Gas Choice Program, on behalf of The Stand Energy Corporation. (2 pgs.)2
05/29/1998Comments of Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company. Submitted by J. Gainer. (10 pgs.)10
05/29/1998Comments of Dayton Power & Light Company. Submitted by: R. Reid. (8 pgs.)8
05/29/1998Comments to the Staff Evaluation by Columbia Energy Service Corporation. Submitted by: S. Bloomfield. (12 pgs.)12
05/29/1998Comments of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel. Submitted by: E. Stephens. (28 pgs.)28
05/29/1998Initial Comments by Enron Energy Services on the May 15, 1998 Staff Evaluation of Ohio's Natural Gas Customer Choice Programs. Submitted by: H. Petricoff. (16 pgs.)16
05/29/1998Comments of The East Ohio Gas Company. Submitted by: H. Liebman. (20 pgs.)20
05/15/1998Staff report filed. (Volumes I and II) (590 pgs.)590
05/15/1998Staff evaluation of Ohio's natural gas customer choice programs: Volume I.104
05/15/1998Staff evaluation of Ohio's natural gas customer choice programs: Volume II. (pt. 3 of 3)83
05/15/1998Staff evaluation of Ohio's natural gas customer choice programs: Volume II. (pt. 2 of 3)200
05/15/1998Staff evaluation of Ohio's natural gas customer choice programs: Volume II. (pt. 1 of 3)205
05/13/1998Entry ordering that the staff file its report on the strengths and weaknesses of the programs in comparison with each other by May 15, 1998; that all interested persons file written comments regarding the staff's report by May 29, 1998; that Case No. 95-656-GA-AIR be closed of record. (5 pgs.)5
04/23/1998Transcript filed for hearing held 4/9/98, (CG) (DM) (SP) (AG), 110 pgs. (Public Forum, Session 2, PUCO-Columbus, OH)110
04/15/1998Transcript filed for hearing held 4/1/98, (CG) (DM) (JJ) (JBB) (RF), 79 pgs., Con't. (PUCO-Columbus, OH) (Public Forum-Session I)79
04/09/1998In the matter of the Commission's investigation of the Customer Choice Program of The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company. (1 pg.)1